The latest research conductedd over group of men &women using latest MRI, proved the difference of nature,mind and body of men & women. It shows that men uses fight & flight way to face stress or any tough situation. Blood supply flow more towards left of men i.e. right parts of brain is more active. on the contrary women shows a lymbic activity suggests for emotions activity. Men shows Mars types while women are emotional of venus type. Adrenalin &stress harmone produce much more in men than in women in same stress Again we know that mars is planet represent wrrior or lord of war and venus is godess of beuty and sex if any astrology of thus affects our life is further get supports by this study.

of course you know that the results cannot be generalized outside of the study group

and if there was no control group it's worthless

I'm from the planet EARTH !
lol

/

As a Melmacian, I am eye-witness to the fact that men are not from Mars.

Here is an image of a Martian I know:



Now, does any real man wear a tutu? Answer: No!

that's not a tutu. it's Martian Armor

geez

do I have to esplain everything??

Yeah, by wearing tutus, the Martians are hoping to scare away people.

Wait a minute . . . you are using science to support mythology? First, who did the study?

Second, you don't anything about mythology! The Roman god Mars was adapted from the Greek god Ares. The planet was named "Mars" because it is red--the color of blood and anger. Ares/Mars were generally disliked in their cultures because they were chaotic, lacking logic and reason. They were EXTREMELY emotional! The "war" deity that had much more respect was Athena/Minerva, the goddess of wisdom who is very often portrayed in war regalia, complete with spear, shield and helmet--and she is female.

Venus is the goddess of beauty and she, like Mars, was "emotional." She often used her beauty to "reduce" males to a basic state ruled by emotions, aka, she got them by the balls.

Humans gave names and attributes to the planets and stars. The universe knows nothing of the connotations that humans place on heavenly bodies (including that of Venus).

Don't use science to validate superstition--it just doesn't work. In addition, the conclusion you draw begs the question and lacks any type of logic.

Yeah! Something to celebrate!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNmwwz07ftA

Something to celebrate?

You humans really don't know what kind of reputation that your planet has among the other inhabited planets.

I do not care much about the opinions of strangers--or even people who know me.

I've heard that aliens just sit back and laugh their fool heads off watching us!
It's kinda cool that we have the ability to make "strangers" laugh!
N'est-ce pas?

ya u r right to some extent. But the subject is that what is myths says is who knows is correct but mars is exist every body knows. And you also know star sun is only cause of life on erth. How ?? I think no need to explain it. Means effect of sun on life same way moon has big effect on sea & emotions mood etc well studied. A no of studies shows sucidal cases or such thing all over world seen on full moon. Similarly almost its planetary rotation &electro megn
etic effects are known on life of earth. No. of research expts are running in nasa for astrobilogy. astrogronomy astromedicines etc. ok rest in next

You speak gibberish.

When you make a claim such as suicidal cases, give stats and facts.

atagirl

Stats and facts? We don't need no stinkin' stats and facts.

yes ur gonna very right dodo.... we dont needs. atta girl u got ???.

I swear on our news the other day they said we all come from mars. True story!

Not saying I believe it, but funny you bring this up.

Here is the story regarding the research, it's from Aug 29'13 but they mentioned this on our news the other morn.lol

Evidence is mounting that we are all Martians. According to new research presented at the annual Goldschmidt geochemistry conference in Florence, there is compelling evidence that life on Earth was kick-started by a meteorite from Mars bearing simple, RNA-based organisms. Furthermore, the same research also indicates that the ancient, primordial surface of Earth would’ve been inhospitable to the formation of the building blocks of life (RNA, DNA, and proteins) — therefore, the only way that life could’ve begun more than three billion years ago is if it arrived here from Mars.

As far as we know, life began on Earth roughly 3.5 billion years ago. The leading theory on how life begun is abiogenesis — that life spontaneously formed from organic compounds, which themselves spontaneously formed. What we don’t know is whether abiogenesis occurred here on Earth, or whether it occurred elsewhere in the universe and then was deposited here via a meteorite (exogenesis/panspermia). Now, according to the findings of Steven Benner of The Westheimer Institute for Science and Technology in Florida, conditions here on Earth would’ve made it impossible for these organic compounds to make the leap to life — while the conditions on Mars would’ve been just right.

Basically, Benner postulates that RNA — the single-stranded, non-helical version of DNA that was probably the first building block of life — could only have been created in the presence of highly oxidized molybdenum and boron. Boron minerals could’ve helped early organic compounds to form into carbohydrate rings, and oxygenized molybdenum could’ve acted as a template for forming those carbohydrates into ribose, and thus RNA.

http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/165184-life-on-earth-originally-came-from-mars-new-study-suggests