Topic: White house fence jumper shot dead | |
---|---|
That's a cop out....no oun intended
"" by HEATHER MAC DONALD December 11, 2014 7:12 PM The FBI has just released its supplemental homicide data for 2012, including the numbers of interracial killings . These are highly relevant for the current rallying cry that “black lives matter.” Unfortunately, the FBI continues its usual practice of combining whites and Hispanics into the single category “white,” thus overstating white crime and victimization rates. Even so, the data are telling. A “white” homicide victim is over twice as likely to be killed by a black than a black homicide victim is to be killed by a “white.” Sixteen percent of “white” victims in homicide incidents involving a single victim and single offender were killed by blacks, compared with only 7 percent of black victims who are killed by “whites.” Given the fact that blacks are less than 13 percent of the national population, their homicide rate against whites and Hispanics combined is vastly disproportionate to their share of the population. There were 431 black killers of “whites,” compared to 193 “white” killers of blacks. Undoubtedly a large percentage of interracial killings involve gang killings among black and Hispanic gangs; the number of non-Hispanic whites who kill blacks is undoubtedly far lower than 193. (The number of non-Hispanic whites killed by blacks is also presumably lower than 431.) Blacks are also disproportionately represented among cop killers. In 2013, blacks made up 42 percent of all cop killers whose race was known. It is tempting to say in response to this latest data, drearily repetitive of everything that went before it, that “white lives matter.” Of course that would be racist. But it is precisely in response to the disproportionate criminality among the black population that the police are deployed in much higher numbers in black neighborhoods, where they are trying to save innocent lives. There are thousands of law- abiding inner-city blacks who live by bourgeois values and who need protection from criminals. Only the police are willing to provide that protection. Their mantra could be “black lives matter.” The 200 or so reported killings of blacks by police officers — nearly all justified — pale in comparison to the 6,000 or so killings of blacks by other blacks."" http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/394489/new-data-its-still-about-black-black-crime-heather-mac-donald Now do what you do....totally ignore facts and spin away. |
|
|
|
That's a cop out....no oun intended "" by HEATHER MAC DONALD December 11, 2014 7:12 PM The FBI has just released its supplemental homicide data for 2012, including the numbers of interracial killings . These are highly relevant for the current rallying cry that “black lives matter.” Unfortunately, the FBI continues its usual practice of combining whites and Hispanics into the single category “white,” thus overstating white crime and victimization rates. Even so, the data are telling. A “white” homicide victim is over twice as likely to be killed by a black than a black homicide victim is to be killed by a “white.” Sixteen percent of “white” victims in homicide incidents involving a single victim and single offender were killed by blacks, compared with only 7 percent of black victims who are killed by “whites.” Given the fact that blacks are less than 13 percent of the national population, their homicide rate against whites and Hispanics combined is vastly disproportionate to their share of the population. There were 431 black killers of “whites,” compared to 193 “white” killers of blacks. Undoubtedly a large percentage of interracial killings involve gang killings among black and Hispanic gangs; the number of non-Hispanic whites who kill blacks is undoubtedly far lower than 193. (The number of non-Hispanic whites killed by blacks is also presumably lower than 431.) Blacks are also disproportionately represented among cop killers. In 2013, blacks made up 42 percent of all cop killers whose race was known. It is tempting to say in response to this latest data, drearily repetitive of everything that went before it, that “white lives matter.” Of course that would be racist. But it is precisely in response to the disproportionate criminality among the black population that the police are deployed in much higher numbers in black neighborhoods, where they are trying to save innocent lives. There are thousands of law- abiding inner-city blacks who live by bourgeois values and who need protection from criminals. Only the police are willing to provide that protection. Their mantra could be “black lives matter.” The 200 or so reported killings of blacks by police officers — nearly all justified — pale in comparison to the 6,000 or so killings of blacks by other blacks."" http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/394489/new-data-its-still-about-black-black-crime-heather-mac-donald Now do what you do....totally ignore facts and spin away. People prefer numbers that are contrived to fit their agenda. When lies are told enough times they become the truth to the obtuse/ weak minded people that need an excuse for their failure and jealousy. |
|
|
|
figures dont lie but liars figure
revisit my posts perhaps, paying special attention to the words 'encounter' and the issue of where cops are 'deployed' is irrelevant to the concern about how often that 'deployment' leads to the death of the unarmed or you can ignore it all together for your 'agenda' of painting blacks as justifiably killed due to their extraordinary preponderance for crime,,, |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Thu 08/27/15 09:48 AM
|
|
ooh, so fun to play with numbers and statistics,,
my turn estimated 2013 population 316,497,531 of which 245,918, 581 (77.7 %) are white and 41,777, 674 (13.2%) are black doing math, that makes (roughly) 6 white people for every black person and conversely only a 1/6 chance for each white person to run into a black person ENCOUNTER RATES blacks are 6 times more likely to encounter a white person than vice versa meaning if things were truly equal we should see whites being 6 times more likely to be killed by blacks, not 2 times kind of knocking the idea of 'disproportionate' (interracial) criminality out of the water,, |
|
|
|
figures dont lie but liars figure revisit my posts perhaps, paying special attention to the words 'encounter' and the issue of where cops are 'deployed' is irrelevant to the concern about how often that 'deployment' leads to the death of the unarmed or you can ignore it all together for your 'agenda' of painting blacks as justifiably killed due to their extraordinary preponderance for crime,,, so, blacks do have an extraordinary preponderance for crime? |
|
|
|
ooh, so fun to play with numbers and statistics,, my turn estimated 2013 population 316,497,531 of which 245,918, 581 (77.7 %) are white and 41,777, 674 (13.2%) are black doing math, that makes (roughly) 6 white people for every black person and conversely only a 1/6 chance for each white person to run into a black person ENCOUNTER RATES blacks are 6 times more likely to encounter a white person than vice versa meaning if things were truly equal we should see whites being 6 times more likely to be killed by blacks, not 2 times kind of knocking the idea of 'disproportionate' (interracial) criminality out of the water,, I will be you... What defines an encounter? At work? At school? In the mall? At what times of the day are these encounters taking place? |
|
|
|
or you can ignore it all together for your
Thats not my agenda (and I see youre stealing what rightfully has been bestowed upon you), those are facts gathered by the FBI.
'agenda' of painting blacks as justifiably killed due to their extraordinary preponderance for crime,,, As for the rest of what you posted....I said spin away...that crap was a lousy wobble. |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Thu 08/27/15 10:03 AM
|
|
oh, I love the simple question
to come upon face to face, ENCOUNTER by the numbers with there being a six to one ratio of whites to blacks that means every unique black person potentially has six unique white people they could encounter and in a largely segregated society, for another example, a black person may only encounter blacks in their immediate community on a regular basis,, but when they have to leave their community they are much less likely to avoid an encounter with whites whereas, in that same society, a white person may only encounter whites in their community on a regular basis, and when they leave are more likely to be able to AVOID encountering blacks that was one of the purposes of segregation, minorities had to live in the world of the white male,, not vice versa |
|
|
|
or you can ignore it all together for your
Thats not my agenda (and I see youre stealing what rightfully has been bestowed upon you), those are facts gathered by the FBI.
'agenda' of painting blacks as justifiably killed due to their extraordinary preponderance for crime,,, As for the rest of what you posted....I said spin away...that crap was a lousy wobble. 'spin'..mingle speak for anything that doesnt support my opinion,,, lol |
|
|
|
That's a cop out....no oun intended "" by HEATHER MAC DONALD December 11, 2014 7:12 PM The FBI has just released its supplemental homicide data for 2012, including the numbers of interracial killings . These are highly relevant for the current rallying cry that “black lives matter.” Unfortunately, the FBI continues its usual practice of combining whites and Hispanics into the single category “white,” thus overstating white crime and victimization rates. Even so, the data are telling. A “white” homicide victim is over twice as likely to be killed by a black than a black homicide victim is to be killed by a “white.” Sixteen percent of “white” victims in homicide incidents involving a single victim and single offender were killed by blacks, compared with only 7 percent of black victims who are killed by “whites.” Given the fact that blacks are less than 13 percent of the national population, their homicide rate against whites and Hispanics combined is vastly disproportionate to their share of the population. There were 431 black killers of “whites,” compared to 193 “white” killers of blacks. Undoubtedly a large percentage of interracial killings involve gang killings among black and Hispanic gangs; the number of non-Hispanic whites who kill blacks is undoubtedly far lower than 193. (The number of non-Hispanic whites killed by blacks is also presumably lower than 431.) Blacks are also disproportionately represented among cop killers. In 2013, blacks made up 42 percent of all cop killers whose race was known. It is tempting to say in response to this latest data, drearily repetitive of everything that went before it, that “white lives matter.” Of course that would be racist. But it is precisely in response to the disproportionate criminality among the black population that the police are deployed in much higher numbers in black neighborhoods, where they are trying to save innocent lives. There are thousands of law- abiding inner-city blacks who live by bourgeois values and who need protection from criminals. Only the police are willing to provide that protection. Their mantra could be “black lives matter.” The 200 or so reported killings of blacks by police officers — nearly all justified — pale in comparison to the 6,000 or so killings of blacks by other blacks."" http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/394489/new-data-its-still-about-black-black-crime-heather-mac-donald Now do what you do....totally ignore facts and spin away. People prefer numbers that are contrived to fit their agenda. When lies are told enough times they become the truth to the obtuse/ weak minded people that need an excuse for their failure and jealousy. so true,, so true,,,, |
|
|
|
figures dont lie but liars figure revisit my posts perhaps, paying special attention to the words 'encounter' and the issue of where cops are 'deployed' is irrelevant to the concern about how often that 'deployment' leads to the death of the unarmed or you can ignore it all together for your 'agenda' of painting blacks as justifiably killed due to their extraordinary preponderance for crime,,, so, blacks do have an extraordinary preponderance for crime? no, but the 'agenda' in place consistently attempts to suggest they do |
|
|
|
or you can ignore it all together for your
Thats not my agenda (and I see youre stealing what rightfully has been bestowed upon you), those are facts gathered by the FBI.
'agenda' of painting blacks as justifiably killed due to their extraordinary preponderance for crime,,, As for the rest of what you posted....I said spin away...that crap was a lousy wobble. 'spin'..mingle speak for anything that doesnt support my opinion,,, lol 13% of the population commits 50% of the homicides. That fact isnt meant for you MH...its meant for any from outside our country to read....so they wont be swayed by your rhetoric of "po wittle bwack boyz" being always treated bad by police. Fact is, theyre the most prolific murderers in our country. Wobble on MH....wobble on. |
|
|
|
figures dont lie but liars figure revisit my posts perhaps, paying special attention to the words 'encounter' and the issue of where cops are 'deployed' is irrelevant to the concern about how often that 'deployment' leads to the death of the unarmed or you can ignore it all together for your 'agenda' of painting blacks as justifiably killed due to their extraordinary preponderance for crime,,, so, blacks do have an extraordinary preponderance for crime? no, but the 'agenda' in place consistently attempts to suggest they do I have not heard of this "agenda". Where does it come from? |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Thu 08/27/15 10:23 AM
|
|
figures dont lie but liars figure revisit my posts perhaps, paying special attention to the words 'encounter' and the issue of where cops are 'deployed' is irrelevant to the concern about how often that 'deployment' leads to the death of the unarmed or you can ignore it all together for your 'agenda' of painting blacks as justifiably killed due to their extraordinary preponderance for crime,,, so, blacks do have an extraordinary preponderance for crime? no, but the 'agenda' in place consistently attempts to suggest they do I have not heard of this "agenda". Where does it come from? u r funny, look back through the thread 1st instance of the exceptionally criminal black people narrative, page 1 "Me black on black crime that outweighs white on black crime 10 to 1." 2nd instance of the excecptionally criminal black people narrative, page 2 "But it is precisely in response to the disproportionate criminality among the black population that the police are deployed in much higher numbers in black neighborhoods, where they are trying to save innocent lives." 3rd instance of COSGINING The exceptionally criminal (and apparently jealous) black people narrative , page 2 'People prefer numbers that are contrived to fit their agenda. When lies are told enough times they become the truth to the obtuse/ weak minded people that need an excuse for their failure and jealousy. ' 4th instance of the exceptionally criminal black people narrative (warning foreigners apparently,,lol) page 2 ' Fact is, theyre the most prolific murderers in our country. ' |
|
|
|
figures dont lie but liars figure revisit my posts perhaps, paying special attention to the words 'encounter' and the issue of where cops are 'deployed' is irrelevant to the concern about how often that 'deployment' leads to the death of the unarmed or you can ignore it all together for your 'agenda' of painting blacks as justifiably killed due to their extraordinary preponderance for crime,,, so, blacks do have an extraordinary preponderance for crime? no, but the 'agenda' in place consistently attempts to suggest they do I have not heard of this "agenda". Where does it come from? u r funny, look back through the thread Oh, I thought you had found a "secret agenda" against blacks. |
|
|
|
oh, I love the simple question to come upon face to face, ENCOUNTER by the numbers with there being a six to one ratio of whites to blacks that means every unique black person potentially has six unique white people they could encounter and in a largely segregated society, for another example, a black person may only encounter blacks in their immediate community on a regular basis,, but when they have to leave their community they are much less likely to avoid an encounter with whites whereas, in that same society, a white person may only encounter whites in their community on a regular basis, and when they leave are more likely to be able to AVOID encountering blacks that was one of the purposes of segregation, minorities had to live in the world of the white male,, not vice versa You are talking about how encounters should equal crime. Not every single black person wants to kill someone. So taking the overall numbers of people in the entire group and then saying that based on the number of encounters the crime rate should be higher is not a basis statistically to make that argument. Where I work there are 40 production workers and 30 are black. Does that mean based on your logic that the interracial crime rate at my workplace should be much higher because when I leave my office I encounter 30 black men? |
|
|
|
no, the 'exceptionally violent and criminal blacks makes their deaths understandable and excusable' agenda
or perhaps 'narrative' ? take your pick,,, |
|
|
|
figures dont lie but liars figure revisit my posts perhaps, paying special attention to the words 'encounter' and the issue of where cops are 'deployed' is irrelevant to the concern about how often that 'deployment' leads to the death of the unarmed or you can ignore it all together for your 'agenda' of painting blacks as justifiably killed due to their extraordinary preponderance for crime,,, so, blacks do have an extraordinary preponderance for crime? no, but the 'agenda' in place consistently attempts to suggest they do I have not heard of this "agenda". Where does it come from? u r funny, look back through the thread 1st instance of the exceptionally criminal black people narrative, page 1 "Me black on black crime that outweighs white on black crime 10 to 1." 2nd instance of the excecptionally criminal black people narrative, page 2 "But it is precisely in response to the disproportionate criminality among the black population that the police are deployed in much higher numbers in black neighborhoods, where they are trying to save innocent lives." 3rd instance of COSGINING The exceptionally criminal (and apparently jealous) black people narrative , page 2 'People prefer numbers that are contrived to fit their agenda. When lies are told enough times they become the truth to the obtuse/ weak minded people that need an excuse for their failure and jealousy. ' 4th instance of the exceptionally criminal black people narrative (warning foreigners apparently,,lol) page 2 ' Fact is, theyre the most prolific murderers in our country. ' http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Oz0A1Ux9Lok&itct=CCkQpDAYBiITCN_m-vLiyccCFU8sfgodAoAD2FIaYmxhY2sgZ2lybCBkb2VzIHRoZSB3b2JibGU%3D&gl=US&hl=en&client=mv-google |
|
|
|
oh, I love the simple question to come upon face to face, ENCOUNTER by the numbers with there being a six to one ratio of whites to blacks that means every unique black person potentially has six unique white people they could encounter and in a largely segregated society, for another example, a black person may only encounter blacks in their immediate community on a regular basis,, but when they have to leave their community they are much less likely to avoid an encounter with whites whereas, in that same society, a white person may only encounter whites in their community on a regular basis, and when they leave are more likely to be able to AVOID encountering blacks that was one of the purposes of segregation, minorities had to live in the world of the white male,, not vice versa You are talking about how encounters should equal crime. Not every single black person wants to kill someone. So taking the overall numbers of people in the entire group and then saying that based on the number of encounters the crime rate should be higher is not a basis statistically to make that argument. Where I work there are 40 production workers and 30 are black. Does that mean based on your logic that the interracial crime rate at my workplace should be much higher because when I leave my office I encounter 30 black men? no in your example,,,there are 3 black workers to every 1 white worker that would mean it would be numerically logical, considering every white worker has 3 unique black victims,,, and only every third black worker has their own unique white victim IF whites were 'more likely' to be involved in crimes of an INTERRACIAL nature against their coworkers,, based on their being 'more likely' to have the opportunity to do so,,, so, if someone were to point out that at your workplace that whites were involved in interracial crimes three times as much as blacks were, that would not prove some exceptional propensity towards crime, but would reflect numbers that logically added up based upon OPPORTUNITY to commit interracial crime being 3 times more likely |
|
|
|
so, if someone were to point out that at your
Good FREAKIN God at the spin....
workplace that whites were involved in interracial crimes three times as much as blacks were, that would not prove some exceptional propensity towards crime, but would reflect numbers that logically added up based upon OPPORTUNITY to commit interracial crime being 3 times more likely Oh please explain how 13% of the population accounts for HALF of ALL murders. I guess that blacks, being the 13%, have a bigger victim pool to choose from, right? Thats some piss poor "logic" you have there.... |
|
|