Topic: Obama Hatred {KING}™
no photo
Fri 09/05/14 08:12 AM
Edited by fleta_n_mach on Fri 09/05/14 08:15 AM
It's not about race.

Obama is a puppet for the elite Fed Reserve, World Bank, and corporations.

Russia is not part of the NWO.

We just want oil to shore up the lost Gold Standard, and to relieve printing of worthless money. WE HAVE LOST THE GLOBAL RESERVE DOLLAR. Ask China!

Russia won't allow us to instal Democracy in Syria. Ukraine is too close there.

Syria was targeted years and years ago, along with Iraq and Afganistan for oil and take over.

NATO an UN is a problem. Executive orders are dictatorship.

Impeach.

mr_king_solomon's photo
Fri 09/05/14 08:14 AM

oh, not verifying your wolf blizter rant? laugh


English.

Do you speak it?

mr_king_solomon's photo
Fri 09/05/14 08:14 AM
Do you have any more conspiracy theories you want to share?


msharmony's photo
Fri 09/05/14 08:15 AM
in the law, most charges that are successfully brought have a precedent to validate the charge

what is the precedent here for an impeachment?

based upon what actions SPECIFICALLY?

no photo
Fri 09/05/14 08:26 AM
Edited by fleta_n_mach on Fri 09/05/14 08:31 AM

Are there actually Grounds to impeach Obama?
:http://youtu.be/HcTwDf6KTug
Watch how congress backs down to Mr. Cohen.(Interpretation of law.)

Can Congress Impeach Obama If They Force Debt Default? :http://youtu.be/dkwHXYNeLQk

Sojourning_Soul's photo
Fri 09/05/14 09:17 AM
Edited by Sojourning_Soul on Fri 09/05/14 09:28 AM

"If you like your insurance you can keep it. PERIOD!"

"If you like your Dr you can keep them. PERIOD!"

"It was the result of a racially motivated youtube video!"

"I only heard about it after watching it on the news!"

"I killed Bin Laden!"

"Al Qaeda is on the run!"

"I'll give the American public 5 days to check out any bill before placing it before Congress!"

"When I am President there will be no more signing statements!"

"I will not be like President Bush who thinks he can rule by Executive Order!"

"Our borders are secure!"



Unless you can tolerate or defend a liar, any racial claims are moot!

Conrad_73's photo
Fri 09/05/14 09:32 AM

"So your people came here with land granted to them...

Interesting... "

So now it looks that you are opinionated about what someone else's ancestors did ? Would you like it when someone holds you accountable for what someone in your culture did in their past ? I thought that Jesus said "He that is without sin , throws the first stone" ?

I thought you started this discussion about Obama ? :(

So to jump on your "bandwagon" ..again... For me Obama is an idealist
that reads great speeches made by someone else from a teleprompt.
He was either too gullible to see the facade behind politics.Maybe no one ever told him that his sponsors do want something back in return for all those dollars. Or he knew what his role as politician would be.
The only thing that i can remember that was good about when Obama came to power is that he is an African American. But his actions are
from a corporate spokesman. If i want a metaphore then i choose
Dr Martin Luther King.



an IdeaWHAT?:laughing:

Idealism increases in direct proportion to one's distance from the problem.
Author: John Galsworthy 1867-1933, British Novelist, Playwright


"Idealism is fine, but as it approaches reality, the costs become prohibitive."
-William F. Buckley Jr.


mr_king_solomon's photo
Fri 09/05/14 10:01 AM
SMH

I can't wait to see how the next president is treated.

Obama faced UNPRECEDENTED obstructionism.

I can't wait.

msharmony's photo
Fri 09/05/14 10:23 AM
good luck with that

understanding where you are coming from, but you are truly sounding off to deaf ears in this particular crowd,,,,

Dodo_David's photo
Fri 09/05/14 10:37 AM

Obama faced UNPRECEDENTED obstructionism.


Another false claim being presented.

Anyway, the last POTUS was at the receiving end of hatred.
Did you complain about that hatred?

Dodo_David's photo
Fri 09/05/14 10:39 AM

good luck with that

understanding where you are coming from, but you are truly sounding off to deaf ears in this particular crowd,,,,


Nobody here is deaf. Other people here simply refuse to defend President Obama just because he a Democrat and/or black.

Others here have legitimate complaints about President Obama. Dig it.

Conrad_73's photo
Fri 09/05/14 11:22 AM

SMH



Obama faced UNPRECEDENTED obstructionism.




laugh laugh laugh

msharmony's photo
Fri 09/05/14 11:23 AM


good luck with that

understanding where you are coming from, but you are truly sounding off to deaf ears in this particular crowd,,,,


Nobody here is deaf. Other people here simply refuse to defend President Obama just because he a Democrat and/or black.

Others here have legitimate complaints about President Obama. Dig it.


'deaf ears' is actually just a sylloquism which refers to people not wishing to aknowledge , speak about, or consider something,,,,


and thst is not in reference to whether people defend someone based upon politics or race, its in reference to whether people will aknowledge or believe the experiences of others that have been based in their politics or race


Dodo_David's photo
Fri 09/05/14 11:24 AM

'deaf ears' is actually just a sylloquism which refers to people not wishing to aknowledge , speak about, or consider something,,,


So, do you acknowledge that others here have legitimate complaints about President Obama?

bashajones's photo
Fri 09/05/14 11:24 AM

SMH

I can't wait to see how the next president is treated.

Obama faced UNPRECEDENTED obstructionism.

I can't wait.


Obama is a liar. He is weak. And he is NO leader. But, you can always find someone to blame that on.

msharmony's photo
Fri 09/05/14 11:30 AM


'deaf ears' is actually just a sylloquism which refers to people not wishing to aknowledge , speak about, or consider something,,,


So, do you acknowledge that others here have legitimate complaints about President Obama?


I always have. I have never stated or supported an idea that the ONLY reason anyone objects to his decisions is his race. I have just been cognizant that it is, in fact, one of the reasons, based upon how the reaction happened when other Presidents made similar decisions, considering all other PResidents were white.



Dodo_David's photo
Fri 09/05/14 11:35 AM



'deaf ears' is actually just a sylloquism which refers to people not wishing to aknowledge , speak about, or consider something,,,


So, do you acknowledge that others here have legitimate complaints about President Obama?


I always have. I have never stated or supported an idea that the ONLY reason anyone objects to his decisions is his race. I have just been cognizant that it is, in fact, one of the reasons, based upon how the reaction happened when other Presidents made similar decisions, considering all other PResidents were white.


Apparently, you aren't aware of how other Presidents were treated just as harshly by critics.

bashajones's photo
Fri 09/05/14 11:40 AM




'deaf ears' is actually just a sylloquism which refers to people not wishing to aknowledge , speak about, or consider something,,,


So, do you acknowledge that others here have legitimate complaints about President Obama?


I always have. I have never stated or supported an idea that the ONLY reason anyone objects to his decisions is his race. I have just been cognizant that it is, in fact, one of the reasons, based upon how the reaction happened when other Presidents made similar decisions, considering all other PResidents were white.


Apparently, you aren't aware of how other Presidents were treated just as harshly by critics.


Yes. Liberals definitely kept their mouths shut when Bush made a mistake. They were very gracious with their rhetoric when he made a bad decision....lol.....wtf? Really?

msharmony's photo
Fri 09/05/14 11:55 AM
Edited by msharmony on Fri 09/05/14 11:55 AM




'deaf ears' is actually just a sylloquism which refers to people not wishing to aknowledge , speak about, or consider something,,,


So, do you acknowledge that others here have legitimate complaints about President Obama?


I always have. I have never stated or supported an idea that the ONLY reason anyone objects to his decisions is his race. I have just been cognizant that it is, in fact, one of the reasons, based upon how the reaction happened when other Presidents made similar decisions, considering all other PResidents were white.


Apparently, you aren't aware of how other Presidents were treated just as harshly by critics.




no, Im aware of the similar treatment, Im disappointed by the DISSIMILAR treatment

both are real things,,


were there white presidents in modern history accused of not being 'American enough' to be president AFTER THEY WERE ELECTED?

were there white presidents in modern history accused of forging their birth records ?

were there white presidents in modern history who had governors WAGGING THEIR FINGER IN THEIR FACE on national television?

were there white presidents in modern history who were interrupted by VERBAL OUTBURSTS during their state of the union?

were there white presidents who found a congressman had made a PUBLIC spectacle of their choice to basically protest his leadership by Planning to NOT ATTEND their speech?


yes, I am aware that dissent and disagreement have been at similar levels in other presidencies

but I am also aware that the DISRESPECT manifested from that dissent and disagreement has not,,,,



and Im not talking about pundits who have always made a living over being disrespectful and SENSATIONAL, IM talking about disrespect as it relates to the 'professional, elected and well paid PUBLIC OFFICIALS that are supposed to represent and work within the government


and have the POWER to institute or to fight policy and law

Dodo_David's photo
Fri 09/05/14 12:21 PM

were there white presidents in modern history accused of not being 'American enough' to be president AFTER THEY WERE ELECTED?

were there white presidents in modern history accused of forging their birth records ?

were there white presidents in modern history who had governors WAGGING THEIR FINGER IN THEIR FACE on national television?

were there white presidents in modern history who were interrupted by VERBAL OUTBURSTS during their state of the union?

were there white presidents who found a congressman had made a PUBLIC spectacle of their choice to basically protest his leadership by Planning to NOT ATTEND their speech?


yes, I am aware that dissent and disagreement have been at similar levels in other presidencies

but I am also aware that the DISRESPECT manifested from that dissent and disagreement has not,,,,



and Im not talking about pundits who have always made a living over being disrespectful and SENSATIONAL, IM talking about disrespect as it relates to the 'professional, elected and well paid PUBLIC OFFICIALS that are supposed to represent and work within the government


and have the POWER to institute or to fight policy and law


Yep, it was the racist Democrat supporters of Hillary Clinton who started the nonsense about President Obama not being born in the USA.

As for those other things, race isn't the cause of them.