Topic: Racist DHS employee fired | |
---|---|
we all have our "opinions", but it does advocate war, regardless... is there something i missed about white people getting ready to go to war with the blacks? did i not get that memo? what exactly is he defending the blacks from? does he want want to kill white babies too? or does he want protect the blacks from the evil white babies? sometimes the wording makes a big difference.... from what I saw ,he is PARANOID about an impending danger upon blacks that they need to be able to DEFEND Themselves from I dont see it as advocating(recommending) war,, I see it as advocating self defense,,, much like those who think americans should be prepared to defend themself against communists and government,,,etc,,, they arent seeking to START War,, they are paranoid enough about the reality of war being started by SOMEONE ELSE that they obsess over their preparedness its racist because it is based on race, and it is fear mongering because it seeks to enlist by spreading fear,,,but not advocatingfor war,,, in my opinion from what? genocide your being suspiciously vague here... what genocide? why? its his paranoia not mind genocide: the deliberate killing of a large group of people, esp. those of a particular ethnic group or nation. I would just GUESS that would be the group he considers himself a part of,,, so your opinion is that he's not racist, just batchit crazy? I think you have been missing some posts...lol my opinions are 1. He is racist, the site is racist 2. Americans are 'free' to be racist and most all are 3. His reason for being fired is not specific in the op but no doubt was due to violating something in his CONTRACT,, where the website was concerned 4. He has a paranoia about genocide. 5. The site is fear mongering. |
|
|
|
we all have our "opinions", but it does advocate war, regardless... is there something i missed about white people getting ready to go to war with the blacks? did i not get that memo? what exactly is he defending the blacks from? does he want want to kill white babies too? or does he want protect the blacks from the evil white babies? sometimes the wording makes a big difference.... from what I saw ,he is PARANOID about an impending danger upon blacks that they need to be able to DEFEND Themselves from I dont see it as advocating(recommending) war,, I see it as advocating self defense,,, much like those who think americans should be prepared to defend themself against communists and government,,,etc,,, they arent seeking to START War,, they are paranoid enough about the reality of war being started by SOMEONE ELSE that they obsess over their preparedness its racist because it is based on race, and it is fear mongering because it seeks to enlist by spreading fear,,,but not advocatingfor war,,, in my opinion from what? genocide your being suspiciously vague here... what genocide? why? its his paranoia not mind genocide: the deliberate killing of a large group of people, esp. those of a particular ethnic group or nation. I would just GUESS that would be the group he considers himself a part of,,, so your opinion is that he's not racist, just batchit crazy? I think you have been missing some posts...lol my opinions are 1. He is racist, the site is racist 2. Americans are 'free' to be racist and most all are 3. His reason for being fired is not specific in the op but no doubt was due to violating something in his CONTRACT,, where the website was concerned 4. He has a paranoia about genocide. 5. The site is fear mongering. ok, that sums it all up fairly neatly... i agree, except with #2... white people cannot be racists, any other race is free to be racist, but not whites.... |
|
|
|
we all have our "opinions", but it does advocate war, regardless... is there something i missed about white people getting ready to go to war with the blacks? did i not get that memo? what exactly is he defending the blacks from? does he want want to kill white babies too? or does he want protect the blacks from the evil white babies? sometimes the wording makes a big difference.... from what I saw ,he is PARANOID about an impending danger upon blacks that they need to be able to DEFEND Themselves from I dont see it as advocating(recommending) war,, I see it as advocating self defense,,, much like those who think americans should be prepared to defend themself against communists and government,,,etc,,, they arent seeking to START War,, they are paranoid enough about the reality of war being started by SOMEONE ELSE that they obsess over their preparedness its racist because it is based on race, and it is fear mongering because it seeks to enlist by spreading fear,,,but not advocatingfor war,,, in my opinion from what? genocide your being suspiciously vague here... what genocide? why? its his paranoia not mind genocide: the deliberate killing of a large group of people, esp. those of a particular ethnic group or nation. I would just GUESS that would be the group he considers himself a part of,,, so your opinion is that he's not racist, just batchit crazy? I think you have been missing some posts...lol my opinions are 1. He is racist, the site is racist 2. Americans are 'free' to be racist and most all are 3. His reason for being fired is not specific in the op but no doubt was due to violating something in his CONTRACT,, where the website was concerned 4. He has a paranoia about genocide. 5. The site is fear mongering. ok, that sums it all up fairly neatly... i agree, except with #2... white people cannot be racists, any other race is free to be racist, but not whites.... white people invented racism in america,,lol just the truth and yeah, they are just as free to be racist as anyone else,,but like anyone else, they are not free to DISCRIMINATE in hiring and education |
|
|
|
we all have our "opinions", but it does advocate war, regardless... is there something i missed about white people getting ready to go to war with the blacks? did i not get that memo? what exactly is he defending the blacks from? does he want want to kill white babies too? or does he want protect the blacks from the evil white babies? sometimes the wording makes a big difference.... from what I saw ,he is PARANOID about an impending danger upon blacks that they need to be able to DEFEND Themselves from I dont see it as advocating(recommending) war,, I see it as advocating self defense,,, much like those who think americans should be prepared to defend themself against communists and government,,,etc,,, they arent seeking to START War,, they are paranoid enough about the reality of war being started by SOMEONE ELSE that they obsess over their preparedness its racist because it is based on race, and it is fear mongering because it seeks to enlist by spreading fear,,,but not advocatingfor war,,, in my opinion from what? genocide your being suspiciously vague here... what genocide? why? its his paranoia not mind genocide: the deliberate killing of a large group of people, esp. those of a particular ethnic group or nation. I would just GUESS that would be the group he considers himself a part of,,, so your opinion is that he's not racist, just batchit crazy? I think you have been missing some posts...lol my opinions are 1. He is racist, the site is racist 2. Americans are 'free' to be racist and most all are 3. His reason for being fired is not specific in the op but no doubt was due to violating something in his CONTRACT,, where the website was concerned 4. He has a paranoia about genocide. 5. The site is fear mongering. ok, that sums it all up fairly neatly... i agree, except with #2... white people cannot be racists, any other race is free to be racist, but not whites.... white people invented racism in america,,lol just the truth and yeah, they are just as free to be racist as anyone else,,but like anyone else, they are not free to DISCRIMINATE in hiring and education i'm guessing you don't understand anymore about being white than i do about being black... if that was the case, why are only white people convicted of hate crimes? here is one reason why... http://www.examiner.com/article/exclusive-offender-data-for-fbi-hate-crime-statistics-to-be-updated-for-2013 |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Tue 12/17/13 11:45 AM
|
|
we all have our "opinions", but it does advocate war, regardless... is there something i missed about white people getting ready to go to war with the blacks? did i not get that memo? what exactly is he defending the blacks from? does he want want to kill white babies too? or does he want protect the blacks from the evil white babies? sometimes the wording makes a big difference.... from what I saw ,he is PARANOID about an impending danger upon blacks that they need to be able to DEFEND Themselves from I dont see it as advocating(recommending) war,, I see it as advocating self defense,,, much like those who think americans should be prepared to defend themself against communists and government,,,etc,,, they arent seeking to START War,, they are paranoid enough about the reality of war being started by SOMEONE ELSE that they obsess over their preparedness its racist because it is based on race, and it is fear mongering because it seeks to enlist by spreading fear,,,but not advocatingfor war,,, in my opinion from what? genocide your being suspiciously vague here... what genocide? why? its his paranoia not mind genocide: the deliberate killing of a large group of people, esp. those of a particular ethnic group or nation. I would just GUESS that would be the group he considers himself a part of,,, so your opinion is that he's not racist, just batchit crazy? I think you have been missing some posts...lol my opinions are 1. He is racist, the site is racist 2. Americans are 'free' to be racist and most all are 3. His reason for being fired is not specific in the op but no doubt was due to violating something in his CONTRACT,, where the website was concerned 4. He has a paranoia about genocide. 5. The site is fear mongering. ok, that sums it all up fairly neatly... i agree, except with #2... white people cannot be racists, any other race is free to be racist, but not whites.... white people invented racism in america,,lol just the truth and yeah, they are just as free to be racist as anyone else,,but like anyone else, they are not free to DISCRIMINATE in hiring and education i'm guessing you don't understand anymore about being white than i do about being black... if that was the case, why are only white people convicted of hate crimes? here is one reason why... http://www.examiner.com/article/exclusive-offender-data-for-fbi-hate-crime-statistics-to-be-updated-for-2013 actually, only slightly over half identified are white,,, http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2011/narratives/offenders and committing an actual crime is different than not being allowed to be racist |
|
|
|
we all have our "opinions", but it does advocate war, regardless... is there something i missed about white people getting ready to go to war with the blacks? did i not get that memo? what exactly is he defending the blacks from? does he want want to kill white babies too? or does he want protect the blacks from the evil white babies? sometimes the wording makes a big difference.... from what I saw ,he is PARANOID about an impending danger upon blacks that they need to be able to DEFEND Themselves from I dont see it as advocating(recommending) war,, I see it as advocating self defense,,, much like those who think americans should be prepared to defend themself against communists and government,,,etc,,, they arent seeking to START War,, they are paranoid enough about the reality of war being started by SOMEONE ELSE that they obsess over their preparedness its racist because it is based on race, and it is fear mongering because it seeks to enlist by spreading fear,,,but not advocatingfor war,,, in my opinion from what? genocide your being suspiciously vague here... what genocide? why? its his paranoia not mind genocide: the deliberate killing of a large group of people, esp. those of a particular ethnic group or nation. I would just GUESS that would be the group he considers himself a part of,,, so your opinion is that he's not racist, just batchit crazy? I think you have been missing some posts...lol my opinions are 1. He is racist, the site is racist 2. Americans are 'free' to be racist and most all are 3. His reason for being fired is not specific in the op but no doubt was due to violating something in his CONTRACT,, where the website was concerned 4. He has a paranoia about genocide. 5. The site is fear mongering. ok, that sums it all up fairly neatly... i agree, except with #2... white people cannot be racists, any other race is free to be racist, but not whites.... white people invented racism in america,,lol just the truth and yeah, they are just as free to be racist as anyone else,,but like anyone else, they are not free to DISCRIMINATE in hiring and education i'm guessing you don't understand anymore about being white than i do about being black... if that was the case, why are only white people convicted of hate crimes? here is one reason why... http://www.examiner.com/article/exclusive-offender-data-for-fbi-hate-crime-statistics-to-be-updated-for-2013 actually, only slightly over half identified are white,,, http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2011/narratives/offenders and committing an actual crime is different than not being allowed to be racist you didn't read the article... |
|
|
|
we all have our "opinions", but it does advocate war, regardless... is there something i missed about white people getting ready to go to war with the blacks? did i not get that memo? what exactly is he defending the blacks from? does he want want to kill white babies too? or does he want protect the blacks from the evil white babies? sometimes the wording makes a big difference.... from what I saw ,he is PARANOID about an impending danger upon blacks that they need to be able to DEFEND Themselves from I dont see it as advocating(recommending) war,, I see it as advocating self defense,,, much like those who think americans should be prepared to defend themself against communists and government,,,etc,,, they arent seeking to START War,, they are paranoid enough about the reality of war being started by SOMEONE ELSE that they obsess over their preparedness its racist because it is based on race, and it is fear mongering because it seeks to enlist by spreading fear,,,but not advocatingfor war,,, in my opinion from what? genocide your being suspiciously vague here... what genocide? why? its his paranoia not mind genocide: the deliberate killing of a large group of people, esp. those of a particular ethnic group or nation. I would just GUESS that would be the group he considers himself a part of,,, so your opinion is that he's not racist, just batchit crazy? I think you have been missing some posts...lol my opinions are 1. He is racist, the site is racist 2. Americans are 'free' to be racist and most all are 3. His reason for being fired is not specific in the op but no doubt was due to violating something in his CONTRACT,, where the website was concerned 4. He has a paranoia about genocide. 5. The site is fear mongering. ok, that sums it all up fairly neatly... i agree, except with #2... white people cannot be racists, any other race is free to be racist, but not whites.... white people invented racism in america,,lol just the truth and yeah, they are just as free to be racist as anyone else,,but like anyone else, they are not free to DISCRIMINATE in hiring and education i'm guessing you don't understand anymore about being white than i do about being black... if that was the case, why are only white people convicted of hate crimes? here is one reason why... http://www.examiner.com/article/exclusive-offender-data-for-fbi-hate-crime-statistics-to-be-updated-for-2013 actually, only slightly over half identified are white,,, http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2011/narratives/offenders and committing an actual crime is different than not being allowed to be racist you didn't read the article... uh, yeah I did " According to the data for 2012, 54.6 percent of hate crimes were committed by "white" people." and the information doesnt refer to convictions but reporting of offense "One of the strangest aspects of the FBI hate crime reporting is that convictions are not needed in order to be counted as a hate crime, " |
|
|
|
Edited by
mightymoe
on
Tue 12/17/13 11:58 AM
|
|
we all have our "opinions", but it does advocate war, regardless... is there something i missed about white people getting ready to go to war with the blacks? did i not get that memo? what exactly is he defending the blacks from? does he want want to kill white babies too? or does he want protect the blacks from the evil white babies? sometimes the wording makes a big difference.... from what I saw ,he is PARANOID about an impending danger upon blacks that they need to be able to DEFEND Themselves from I dont see it as advocating(recommending) war,, I see it as advocating self defense,,, much like those who think americans should be prepared to defend themself against communists and government,,,etc,,, they arent seeking to START War,, they are paranoid enough about the reality of war being started by SOMEONE ELSE that they obsess over their preparedness its racist because it is based on race, and it is fear mongering because it seeks to enlist by spreading fear,,,but not advocatingfor war,,, in my opinion from what? genocide your being suspiciously vague here... what genocide? why? its his paranoia not mind genocide: the deliberate killing of a large group of people, esp. those of a particular ethnic group or nation. I would just GUESS that would be the group he considers himself a part of,,, so your opinion is that he's not racist, just batchit crazy? I think you have been missing some posts...lol my opinions are 1. He is racist, the site is racist 2. Americans are 'free' to be racist and most all are 3. His reason for being fired is not specific in the op but no doubt was due to violating something in his CONTRACT,, where the website was concerned 4. He has a paranoia about genocide. 5. The site is fear mongering. ok, that sums it all up fairly neatly... i agree, except with #2... white people cannot be racists, any other race is free to be racist, but not whites.... white people invented racism in america,,lol just the truth and yeah, they are just as free to be racist as anyone else,,but like anyone else, they are not free to DISCRIMINATE in hiring and education i'm guessing you don't understand anymore about being white than i do about being black... if that was the case, why are only white people convicted of hate crimes? here is one reason why... http://www.examiner.com/article/exclusive-offender-data-for-fbi-hate-crime-statistics-to-be-updated-for-2013 actually, only slightly over half identified are white,,, http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2011/narratives/offenders and committing an actual crime is different than not being allowed to be racist you didn't read the article... uh, yeah I did " According to the data for 2012, 54.6 percent of hate crimes were committed by "white" people." and the information doesnt refer to convictions but reporting of offense "One of the strangest aspects of the FBI hate crime reporting is that convictions are not needed in order to be counted as a hate crime, " ummm... they're not white, thats what the whole article was about... ![]() kinda odd how you missed that part of it... |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Tue 12/17/13 12:02 PM
|
|
we all have our "opinions", but it does advocate war, regardless... is there something i missed about white people getting ready to go to war with the blacks? did i not get that memo? what exactly is he defending the blacks from? does he want want to kill white babies too? or does he want protect the blacks from the evil white babies? sometimes the wording makes a big difference.... from what I saw ,he is PARANOID about an impending danger upon blacks that they need to be able to DEFEND Themselves from I dont see it as advocating(recommending) war,, I see it as advocating self defense,,, much like those who think americans should be prepared to defend themself against communists and government,,,etc,,, they arent seeking to START War,, they are paranoid enough about the reality of war being started by SOMEONE ELSE that they obsess over their preparedness its racist because it is based on race, and it is fear mongering because it seeks to enlist by spreading fear,,,but not advocatingfor war,,, in my opinion from what? genocide your being suspiciously vague here... what genocide? why? its his paranoia not mind genocide: the deliberate killing of a large group of people, esp. those of a particular ethnic group or nation. I would just GUESS that would be the group he considers himself a part of,,, so your opinion is that he's not racist, just batchit crazy? I think you have been missing some posts...lol my opinions are 1. He is racist, the site is racist 2. Americans are 'free' to be racist and most all are 3. His reason for being fired is not specific in the op but no doubt was due to violating something in his CONTRACT,, where the website was concerned 4. He has a paranoia about genocide. 5. The site is fear mongering. ok, that sums it all up fairly neatly... i agree, except with #2... white people cannot be racists, any other race is free to be racist, but not whites.... white people invented racism in america,,lol just the truth and yeah, they are just as free to be racist as anyone else,,but like anyone else, they are not free to DISCRIMINATE in hiring and education i'm guessing you don't understand anymore about being white than i do about being black... if that was the case, why are only white people convicted of hate crimes? here is one reason why... http://www.examiner.com/article/exclusive-offender-data-for-fbi-hate-crime-statistics-to-be-updated-for-2013 actually, only slightly over half identified are white,,, http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2011/narratives/offenders and committing an actual crime is different than not being allowed to be racist you didn't read the article... uh, yeah I did " According to the data for 2012, 54.6 percent of hate crimes were committed by "white" people." and the information doesnt refer to convictions but reporting of offense "One of the strangest aspects of the FBI hate crime reporting is that convictions are not needed in order to be counted as a hate crime, " ummm... they're not white, thats what the whole article was about... ![]() lol, so why did you ask why 'only white' people are convicted? we are in agreement, white people arent the only ones convicted of hate crimes and since these numbers are based upon the report of the victim, Im doubting alot of confusion is happening between who is 'arab' and who is 'hispanic' not to mention these classifications are not races, but one is an ethnicity that can be black or white in race and the other is a geographic/nationalist description that most make based upon certain facial features that they dont identify as 'white' |
|
|
|
Edited by
Dodo_David
on
Tue 12/17/13 12:28 PM
|
|
I don't know any non racists,,, msharmony, if your above-quoted statement is true, then every Democrat that you know is a racist. ![]() indeed, every American I have ever known or met is racist Well, you must have met very few Americans, because not every American is a racist. No, msharmony, I am not a racist, and it looks to me like you have personally expanded the definition of a racist so that it will conform to some kind of personal desire. |
|
|
|
I don't know any non racists,,, msharmony, if your above-quoted statement is true, then every Democrat that you know is a racist. ![]() indeed, every American I have ever known or met is racist Well, you must have met very few Americans, because not every American is a racist. No, msharmony, I am not a racist, and it looks to me like you have personally expanded the definition of a racist so that it will conform to some kind of personal desire. not at all, I am going by all the ways people use 'racist' when referring to others opinions and actions in fact, the very aknowledgement of race in this country is denoted as racist,, to most people I converse with so, by that definition , I have not met ANY AMERICAN raised around television or with public education who is not racest |
|
|
|
rac·ist
/ˈrāsist/ noun noun: racist; plural noun: racists 1. a person who believes that a particular race is superior to another. adjective noun: racist; plural noun: racists; adjective: racist 1.having or showing the belief that a particular race is superior to another. The definition of "racist" isn't that confusing or complicated. But I guess since some people have managed to confuse and complicate what the definition of "is" is.....then why can't the definition racist can be confused and complicated too? ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Tue 12/17/13 03:43 PM
|
|
dont blame it on me,,blame it on my curiousity in READING throughout my life
you post, ONE Definition of racist,, here is another suffix IST: one that adheres to or advocates a (specified) doctrine or system or code of behavior racism: a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race one who has a racist belief, by way of conjugation, would be said to be a 'racist' meaning anyone believing that the primary determinant of ones traits and capacities is their RACE like, black people can DANCE, or black males are VIOLENT, or white women are ATTRACTIVE,, all these are RACIST beliefs held by those, who by definition of their BELIEF, by qualifying traits and characteristics EXCLUSIVELY WIth race, can accurately be called 'racists' |
|
|
|
dont blame it on me,,blame it on my curiousity in READING throughout my life you post, ONE Definition of racist,, here is another suffix IST: one that adheres to or advocates a (specified) doctrine or system or code of behavior racism: a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race one who has a racist belief, by way of conjugation, would be said to be a 'racist' meaning anyone believing that the primary determinant of ones traits and capacities is their RACE like, black people can DANCE, or black males are VIOLENT, or white women are ATTRACTIVE,, all these are RACIST beliefs held by those, who by definition of their BELIEF, by qualifying traits and characteristics EXCLUSIVELY WIth race, can accurately be called 'racists' Then you admit you are racist? Seems to me that's what most of your posts do..... blame a predominately white society for the fate of the black man/woman |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Tue 12/17/13 04:56 PM
|
|
dont blame it on me,,blame it on my curiousity in READING throughout my life you post, ONE Definition of racist,, here is another suffix IST: one that adheres to or advocates a (specified) doctrine or system or code of behavior racism: a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race one who has a racist belief, by way of conjugation, would be said to be a 'racist' meaning anyone believing that the primary determinant of ones traits and capacities is their RACE like, black people can DANCE, or black males are VIOLENT, or white women are ATTRACTIVE,, all these are RACIST beliefs held by those, who by definition of their BELIEF, by qualifying traits and characteristics EXCLUSIVELY WIth race, can accurately be called 'racists' Then you admit you are racist? Seems to me that's what most of your posts do..... blame a predominately white society for the fate of the black man/woman through my eyes, everyone here is racist,no there may be a hand full (those from other countries and one or two from here) who arent its not my problem if others have tunnelvision that doesnt allow them to aknowledge any of my opinions not having to do with race,, shrugs |
|
|
|
dont blame it on me,,blame it on my curiousity in READING throughout my life you post, ONE Definition of racist,, here is another suffix IST: one that adheres to or advocates a (specified) doctrine or system or code of behavior racism: a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race one who has a racist belief, by way of conjugation, would be said to be a 'racist' meaning anyone believing that the primary determinant of ones traits and capacities is their RACE like, black people can DANCE, or black males are VIOLENT, or white women are ATTRACTIVE,, all these are RACIST beliefs held by those, who by definition of their BELIEF, by qualifying traits and characteristics EXCLUSIVELY WIth race, can accurately be called 'racists' Then you admit you are racist? Seems to me that's what most of your posts do..... blame a predominately white society for the fate of the black man/woman through my eyes, everyone here is racist,no there may be a hand full (those from other countries and one or two from here) who arent its not my problem if others have tunnelvision that doesnt allow them to aknowledge any of my opinions not having to do with race,, shrugs You are the most racist person I have encountered in 20 years.... Not so Sharpton, Jackasson and Obozo...... are also admitted racists preaching division and flaunting that crutch when their opinions fail to incite |
|
|
|
seeing things that arent there?
ur problem, not mine the past 25 topics I posted in, three mentioned race, and I didnt start any of them |
|
|
|
seeing things that arent there? ur problem, not mine the past 25 topics I posted in, three mentioned race, and I didnt start any of them It's not about topic shared but the opinion expressed, and you have condemned and accused many of us for your admitted fault..... without knowing any of us. That's indeed racist |
|
|
|
seeing things that arent there? ur problem, not mine the past 25 topics I posted in, three mentioned race, and I didnt start any of them It's not about topic shared but the opinion expressed, and you have condemned and accused many of us for your admitted fault..... without knowing any of us. That's indeed racist I didnt condemn anyone, I made clear that to me 'racist' is not a bad word, nor a character assessment, as many wonderful people are also racist |
|
|
|
seeing things that arent there? ur problem, not mine the past 25 topics I posted in, three mentioned race, and I didnt start any of them It's not about topic shared but the opinion expressed, and you have condemned and accused many of us for your admitted fault..... without knowing any of us. That's indeed racist I didnt condemn anyone, I made clear that to me 'racist' is not a bad word, nor a character assessment, as many wonderful people are also racist Excuse me for finding racism contemptible. It's a form of hatred that I care not to associate myself with, or be around people who do |
|
|