Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Topic: Tax payers chip in on Meeshells birthday present
msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Sun 01/12/14 10:35 PM
really? so is your argument that no one can be 'self employed'? haaa ok, in that case the whole argument about whether self employed take vacations is irrelevant No, my argument is that your insistence you knew what self employed was when in actuality it is but a misnomer made your conclusion totally mute. And finally you come to the correct conclusion, your argument was irrelevant and unjustified. your argument is a non argument actually I made a statement about self employed that was met wit an allegation that I Didn't understand what self employed was I supplied the DEFINITION from the IRS of what is considered self employd and I was met with an allegation that the IRS is not a relevant or reliable source I gave examples of four people, considering themselves self employed and defined as such by the IRS and I was met with some pedantic nonsense about specific sections of the US code lol my argument is not mute, its just being distracted from by some inane requirement to provide a definition of self employed that others will agree is sufficient enough for THEIR personal perception,,, my argument , that self employed take vacations, is yet to be proven untrue,,, and still stands unless someone more 'enlightened' about what 'self employed' means can provide the definition for us that will prove once and for all that my argument is false,,,, Get a grip. my thoughts exactly,, still waiting for the logical argument about how self empioyed CAN NOT take vacations,, even though I personally know of several individuals who are and do,,, I wont hold my breath, but I will check back for some more fascinating posts about US code and legal definitions,,,,

alnewman Joined Sat 12/14/13 Posts: 4009	Mon 01/13/14 02:50 AM
really? so is your argument that no one can be 'self employed'? haaa ok, in that case the whole argument about whether self employed take vacations is irrelevant No, my argument is that your insistence you knew what self employed was when in actuality it is but a misnomer made your conclusion totally mute. And finally you come to the correct conclusion, your argument was irrelevant and unjustified. your argument is a non argument actually I made a statement about self employed that was met wit an allegation that I Didn't understand what self employed was I supplied the DEFINITION from the IRS of what is considered self employd and I was met with an allegation that the IRS is not a relevant or reliable source I gave examples of four people, considering themselves self employed and defined as such by the IRS and I was met with some pedantic nonsense about specific sections of the US code lol my argument is not mute, its just being distracted from by some inane requirement to provide a definition of self employed that others will agree is sufficient enough for THEIR personal perception,,, my argument , that self employed take vacations, is yet to be proven untrue,,, and still stands unless someone more 'enlightened' about what 'self employed' means can provide the definition for us that will prove once and for all that my argument is false,,,, Get a grip. my thoughts exactly,, still waiting for the logical argument about how self empioyed CAN NOT take vacations,, even though I personally know of several individuals who are and do,,, I wont hold my breath, but I will check back for some more fascinating posts about US code and legal definitions,,,, Oh my, it is so much fun leading you around like a little puppy dog.

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Mon 01/13/14 08:31 AM Edited by msharmony on Mon 01/13/14 08:32 AM
following is more like it,,, its a public FORUM,, still no logical response huh? no worries,, Im bored with waiting,,,,on to another thread,,,

Drivinmenutz Joined Wed 11/14/07 Posts: 4290	Mon 01/13/14 09:09 AM Edited by Drivinmenutz on Mon 01/13/14 09:12 AM
my thoughts exactly,, still waiting for the logical argument about how self empioyed CAN NOT take vacations,, even though I personally know of several individuals who are and do,,, I wont hold my breath, but I will check back for some more fascinating posts about US code and legal definitions,,,, Depends on the business. Depends on what you are trying to do with the business. Depends on a lot of things. I know several who cannot or could not take vacations for a long time (several years). When building a business you're often considered "married" to your job. Almost all your profits go back into said business, and many times you are working 80 hours a week to manage everything and keep things afloat. Many times it would be considered irresponsible to take a vacation. And even those that do, often can't for longer than 3 or 4 days, unless they are big and profitable enough to hire someone to manage the issues that occur when the owner is away.

willing2 Joined Sun 06/08/08 Posts: 20221	Mon 01/13/14 09:21 AM
In my building maint. Bus.,I tested potential employees. I'd put a marked 50 dollar bill next to an office chair. If, it was gone,I'll take my bill back and they were gone. Unfortunately,many employees aren't satisfied with the pay and rip off their employers.

willing2 Joined Sun 06/08/08 Posts: 20221	Mon 01/13/14 09:24 AM
Like Meeshel. She ain't got a job,nannys raise the kids. She steals taxpayers money and throws it around and in our faces.