100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Stop Inulting Zimmerman Jury | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
when they were in deliberations, they asked the judge to clarify the charge,,which she didn't because the question wasn't specific enough  And you know this how?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
when they were in deliberations, they asked the judge to clarify the charge,,which she didn't because the question wasn't specific enough And you know this how? I watched the trial,,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Tue 07/30/13 08:40 AM
|
|
MH. You claim Precious is a credible witness. Then, turn around and agreed she's a liar. Mr Z told popo he saw a suspicious kid? Or, did he say person? Dark, rainy and a tall person? How y'all get kid out of that? Or, is it just more fairly tale?  and ALSO that Z was a liar,,, lol,, I don't make stuff up Dispatcher How old would you say he looks? Zimmerman He's got button on his shirt, late teens read the transcript for yourself,, http://misterbillohno.newsvine.com/_news/2013/07/10/19392176-transcript-of-george-zimmerman-911-call |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Late teen. Could have been thought to have been legal age.
So. Was Precious a liar? Did she get caught lying. Would that make her less than credible? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Late teen. Could have been thought to have been legal age. So. Was Precious a liar? Did she get caught lying. Would that make her less than credible? late teen isn't a little younger than 28 though is it? Zimmerman in Apology: "I did not know how old he was, I thought he was a little younger than I am". is Z a liar?,,,,did he get caught lying?,,,,, would 19 be that much different than 17, ,,or is that explainable too? unlike lying about ones age to avoid being involved in a media trial..... ...lol more double standard,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One question per post?
Was Precious a liar? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One question per post? Was Precious a liar? regarding age, she was a liar, just like Zimmerman,,,,, motive for said lies,, may be quite different though,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Motif for Precious committing perjury?
I heard nothing on the news. Did she get a fine, jail time, loss of Skittle and tea privileges? Anything for lying to the court? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Motif for Precious committing perjury? I heard nothing on the news. Did she get a fine, jail time, loss of Skittle and tea privileges? Anything for lying to the court? when did she lie on the stand? I watched the trial and don't remember any such event? making up fairytales maybe? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I won a hundred dollar pool on the trial.
Anyone win or lose money on it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
trials are true toss ups
too many variables for me to ever bet on the jurors, the defendants, the witnesses, all can sway the verdict one way or the other,,,and before a trial, its impossible to have much detail about any of those factors,,, ,,its a 50/50 gamble,,, to high risk for me to spend money on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I knew it was a shoe-in when prosecution put up their star witness Precious.
I could hear em mumble something like, 'We could have had a V8. Wanna blame some group? I'd be ablamin' the team Hispanic haters who fumbled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I found her credible, she was a major witness being she was SPEAKING With the victim when the incident occurred
but, you were write in gambling that they would write off her testimony based upon her culture and demeanor,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
when they were in deliberations, they asked the judge to clarify the charge,,which she didn't because the question wasn't specific enough And you know this how? I watched the trial,,,,, Then you would also know that both lawyers wrote explaining to the jurers that they needs to be more specific and the judge gave that letter to the jurors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
when they were in deliberations, they asked the judge to clarify the charge,,which she didn't because the question wasn't specific enough And you know this how? I watched the trial,,,,, Then you would also know that both lawyers wrote explaining to the jurers that they needs to be more specific and the judge gave that letter to the jurors. that is what I said, the judge didn't answer because the question wasn't specific enough |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
when they were in deliberations, they asked the judge to clarify the charge,,which she didn't because the question wasn't specific enough And you know this how? I watched the trial,,,,, Then you would also know that both lawyers wrote explaining to the jurers that they needs to be more specific and the judge gave that letter to the jurors. that is what I said, the judge didn't answer because the question wasn't specific enough None of this proves that the jury ruled incorrectly. As I see it, the claim that the jury gave an incorrect decision is a claim based on pretrial prejudice. Plenty of people decided before the trial that Zimmerman was guilty of either murder or manslaughter. So, those same people are claiming that the jury reached the wrong decision. Zimmerman hasn't gone without punishment. As a result of what he did, he is now a social pariah, and it is unlikely that he will ever get to be the law officer that he wants to be. His life has been changed for the worse. In Zimmerman's case, justice doesn't require that he be incarcerated. Meanwhile, I see nothing wrong with wanting Florida's criminal statutes to be changed so that the overzealous behavior displayed by Zimmerman will be a legally-punishable offense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
when they were in deliberations, they asked the judge to clarify the charge,,which she didn't because the question wasn't specific enough And you know this how? I watched the trial,,,,, Then you would also know that both lawyers wrote explaining to the jurers that they needs to be more specific and the judge gave that letter to the jurors. that is what I said, the judge didn't answer because the question wasn't specific enough None of this proves that the jury ruled incorrectly. As I see it, the claim that the jury gave an incorrect decision is a claim based on pretrial prejudice. Plenty of people decided before the trial that Zimmerman was guilty of either murder or manslaughter. So, those same people are claiming that the jury reached the wrong decision. Zimmerman hasn't gone without punishment. As a result of what he did, he is now a social pariah, and it is unlikely that he will ever get to be the law officer that he wants to be. His life has been changed for the worse. In Zimmerman's case, justice doesn't require that he be incarcerated. Meanwhile, I see nothing wrong with wanting Florida's criminal statutes to be changed so that the overzealous behavior displayed by Zimmerman will be a legally-punishable offense. Which criminal statutes would that be? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
when they were in deliberations, they asked the judge to clarify the charge,,which she didn't because the question wasn't specific enough And you know this how? I watched the trial,,,,, Then you would also know that both lawyers wrote explaining to the jurers that they needs to be more specific and the judge gave that letter to the jurors. that is what I said, the judge didn't answer because the question wasn't specific enough None of this proves that the jury ruled incorrectly. As I see it, the claim that the jury gave an incorrect decision is a claim based on pretrial prejudice. Plenty of people decided before the trial that Zimmerman was guilty of either murder or manslaughter. So, those same people are claiming that the jury reached the wrong decision. Zimmerman hasn't gone without punishment. As a result of what he did, he is now a social pariah, and it is unlikely that he will ever get to be the law officer that he wants to be. His life has been changed for the worse. In Zimmerman's case, justice doesn't require that he be incarcerated. Meanwhile, I see nothing wrong with wanting Florida's criminal statutes to be changed so that the overzealous behavior displayed by Zimmerman will be a legally-punishable offense. I don't think his was being overzealous. He was being beaten up by a thug, screaming for help, and he shot the guy. End of story. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
when they were in deliberations, they asked the judge to clarify the charge,,which she didn't because the question wasn't specific enough And you know this how? I watched the trial,,,,, Then you would also know that both lawyers wrote explaining to the jurers that they needs to be more specific and the judge gave that letter to the jurors. that is what I said, the judge didn't answer because the question wasn't specific enough None of this proves that the jury ruled incorrectly. As I see it, the claim that the jury gave an incorrect decision is a claim based on pretrial prejudice. Plenty of people decided before the trial that Zimmerman was guilty of either murder or manslaughter. So, those same people are claiming that the jury reached the wrong decision. Zimmerman hasn't gone without punishment. As a result of what he did, he is now a social pariah, and it is unlikely that he will ever get to be the law officer that he wants to be. His life has been changed for the worse. In Zimmerman's case, justice doesn't require that he be incarcerated. Meanwhile, I see nothing wrong with wanting Florida's criminal statutes to be changed so that the overzealous behavior displayed by Zimmerman will be a legally-punishable offense. I don't think his was being overzealous. He was being beaten up by a thug, screaming for help, and he shot the guy. End of story. So, change the statute so that a person can't use deadly force to defend himself. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's the tickets.
Turn the zoo over to the animals.
|
|
|
|
|
