Topic: U.S. policy in Syria | |
---|---|
Fox! I hope your people succeed in purging those foreign dogs from your country... and your cause.
![]() Anyone caught fighting who is not Syrian should be eliminated... Enough of these foreign fighters in YOUR land! |
|
|
|
yeah,, and many administrations before ,,, how did Hussein get his gas again? i'm sorry, i thought barry was president now, the present... so now you wanna bring up the past? and, since you did, when that was sold to saddam, were we at war with them? no, selling weapons to an enemy is actually treason, and who are we at war with? the same terrorists that are killing our soldiers now? so barry wants to take our guns, give them to mexican cartels and the same terrorists we are fighting in afganistan... totally worthy of the "peace" prize.... ' are we at war with those who follow islam? whts your point exactly? my point is, its part of US policy,, LONG BEFORE OBAMA to sell and trade arms that go into the hands of people who,, guess what? use them sometimes to kill innocent people that's what guns do US has been in the gun industry for decades,, just wanted to clear up any dilusion that this was in some exclusive way about OBama or this administration,,, US dropped a NUCLER BOMB on innocent people US armed Hussein US has armed more 'rebels' than one can shake stick at,,,,, just using the word 'islamist' or 'rebel' doesn't tell anyone anything about who is actually being armed or for what Simply proves the corruption of gov't. This POTUS however provides arms and support to our enemies WHILE we are at war with them assuming much the article doesn't say who is being armed,, so how do we know its someone we are 'at war' with? try reading the newspaper, or reading articles on the internet.. there's plenty of sources that have documented this... and why is barry getting involved anyway? what does syria's civil war have to do with the US? |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Thu 12/19/13 08:52 AM
|
|
yeah,, and many administrations before ,,, how did Hussein get his gas again? i'm sorry, i thought barry was president now, the present... so now you wanna bring up the past? and, since you did, when that was sold to saddam, were we at war with them? no, selling weapons to an enemy is actually treason, and who are we at war with? the same terrorists that are killing our soldiers now? so barry wants to take our guns, give them to mexican cartels and the same terrorists we are fighting in afganistan... totally worthy of the "peace" prize.... ' are we at war with those who follow islam? whts your point exactly? my point is, its part of US policy,, LONG BEFORE OBAMA to sell and trade arms that go into the hands of people who,, guess what? use them sometimes to kill innocent people that's what guns do US has been in the gun industry for decades,, just wanted to clear up any dilusion that this was in some exclusive way about OBama or this administration,,, US dropped a NUCLER BOMB on innocent people US armed Hussein US has armed more 'rebels' than one can shake stick at,,,,, just using the word 'islamist' or 'rebel' doesn't tell anyone anything about who is actually being armed or for what Simply proves the corruption of gov't. This POTUS however provides arms and support to our enemies WHILE we are at war with them assuming much the article doesn't say who is being armed,, so how do we know its someone we are 'at war' with? ![]() |
|
|
|
yeah,, and many administrations before ,,, how did Hussein get his gas again? i'm sorry, i thought barry was president now, the present... so now you wanna bring up the past? and, since you did, when that was sold to saddam, were we at war with them? no, selling weapons to an enemy is actually treason, and who are we at war with? the same terrorists that are killing our soldiers now? so barry wants to take our guns, give them to mexican cartels and the same terrorists we are fighting in afganistan... totally worthy of the "peace" prize.... ' are we at war with those who follow islam? whts your point exactly? my point is, its part of US policy,, LONG BEFORE OBAMA to sell and trade arms that go into the hands of people who,, guess what? use them sometimes to kill innocent people that's what guns do US has been in the gun industry for decades,, just wanted to clear up any dilusion that this was in some exclusive way about OBama or this administration,,, US dropped a NUCLER BOMB on innocent people US armed Hussein US has armed more 'rebels' than one can shake stick at,,,,, just using the word 'islamist' or 'rebel' doesn't tell anyone anything about who is actually being armed or for what Simply proves the corruption of gov't. This POTUS however provides arms and support to our enemies WHILE we are at war with them assuming much the article doesn't say who is being armed,, so how do we know its someone we are 'at war' with? ![]() i think it's been established that king barry doesn't worry about that little piece of paper... |
|
|
|
yeah,, and many administrations before ,,, how did Hussein get his gas again? i'm sorry, i thought barry was president now, the present... so now you wanna bring up the past? and, since you did, when that was sold to saddam, were we at war with them? no, selling weapons to an enemy is actually treason, and who are we at war with? the same terrorists that are killing our soldiers now? so barry wants to take our guns, give them to mexican cartels and the same terrorists we are fighting in afganistan... totally worthy of the "peace" prize.... ' are we at war with those who follow islam? whts your point exactly? my point is, its part of US policy,, LONG BEFORE OBAMA to sell and trade arms that go into the hands of people who,, guess what? use them sometimes to kill innocent people that's what guns do US has been in the gun industry for decades,, just wanted to clear up any dilusion that this was in some exclusive way about OBama or this administration,,, US dropped a NUCLER BOMB on innocent people US armed Hussein US has armed more 'rebels' than one can shake stick at,,,,, just using the word 'islamist' or 'rebel' doesn't tell anyone anything about who is actually being armed or for what Simply proves the corruption of gov't. This POTUS however provides arms and support to our enemies WHILE we are at war with them assuming much the article doesn't say who is being armed,, so how do we know its someone we are 'at war' with? try reading the newspaper, or reading articles on the internet.. there's plenty of sources that have documented this... and why is barry getting involved anyway? what does syria's civil war have to do with the US? its not a topic that interests me enough to seek out other articles,, this forum interests me so IM commenting on what is provided here in this forum since when did 'considering' something turn into becoming involved? since when does a president get 'involved' with anything by themselves,,,, they speak on behalf government and citizens, not for their person,,, Presidents work with theit CONGRESS ,,, not alone |
|
|
|
yeah,, and many administrations before ,,, how did Hussein get his gas again? i'm sorry, i thought barry was president now, the present... so now you wanna bring up the past? and, since you did, when that was sold to saddam, were we at war with them? no, selling weapons to an enemy is actually treason, and who are we at war with? the same terrorists that are killing our soldiers now? so barry wants to take our guns, give them to mexican cartels and the same terrorists we are fighting in afganistan... totally worthy of the "peace" prize.... ' are we at war with those who follow islam? whts your point exactly? my point is, its part of US policy,, LONG BEFORE OBAMA to sell and trade arms that go into the hands of people who,, guess what? use them sometimes to kill innocent people that's what guns do US has been in the gun industry for decades,, just wanted to clear up any dilusion that this was in some exclusive way about OBama or this administration,,, US dropped a NUCLER BOMB on innocent people US armed Hussein US has armed more 'rebels' than one can shake stick at,,,,, just using the word 'islamist' or 'rebel' doesn't tell anyone anything about who is actually being armed or for what Simply proves the corruption of gov't. This POTUS however provides arms and support to our enemies WHILE we are at war with them assuming much the article doesn't say who is being armed,, so how do we know its someone we are 'at war' with? try reading the newspaper, or reading articles on the internet.. there's plenty of sources that have documented this... and why is barry getting involved anyway? what does syria's civil war have to do with the US? its not a topic that interests me enough to seek out other articles,, this forum interests me so IM commenting on what is provided here in this forum since when did 'considering' something turn into becoming involved? since when does a president get 'involved' with anything by themselves,,,, they speak on behalf government and citizens, not for their person,,, Presidents work with theit CONGRESS ,,, not alone umm.. due to your lack of not being interested, congress said no, and barry wanted to anyway... read up |
|
|
|
The 2 parties, and all 3 branches of gov't, controlled by bankers and Wall Street CEOs, could care less about what the people think. We are nothing more than an obstacle in their way to the power and privilege they seek. Oliver Stone laid it out pretty well.... The Untold History Of The United States http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/120359/The_Untold_History_Of_The_United_States_ep07/ |
|
|
|
yeah,, and many administrations before ,,, how did Hussein get his gas again? i'm sorry, i thought barry was president now, the present... so now you wanna bring up the past? and, since you did, when that was sold to saddam, were we at war with them? no, selling weapons to an enemy is actually treason, and who are we at war with? the same terrorists that are killing our soldiers now? so barry wants to take our guns, give them to mexican cartels and the same terrorists we are fighting in afganistan... totally worthy of the "peace" prize.... ' are we at war with those who follow islam? whts your point exactly? my point is, its part of US policy,, LONG BEFORE OBAMA to sell and trade arms that go into the hands of people who,, guess what? use them sometimes to kill innocent people that's what guns do US has been in the gun industry for decades,, just wanted to clear up any dilusion that this was in some exclusive way about OBama or this administration,,, US dropped a NUCLER BOMB on innocent people US armed Hussein US has armed more 'rebels' than one can shake stick at,,,,, just using the word 'islamist' or 'rebel' doesn't tell anyone anything about who is actually being armed or for what Simply proves the corruption of gov't. This POTUS however provides arms and support to our enemies WHILE we are at war with them assuming much the article doesn't say who is being armed,, so how do we know its someone we are 'at war' with? try reading the newspaper, or reading articles on the internet.. there's plenty of sources that have documented this... and why is barry getting involved anyway? what does syria's civil war have to do with the US? its not a topic that interests me enough to seek out other articles,, this forum interests me so IM commenting on what is provided here in this forum since when did 'considering' something turn into becoming involved? since when does a president get 'involved' with anything by themselves,,,, they speak on behalf government and citizens, not for their person,,, Presidents work with theit CONGRESS ,,, not alone umm.. due to your lack of not being interested, congress said no, and barry wanted to anyway... read up and? |
|
|
|
yeah,, and many administrations before ,,, how did Hussein get his gas again? i'm sorry, i thought barry was president now, the present... so now you wanna bring up the past? and, since you did, when that was sold to saddam, were we at war with them? no, selling weapons to an enemy is actually treason, and who are we at war with? the same terrorists that are killing our soldiers now? so barry wants to take our guns, give them to mexican cartels and the same terrorists we are fighting in afganistan... totally worthy of the "peace" prize.... ' are we at war with those who follow islam? whts your point exactly? my point is, its part of US policy,, LONG BEFORE OBAMA to sell and trade arms that go into the hands of people who,, guess what? use them sometimes to kill innocent people that's what guns do US has been in the gun industry for decades,, just wanted to clear up any dilusion that this was in some exclusive way about OBama or this administration,,, US dropped a NUCLER BOMB on innocent people US armed Hussein US has armed more 'rebels' than one can shake stick at,,,,, just using the word 'islamist' or 'rebel' doesn't tell anyone anything about who is actually being armed or for what Simply proves the corruption of gov't. This POTUS however provides arms and support to our enemies WHILE we are at war with them assuming much the article doesn't say who is being armed,, so how do we know its someone we are 'at war' with? ![]() i think it's been established that king barry doesn't worry about that little piece of paper... that piece of paper states: congress has power To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations; To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water president has power to make treaties and that all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; other countries are also our concern, even in the Constitution,,, |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Thu 12/19/13 10:23 AM
|
|
yeah,, and many administrations before ,,, how did Hussein get his gas again? i'm sorry, i thought barry was president now, the present... so now you wanna bring up the past? and, since you did, when that was sold to saddam, were we at war with them? no, selling weapons to an enemy is actually treason, and who are we at war with? the same terrorists that are killing our soldiers now? so barry wants to take our guns, give them to mexican cartels and the same terrorists we are fighting in afganistan... totally worthy of the "peace" prize.... ' are we at war with those who follow islam? whts your point exactly? my point is, its part of US policy,, LONG BEFORE OBAMA to sell and trade arms that go into the hands of people who,, guess what? use them sometimes to kill innocent people that's what guns do US has been in the gun industry for decades,, just wanted to clear up any dilusion that this was in some exclusive way about OBama or this administration,,, US dropped a NUCLER BOMB on innocent people US armed Hussein US has armed more 'rebels' than one can shake stick at,,,,, just using the word 'islamist' or 'rebel' doesn't tell anyone anything about who is actually being armed or for what Simply proves the corruption of gov't. This POTUS however provides arms and support to our enemies WHILE we are at war with them assuming much the article doesn't say who is being armed,, so how do we know its someone we are 'at war' with? ![]() i think it's been established that king barry doesn't worry about that little piece of paper... that piece of paper states: congress has power To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations; To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water president has power to make treaties and that all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; other countries are also our concern, even in the Constitution,,, Congress has the power, if it is the will of the people.....NOT the POTUS or congress on its own whim And the "High Seas" does not mean any foreign country or its territorial waters Treaties and trade maybe, but it warns against alliances Our Constitution can not dictate foreign policies, and letters of Mark must be recognized by those foreign nations before they can be serviced |
|
|
|
Fox! I hope your people succeed in purging those foreign dogs from your country... and your cause. ![]() Anyone caught fighting who is not Syrian should be eliminated... Enough of these foreign fighters in YOUR land! Would that include the Russians,Iranians and Hezbollah too? |
|
|
|
yeah,, and many administrations before ,,, how did Hussein get his gas again? i'm sorry, i thought barry was president now, the present... so now you wanna bring up the past? and, since you did, when that was sold to saddam, were we at war with them? no, selling weapons to an enemy is actually treason, and who are we at war with? the same terrorists that are killing our soldiers now? so barry wants to take our guns, give them to mexican cartels and the same terrorists we are fighting in afganistan... totally worthy of the "peace" prize.... ' are we at war with those who follow islam? whts your point exactly? my point is, its part of US policy,, LONG BEFORE OBAMA to sell and trade arms that go into the hands of people who,, guess what? use them sometimes to kill innocent people that's what guns do US has been in the gun industry for decades,, just wanted to clear up any dilusion that this was in some exclusive way about OBama or this administration,,, US dropped a NUCLER BOMB on innocent people US armed Hussein US has armed more 'rebels' than one can shake stick at,,,,, just using the word 'islamist' or 'rebel' doesn't tell anyone anything about who is actually being armed or for what Simply proves the corruption of gov't. This POTUS however provides arms and support to our enemies WHILE we are at war with them assuming much the article doesn't say who is being armed,, so how do we know its someone we are 'at war' with? try reading the newspaper, or reading articles on the internet.. there's plenty of sources that have documented this... and why is barry getting involved anyway? what does syria's civil war have to do with the US? its not a topic that interests me enough to seek out other articles,, this forum interests me so IM commenting on what is provided here in this forum since when did 'considering' something turn into becoming involved? since when does a president get 'involved' with anything by themselves,,,, they speak on behalf government and citizens, not for their person,,, Presidents work with theit CONGRESS ,,, not alone Newsflash! Two federal judges have declared Obama's actions unconstitutional where he has bypassed congress and made SECRET executive orders! One judge came from liberal beginnings and the other from conservative. http://beforeitsnews.com/economics-and-politics/2013/12/judge-rules-against-secret-law-in-center-for-effective-government-lawsuit-2459800.html “The government appears to adopt the cavalier attitude that the President should be permitted to convey orders throughout the Executive Branch without public oversight … to engage in what is in effect governance by ‘secret law,’” Huvelle said. “ This ruling goes nicely with the previous finding by Judge Richard Leon earlier in the week regarding the unconstitutionality of the NSA spying program . Finally our resident “Constitutional Scholar” is getting a well-deserved lesson on the Constitution . |
|
|
|
I must have missed something, nothing in the link provided mentioned anything about constitutionality,,,
and it was about One judges ruling to release some information,, |
|
|
|
I must have missed something, nothing in the link provided mentioned anything about constitutionality,,, and it was about One judges ruling to release some information,, It would appear you missed everything. |
|
|
|
lol,, nope,, nothing about constitutionality in the link provided,
|
|
|
|
I must have missed something, nothing in the link provided mentioned anything about constitutionality,,, and it was about One judges ruling to release some information,, It would appear you missed everything. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
anyone care to post the line that mentions constitutionality,, instead of avoiding the issue with laughter and other comments ?
if one posts that a link is about the consitutionality of something, surely they can post the SPECIFIC part of the link that states their claim...? but probably not,,,,if its not really there |
|
|
|
anyone care to post the line that mentions constitutionality,, instead of avoiding the issue with laughter and other comments ? if one posts that a link is about the consitutionality of something, surely they can post the SPECIFIC part of the link that states their claim...? but probably not,,,,if its not really there why? you already stated you don't care enough to read it anyway... lets us know when you do care enough |
|
|
|
Edited by
Ɔʎɹɐx
on
Thu 12/19/13 11:50 AM
|
|
to make things clear , first of all , as a Syrian i am against any involvement of any other country in the Syrian mess for sure , and i don't think that many are interested in that ... but if it happened , why for hell's sake it would be in the terrorists side !
@msharmony : do you think that term "rebels" could be used to describe bunch of killers who came from all around the globe to make me pray to their God against my will ? i don't think so ... rebels fight for freedom and better future , not for Allah Akbar !! @Johnn111 : thanks friend for your true feelings , each nation has been through bad times , that's how life is going on .. |
|
|
|
The 2 parties, and all 3 branches of gov't, controlled by bankers and Wall Street CEOs, could care less about what the people think. We are nothing more than an obstacle in their way to the power and privilege they seek. Oliver Stone laid it out pretty well.... The Untold History Of The United States http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/120359/The_Untold_History_Of_The_United_States_ep07/ http://beforeitsnews.com/economy/2013/12/this-secret-group-controls-the-world-2579670.html?currentSplittedPage=0 you might find this interesting... |
|
|