Topic: TED talks now routinely censoring scientists who share ideas
no photo
Thu 09/05/13 08:38 AM
(NaturalNews) The "TED talks" organization, once founded on the idea of spreading good ideas, has become the new priesthood of status quo dogma. The TED organization doesn't want you to hear the really important, breakthrough advancements in scientific thinking, and to enforce that intellectual ignorance, it has resorted to censoring and suppressing two of the most important scientists our world has ever produced.

This is being accomplished by a cowardly board of "anonymous scientific advisors" who have seized control of TED's talks while hiding behind a curtain of anonymity. These "scientific advisors" no doubt represent the interests of Big Pharma, biotech and the corporate-dominated "science" sellout community that's desperately trying to crush any real revolution in scientific understanding.

While TED is positioned as trendy and cool, it's actually just another vehicle of idea suppression that has joined with other dark forces which are attempting to keep humankind ignorant of the reality of consciousness, free will, spirituality and the fact that our cosmos is far more than physical "stuff." TED gladly features scientists who unveil technologies that will be used to enslave humanity, but the organization doesn't want you to hear about advances in understanding that can set you free.



Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/041931_TED_talks_censorship_consciousness.html#ixzz2e27VFIMd

HotRodDeluxe's photo
Thu 09/05/13 11:01 PM
Obviously Sheldrake's and Hancock's particular brands of pseudo-science aren't ideas worth spreading, and of course, Natural News being purveyors of dumb ideas, takes umbrage to this.

Don't worry, the books will sell anyway.




no photo
Thu 09/05/13 11:04 PM
I'm not worried, and everyone has a right to their own opinions.



HotRodDeluxe's photo
Thu 09/05/13 11:07 PM

I'm not worried, and everyone has a right to their own opinions.





I never stated they didn't have a right to their opinion however dumb it may be, and 'don't worry' is merely a figure of speech similar to 'no matter' or 'it's of little consequence' etc.

no photo
Thu 09/05/13 11:15 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Thu 09/05/13 11:16 PM
I simply liked the article. laugh
I will be more specific: YOU have a right to your own opinion.

and I don't worry or care if they are selling books.

A "figure of speech" that means nothing or has to be explained or defended, does not need to be said or used. Its rather pointless.


If the history of science has taught us anything, it's that scientists are perpetually delusional in their belief that they know everything. Why should we suddenly believe that the scientists of 2013 somehow know everything when the scientists of 1985, 1945, 1897 and earlier are now known to have been foolishly and arrogant incorrect about so many things? And why should we believe any anonymous board of scientific advisors who are, themselves, beyond any measure of scrutiny?

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/041931_TED_talks_censorship_consciousness.html#ixzz2e5fYyHnL

HotRodDeluxe's photo
Thu 09/05/13 11:20 PM

I simply liked the article. laugh
I will be more specific: YOU have a right to your own opinion.

and I don't worry or care if they are selling books.

A "figure of speech" that means nothing or has to be explained or defended, does not need to be said or used. Its rather pointless.


LOL, whatever.


Dodo_David's photo
Fri 09/06/13 12:21 PM
huh Who is Ted?

Conrad_73's photo
Fri 09/06/13 01:04 PM
Edited by Conrad_73 on Fri 09/06/13 01:06 PM

huh Who is Ted?
the Bats**t-crazy Healthranger!

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/NaturalNews

Oyllo's photo
Sun 09/08/13 10:49 PM

I simply liked the article. laugh
I will be more specific: YOU have a right to your own opinion.

and I don't worry or care if they are selling books.

A "figure of speech" that means nothing or has to be explained or defended, does not need to be said or used. Its rather pointless.


If the history of science has taught us anything, it's that scientists are perpetually delusional in their belief that they know everything. Why should we suddenly believe that the scientists of 2013 somehow know everything when the scientists of 1985, 1945, 1897 and earlier are now known to have been foolishly and arrogant incorrect about so many things? And why should we believe any anonymous board of scientific advisors who are, themselves, beyond any measure of scrutiny?

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/041931_TED_talks_censorship_consciousness.html#ixzz2e5fYyHnL



That quote doesn't actually make sense... Scientists KNOW they don't know everything and they KNOW they still have a lot to learn. That's why there's still scientific research going on. If you hear someone say they have absolute knowledge of everything, they are most certainly NOT a scientist.

no photo
Mon 09/09/13 01:11 PM


I simply liked the article. laugh
I will be more specific: YOU have a right to your own opinion.

and I don't worry or care if they are selling books.

A "figure of speech" that means nothing or has to be explained or defended, does not need to be said or used. Its rather pointless.


If the history of science has taught us anything, it's that scientists are perpetually delusional in their belief that they know everything. Why should we suddenly believe that the scientists of 2013 somehow know everything when the scientists of 1985, 1945, 1897 and earlier are now known to have been foolishly and arrogant incorrect about so many things? And why should we believe any anonymous board of scientific advisors who are, themselves, beyond any measure of scrutiny?

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/041931_TED_talks_censorship_consciousness.html#ixzz2e5fYyHnL



That quote doesn't actually make sense... Scientists KNOW they don't know everything and they KNOW they still have a lot to learn. That's why there's still scientific research going on. If you hear someone say they have absolute knowledge of everything, they are most certainly NOT a scientist.


This is true. LOL Unfortunately there are a lot of people who claim to be "scientists" that are stuck in dogma. A real scientist, as you say, has a more open mind.


no photo
Tue 09/10/13 04:35 PM
Perspective is certainly subjective, as evidenced in the responses.

"We are oft to blame in this,
'Tis too much proved, that with devotion�s visage
And pious action we do sugar o'er
The devil himself."

Personally I deal in truth, as harsh and ugly it may be, or fantastically beautiful it can become. Anyone who believes that there are not forces 'behind the scenes' with a plan enacted long ago to manipulate the minds of the masses, control through division and isolation, etc., are not only ignorant, they practice D.E.N.I.A.L.

Of Course anything that can better the human (and the planet's) existence that cannot bring a profit to Mega Conglomerate, shall be deemed unfit for public distribution. Do you seriously think there is no viable solution for free energy, or oil/ gas free vehicles, or that there are no healthy natural alternatives to pharmacology? Please...

Stop deluding yourselves. Of course there is, but, those in power will not give up that power and simply hand us the keys to a future eden. It must be taken, and not my the meek or faint of heart.