Topic: Black Lives Matter/Hate Group & Text Book | |
---|---|
Edited by
yellowrose10
on
Wed 09/09/15 10:50 AM
|
|
You realize That arguement can be used for any debate to those that don't agree? I'm right and you're wrong has been the arguement here since I started in 07 I do, but sometimes its provable, if something is 'right' for instance, IF I say, I believe tomato is a vegetable, and you say I believe tomato is a fruit one of us IS actually right and the other one not although , it would be understandable for me to BELIEVE the tomato to be a vegetable if thats all I have heard and I never did due diligence to research its factual basis,,, Just because you say it...doesn't make it so any more than because I say it, doesn't make it so. I believe what I believe and can't change that by saying I am wrong. And I am very well educated to give an opinion. I just happen to know the difference between opinion and fact. So please excuse me if I don't take because I saod so neener neener as proof. NEXT |
|
|
|
ok,, Trump is a racist homophobe,,,,,
and I can link several sites with someone else who has posted that opinion,,,, :DISCLAIMER,, I happen to be fully aware this is an UNEDUCATED and UNVERIFIABLE opinion,, and use it only as a source of sarcasm,, |
|
|
|
for those wishing more FIRST HAND knowledge on the purpose and drive of the movement
http://www.joincampaignzero.org/problem/ |
|
|
|
Well the debate can stop..all had been explained
|
|
|
|
actually true
right there in black and white ,from the source,, its less than two years old (the movement) so thats pretty extensive in its detailed explanation,,,, |
|
|
|
You realize That arguement can be used for any debate to those that don't agree? I'm right and you're wrong has been the arguement here since I started in 07 The argument of opinion vs. opinion brings only a result of I'm right because I'm right (making the other wrong). That type of argument unfortunately does occur quite often. The opinion vs. fact argument where one side has no basis in actual fact from the original source make the opinion logically false. The self supporting argument� is also invalid. For example: I believe what I believe and can't change that by saying I am wrong. KNOWING you were wrong changes what you believe, CAUSING you to say "I am wrong." That may or may not change how you FEEL, or whether or not you are self-aware. What she said was not a reference to your education level. It's about the specific source of information. A fourth or fifth hand source may or may not be true. The way to check that is to go to the original source. Once that is done and the reports don't match one is a misinformed or falsified opinion and one is the truth. It's not an insult in any way. |
|
|
|
Black lives matter is a hate group by definition. As a "group" they sing the praises of killing cops. One instance of a large group doing this is evidence. More than one group doing it is proof.
"fry them like bacon!" You got to be kidding. Their actions are indefensible. |
|
|
|
Edited by
yellowrose10
on
Wed 09/09/15 09:19 PM
|
|
You realize That arguement can be used for any debate to those that don't agree? I'm right and you're wrong has been the arguement here since I started in 07 The argument of opinion vs. opinion brings only a result of I'm right because I'm right (making the other wrong). That type of argument unfortunately does occur quite often. The opinion vs. fact argument where one side has no basis in actual fact from the original source make the opinion logically false. The self supporting argument� is also invalid. For example: I believe what I believe and can't change that by saying I am wrong. KNOWING you were wrong changes what you believe, CAUSING you to say "I am wrong." That may or may not change how you FEEL, or whether or not you are self-aware. What she said was not a reference to your education level. It's about the specific source of information. A fourth or fifth hand source may or may not be true. The way to check that is to go to the original source. Once that is done and the reports don't match one is a misinformed or falsified opinion and one is the truth. It's not an insult in any way. my uneducated reply was sarcasm I believe I made an educated opinion....plain and simple. |
|
|
|
You realize That arguement can be used for any debate to those that don't agree? I'm right and you're wrong has been the arguement here since I started in 07 The argument of opinion vs. opinion brings only a result of I'm right because I'm right (making the other wrong). That type of argument unfortunately does occur quite often. The opinion vs. fact argument where one side has no basis in actual fact from the original source make the opinion logically false. The self supporting argument� is also invalid. For example: I believe what I believe and can't change that by saying I am wrong. KNOWING you were wrong changes what you believe, CAUSING you to say "I am wrong." That may or may not change how you FEEL, or whether or not you are self-aware. What she said was not a reference to your education level. It's about the specific source of information. A fourth or fifth hand source may or may not be true. The way to check that is to go to the original source. Once that is done and the reports don't match one is a misinformed or falsified opinion and one is the truth. It's not an insult in any way. However, this is not science. Statement of "purpose", used as an original source of information means nothing when presented with reel after reel of marcher's singing hate. Kim is correct, as usual. |
|
|
|
You realize That arguement can be used for any debate to those that don't agree? I'm right and you're wrong has been the arguement here since I started in 07 The argument of opinion vs. opinion brings only a result of I'm right because I'm right (making the other wrong). That type of argument unfortunately does occur quite often. The opinion vs. fact argument where one side has no basis in actual fact from the original source make the opinion logically false. The self supporting argument� is also invalid. For example: I believe what I believe and can't change that by saying I am wrong. KNOWING you were wrong changes what you believe, CAUSING you to say "I am wrong." That may or may not change how you FEEL, or whether or not you are self-aware. What she said was not a reference to your education level. It's about the specific source of information. A fourth or fifth hand source may or may not be true. The way to check that is to go to the original source. Once that is done and the reports don't match one is a misinformed or falsified opinion and one is the truth. It's not an insult in any way. However, this is not science. Statement of "purpose", used as an original source of information means nothing when presented with reel after reel of marcher's singing hate. Kim is correct, as usual. You're also ignoring the FACT that not all blacks are members of the Nation of Islam. Misinformation = assumed association of Nation of Islam & Black Lives Matter Misinformation = assumed association of NBPP & Black Lives Matter Misinformation = assumed association of Black Panthers & Black Lives Matter Misinformation = assumed criminality of Black Lives Matter Misinformation = assumed association of recent police murdered & Black Lives Matter Misinformation = assumed association of crimes in Ferguson & PEACEFUL Black Lives Matter Protest Misinformation = assumed association of the murder of Lt Joe Gliniewicz & Black Lives Matter. His dying words were there were 2 WHITE & 1 black suspect. To date NO ONE KNOWS who of the. three suspects killed him. Misinformation = assumed association of the murder of Deputy Goforth & Black Lives Matter. His own Sheriff is on record confirming that there is NO EVIDENCE to suggest that the murder was racially motivated. Common denominator, Black or assumed black people Put all those things together with a couple hundred thousand gallons of super glue graciously donated by Ronald Grump and you get one big less than happy bigoted view of anyone black or assumed black. I'd say that pretty much qualifies as hate speech. Bmore got torn to pieces, especially the pharmacies. What people don't know about that particular crime spree is that corrupt police have been protecting shipments of cocaine and herion throughout the east coast. Not all police obviously, but 13 police and correctional officers have been indicted on those charges as a result of OPERATION ROCKFISH. Free opiates are more profitable to DRUG DEALERS than police escorted shipments from overseas or South America. DRUG DEALERS, who STEAL and SELL DRUGS are not PEACEFUL PROTESTERS. |
|
|
|
You realize That arguement can be used for any debate to those that don't agree? I'm right and you're wrong has been the arguement here since I started in 07 The argument of opinion vs. opinion brings only a result of I'm right because I'm right (making the other wrong). That type of argument unfortunately does occur quite often. The opinion vs. fact argument where one side has no basis in actual fact from the original source make the opinion logically false. The self supporting argument� is also invalid. For example: I believe what I believe and can't change that by saying I am wrong. KNOWING you were wrong changes what you believe, CAUSING you to say "I am wrong." That may or may not change how you FEEL, or whether or not you are self-aware. What she said was not a reference to your education level. It's about the specific source of information. A fourth or fifth hand source may or may not be true. The way to check that is to go to the original source. Once that is done and the reports don't match one is a misinformed or falsified opinion and one is the truth. It's not an insult in any way. However, this is not science. Statement of "purpose", used as an original source of information means nothing when presented with reel after reel of marcher's singing hate. Kim is correct, as usual. You're also ignoring the FACT that not all blacks are members of the Nation of Islam. Misinformation = assumed association of Nation of Islam & Black Lives Matter Misinformation = assumed association of NBPP & Black Lives Matter Misinformation = assumed association of Black Panthers & Black Lives Matter Misinformation = assumed criminality of Black Lives Matter Misinformation = assumed association of recent police murdered & Black Lives Matter Misinformation = assumed association of crimes in Ferguson & PEACEFUL Black Lives Matter Protest Misinformation = assumed association of the murder of Lt Joe Gliniewicz & Black Lives Matter. His dying words were there were 2 WHITE & 1 black suspect. To date NO ONE KNOWS who of the. three suspects killed him. Misinformation = assumed association of the murder of Deputy Goforth & Black Lives Matter. His own Sheriff is on record confirming that there is NO EVIDENCE to suggest that the murder was racially motivated. Common denominator, Black or assumed black people Put all those things together with a couple hundred thousand gallons of super glue graciously donated by Ronald Grump and you get one big less than happy bigoted view of anyone black or assumed black. I'd say that pretty much qualifies as hate speech. Bmore got torn to pieces, especially the pharmacies. What people don't know about that particular crime spree is that corrupt police have been protecting shipments of cocaine and herion throughout the east coast. Not all police obviously, but 13 police and correctional officers have been indicted on those charges as a result of OPERATION ROCKFISH. Free opiates are more profitable to DRUG DEALERS than police escorted shipments from overseas or South America. DRUG DEALERS, who STEAL and SELL DRUGS are not PEACEFUL PROTESTERS. I never said all blacks are anything. I never made any of those assumptions. I was referring to the movement itself |
|
|
|
Not you Rose. The unfounded claim was made on another post
but the subject is the same. QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: the victims arent hurt because they wouldnt fire back, they were hurt because they were caught off guard,, Victims? if your referring to the police, the were hurt because they were ambushed... They should have fired back, it would have been justified. It's to the point where Law Enforcement Officers are scared to defend themselves unfortunately thanks to Barry who vilifies them and the damn Black Lives Matter hate group. Don't repeat that crap or leave out the relevant evidence. LV shooting 1, 1 suspect, 1 gun, 1 victim, 1 wound. CAPTURED. Next LV shooting 2, 1 suspect, 1 gun, 1 victim, 1 wound. CAPTURED. Next Deputy Goforth, 1 homicide, 1 gun, 1 suspect hospitalized by court order for 6 months, CAPTURED. R.I.P. ... Lt Gliniewicz, 1 homicide, 1+? gun(s)?, 1 victim, 2 WHITE 1 black suspects WANTED. $50,000 reward last I heard. R.I.P. 4 shootings 2 black suspects, 1 known to be deputy Goforths killer was found to be mentally incompetent to stand trial and court ordered to a Texas State mental hospital for 6 months. Nobody knows how many guns may have been involved in the Lt. murder or who actually shot him. Lt Gliniewicz' death wasn't racially motivated. Any judge that would even allow that on record in court shouldn't just be disbarred he should have to eat his robe and his gavel. 2white 1 black suspect. Murder, without a doubt it will be charged as such if anyone ever finds out who these 3 guys are. Even then it'd have to be charged as a joint venture because all 3 of them would plea bargain saying the other two killed him and they were just the look out. Goforths murder was an execution by a mentally ill person. Crime. Tragic. Terrible. Inexcusable. How Travis county is going to get out of the mess they are in seeing what they did with his previous case in terms of not following up, idk. The Sheriff is on record stating that there is no evidence to support that race was a motivation. His uniform was. Were any of them carrying black lives matter banners? Any? No. The people chanting FOR 30 SECONDS about pigs blankets and bacon, quite a few of them including the 2 in front of the banner and some carrying the black lives matter banner, were WHITE. They were WHITE people, people. They were white. What does that mean? It means these attacks on police, if the movement is their motivation, CANNOT BE RACIAL. 30 seconds of chanting in one city does not turn A PEACEFUL PROTEST ORGANIZATION into a hate group. |
|
|
|
Focusing directly on the case of Deputy Goforths murder, the OFFICIAL source, the DIRECT source is his own Sheriff. His own Sheriff who is OFFICIALLY in charge of the investigation into his death, spoke out emotionally during a press conference. He later when asked specific questions about the admissible evidence to ANY motivation the murderer had he himself said there was none. When asked specific questions from specific known critics of his emotional statement he responded on record that it appeared the deputy was targeted because of his uniform but there was no evidential motive.
|
|
|
|
Focusing directly on the case of Deputy Goforths murder, the OFFICIAL source, the DIRECT source is his own Sheriff. His own Sheriff who is OFFICIALLY in charge of the investigation into his death, spoke out emotionally during a press conference. He later when asked specific questions about the admissible evidence to ANY motivation the murderer had he himself said there was none. When asked specific questions from specific known critics of his emotional statement he responded on record that it appeared the deputy was targeted because of his uniform but there was no evidential motive. |
|
|
|
Focusing directly on the case of Deputy Goforths murder, the OFFICIAL source, the DIRECT source is his own Sheriff. His own Sheriff who is OFFICIALLY in charge of the investigation into his death, spoke out emotionally during a press conference. He later when asked specific questions about the admissible evidence to ANY motivation the murderer had he himself said there was none. When asked specific questions from specific known critics of his emotional statement he responded on record that it appeared the deputy was targeted because of his uniform but there was no evidential motive. Is there a better source than the Deputy's own Sheriff in a one on one exclusive interview on National tv to the public in an ongoing investigation? Further information about the suspect revealed Travis County found him legally "incompetent to stand trial" and court ordered him to a 6 month Texas State mental hospitalization, Is there a better source than the Fox Lake IL coroners report for Lt Gliniewicz that stated "1 devastating gunshot wound" no other details no approximate distance no details of any other wounds it specifically "couldn't rule out suicide" . There was DNA evidence found at the scene that didn't belong to the Lt. and the 3 persons of interest seen in the home security camera footage were ruled out. These are not opinions. These are from the directly associated authorities who obviously side with their officers and want to bring their killers to justice. What people tend to ignore is when things like this happen there is an outpouring of public support and grieving from good tax paying black PEOPLE too. Those crowds, cards balloons donations don't all come from white PEOPLE, hispanic PEOPLE, asian PEOPLE and everyone else. What's the common denominator ^ people? |
|
|
|
Black lives matter is a hate group by definition. As a "group" they sing the praises of killing cops. One instance of a large group doing this is evidence. More than one group doing it is proof. "fry them like bacon!" You got to be kidding. Their actions are indefensible. 1 instance of 1 group chanting for 30 SECONDS in 1 city actually lead on the ground in this particular instance by white people. 2 in front of the BLM banner, at least one holding the banner and several whites behind the banner. The "leader" who arranged the PEACEFUL protest was not telling them to say that which is why I imagine it only happened for 30 SECONDS. The "leader" who arranged this protest was not the actual leader of the Black Lives Matter movement who also found the 30 SECOND chant offensive. "Singing praises of killing cops" never happened nor was it or is it a part of the movement. If you want to know what the movement is about and does encourage and condone http://www.joincampaignzero.org/problem/ |
|
|
|
Wake up people & smell the coffee.
#childrenslivesmatter beginning January, 2016 Grades 6- 12 NEWS / Curriculum Matters Blog Unpublished 'Black Lives Matter |
|
|
|
Update: Fox News pundit sends tweet in response to critics.
On Tuesday afternoon, Elisabeth Hasselbeck headed to Twitter to clear the air about her intentions. My question was NOT my opinion it was for my guest & was @ the St Paul group (NOT entire BLM) calling for cops to be 'fried like bacon'. My calling @foxandfriends is to ask questions and my calling as a #Christian is to #LoveAllGodsPeople -I give my best to do both each day. Sure, every movement has its critics. But Elisabeth Hasselbeck's recent question about Black Lives Matter seems more like a ridiculous reach, if nothing else. On Fox & Friends on Monday, Hasselbeck and co-host Brian Kilmeade talked to Kevin Jackson, executive director of The Blacksphere, about the recent killing of Houston-area deputy sheriff Darren Goforth and Black Lives Matter protests held at the Minnesota State Fair over the weekend. 'Kevin, why has the Black Lives Matter movement not been classified yet as a hate group?' Hasselbeck asked. 'I mean, how much more has to go in this direction before someone actually labels it as such?' Black Lives Matter a hate group? Apparently, Hasselbeck doesn't understand the fight for justice in America for people of color. Now Jackson, who's Black and conservative, took the bait and ran with it. Not only did he call the movement 'nonsense' and financed by 'leftists,' but he also said that Blacks needed to stop pointing the finger for problems in our community. 'The sad part about it is the impact [the Black Lives Matter movement] is going to have in the Black community and the fact that it takes away so much thought about what really is the problem in the Black community, which is a lack of whole Black families. What it allows people to do is point the finger at everything but where it really needs to point. 'If we had more Black families whole in the community, we would have a lot less of this,' he continued. 'If we had clergy who were willing to support real issues and change in the Black community, we would have a lot less of this. Of course, we have the Congressional Black Caucus who actually loves this type of strife.' Now Jackson's answer is just the type of conservative nonsense we would expect. He might have well have added that Black-on-Black crime is the real problem, which has been debunked several times over. In a more just world, Hasselbeck would have asked this crazy question of someone who could have made sense of a nonsensical question. We're sure Marc Lamont Hill or DeRay McKesson would have had all the answers. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Ladywind7
on
Thu 09/10/15 06:48 AM
|
|
Wake up people & smell the coffee. #childrenslivesmatter beginning January, 2016 Grades 6- 12 NEWS / Curriculum Matters Blog Unpublished 'Black Lives Matter What are you saying here Sassy? Macalester College Professor Duchess Harris said she and co-author Sue Bradford Edwards, a Missouri-based journalist, hoped to provide information for young people looking to understand current events and African-American history.
Are we not to teach each nation's history to our young? Do we leave them ignorant and unable to form their own opinions? |
|
|
|
You realize That arguement can be used for any debate to those that don't agree? I'm right and you're wrong has been the arguement here since I started in 07 The argument of opinion vs. opinion brings only a result of I'm right because I'm right (making the other wrong). That type of argument unfortunately does occur quite often. The opinion vs. fact argument where one side has no basis in actual fact from the original source make the opinion logically false. The self supporting argument� is also invalid. For example: I believe what I believe and can't change that by saying I am wrong. KNOWING you were wrong changes what you believe, CAUSING you to say "I am wrong." That may or may not change how you FEEL, or whether or not you are self-aware. What she said was not a reference to your education level. It's about the specific source of information. A fourth or fifth hand source may or may not be true. The way to check that is to go to the original source. Once that is done and the reports don't match one is a misinformed or falsified opinion and one is the truth. It's not an insult in any way. However, this is not science. Statement of "purpose", used as an original source of information means nothing when presented with reel after reel of marcher's singing hate. Kim is correct, as usual. reel after reel of marchers singing hate? where did this happen,, lets say,, just 3 recurring and consistent occasions where specifically the GROUP (not isolated and random individuals who happened to join in in a public place) did this? I have not seen nor heard these incidents remember we are talking about the BLACK LIVES MATTER as a GROUP,, and not isolated individuals who show up to public places,, |
|
|