2 Next
Topic: AZ lawmaker refers to Obama as 'De Fuhrer'
no photo
Sat 10/12/13 03:38 PM
Please, stop comparing barry to Hitler.
Hitler would never have been seen ridiculously dancing with a lesbian on national television.

msharmony's photo
Sat 10/12/13 03:45 PM
Edited by msharmony on Sat 10/12/13 03:46 PM
nor would he have been supporting lgbt rights,,,,

or having the love to raise a family,,,

or any host of other things ,,,,Hitlers character made him capable of or not capable of

no photo
Sat 10/12/13 03:55 PM
I can just see Hitler and barry dancing cheek to cheek.
What a couple they would have made.laugh

1ntercepter's photo
Mon 10/14/13 06:10 AM
Disagree with Obamacare, that's understandable. Not being happy with his presidency is understandable too. Comparing his policies to the most horrific genocide in modern history is disgusting. Maybe if republicans, especially young ones, thought of better ways to oppose their views then by using Gustavo tactics and name calling they would be attract more urban educated people. Many of those which would agree with some republican economic principles but are revolted at the idea of associating themselves with the self righteous, ethnocentric bigots whos voice is heard all too often in the GOP.

Sojourning_Soul's photo
Mon 10/14/13 07:54 AM

Disagree with Obamacare, that's understandable. Not being happy with his presidency is understandable too. Comparing his policies to the most horrific genocide in modern history is disgusting. Maybe if republicans, especially young ones, thought of better ways to oppose their views then by using Gustavo tactics and name calling they would be attract more urban educated people. Many of those which would agree with some republican economic principles but are revolted at the idea of associating themselves with the self righteous, ethnocentric bigots whos voice is heard all too often in the GOP.


Our 2 party system is a double headed coin.... no matter how you toss it the results will always be the same, either supporting welfare, warfare, or both.

Compromise is not a viable option when either result is death to the economy, personal liberty, or freedom of choice.

To compare this admin, our congress, or even Obozo himself to the villains of history is in truth an understatement. The villains of history would be jealous!

Conrad_73's photo
Mon 10/14/13 08:22 AM

Disagree with Obamacare, that's understandable. Not being happy with his presidency is understandable too. Comparing his policies to the most horrific genocide in modern history is disgusting. Maybe if republicans, especially young ones, thought of better ways to oppose their views then by using Gustavo tactics and name calling they would be attract more urban educated people. Many of those which would agree with some republican economic principles but are revolted at the idea of associating themselves with the self righteous, ethnocentric bigots whos voice is heard all too often in the GOP.
where do you think Obama's and his Handlers Stance on Guncontrol will eventually lead?
And that is just one example!
And the Economic Principles of both Parties are the same,namely Statist!

Conrad_73's photo
Mon 10/14/13 08:28 AM

nor would he have been supporting lgbt rights,,,,

or having the love to raise a family,,,

or any host of other things ,,,,Hitlers character made him capable of or not capable of


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/9088865/Hitler-had-son-with-French-teen.html

Hitler had son with French teen
Adolf Hitler had a son with a French teenager while serving as a soldier during the First World War, according to new evidence.

msharmony's photo
Mon 10/14/13 12:07 PM
raising children takes character

making them only takes some time and opportunity,,,

dcastelmissy's photo
Thu 10/17/13 10:32 AM

raising children takes character

making them only takes some time and opportunity,,,


The same can be said of a President of a nation!

boredinaz06's photo
Thu 10/17/13 11:40 AM







Arizona lawmaker refers to Obama as 'De Fuhrer' on Facebook

Like many Republican lawmakers, Brenda Barton is furious that the federal government shutdown has forced the closure of national parks.

Barton, an Arizona state representative, took to Facebook to express her fury in a series of status updates Monday. In one, she compared President Barack Obama to Adolf Hitler.

"Someone is paying the National Park Service thugs overtime for their efforts to carry out the order of De Fuhrer," Barton wrote. "[W]here are our Constitutional Sheriffs who can revoke the Park Service Rangers authority to arrest??? Do we have any Sheriffs with a pair?"

Fuhrer, the German term for leader, is most often associated with Hitler.

"While the POTUS continues to punish the American people," Barton continued, "he keeps open his golf course, he keeps open Camp David, and he retains his and his wife's excessive staff and stable of Czars! I'll bet he has kept in service his 3 food tasters!!!"

http://news.yahoo.com/arizona-de-fuhrer-barton-obama-134942788.html



hmmm

so, OBAMA has shutdown the government?...lol


When he says he won't negotiate with the body of gov't that controls the purse strings? Yeah, I'd say it's his fault!



yes, I understand

see above example...lol

his failure to 'negotiate' (do as someone else wants him to do), means he is responsible for what they CHOOSE to do,,,lol




So by your words everybody else should (do as he want's them to do)?

msharmony's photo
Thu 10/17/13 12:11 PM








Arizona lawmaker refers to Obama as 'De Fuhrer' on Facebook

Like many Republican lawmakers, Brenda Barton is furious that the federal government shutdown has forced the closure of national parks.

Barton, an Arizona state representative, took to Facebook to express her fury in a series of status updates Monday. In one, she compared President Barack Obama to Adolf Hitler.

"Someone is paying the National Park Service thugs overtime for their efforts to carry out the order of De Fuhrer," Barton wrote. "[W]here are our Constitutional Sheriffs who can revoke the Park Service Rangers authority to arrest??? Do we have any Sheriffs with a pair?"

Fuhrer, the German term for leader, is most often associated with Hitler.

"While the POTUS continues to punish the American people," Barton continued, "he keeps open his golf course, he keeps open Camp David, and he retains his and his wife's excessive staff and stable of Czars! I'll bet he has kept in service his 3 food tasters!!!"

http://news.yahoo.com/arizona-de-fuhrer-barton-obama-134942788.html



hmmm

so, OBAMA has shutdown the government?...lol


When he says he won't negotiate with the body of gov't that controls the purse strings? Yeah, I'd say it's his fault!



yes, I understand

see above example...lol

his failure to 'negotiate' (do as someone else wants him to do), means he is responsible for what they CHOOSE to do,,,lol




So by your words everybody else should (do as he want's them to do)?



what words did I use to say that? more of that 'code english' in these threads that Im not well versed in,,,

lol

boredinaz06's photo
Thu 10/17/13 12:23 PM




So by your words everybody else should (do as he want's them to do)?



what words did I use to say that? more of that 'code english' in these threads that Im not well versed in,,,

lol


his failure to 'negotiate' (do as someone else wants him to do), means he is responsible for what they CHOOSE to do,,,lol


You wrote it, you tell me what code you used?

msharmony's photo
Thu 10/17/13 02:49 PM





So by your words everybody else should (do as he want's them to do)?



what words did I use to say that? more of that 'code english' in these threads that Im not well versed in,,,

lol


his failure to 'negotiate' (do as someone else wants him to do), means he is responsible for what they CHOOSE to do,,,lol


You wrote it, you tell me what code you used?


lol, NONE that's the point

lets recap

what I said,,

his failure to 'negotiate' (do as someone else wants him to do), means he is responsible for what they CHOOSE to do,,,lol


what was interpreted from that by you

everybody else should (do as he want's them to do)?



nothing in the first sentence implies the second sentence,,that would be a HUGE Fail on any reading comprehension test..HAAAA


basically, as in an earlier example

if I fail to give someone sex, because they say they will beat up their neighbor of I don't,,,it doesn't make me responsible for their CHOICE to beat up their neighbor

nor does it mean everyone has to do what I want them to do,,,

2 Next