No, it's not that it's racist to not want Obama in office. It's just racist to use his race or a fictional national origin as a reason to not want him in office. And just because you can *also* think of a non-racist reason for him to not be president doesn't mean that you're not racist, or you didn't just type a racist thing. And for those of you who insist that you're not racist, why bring up the race of his mother (as seen above)?

Hillary's a good candidate. Maybe not ideal, but miles better than the other potential candidates at this point.

No, it's not that it's racist to not want Obama in office. It's just racist to use his race or a fictional national origin as a reason to not want him in office. And just because you can *also* think of a non-racist reason for him to not be president doesn't mean that you're not racist, or you didn't just type a racist thing. And for those of you who insist that you're not racist, why bring up the race of his mother (as seen above)?

Hillary's a good candidate. Maybe not ideal, but miles better than the other potential candidates at this point.

surely you jest?

I don't know what makes you think any of the Republican candidates have anything going for them. Here's an example. Ted Cruz just announced his candidacy today. The press is widely scoffing at him. The headline says "Let’s Be Serious About Ted Cruz From The Start: He’s Too Extreme And Too Disliked To Win."

Hillary is at least well-liked among Democrats.

You ignore that most of the press are actively cheerleading for the Democrats. The press also hated Mitt Romney, John McCain, George W. Bush, Bob Dole, George H. W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, Gerald Ford, and Richard Nixon. As for Hillary being liked by the Democrats, she was the inevitable nominee in 2008. No one could possibly beat her. Then some guy from Illinois no one had ever heard of showed up.

Oh sure. Those poor, poor, persecuted Republicans. Puh. leez. That yarn's as old as the "liberal media" fable started back in the 80s. They only seem liberal because they don't toe the NeoCon line to your satisfaction. You must've been ticked when they took a few minutes to talk about Obama addressing a huge crowd in Germany, but only a few seconds on McCain appearing at a Waffle House, that day in 2008. Because, you know, liberal media.

Okay, so what about Mitt Romney was so likeable?

And the fact that more than 80% of the media are Democrats means that they must be completely fair and impartial.

You've got a source for that statistic?

I don't know that they're fair and/or impartial. I don't believe that they're measurably Liberal and which members of "the media" actually declare a party affiliation at all? I wonder if you just point that statistic out to justify FoxNews's bias.