100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Connecticut passes "gun confiscation" bill | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Seems reasonable, Whatever it takes! Amend the Amendments! Guns=violence no place for that on the streets  It's reasonable to allow people to protect themselves. Guns = ability to protect yourself from the criminals who are violent on any street. Oh that's such a position of insecurity that I'll ignore it altogether  It's not insecure position to believe people should be able to protect themselves, it's logical. You didn't ignore my statement, you just didn't make a rebuttal.  It was a polite way of acknowledging your post by ignoring your insecurity as a reason to possess weapons on the streets And you still have not presented a rebuttal showing how it's insecure for a person to protect themselves. I don't carry a gun except when I'm hunting, I'm just not so insecure that I feel threatened by law abiding people who do posses a gun on the streets. It seems you are showing insecurity about law abiding people possessing a gun on the streets. It seem to be another case of someone being guilty of their own accusation. The second amendment was drafted as a way to protect against tyranny in Government... When did it Morph into protecting against "bubba" on the street? There is a problem, more guns ain't the answer chum, the drug epidemic is changing peoples perceptions of real danger with overreactions resulting in unnecessary deaths. I'm quite insecure about 2yr olds grabbing a weapon from under mommas seat and shooting her in the back yup... your law abiding idiots are still leaving loaded weapons in their vehicles that are easily stolen and fed into the criminal element or fall into children hands. You're right, I should have completely ignored your azz lol SO now you want to talk about the 2nd amendment and the drug epidemic??? Nice diatribe CHUM...but you STILL haven't explained or justified your original assertion. Yes, your azz should have ignored my post and shouldn't have inferred, incorrectly, that I'm insecure for believing people should be able to defend themselves without being able to defend your accusation. BTW I was born in Chatham, Ontario and have relatives that still live in Canada including a cop who has told me people would be shocked by what isn't reported. My ex has brothers who live in the Bruce Peninsula who never go anywhere without have a loaded gun in their vehicles and it's not because there are bears in the area. Maybe if there was freedom of the press the public would know about the REAL amount of gun violence in Canada. Shhhhh....if it's not reported it never happened and there is an image that needs to be protected.  My ex has brothers who live in the Bruce Peninsula who never go anywhere without have a loaded gun in their vehicles and it's not because there are bears in the area. Please! Nuf with the BS No kidding, there's a criminal element in Canada too!  Where do you think they get their weapons? That's right, indirectly from American gloves boxes.  I think it's reasonable to remove weapons from spouses who threaten or assault. Only a fool would dispute that aww poor canucks... just gives you something to whine about... well TBH, you should be doing the whinning, you must be too busy with something more important? like mudpit racing or tractor pull still sniping at those Pigeons in the Backyard? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seems reasonable, Whatever it takes! Amend the Amendments! Guns=violence no place for that on the streets It's reasonable to allow people to protect themselves. Guns = ability to protect yourself from the criminals who are violent on any street. Oh that's such a position of insecurity that I'll ignore it altogether It's not insecure position to believe people should be able to protect themselves, it's logical. You didn't ignore my statement, you just didn't make a rebuttal. It was a polite way of acknowledging your post by ignoring your insecurity as a reason to possess weapons on the streets And you still have not presented a rebuttal showing how it's insecure for a person to protect themselves. I don't carry a gun except when I'm hunting, I'm just not so insecure that I feel threatened by law abiding people who do posses a gun on the streets. It seems you are showing insecurity about law abiding people possessing a gun on the streets. It seem to be another case of someone being guilty of their own accusation. The second amendment was drafted as a way to protect against tyranny in Government... When did it Morph into protecting against "bubba" on the street? There is a problem, more guns ain't the answer chum, the drug epidemic is changing peoples perceptions of real danger with overreactions resulting in unnecessary deaths. I'm quite insecure about 2yr olds grabbing a weapon from under mommas seat and shooting her in the back yup... your law abiding idiots are still leaving loaded weapons in their vehicles that are easily stolen and fed into the criminal element or fall into children hands. You're right, I should have completely ignored your azz lol SO now you want to talk about the 2nd amendment and the drug epidemic??? Nice diatribe CHUM...but you STILL haven't explained or justified your original assertion. Yes, your azz should have ignored my post and shouldn't have inferred, incorrectly, that I'm insecure for believing people should be able to defend themselves without being able to defend your accusation. BTW I was born in Chatham, Ontario and have relatives that still live in Canada including a cop who has told me people would be shocked by what isn't reported. My ex has brothers who live in the Bruce Peninsula who never go anywhere without have a loaded gun in their vehicles and it's not because there are bears in the area. Maybe if there was freedom of the press the public would know about the REAL amount of gun violence in Canada. Shhhhh....if it's not reported it never happened and there is an image that needs to be protected. My ex has brothers who live in the Bruce Peninsula who never go anywhere without have a loaded gun in their vehicles and it's not because there are bears in the area. Please! Nuf with the BS No kidding, there's a criminal element in Canada too! Where do you think they get their weapons? That's right, indirectly from American gloves boxes. I think it's reasonable to remove weapons from spouses who threaten or assault. Only a fool would dispute that aww poor canucks... just gives you something to whine about... well TBH, you should be doing the whinning, you must be too busy with something more important? like mudpit racing or tractor pull lol... i know you canucks don't understand "mud", since it's frozen 11 and a half months outa the year up there... but watch out, this canadian has a gun! (don't be scared now, he's one of you guys - eh) 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
still sniping at those Pigeons in the Backyard? That's not very nice... They're Americans not pigeons my fine yodelling friend 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My ex has brothers who live in the Bruce Peninsula who never go anywhere without have a loaded gun in their vehicles and it's not because there are bears in the area. Please! Nuf with the BS No kidding, there's a criminal element in Canada too! Where do you think they get their weapons? That's right, indirectly from American gloves boxes. I think it's reasonable to remove weapons from spouses who threaten or assault. Only a fool would dispute that BS???? So now you are accusing me of lying?? This accusation is another lame azz response, just like your first response to my original post basically accusing me of being insecure. It's unreasonable to take anything away from anyone based on an ACCUSATION, in the US you are presumed to be INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. The law in question doesn't require PROOF of an assault or a threat...it only one of those things you are so fond of making...an accusation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My ex has brothers who live in the Bruce Peninsula who never go anywhere without have a loaded gun in their vehicles and it's not because there are bears in the area. Please! Nuf with the BS No kidding, there's a criminal element in Canada too! Where do you think they get their weapons? That's right, indirectly from American gloves boxes. I think it's reasonable to remove weapons from spouses who threaten or assault. Only a fool would dispute that BS???? So now you are accusing me of lying?? This accusation is another lame azz response, just like your first response to my original post basically accusing me of being insecure. It's unreasonable to take anything away from anyone based on an ACCUSATION, in the US you are presumed to be INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. The law in question doesn't require PROOF of an assault or a threat...it only one of those things you are so fond of making...an accusation. that's Canadians for ya.. they just bore ya to death... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My ex has brothers who live in the Bruce Peninsula who never go anywhere without have a loaded gun in their vehicles and it's not because there are bears in the area. Please! Nuf with the BS No kidding, there's a criminal element in Canada too! Where do you think they get their weapons? That's right, indirectly from American gloves boxes. I think it's reasonable to remove weapons from spouses who threaten or assault. Only a fool would dispute that BS???? So now you are accusing me of lying?? This accusation is another lame azz response, just like your first response to my original post basically accusing me of being insecure. It's unreasonable to take anything away from anyone based on an ACCUSATION, in the US you are presumed to be INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. The law in question doesn't require PROOF of an assault or a threat...it only one of those things you are so fond of making...an accusation. that's Canadians for ya.. they just bore ya to death... If I was hypersensitive I might be offended since I was born in Canada. All Canadians, like all Americans, aren't the same.....thankfully.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
mightymoe
on
Wed 05/04/16 12:57 PM
|
|
My ex has brothers who live in the Bruce Peninsula who never go anywhere without have a loaded gun in their vehicles and it's not because there are bears in the area. Please! Nuf with the BS No kidding, there's a criminal element in Canada too! Where do you think they get their weapons? That's right, indirectly from American gloves boxes. I think it's reasonable to remove weapons from spouses who threaten or assault. Only a fool would dispute that BS???? So now you are accusing me of lying?? This accusation is another lame azz response, just like your first response to my original post basically accusing me of being insecure. It's unreasonable to take anything away from anyone based on an ACCUSATION, in the US you are presumed to be INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. The law in question doesn't require PROOF of an assault or a threat...it only one of those things you are so fond of making...an accusation. that's Canadians for ya.. they just bore ya to death... If I was hypersensitive I might be offended since I was born in Canada. All Canadians, like all Americans, aren't the same.....thankfully. i have nothing against canucks, just fun messing with them...most are to polite to say anything back... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My ex has brothers who live in the Bruce Peninsula who never go anywhere without have a loaded gun in their vehicles and it's not because there are bears in the area. Ok I admit, I wasn't familiar with the "Bruce peninsula" So I looked it up, it's a National Park ffs Are you telling me the CRYPTS and the BLOODS have taken over our national parks??? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My ex has brothers who live in the Bruce Peninsula who never go anywhere without have a loaded gun in their vehicles and it's not because there are bears in the area. Ok I admit, I wasn't familiar with the "Bruce peninsula" So I looked it up, it's a National Park ffs Are you telling me the CRYPTS and the BLOODS have taken over our national parks??? Perhaps you should do further research. The Bruce Peninsula is a peninsula in Ontario that's between Georgian Bay and the main basin of Lake Huron. I didn't and won't tell you the crypts and bloods have taken over ANYTHING in Canada.....because I don't make ASSUMPTIONS...that's your thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My ex has brothers who live in the Bruce Peninsula who never go anywhere without have a loaded gun in their vehicles and it's not because there are bears in the area. Ok I admit, I wasn't familiar with the "Bruce peninsula" So I looked it up, it's a National Park ffs Are you telling me the CRYPTS and the BLOODS have taken over our national parks??? Perhaps you should do further research. The Bruce Peninsula is a peninsula in Ontario that's between Georgian Bay and the main basin of Lake Huron. I didn't and won't tell you the crypts and bloods have taken over ANYTHING in Canada.....because I don't make ASSUMPTIONS...that's your thing. Oh ok, I was sure you were trying to tell me it was a real bad town this peninsula(reread your post), aside from the token rabid beaver, who else would want to kill you up there? And why are you so against potentially violent ppl losing their weapons? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My ex has brothers who live in the Bruce Peninsula who never go anywhere without have a loaded gun in their vehicles and it's not because there are bears in the area. Ok I admit, I wasn't familiar with the "Bruce peninsula" So I looked it up, it's a National Park ffs Are you telling me the CRYPTS and the BLOODS have taken over our national parks??? Perhaps you should do further research. The Bruce Peninsula is a peninsula in Ontario that's between Georgian Bay and the main basin of Lake Huron. I didn't and won't tell you the crypts and bloods have taken over ANYTHING in Canada.....because I don't make ASSUMPTIONS...that's your thing. Oh ok, I was sure you were trying to tell me it was a real bad town this peninsula(reread your post), aside from the token rabid beaver, who else would want to kill you up there? And why are you so against potentially violent ppl losing their weapons? There you go ASSUMING something again. Yes I'm against "potentially violent" people losing their weapons because EVERYONE is "potentially violent" depending on circumstances. If someone broke into your house and threatens you with physical harm would you not use some form of violence to protect yourself? Violence isn't always unjustified. Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, while I'm reasonably sure this wont stand, I think it's being described incorrectly in that article. The problem is with the word "accused." The article talks about it as though as soon as the spouse says "he/she hit me!" that the cops will swoop in and demand to take any and all weapons away. The thing is, "accused" often means "formally charged." We already HAVE laws, which are constitutional, and which take all sorts of freedoms and rights away from formally charged people. My point is, that depending on exactly how they wrote this up, it may or may not pass a constitutionality test. yeh holding back the states constant assault on our rights is becoming a full time job isnt it 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My ex has brothers who live in the Bruce Peninsula who never go anywhere without have a loaded gun in their vehicles and it's not because there are bears in the area. Please! Nuf with the BS No kidding, there's a criminal element in Canada too! Where do you think they get their weapons? That's right, indirectly from American gloves boxes. I think it's reasonable to remove weapons from spouses who threaten or assault. Only a fool would dispute that BS???? So now you are accusing me of lying?? This accusation is another lame azz response, just like your first response to my original post basically accusing me of being insecure. It's unreasonable to take anything away from anyone based on an ACCUSATION, in the US you are presumed to be INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. The law in question doesn't require PROOF of an assault or a threat...it only one of those things you are so fond of making...an accusation. that's Canadians for ya.. they just bore ya to death... If I was hypersensitive I might be offended since I was born in Canada. All Canadians, like all Americans, aren't the same.....thankfully. i have nothing against canucks, just fun messing with them...most are to polite to say anything back... * Correct, sorry about that eh! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
still sniping at those Pigeons in the Backyard? That's not very nice... They're Americans not pigeons my fine yodelling friend OMG,a Canadian Sniper launchin' Plastic-Pellets at unsuspecting Americans! HoodahThunkit?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Violence isn't always unjustified. Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes. Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter. A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
don't you just love those Hundred-Yarders?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Violence isn't always unjustified. Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes. Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter. A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights. people sure are scared of something they know nothing aboot...the Open carry law here in Texas, and you know what? NOTHING HAS CHANGED... people aren't killing each other, very rarely even see a gun strapped on, and it's just not a big deal... it's people like you who keep schreeching about their fear of guns that paint this "violent" escapades that don't always happen... they don't want us to judge muslims based on a few radicals, but yet the want to paint every gun owner as a violent radical... liberal logic, eh? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Violence isn't always unjustified. Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes. Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter. A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights. And does it have to be a temp order issued because of DV? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hoplophobia is strong in this Thread!
|
|
|
|
|
