Topic: Minimum Wage?
no photo
Fri 05/23/14 07:00 PM

“Have you ever wondered why Republicans are so interested in encouraging people to volunteer in their communities? It’s because volunteers work for no pay. Republicans have been trying to get people to work for no pay for a long time. ” George Carlin


And the Dumbocrats perfected the concept, not just working for free but to steal from others to give them some change while not working at all.

no photo
Fri 05/23/14 07:02 PM


“Have you ever wondered why Republicans are so interested in encouraging people to volunteer in their communities? It’s because volunteers work for no pay. Republicans have been trying to get people to work for no pay for a long time. ” George Carlin


They have? First time that I've heard that whopper. Must have been a drug induced pipedream. I was told that the Republicans wanted to kill children and old people. Which is it?
But, hey, I'm for it. But let's not stop there at $15/hr. go all in. Let's make it $30/hr minimum, with no food stamps, no housing assistance, no free medical ins., we'll see just how many will jump on that boat.


I think all of them should jump on that boat, I'll volunteer to drill the holes.

no photo
Fri 05/23/14 07:06 PM

Like, I needs me them Air Jordans, pimp wheels and mo gold blang ta match my teefs.

I got my biach workin now laugh

no photo
Fri 05/23/14 07:14 PM

George Carlin was a political comedian making a poitical joke

15 hour is far from the 'nothing' he mentions

15 hour is a full tank of gas in the first two hours , as opposed to the first four,,,,,30 hour would be, obviously, only one hour of work to fill the tank,,,, so one can get back and forth to work the remaining hours,,,,


$30 for a tank of gas, are you based in reality. At first I thought maybe Dirty Harry had suckered the rest of the US to pay part of Nevada's bill but he didn't. Let's see the cheapest gas seems to be Pahrump at $3.53 with Vegas being 2 cents higher at $3.55. The average small car has a 12 gallon tank, but even a 10 gallon fill-up would be over $35. Personally, just looking at a gas station is $75.

But of course, with all that extra cast floating around and with the possible reduction in goods available due to increased unemployment, then comes inflation which by the way gas doesn't count in CPI anymore so it's rise doesn't register on the index. Won't take long till gas back to $5. Now what?

no photo
Fri 05/23/14 07:20 PM

except no one is proposing 30/hr

what is being proposed is that the wage increase with the cost of living,, not vice versa


when the col doesn't increase, the wage doesn't need to either, but the col is CONSTANTLY increasing,,,,


That is just the problem, very little understanding of the economy while trying to drive the economy, sort of like that idiot in the White House and that idiotic economist that he employes.

The natural law, what happens in the microcosm also happens in the macrocosm and vice versa. It is all intricately tied together and can not be separated.

no photo
Fri 05/23/14 07:28 PM


except no one is proposing 30/hr

what is being proposed is that the wage increase with the cost of living,, not vice versa


when the col doesn't increase, the wage doesn't need to either, but the col is CONSTANTLY increasing,,,,


I hate when that cost of living goes up. What causes that?


The hidden tax, inflation. Impossible to avoid with fiat currency and fractional reserve banking based on debt. Without debt, the whole house of cards collapses, with debt it just takes longer to collapse but collapse is inevitable. As to inflation, when you keep injecting debt into an economy, then there is increased capital chasing the same level of goods, so everything costs more.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iP9H5fADC0E The short version.

msharmony's photo
Fri 05/23/14 07:32 PM
Edited by msharmony on Fri 05/23/14 07:33 PM


George Carlin was a political comedian making a poitical joke

15 hour is far from the 'nothing' he mentions

15 hour is a full tank of gas in the first two hours , as opposed to the first four,,,,,30 hour would be, obviously, only one hour of work to fill the tank,,,, so one can get back and forth to work the remaining hours,,,,


$30 for a tank of gas, are you based in reality. At first I thought maybe Dirty Harry had suckered the rest of the US to pay part of Nevada's bill but he didn't. Let's see the cheapest gas seems to be Pahrump at $3.53 with Vegas being 2 cents higher at $3.55. The average small car has a 12 gallon tank, but even a 10 gallon fill-up would be over $35. Personally, just looking at a gas station is $75.

But of course, with all that extra cast floating around and with the possible reduction in goods available due to increased unemployment, then comes inflation which by the way gas doesn't count in CPI anymore so it's rise doesn't register on the index. Won't take long till gas back to $5. Now what?


what?

gas prices aren't determined by minimum wage,,,,,,laugh

and Id like to see PROOF of this theory that a hike in minimum wage LEADS to some form of inflation that would affect the price of gas,,,

no photo
Fri 05/23/14 07:34 PM


So a person can live above the poverty level pretty much already with minimum wage or at least pretty close. So you are saying if people who cant afford to have kids dont then we dont need to raise minimum wage.?


Im saying as times change, and since the minimum wage only indicates the MINIMUM one can be paid , we should account for how many people are working jobs that are near to the minimum but who are trying to support families,,

that is to say, to raise the bar to a standard that at least supports a household of two,,,


The theorem that one dummy ok, hooks up with second dummy and decides only one will work and they should bring a third into this world. Now it is the world's fault that things are so miserable, the one working leaves and quits working also. Now everybody must chip in, well the government does have a gun, and pay for all the dummies. Marvelous theorem, becomes even more marvelous in operation.

no photo
Fri 05/23/14 07:36 PM



So a person can live above the poverty level pretty much already with minimum wage or at least pretty close. So you are saying if people who cant afford to have kids dont then we dont need to raise minimum wage.?


Im saying as times change, and since the minimum wage only indicates the MINIMUM one can be paid , we should account for how many people are working jobs that are near to the minimum but who are trying to support families,,

that is to say, to raise the bar to a standard that at least supports a household of two,,,


So you are saying the employer should be forced to pay more for unskilled labor because, through no fault of the employer, their workers are trying to support a family?


That is way too difficult a concept for the intended audience to conceive, after all they are entitled.

no photo
Fri 05/23/14 07:39 PM




New dedication, to the new multiple 100s of millions that will be dying because of that concept.

no photo
Fri 05/23/14 07:39 PM



So a person can live above the poverty level pretty much already with minimum wage or at least pretty close. So you are saying if people who cant afford to have kids dont then we dont need to raise minimum wage.?


Im saying as times change, and since the minimum wage only indicates the MINIMUM one can be paid , we should account for how many people are working jobs that are near to the minimum but who are trying to support families,,

that is to say, to raise the bar to a standard that at least supports a household of two,,,


...and you will invariably pay for it,since you're not the only one receiving a bigger Paycheck!

when the Hamburger costs a Dollar more,the Customer wants a Payraise as well,then the Milk goes up a Dollar/gal,Bread will be up a Buck,Rent increases etc!
Where does that leave you?laugh


Same quandary as before,so,lets raise the Minimum-Wage again,ad Infinitum!:laughing:

http://mises.org/daily/6638/Welfare-Minimum-Wages-and-Unemployment


Very true, same life increase currency in circulation, increase in inflation, same life now worse that life before.

no photo
Fri 05/23/14 07:44 PM
Edited by alnewman on Fri 05/23/14 07:45 PM




So a person can live above the poverty level pretty much already with minimum wage or at least pretty close. So you are saying if people who cant afford to have kids dont then we dont need to raise minimum wage.?


Im saying as times change, and since the minimum wage only indicates the MINIMUM one can be paid , we should account for how many people are working jobs that are near to the minimum but who are trying to support families,,

that is to say, to raise the bar to a standard that at least supports a household of two,,,


So you are saying the employer should be forced to pay more for unskilled labor because, through no fault of the employer, their workers are trying to support a family?


no, IM saying employers should pay REAONABLE and COMPETITIVE Wages that meet a standard for their employers needs, the way the employer sets their PRICES to meet the standards for their needs,,,

its a two way street, and both sides interests are important,,,


Screw the employee, if they don't like it, seek work elsewhere. An employer only needs to be reasonable and competitive when there are few that can meet the needs of the jobs. That doesn't apply to unskilled, hence the term unskilled. Then it's either take it or leave it, next.

And it has never been nor will ever be a two way street with unskilled, there is no value to negotiate on the part of the unskilled part. They have nothing to offer that the next person in line can't offer, in fact the next in line may be skilled with no other choice, in which case would you please get out of the way so that the employer can get a keeper.

no photo
Fri 05/23/14 07:49 PM


You dont need competitive wages for unskilled labor. The reason they pay so low is anyone can do it and anyone is easily replaced.


all labor is a skill,, whether it is a common skill or not is irrelevant

I understand wage should be commiserate with work, but even that is not the reality

who says a teacher isn't doing something that not everyone can do, and an entertainer too, but why would one make so much more than the other? because of being able to COMPETE based upon their PERSONAL Contribution to THEIR employer and their employers profits,,,

time is money, time and energy should be compensated,,,,


Teacher, about six years of their life getting indoctrinated on the skills of indoctrinating others. So you want the teachers pay without putting in the effort, sure you do, you're entitled.

no photo
Fri 05/23/14 07:51 PM

ahh,, the neverending stereotype wagon,,,,


people seeking more than minimum wage are now up there with the 'welfare queen' who wears high end clothes and drives a fancy car and jewelry,,,


whoa


Well you got that part right, both looking to get what they haven't earned for someone that has, both by using the coercion of the government's guns.

no photo
Fri 05/23/14 09:00 PM

what?

gas prices aren't determined by minimum wage,,,,,,laugh

and Id like to see PROOF of this theory that a hike in minimum wage LEADS to some form of inflation that would affect the price of gas,,,


Yeah, I agree with you, no clue at all. That takes care of what.

So another little understood subject for a snippet, followed by the universal symbol of just laugh it off.

Proof, first you need to understand the concept of inflation. What it is and why it exists, outside of that there is not proof of anything. The whole proof is in the what and the why?

And before you can understand inflation, you would need to understand the concepts of money and value. And by this long thread and many others, that will never happen in this lifetime.

So I guess that the whole concept will just remain a mystery, at least as it pertains to you. Oh, and if by miracle you do understand inflation, money and value, then the price of gas will not need to be explained and the proof is inherent.

Sojourning_Soul's photo
Sat 05/24/14 05:13 AM
Edited by Sojourning_Soul on Sat 05/24/14 05:21 AM

Thank god liberals are a dying breed..... but stupidity continues as the norm it seems ohwell

Some people just don't seem to get the fact that if wages rise, costs rise! Employers will always pass the cost of doing business along to the consumer so what do they care until that $10 burger or $9 cup of coffee doesn't fit the consumer budget any more?

Conrad_73's photo
Sat 05/24/14 05:21 AM



George Carlin was a political comedian making a poitical joke

15 hour is far from the 'nothing' he mentions

15 hour is a full tank of gas in the first two hours , as opposed to the first four,,,,,30 hour would be, obviously, only one hour of work to fill the tank,,,, so one can get back and forth to work the remaining hours,,,,


$30 for a tank of gas, are you based in reality. At first I thought maybe Dirty Harry had suckered the rest of the US to pay part of Nevada's bill but he didn't. Let's see the cheapest gas seems to be Pahrump at $3.53 with Vegas being 2 cents higher at $3.55. The average small car has a 12 gallon tank, but even a 10 gallon fill-up would be over $35. Personally, just looking at a gas station is $75.

But of course, with all that extra cast floating around and with the possible reduction in goods available due to increased unemployment, then comes inflation which by the way gas doesn't count in CPI anymore so it's rise doesn't register on the index. Won't take long till gas back to $5. Now what?


what?

gas prices aren't determined by minimum wage,,,,,,laugh

and Id like to see PROOF of this theory that a hike in minimum wage LEADS to some form of inflation that would affect the price of gas,,,


what do you think Higher Prices are?
And how do you think Prices are determined?laugh

Chazster's photo
Sat 05/24/14 08:32 AM




You dont need competitive wages for unskilled labor. The reason they pay so low is anyone can do it and anyone is easily replaced.


all labor is a skill,, whether it is a common skill or not is irrelevant

I understand wage should be commiserate with work, but even that is not the reality

who says a teacher isn't doing something that not everyone can do, and an entertainer too, but why would one make so much more than the other? because of being able to COMPETE based upon their PERSONAL Contribution to THEIR employer and their employers profits,,,

time is money, time and energy should be compensated,,,,

skilled labor
noun
1.
labor that requires special training for its satisfactory performance.


unskilled labor
noun
1.
work that requires practically no training or experience for its adequate or competent performance.

No not all labor is skilled




actually it is

skill: : the ability to do something that comes from training, experience, or practice

the CLASSIST definition of 'skilled LABOR' ,unfortunately, ties work to the 'training' (to be equated with financial investment)

and totally disregards the EXPERIENCE that comes freely from ambition and interest


if its not money, its not a value, if it didn't cost money, its not a value either,,,,

but, strictly speaking, any LABOR is a SKILL in that it has come from someones experiences or practice in doing that thing,,,


Actually its not. Just like Sun and sun light are two different things a skill and skilled labor are two different things. Nice try though.

no photo
Sat 05/24/14 11:25 AM

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/21/study-in-most-states-welfare-pays-more-than-minimum-wage-job/

When our entitlement programs are paying more for 'basic living' needs than what employers are paying their workers...there is a problem.

But the deeper issue is WHY are employers ABLE to pay so low? they shouldn't need a law, but it's because most feel they can't find a job anywhere else, and that is partly because we have wiped out the small-business in this country with way to high of taxes, and to many.

If a "burger flipper" could go next door to a mom and pop shop and make more money there they would, but if squeeze those startups out, then you have a study supply of people who you can then choose to pay whatever you want, because you know you are the game in town.

The wagers should have slowly been increasing over the years, but they have not.


Wow and someone said my writing was bad but it has been more than 40 years since my last writing class, was going to do a refresher but guess I'm still ahead of most, good enough for me.

Anyhow, after reading numerous times I believe I grasp the message. Let's see, we have wiped out the small businesses because of too high a taxes.

Understanding the Small Business Credit Crunch


Even as their big competitors are awash in capital, many locally owned businesses are struggling to secure the financing they need to grow. A new ILSR analysis has found that, since 2000, bank lending to large businesses is up 36 percent, while small business loan volume has fallen 14 percent and "micro" business loans — those under $100,000 — have plummeted 33 percent.


ROLLING BACK PROPERTY TAX PAYMENTS


Yet what Wal-Mart does not disclose in site fights-but is revealed
for the first time in this report—is the extent to which the company later in effect concedes the point about reduced property values. Once a store has been in operation for a while, Wal-Mart frequently challenges the assessed value that local officials assign to it for tax purposes. In an effort to cut the property tax it pays to local governments-revenue that pays for public education, police and fire protection and other vital services-Wal-Mart routinely tries to belittle the value of its own facilities.


So it doesn't seem to be a tax issue at all except from the "big-box" point of view, how they shaft the local community for property taxes. Now while the local governments are a pain in the butt constantly with their hands, they are more nuisances than a problem, a couple hundred dollars at best. And yes, while big boxes get a big break right from the beginning with tax rebates that aren't available to mom and pop, that still has nothing to do with wages.

The issue is the market, the small local shops that rightfully or not are perceived as overpriced and sheer size, the difference between making one stop or many. Way too big a bother for multiple stops, this entitlement generation just can't be bothered.

But that has nothing to do with wages except the concept. The big box stores hire anyone that can fog a mirror, the lowest of the skill set. That means to lowest wages possible to lower costs and keep the local mom and pop business from underselling them. But even that doesn't matter, it is just the revolving door between welfare and working, welfare until that runs out, work until enough credits for welfare, vicious circle.
But that still isn't the issue, it just begs the issue. The real issue starts with your source, the entitlement system, the system that maintains whole communities at the absolute control of government.

So now that all the trash is out of the way, just what are we talking about?

BLS: Percentage of Hourly Workers Earning Minimum Wage or Less in 2013 Falls to 4.3%

In the midst of the Obama administration's latest push to increase the federal minimum wage from $7.25 to $10.10 an hour, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has released an analysis showing the the percentage of hourly workers earning at or below the minimum wage is down to 4.3 percent, or 3.3 million workers. The decrease continues a trend of more than three decades, beginning with a high of 15 percent back in the early 1980s. The numbers have occasionally spiked in reaction to economic conditions, most recently in the so-called Great Recession from 2008 to 2010, but then resumed the downward direction.


4.3% of the population, straight from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. So we wish to condemn those that have earned their place in life to earn $10 or more an hour so that those not able can get what they haven't earned, typical liberal logic, never consider consequences, they are entitled.

no photo
Sat 05/24/14 11:30 AM


Thank god liberals are a dying breed..... but stupidity continues as the norm it seems ohwell

Some people just don't seem to get the fact that if wages rise, costs rise! Employers will always pass the cost of doing business along to the consumer so what do they care until that $10 burger or $9 cup of coffee doesn't fit the consumer budget any more?


Actually their is nothing wrong with liberals, the old classic liberals. The problem is that those now seen as liberals aren't liberals at all, they are the radical left, the progressives.

The same could be said for the other dimension, the conservatives. The days of the classical conservative has gone the way of the classical liberal. Those now labeled "conservatives" are the neo-cons, the radical right, the fascist. I believe the Tea Party is trying to get there but they keep getting hijack by the old school statists.