Articles Of Impeachment Filed By Black Republicans

Published on Sep 11, 2013

The National Black Republican Association filed Articles of Impeachment with Congress against President Barack Obama for his gross violations of our constitution and dereliction of duty as our commander-in-chief.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ji_UrifEmeo&feature=youtu.be

http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/bombshell-national-black-republican-association-files-articles-of-impeachment-against-barack-obama-aka-barry-soetoro/

Anyone heard anything further?

No, I've never heard of the National Black Republicans Association. I imagine they're yet another front group for the Koch Brothers, but from the article, their complains appear to be the same old whining about President Obama doing things that can be described in a negative fashion. NSA spying? It's been going on for decades. Punishing whistle-blowers? Was that supposed to be Snowden, who leaked classified documents to prove that the government was spying--already happening for decades--what whistle was blown?

If we don't read/hear more about this in the coming days and weeks, it's only because it's almost nothing new.

here you are!

http://www.nbra.info/

http://blackrepublican.blogspot.ch/search?updated-min=2014-01-01T00:00:00-05:00&updated-max=2015-01-01T00:00:00-05:00&max-results=6

http://blackrepublican.blogspot.ch/2013/08/black-american-citizens-file-articles.html

same way the DNC is a Front for Soros?

Their claims are nothing new. Correct.

A combination of non impeachable actions (having precedent before this President), improvable accusations and even actions involving congressional action that weren't solely attributed to the office of President.

The group is based in Sarasota Florida.


interesting note, such attempts aren't uncommon, and rarely go anywhere

articles were filed against bush late in his term over the Iraq war, KAtrina, 9/11 and guess what? NSA Spying

against Reagan for Iran Contra

against Bush Sr for the gulf war,,,


I wouldn't expect much here ,,,,

interesting info: Johnson was impeached for suspending (a direct presidential action) the secretary of war after congresss had overturned his decision

Clinton was impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice over HIS affair with an intern.

Nixon was impeached (Watergate) but stepped down before anything else came of it.

Impeachment in the United States is an expressed power of the legislature that allows for formal charges against a civil officer of government for crimes committed in office. The actual trial on those charges, and subsequent removal of an official on conviction on those charges, is separate from the act of impeachment itself.

Impeachment is analogous to indictment in regular court proceedings, while trial by the other house is analogous to the trial before judge and jury in regular courts. Typically, the lower house of the legislature will impeach the official and the upper house will conduct the trial.

At the federal level, Article II of the United States Constitution (Section 4) states that "The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors." The House of Representatives has the sole power of impeaching, while the United States Senate has the sole power to try all impeachments. The removal of impeached officials is automatic upon conviction in the Senate. In Nixon v. United States (1993), the Supreme Court determined that the federal judiciary cannot review such proceedings.WIKI

Impeachment doesn't mean removal from Office,and doesn't even mean there would be a Trial or a Conviction by the Senate!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_in_the_United_States

The cheerleaders sure jumped on that fast didn't they?

Yep, it's like being "fixed". You still have all the equipment, but you can only shoot blanks.

A pen without ink and a phone out of minutes

Does it really matter, you can draw up articles of impeachment until you turn blue but it does not alter the fact that the Senate is the tribunal. If Clinton could not be impeached with a predominately Republican Senate, what chance is there now?

"The perjury charge failed with 45 senators (all Republican) voting "guilty" and 55 senators (45 Democrats and 10 Republicans) voting "not guilty". The obstruction of justice charge failed with 50 senators (all Republican) voting "guilty" and 50 senators (45 Democrats and 5 Republicans) voting "not guilty". In both cases, a two-thirds majority of 67 senators would have been required for conviction."

Impeachment of Bill Clinton - Senate Votes

So is this just another little side show?

"He that is good for making excuses is seldom good for anything else."
- Benjamin Franklin

"It is above all in the present democratic age that the true friends of liberty and human grandeur must remain constantly vigilant and ready to prevent the social power from lightly sacrificing the particular rights of a few individuals to the general execution of its designs. In such times there is no citizen so obscure that it is not very dangerous to allow him to be oppressed, and there are no individual rights so unimportant that they can be sacrificed to arbitrariness with impunity."
- Alexis de Tocqueville

That pretty much defines that sentiment.

Do you really think that helped? It doesn't exist if you deny.

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin

"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
- Benjamin Franklin

"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."
- Benjamin Franklin

"Tricks and treachery are the practice of fools, that don't have brains enough to be honest."
- Benjamin Franklin

So many wise saying from a very wise man in response to a complete line of malarkey.

But in this case I would say it's more like a pen with ink or an Odumbophone with unlimited minutes expressing thoughts by ones incapable of thinking.

side note: the safelink phones were available before Obama ever even ran for President,

Nixon was not impeached. He resigned before he could be impeached.

Clinton was impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives.

An impeachment is the political version of an indictment.
It isn't a conviction.

Duh!

But he did receive Articles of Impeachment from the House Judiciary committee and was a shoe in for the house approving those articles to be presented to the Senate.

Funny though that Gerald Ford, the only President never elected to an executive office, pardoned Nixon in a very controversial executive order. Serves as the basis of today's political environment for the Executive office.

Article II, Section 2, Clause 1

"The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment."

Au contraire, the House does indict by the Articles of Impeachment but the full impeachment is the trail by the Senate, where if found guilty of impeachment results in removal from office, no more. However once removed from office makes the impeached individual a target for criminal and civil actions that can result in more.

Article I, Section 2, Clause 5

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Article I, Section 3, Clause 6

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Black's Law, Revised 4th Edition, 1968

IMPEACH. To accuse; to charge a liability upon; to sue. To dispute, disparage, deny, or contradict; as, to impeach a judgment or decree; or as used in the rule that a jury cannot "impeach their verdict." Wolfgram v. Schoepke, 123 Wis. 19, 100 N.W. 1056. To proceed against a public officer for crime or misfeasance, before a proper court, by the presentation of a written accusation called "articles of impeachment."

In the Law of Evidence. To call in question the veracity of a witness, by means of evidence adduced for that purpose, or the adducing of proof that a witness is unworthy of belief. Johnston v.
Belk-McKnight Co. of Newberry, 188 S.C. 149, 198 S.E. 395, 399.

IMPEACHMENT. A criminal proceeding against a public officer, before a quasi political court, instituted by a written accusation called "articles of impeachment;" for example, a written accusation by the house of representatives of the United States to the senate of the United States against an officer.

"Impeachment" of the Governor, within the meaning of section 16, art. 6, of the Constitution, is the adoption of articles of impeachment by the House of Representatives, and the presentation thereof to the Senate, and the indication by that body that the same are accepted for the purpose of permitting prosecution thereof, and the impeachment of the Governor operates to suspend him; the duties and emoluments of the office automatically devolving upon the Lieutenant Governor for the remainder of the term or until the disability is removed by the acquittal of the Governor of the charges preferred against him. State v. Chambers,
96 Okl. 78, 220 P. 890, 891, 30 A.L.R. 1144; People ex rel. Robin v. Hayes, 143 N.Y.S. 325, 329, 82 Misc. 165.

In England, a prosecution by the house of commons before the house of lords of a commoner for treason, or other high crimes and misdemeanors, or of a peer for any crime.

Evidence
The adducing of proof that a witness is unworthy of belief. State v. Roybal, 33 N.M. 540, 273 P. 919, 922.

General
Articles of impeachment. The formal written allegation of the causes for an impeachment, answering the same purpose as an indictment in an ordinary criminal proceeding.