Topic: Jarad of Subways to plead guilty to kiddie porn
Lpdon's photo
Tue 08/18/15 07:51 PM

Sickening. They are the epitome of evil. To corrupt innocence for selfish gain/sick pleasure is beyond comprehension.
These children grow up and without proper help, self destruct. So they are in essence killing them.


Or end up being offenders themselves.

Ladywind7's photo
Tue 08/18/15 07:55 PM


Sickening. They are the epitome of evil. To corrupt innocence for selfish gain/sick pleasure is beyond comprehension.
These children grow up and without proper help, self destruct. So they are in essence killing them.


Or end up being offenders themselves.


Yes, I have witnessed both scenarios. NOTHING GOOD comes out of this perversion.

no photo
Tue 08/18/15 07:58 PM



Sickening. They are the epitome of evil. To corrupt innocence for selfish gain/sick pleasure is beyond comprehension.
These children grow up and without proper help, self destruct. So they are in essence killing them.


Or end up being offenders themselves.


Yes, I have witnessed both scenarios. NOTHING GOOD comes out of this perversion.


they learn the business (which can be lucrative) as they grow up inside the loop, and end up trafficking other kids as well...knowing exactly how to lure them in...

msharmony's photo
Tue 08/18/15 07:59 PM
Edited by msharmony on Tue 08/18/15 08:01 PM
actually, pedophiles are attracted to PREPUBESCENT children

mid to late teenagers are attractive to many people,, how do you think they start modeling so young? or acting? or any number of things that cause grown men to drool regularly?

because child pornography only requires one to be a 'minor' (under the age of 18) , it is not the same as pedophilia, it is only pedophilia at pre puberty age,,

and many who are willing to be with men this way(not forced on the street) have already been 'damaged' long before

while others, believe it or not, actually know exactly what they are doing and why ,,,,

Lpdon's photo
Tue 08/18/15 08:00 PM
It's a vicious circle. In a away you are ending someone's life which makes it a good argument for the Death Penalty, either that or leaving the a$$holes cell door unlocked and let all the other inmates know exactly why the SOB is in custody.

Lpdon's photo
Tue 08/18/15 08:00 PM

actually, pedophiles are attracted to PREPUBESCENT children

mid to late teenagers are attractive to many people,, how do you think they start modeling so young? or acting? or any number of things that cause grown men to drool regularly?

because child pornography only requires one to be a 'minor' (under the age of 18) , it is not the same as pedophilia, it is only pedophilia at pre puberty age,,


Well, at least we now know what your attracted to.

msharmony's photo
Tue 08/18/15 08:02 PM
Edited by msharmony on Tue 08/18/15 08:02 PM


wow




wow what?


the pov that filming a 17 year old being sexually suggestive is tantamount to 'killing' them

msharmony's photo
Tue 08/18/15 08:04 PM


actually, pedophiles are attracted to PREPUBESCENT children

mid to late teenagers are attractive to many people,, how do you think they start modeling so young? or acting? or any number of things that cause grown men to drool regularly?

because child pornography only requires one to be a 'minor' (under the age of 18) , it is not the same as pedophilia, it is only pedophilia at pre puberty age,,


Well, at least we now know what your attracted to.




really? so the choice is label anyone attracted to someone whose age is not yet 18 a pedophile(incorrectly) or I must be attracted to the youngsters myself?

lol


IM not attracted to youngsters, I am also not into swinging, or stripping for money, or any of many things other people choose as a lifestyle

Im just not prone to condemning everyone for their personal tastes either,,,

no photo
Tue 08/18/15 08:07 PM
+/- 3 bans and 10 deleted posts as this thread progresses?

laugh

no photo
Tue 08/18/15 08:08 PM
He likes em young and Bill likes em drugged. Strange how predators have preferences.

msharmony's photo
Tue 08/18/15 08:09 PM
I feel a lock coming on

no photo
Tue 08/18/15 08:10 PM

Jarad of Subways to plead guilty to kiddie porn

That's extremely imprecise.
From the sourced article:
"Jared Fogle is expected to plead guilty to charges of possessing child pornography..."

That's different. Huge difference.

Neither attorney or the FBI are offering statements (in the article).

And this is after Russell Taylor, the head of Jared's foundation was "preliminarily charged with child exploitation, possession of child pornography, and voyeurism."
http://fox59.com/2015/04/29/executive-director-of-jared-foundation-arrested-on-child-pornography-charges/

There's a huge difference in charges.
For all I know Taylor had an office in Jared's home, stored some child porn there, or it was in his email server.

For all I know Taylor forwarded a text picture of a 17 year old girls boobs.
That can constitute "possession of child pornography."

And there doesn't seem to be a distribution charge.
Teenagers that sext and send boob and genital pics to each other get charged with possession and distribution of child porn.

So the whole thing "could" be just "yes your honor, I do have on my computer naked pictures of some chick my friend Taylor sent me, that happen to be someone under 18."

"Possession" of child pornography is a far cry from producing child porn or kidnapping kids for diddle movies and an honorary membership in NAMBLA.

Not only do they have a crap load of evidence

Says who?
At best I've found anywhere is "several computers were seized" and "allegedly containing child pornography."

didn't you see the picture of them loading a U-Haul sized truck up

There was an evidence truck.
There's no indication that it was filled up.
The pictures of the raid on Jared's home you can find on the internet only show an evidence truck, and one computer being seized.

With the amount of things the picture showed them removing

What picture?
The video in the article mentions finding "hundreds of images and video in his home" but they are talking about Russell Taylor and his house, not Fogle or Fogle's home.

About Fogle's home the article states "Authorities at the time were seen removing numerous items from Fogle's home, carrying them out in bags, boxes and briefcases" which isn't all that informative.


It's scary to read crap like this and comments like
I wish the death penalty applied for pedophiles.

associating the guy with pedophilia when there's an incomplete story and he's not even being charged with pedophilia.




According to Fox59, sources said that the pitchman will accept a plea deal on Wednesday and that the U.S. attorney’s office will hold a press conference Wednesday afternoon to discuss the charges and plea deal

Fogle’s attorney, Ron Elberger, had no comment when reached by Fox 59 regarding the reported deal, saying that any information regarding the charges would come from the U.S.attorney’s office. He did confirm that Fogle’s suspension with Subway continues
____________________________________________________________________
Well lets see what the next few hours bring.

In my experience whenever a defense attorney defers questions to a U.S Attorneys office regarding his client... its not good for the client.

We'll shortly see

no photo
Tue 08/18/15 08:14 PM

Sickening. They are the epitome of evil. To corrupt innocence for selfish gain/sick pleasure is beyond comprehension.
These children grow up and without proper help, self destruct. So they are in essence killing them.


They should be beaten to death with a Mackerel.:angry:

no photo
Tue 08/18/15 08:32 PM


Sickening. They are the epitome of evil. To corrupt innocence for selfish gain/sick pleasure is beyond comprehension.
These children grow up and without proper help, self destruct. So they are in essence killing them.


They should be beaten to death with a Mackerel.:angry:


At the very least with 2 week old bread

Lpdon's photo
Tue 08/18/15 08:52 PM

He likes em young and Bill likes em drugged. Strange how predators have preferences.


I am just scared to find out what Obama's preferences are..........scared

no photo
Tue 08/18/15 09:07 PM


He likes em young and Bill likes em drugged. Strange how predators have preferences.


I am just scared to find out what Obama's preferences are..........scared


aren't you suppose to be more concerned about Trump's?

Lpdon's photo
Tue 08/18/15 09:16 PM



He likes em young and Bill likes em drugged. Strange how predators have preferences.


I am just scared to find out what Obama's preferences are..........scared


aren't you suppose to be more concerned about Trump's?


I already know what his are, European Models in their 30's since he's married two.

msharmony's photo
Tue 08/18/15 09:20 PM
Edited by msharmony on Tue 08/18/15 09:27 PM




















wARNING : a couple of these females are teens,, beware, finding them desirable/sexy winking may mean you are a 'pedophile',,,,winking

Ladywind7's photo
Tue 08/18/15 09:47 PM



wow




wow what?


the pov that filming a 17 year old being sexually suggestive is tantamount to 'killing' them


I was not talking about a 17 year old being filmed. Like that is ok anyway?
The facts are unknown in this case as of yet.
I am referring to paedophiles.
Thus far the media name and shame him for paedophilia.....
We can therefore assume he is a paedophile....until more facts are known.
One thing for sure is, he is not a hero needing to be defended.
Sitting on a fence must be comfortable for you.

no photo
Tue 08/18/15 10:50 PM






















wARNING : a couple of these females are teens,, beware, finding them desirable/sexy winking may mean you are a 'pedophile',,,,winking


And which one of these ladies is under the legal age of 18?. Which one would be classified as a child?. Because Jaret is being charges with child porn not with looking at women in bikinis

CNN)—Former Subway pitchman Jared Fogle is expected to plead guilty to charges related to possession of child pornography, two law enforcement officials told CNN on Tuesday.
_________________________________________________________________
Laws regarding child pornography generally include sexual images involving prepubescents, pubescent or post-pubescent minors and computer-generated images that appear to involve them.[17] Most possessors of child pornography who are arrested are found to possess images of prepubescent children; possessors of pornographic images of post-pubescent minors are less likely to be prosecuted, even though those images also fall within the statutes

It would seem he is being prosecuted.