Topic: Zimmerman Murder case | |
---|---|
It doesn't matter what anyone believes. I believe Zimmerman. The crimes they charged him with could never have been proven or won in court.... no matter what happened. The trial was a waste of time and money. seeking justice for someones death is not a waste of money its done all the time and those cases are sometimes lost and sometimes won,,,,,its not attempting to get justice that's a waste of life more of a concern for me than a 'waste of money' if a conviction isn't achieved,,,, It was a waste of money because they didn't give the jury the choice of charging him with manslaughter. Therefore they lost. They insisted on making it into a media circus involving racial profiling. lol, Im beginning to think you haven't watched the trial during deliberations the jury ASKED FOR CLARIFICATION ON THE MANSLAUGHTER CHARGE they DID have the choice,, clarification wasn't given because the question wasn't PRECISE enough,,,, I have better things to do than watch the entire trial. If they did not find him guilty of any of the choices they were given, then he's NOT GUILTY. So people shall have to get over it. |
|
|
|
It doesn't matter what anyone believes. I believe Zimmerman. The crimes they charged him with could never have been proven or won in court.... no matter what happened. The trial was a waste of time and money. seeking justice for someones death is not a waste of money its done all the time and those cases are sometimes lost and sometimes won,,,,,its not attempting to get justice that's a waste of life more of a concern for me than a 'waste of money' if a conviction isn't achieved,,,, It was a waste of money because they didn't give the jury the choice of charging him with manslaughter. Therefore they lost. They insisted on making it into a media circus involving racial profiling. lol, Im beginning to think you haven't watched the trial during deliberations the jury ASKED FOR CLARIFICATION ON THE MANSLAUGHTER CHARGE they DID have the choice,, clarification wasn't given because the question wasn't PRECISE enough,,,, I have better things to do than watch the entire trial. If they did not find him guilty of any of the choices they were given, then he's NOT GUILTY. So people shall have to get over it. yep, he was not PROVEN guilty,, which is different than not actually BEING GUILTY and , like the oj trial, folks will have to live with it and leave the rest to karma,, ,this man will be in jail someday, or he will look over his shoulder the rest of his life like he caused that boy to do that night,,, |
|
|
|
I don't think George Zimmerman is a monster. I think he is a good man. The Media and basically people's imaginations made him into a monster in their own minds.
|
|
|
|
Edited by
alleoops
on
Sun 07/14/13 04:22 PM
|
|
"If if's and buts were candy and nuts,
we'd all have a merry Christmas"- Don Meredith Everyone has their perception of what event happened that night. Unfortunately, we will never know. Next time we'll win one for the Gipper. Til then, "Let it be"- John Lennon and Paul McCartney. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Toodygirl5
on
Sun 07/14/13 04:24 PM
|
|
The trial was a waste of time and money. Because Z got free...it was a waste. T was not a monster either. I think he was a good Teen. |
|
|
|
The trial was a waste of time and money. Because Z got free...it was a waste, but it is not over Yet. It is over. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Toodygirl5
on
Sun 07/14/13 04:29 PM
|
|
The trial was a waste of time and money. Because Z got free...it was a waste. It is over. That Trail yes, it is done. |
|
|
|
The trial was a waste of time and money. Because Z got free...it was a waste. T was not a monster either. I think he was a good Teen. People need to let it go. It is over. Let it go. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Toodygirl5
on
Sun 07/14/13 04:33 PM
|
|
The trial was a waste of time and money. Because Z got free...it was a waste. T was not a monster either. I think he was a good Teen. People need to let it go. It is over. Let it go. It is not about let it go, it is just some people don't agree with the Verdict. Just Like you agreed. So many differences of Opinions on most of these Topics. |
|
|
|
The trial was a waste of time and money. Because Z got free...it was a waste. It is over. That Trail yes, it is done. Yes, the trail is gone. |
|
|
|
The trial was a waste of time and money. Because Z got free...it was a waste. T was not a monster either. I think he was a good Teen. People need to let it go. It is over. Let it go. It is not about let it go, it is just some people don't agree with the Verdict. Just Like you agreed. So many differences of Opinions on most of these Topics. Well that is to be expected. But it is what it is. I hope people will accept the verdict and let that man get on with his life. |
|
|
|
Please watch this people. What actually happened. Clear and concise. The media would never show this. Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEpCnpnHODI Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxmO9hXHC_o Thanks for posting the links. what was said makes sense to me. Skittles is not what caused the fight it was a punch. this has been played as a poor defenseless child. Any child that can punch like that I don't consider defenseless. Yet this has been said over and over again. HAAAAA wow, a kid that can punch is therefore not defenseless against a man with a gun,,, if the so called kid could hit hard enough to break zimmerman's nose (the upright scuffle you want) then be strong enough to strattle zimmerman and keep him down while delivering blows, then he certainly isn't defenseless makes perfect sense to me do you know children have caused parents broken noses accidentally before?,,,,wow,,, no, i personally don't know of any child that has purposely punched at an adult with the intent of causing bodily harm what started this was the suspicious behavior of Z towards someone alone at night and lost, trying to get home before halftime first you said martin lived with his father's fiance (so he knew the home) but your claim now is that martin was lost. zimmerman's behavior was not suspicious, any neighborhood watch would be following an unknown person lol someone who could not loose this stranger and was then accosted when he confronted him,, zimmerman claims martin lost him. zimmerman claims he was returning to his vehicle when martin approached him. zimmerman claims he was on the phone with non emergency and told the dispatcher he had lost sight of martin. that's what makes sense, that's whats more likely to have happened than the bs about T turning around and jumping out at z before threatening him with some expletive and sucker punching him zimmerman does not claim martin turned around and jumped out at him. the opposite of your story is what zimmerman claims. martin and zimmerman exchanged words before martin struck zimmerman that doesn't even match their own witnesses testimony...lol it doesn't match your version but it fits the stereotype of how some common thug probably would act,,,,,, you may have first hand knowledge of how some common thugs act, but there are many people who don't. if zimmerman knew martin used the mf word often, i would believe zimmerman could add that in for effect. did martin use the mf word when he was on the phone with his girlfriend? 'you got a problem mf',,,'you gonna die tonight mf',,,,GIVE ME A BREAK,,,, you got a break. they had as fair a trail as was possible |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sun 07/14/13 08:01 PM
|
|
Please watch this people. What actually happened. Clear and concise. The media would never show this. Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEpCnpnHODI Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxmO9hXHC_o Thanks for posting the links. what was said makes sense to me. Skittles is not what caused the fight it was a punch. this has been played as a poor defenseless child. Any child that can punch like that I don't consider defenseless. Yet this has been said over and over again. HAAAAA wow, a kid that can punch is therefore not defenseless against a man with a gun,,, if the so called kid could hit hard enough to break zimmerman's nose (the upright scuffle you want) then be strong enough to strattle zimmerman and keep him down while delivering blows, then he certainly isn't defenseless makes perfect sense to me do you know children have caused parents broken noses accidentally before?,,,,wow,,, no, i personally don't know of any child that has purposely punched at an adult with the intent of causing bodily harm what started this was the suspicious behavior of Z towards someone alone at night and lost, trying to get home before halftime first you said martin lived with his father's fiance (so he knew the home) but your claim now is that martin was lost. zimmerman's behavior was not suspicious, any neighborhood watch would be following an unknown person lol someone who could not loose this stranger and was then accosted when he confronted him,, zimmerman claims martin lost him. zimmerman claims he was returning to his vehicle when martin approached him. zimmerman claims he was on the phone with non emergency and told the dispatcher he had lost sight of martin. that's what makes sense, that's whats more likely to have happened than the bs about T turning around and jumping out at z before threatening him with some expletive and sucker punching him zimmerman does not claim martin turned around and jumped out at him. the opposite of your story is what zimmerman claims. martin and zimmerman exchanged words before martin struck zimmerman that doesn't even match their own witnesses testimony...lol it doesn't match your version but it fits the stereotype of how some common thug probably would act,,,,,, you may have first hand knowledge of how some common thugs act, but there are many people who don't. if zimmerman knew martin used the mf word often, i would believe zimmerman could add that in for effect. did martin use the mf word when he was on the phone with his girlfriend? 'you got a problem mf',,,'you gonna die tonight mf',,,,GIVE ME A BREAK,,,, you got a break. they had as fair a trail as was possible whatever its over IF Zimmerman weren't a liar on the line for his freedom and familiar with criminal law,, some of what he 'claimed' may actually be credible the 'girlfriend' was more believable than the stalker, because of the fact she didn't sugarcoat anything,, she included the racial slurs,, why would she leave out the mfs? why would the neighborhood watch need to continue after this person after his guidelines say he isnt to and the POLICE say he isn't to? he needs to get an address closer to where he 'lost' the person because the address near where his CAR was parked, and where he would be wouldn't be good enough right? no one heard t say what Z Claims,,,not even the person on the phone with him,, and his story reeks of bs in my opinion but its over,, and in the hands of karma |
|
|
|
Teenage dead thug couldn't outrun a fat, short Puertorican? Wow. Somebody hasn't paid close attention to Zimmerman's ethnic background. His mother is Peruvian. |
|
|
|
msharmony I feel sorry that you continue to doubt the decisions of 6 women jurors because of your preconceived slanted opinion and imagination. Yes, hopefully it's over in the press too because I am tired of it.
|
|
|
|
Right or wrong....in a court of law it comes down to what can be proven and what can't. That's it. Period! If Zimmerman were found guilty then we would be talking about how it is wrong. He is innocent and guess what? WE ARE FREAKING TALKING ABOUT HOW IT WAS WRONG! Karma???? Seriously???? I swear....this case is so forsaking over blown that some of you need to get your head out of your butts. But oh well.....leave it to Celebrities for making this case more than it should have been. All I know is that Zimmerman faced trial and he won. Don't like it.....riot! Oh wait....;some stupid idiots in LA already did that. Yup....the world is all the better now.
|
|
|
|
Will Shabitch and the other ferals let it go and let him live his life?
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Sun 07/14/13 08:13 PM
|
|
I didn't see this case getting all the Media attention:
http://www.myfoxdfw.com/story/18616119/police-indiana] |
|
|
|
Right or wrong....in a court of law it comes down to what can be proven and what can't. That's it. Period! If Zimmerman were found guilty then we would be talking about how it is wrong. He is innocent and guess what? WE ARE FREAKING TALKING ABOUT HOW IT WAS WRONG! Karma???? Seriously???? I swear....this case is so forsaking over blown that some of you need to get your head out of your butts. But oh well.....leave it to Celebrities for making this case more than it should have been. All I know is that Zimmerman faced trial and he won. Don't like it.....riot! Oh wait....;some stupid idiots in LA already did that. Yup....the world is all the better now. Yeh, go ahead and riot. Then the news will be more interesting. More people will get killed. Oh goody. |
|
|
|
I didn't see this case getting all the Media attention: http://www.myfoxdfw.com/story/18616119/police-indiana] That would have been a racist act to try them. Hussein's media would have wanted the ferals portrayed as victims. |
|
|