She's the closest to right on this imo. I was going to say virtually no market for a "gigalo", at least in the idea that women will use men the way men use women for paid intimacy. She's also correct that you've got to be Brad Pitt (in the 90's) lol, and James Bond mixed in one. Extremely attractive, educated, sociable, cool, etc.

You're better off hittin the iron and eating healthy, hire a choreographer and try make it stripping. It's even more demanding of physical perfection than female stripping, and women hardly ever propse a blunt offering of sex for money, but you WILL make a ton of money in tips plus wage and hook ups are inevidable. Ive done this myself it has it's pros and cons but it's the closest thing to being what you're after. But remember two things, if you go too far with someone and you can't sleep at night because you wonder if you've ruined a family by sleeping with a married girl, don't say you weren't warned. And second and most importantly, treat this for what it is, your job, take pride in it, be professional, and know you're there to be entertaining and show them a good time. You won't last long treating it like its your personal drunken party orgy to get your rocks off. Best of luck

Both the Libertarian party and Socialist party are gaining popularity in the last 5 years. That's not to say we should expect them as a serious contender in 2016 but maybe within 20 years it's very plausible.

Disagree with Obamacare, that's understandable. Not being happy with his presidency is understandable too. Comparing his policies to the most horrific genocide in modern history is disgusting. Maybe if republicans, especially young ones, thought of better ways to oppose their views then by using Gustavo tactics and name calling they would be attract more urban educated people. Many of those which would agree with some republican economic principles but are revolted at the idea of associating themselves with the self righteous, ethnocentric bigots whos voice is heard all too often in the GOP.