http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/07/03/Egypt-military-ousts-Morsi

In the article you posted the link for, it says;

"President Obama has released a statement on Morsi's ouster, indicating that he will "review" U.S. financial aid to Egypt now that the Muslim Brotherhood has been deposed from leadership"

End of excerpt.

Really Obama? You will "review" aid to Egypt now? What about just last month and the last year? Why did you back a dangerous Muslim leader?

Did you hear Obama's statement to Egypt today? It didn't sound good to me at all. He seems to be backing Morsi still, even though he's ousted. Has he threatened using OUR military yet in Egypt? I say stay the hell out and let the people of Egypt elect a new leader on their own. Hopeful he/she will be democratic and not a dictator like how our own president is acting.

The following is an article titled;


"Kerry Quietly Skirts Law Put in Place by Congress, Sends Muslim Brotherhood-Controlled Egypt $1.3 Billion Gift"


The most interesting part of the article states this;


The law that allows the State Department to give Egypt $1.3 billion each year in Foreign Military Financing (FMF) specifies that to get the money, the secretary of State must certify that Egypt is honoring its peace treaty with Israel as well as “supporting the transition to civilian government including holding free and fair elections; implementing policies to protect freedom of expression, association, and religion, and due process of law.”

Several members of Congress said this week that Egypt’s sentencing of American NGO workers, who were there to help Egypt build up its civil society and to promote democracy, flew in the face of that very law, meaning that Egypt should not get the money.

Stephen McInerney, executive director of the Project on Middle East Democracy, told The Daily Beast that it was “very alarming that no public statement was made by the secretary or the Department of State more broadly in conjunction with the waiving of these conditions.”

Do you think the U.S. should be providing more than $1 billion in aid to Muslim Brotherhood-controlled Egypt?


http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/06/07/john-kerry-quietly-waives-law-put-in-place-by-congress-sends-muslim-brotherhood-controlled-egypt-1-3-billion-gift/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=story&utm_campaign=Share+Buttons



I find it sickening that Obama along with his helpers decided to give aid that we cannot afford to a country's government who until today was run by the Muslim Brotherhood. The agreement for aid to Egypt was between Egypt's former government, NOT Morsi's!! They received aid in numerous ways, one of them being our fighter jets.


Would you agree that this "Aid" is another reason for impeachment of Obama?

Obozo has an insurance policy against impeachment or assassination.... It's called Joe Biden!

I'm not sure Biden is capable of continuing Obama's agenda and at least he isn't Muslim. I do realize that no matter what Obama does, he seems untouchable as far as impeachment goes.


http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/07/03/15-anti-obama-photos-from-tahrir-square-protests-that-you-probably-havent-seen/

My favorite sign; USA, Under Satanic Administration

Amen sister! Happy Independence Day!

Breaking on CNN right now!!!!!!

Obama wants the Muslim Brotherhood back in power. LOL!!!!!

MUSLIM SUPPORT!!!!!

Obama on Egypt: Return Authority Back to Muslim Brotherhood

that Guy is really out of his Skull!
Someone call Nurse Ratched pulease!

Walter?

HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY to you too, Sojurning Soul and to any readers :)

Celebrate while we still can,uggh!

I don't like the sound of that. You will NEVER have the necessary National Unity to save your country if you exclude ANYONE, because excluding anyone from your social group is what started the mess in the first place!

Remember "United We Stand; Divided We Fall!"

If you want to save the country, don't count anyone out, or everyone is going to go down for the count!

Quit falling for anti-Islamic propaganda!

Well said. Too many people are incapable of living without an 'us vs them' mentality, its a mentality thats no different to that held by the islamist fundamentalists. its childish, simplistic, incorrect and dangerous and the sooner people improve their thinking of other people the better.

Really? On CNN? show me the CNN link, not www.dailypaul.com forums.

President Obama today warned the Egyptian Military “not to interfere with peaceful protests” – presumably referring to the expected rage protests by Muslim Brotherhood forces in support of ousted Islamist President Mohamed Morsi. Obama staked a lot on Morsi, and it is now coming back to haunt him. The people of Egypt clearly did not want to live in a radicalized Islamic state, and the military moved to keep that from happening.


So, was this basically a Military coup?

Technically Morsi was elected democratically.

Were the protesters peaceful or did the Military take sides against Morsi?



Do we support democracy or not?

Speak up Americans!

Do we support democracy as long as we approve of the winner or do we support free elections and democracy?

Do we support freedom of religion as long as it is OUR chosen religion, or do we support freedom of religion?

My "thinking" is based on fact. According to MOST Muslims, if you are not one of them , you are their enemy and they will kill you in a heartbeat given the chance.

The president needs to be excluded from the United States!! I don't need to fall for any propaganda, I see and hear proof.

I hope that Egypt is able to be a democratic country and not ruled by any extremist leaders. I'm sure there are good people there, just as there are good people in the United States. There are at least 400 of our troops sent there by Obummer, I'm praying for their safety, they need to be sent back to the US now!!




Well said. Too many people are incapable of living without an 'us vs them' mentality, its a mentality thats no different to that held by the islamist fundamentalists. its childish, simplistic, incorrect and dangerous and the sooner people improve their thinking of other people the better.

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/02/opinion/paul-stop-egypt-funds/index.html

Stop using taxpayer money to aid Egypt's Morsy
By Rand Paul, Special to CNN
July 3, 2013 -- Updated 1234 GMT (2034 HKT)

(CNN) -- On the one-year anniversary of President Mohamed Morsy's inauguration, tens of thousands of Egyptians marched in the streets of Cairo in an effort to remove him from office.

The Associated Press described the protesters as "an array of secular and liberal Egyptians, moderate Muslims, Christians — and what the opposition says is a broad sector of the general public that has turned against the Islamists."

You would think these protesters represent an Egypt more favorable or in line with American interests. Unfortunately, our government supports the current regime of Morsy and the Muslim Brotherhood. Earlier this year, we sent Egypt's government 20 F-16 fighter jets, Abrams tanks and other military aid.

I introduced an amendment that would halt the transfer of advanced weapons to Egypt. I argued that the situation in that country was too volatile and that Morsy was not someone the United States should necessarily embrace.

My amendment was defeated in the Senate, 79 to 19.

Last week, President Obama deployed more than 400 Army soldiers to Egypt as part of a nine-month "peacekeeping mission," which could include responding to protests—or even riots—led potentially by Egyptians seeking a more secular or moderate government.

Our government insists on calling Morsy an ally. Morsy, on the other hand, has called Jews "bloodsuckers" and has said they are the "descendants of apes and pigs."


The Obama administration announced in March that we no longer had enough money to continue giving White House tours because of the sequester. That same month, Secretary of State John Kerry met with Morsy and pledged $250 million in additional aid to Egypt.

Before America supported the Muslim Brotherhood, we supported Morsy's predecessor, Hosni Mubarak. For decades, we aided the Mubarak regime to the tune of about $60 billion in total.

When Egyptians protested Mubarak in January 2011, F-16 jets were used by Mubarak to intimidate protesters. Those jets were supplied to Egypt by the United States.

When hundreds of thousands of Egyptians rallied in Tahir Square to protest three decades of martial law, Mubarak doused them with tear gas made in Pennsylvania and paid for with American taxpayer's money.

Mubarak abused and tortured his people for decades, while we subsidized his government. As Egyptians marched in the streets to remove this dictator from power in early 2011, former Vice President Dick Cheney said we should stand by Mubarak and called him our "good friend."

For many Egyptians, the United States was Mubarak. In their eyes, we were the same. To some, we are now undoubtedly Morsy. Indeed, the weapons that were once given to Mubarak or bought with U.S. dollars are now in the hands of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Egypt is just one example of our misguided foreign policy. There are multiple examples of our government aiding and abetting despotic regimes in ways that ultimately work against American interests.

The same Washington leaders who were eager to aid Mubarak, and now Morsy, were also once the loudest voices for supporting Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi. They are the same Democrat and Republican hawks who later insisted we back the Libyan rebels. They are the same people who now demand we fund the Syrian rebels, even though al-Nusra and others who belong to the resistance are also affiliated with al Qaeda.

The problem with constantly intervening in these troubled parts of the world is that there are often no clear good guys or bad guys. Today's ally can quickly become tomorrow's enemy. This should be a paramount and obvious concern, but in Washington it is almost always treated as an afterthought.

Also, what kind of message does funding despots send to the rest of the world? When Mubarak was our "good friend," he was certainly no friend to the Egyptian people. Judging by the protests in Cairo on Sunday, the same can probably be said of Morsy's regime.

You cannot give people liberty. They must fight for it themselves.

People around the world seek to emulate and embrace our concept of freedom. America should continue to lead, something we often do best by example.

But what kind of example do we set when we side with the enemies of freedom? How can we have influence in troubled parts of the world when we cuddle up to regimes responsible for much of the trouble?

Your "thinking" is only based on crap you've heard and not "fact" at all. I know you don't believe me and actually think you "KNOW" this as fact; so the best way to convince you that you are just believing crap propaganda is to challenge you to PROVE THE FACTS you think you "KNOW", so here goes:

I will accept that "if you are not one of them , you are their enemy and they will kill you in a heartbeat given the chance." upon PROOF OF YOUR CLAIM.

You have made an ALLEGATION and CLAIMED it to be FACTUAL...I'm calling "bull$hit" on that one...PROVE IT. (Cite your sources so we can check their validity and determine where they got their "facts" from. (Ten to one, they originated from someone with an agenda to vilify muslims as a scapegoat for a problem they themselves created.)

All muslimes that follow Mohammed need to be deported to Mecca.
Then nuked.
Send the NOI with 'em.

As much as I like you, I can see you are coming from hate & fear and not courageous love. The attitude is counterproductive in the extreme and denies people their RIGHT to a presumption of innocence. It is the source of man's inhumanity to man and the very reason the world is in the shape it's in. It is divisive at a time when unity among men is needed more than ever.

If you really believe what you said, you are a much greater enemy to your country than either the muslims or Mohammed, because you have usurped the position of God and made yourself Judge, jury and executioner (basically a one-man lynch mob) all rolled into one and have convicted innocent people without due process of law.

If you are willing to deny the right to a presumption of innocence to others, what makes you think you are entitled to any presumption of innocence yourself? i.e. Would it not be more fair to have you deported to Mecca and have you killed in the streets there?

I know I sound harsh, but tough love is like that, and I DO like you and think you're just "talking tough" (I hope so anyway.)

That is worse than what Hitler tried on the Jews.

They wanted them all deported to Israel... I suppose there are plans to nuke Israel when they trick all the Jews into going there.

Hell at one point they wanted to surround Israel with a wall.... they claimed "to keep the enemies out..."

Maybe they just wanted to create a huge concentration camp out of it.

oh and if anyone dared to say something like that about Jews they would be pounced on by the JDL and kicked off of this website for hate speech.