100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: I AM NOT A GOLD DIGGER!! | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
mountainwatergirl
on
Mon 02/04/13 01:32 PM
|
|
yes guys who biatch about women being gold diggers need to look in the mirror and make sure they are not solely seeking a woman for sexual pleasure or based on her looks alone, equally shallow....before casting the first stone. Yup, no room to talk. I love being selected for only my sexuality 
That was perfect... there really is nothing else to say hahahahah! BURNT! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as far as this "gold digger" label that all we women who care about the quality of our existence have to face accusations of at some time during our eligible lives, it is just an intimidation tactic wielded to guilt trip us into keeping our expectations and requirements low from the onset... however, those of both genders who seek partners out strictly for what they can financially gain from the other are mostly just players who like to ride thru life on their backs and the backs of others, while any actual digging consists of manual labor that these types prefer to avoid... just my take.. okay.. I'll shut up now... 
I think this says a lot. Wise woman... nice to see. Not just because you and I share the same opinion. It really is instinctive to make sure your potential mate can take care of you and a family... comes from thousands of years of the way things were. A young woman made herself up beautiful and presented herself in public, she was selected by a man because of her looks and demeanor for the ability to conceive and take care of her husband, children, and home. Even large breasts were seen as a sign she was not going to let him down in the conception department, and suggested to him she was more capable of feeding his children than others. They got married FIRST and rocked on. The family of the woman would be involved so they could assess what this man can offer their daughter. This means money and possessions. HIS means to ensure their daughter's survival and family genes were entrusted to him because of his provision. We women sum up the traits in a man that will ensure our survival and any children that are produced. Even though these old fashioned ways are on on the shelf, they are still active in our minds. You can't take out thousands of years of instinct in a couple hundred years. MountainWaterGirl - FYI, your new avatar is hotter than the last! And I see that you and AthenaRose are stepping with the deep deep insight. Good. With your two cents though, didn't many have problems with it? I won't lie, I WISH it was still like that. I am a decent guy, I make great money, a Marine most of my adult life, and I'm great with kids. Using the "old-school" method of selection I am an 8! DOH! We (the planet) are in trouble, and I am so jealous of the naive-but-happy folks... |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Traumer
on
Mon 02/04/13 01:56 PM
|
|
yes guys who biatch about women being gold diggers need to look in the mirror and make sure they are not solely seeking a woman for sexual pleasure or based on her looks alone, equally shallow....before casting the first stone. Yup, no room to talk. I love being selected for only my sexuality
That was perfect... there really is nothing else to say hahahahah! BURNT!
As the brain is our biggest and most important sexual organ(both males and females) one cannot now-days compliment a woman for her brain as that,more than likely, would be taken in a sexual context...one would have to very carefully choose their words and still hope that she doesn't take it as something sexual...it seems that it is getting harder and harder to communicate with women...shame. Would saying "I like your mind" or "I like how your mind works..." be "non sexually acceptable"? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as far as this "gold digger" label that all we women who care about the quality of our existence have to face accusations of at some time during our eligible lives, it is just an intimidation tactic wielded to guilt trip us into keeping our expectations and requirements low from the onset... however, those of both genders who seek partners out strictly for what they can financially gain from the other are mostly just players who like to ride thru life on their backs and the backs of others, while any actual digging consists of manual labor that these types prefer to avoid... just my take.. okay.. I'll shut up now...
I think this says a lot. Wise woman... nice to see. Not just because you and I share the same opinion. It really is instinctive to make sure your potential mate can take care of you and a family... comes from thousands of years of the way things were. A young woman made herself up beautiful and presented herself in public, she was selected by a man because of her looks and demeanor for the ability to conceive and take care of her husband, children, and home. Even large breasts were seen as a sign she was not going to let him down in the conception department, and suggested to him she was more capable of feeding his children than others. They got married FIRST and rocked on. The family of the woman would be involved so they could assess what this man can offer their daughter. This means money and possessions. HIS means to ensure their daughter's survival and family genes were entrusted to him because of his provision. We women sum up the traits in a man that will ensure our survival and any children that are produced. Even though these old fashioned ways are on on the shelf, they are still active in our minds. You can't take out thousands of years of instinct in a couple hundred years. MountainWaterGirl - FYI, your new avatar is hotter than the last! And I see that you and AthenaRose are stepping with the deep deep insight. Good. With your two cents though, didn't many have problems with it? I won't lie, I WISH it was still like that. I am a decent guy, I make great money, a Marine most of my adult life, and I'm great with kids. Using the "old-school" method of selection I am an 8! DOH! We (the planet) are in trouble, and I am so jealous of the naive-but-happy folks... smart man.... bathe yourself...and come to me lol 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
oki,
"MountainWaterGirl - FYI, your new avatar is hotter than the last! " It's going to be because I got my boobs in it right? lol All the other shots... I was trying to leave them out of the equation for obvious reasons lol. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not interested in being the hooker, or the trick. If I want a business partner I'll get one. Love is about me sharing and it's about me being comfortable that what is ours separately is ours together. If not than staying friends is cool with me. Bonding in degrees is fine but it's not the 100% that people talk about unless it is truly the 100%.
Lets not kid ourselves greed and self is the beginning of the end or it's a business contract with boundaries. I don't see any problem with folks going part way. What I have a problem with is the lie that comes along with "I give you myself completely" with no strings attached, but lets not truly become one. Completely means completely and people have been twisting the better or worse thing around so badly over the years that it has little meaning any more. Oh no, Michael's about to pitch, not really. All of us have lines and sit there with our own dictionary ready to defend those lines we draw in our sand, but keep in mind this is our sand and not necessarily by the book of the 100%. I'll take companionship (sometimes) but what I want is love and to me that means a sense of ownership (both ways). I want my worth to be claimed by the one who loves me and at the same time protected by that same person with all they have. Likewise what is giving if it is only part. And if it is only part, what part is it? What part do I think she can't handle that keeps me from giving all? And if I can't feel the joy of giving my all is it something I really want to be doing? Not me! You see I like to pour 100% into what I do for richer or poorer. That goes for love or biz. Why would I want to have a puzzle with missing parts? Spending time working on it only to find it incomplete at the end doesn't say "whole". My goal in life is to be complete, and to have someone who completes me and I them as well as the things we give ourselves to. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
mountainwatergirl
on
Mon 02/04/13 08:01 PM
|
|
I'm not interested in being the hooker, or the trick. If I want a business partner I'll get one. Love is about me sharing and it's about me being comfortable that what is ours separately is ours together. If not than staying friends is cool with me. Bonding in degrees is fine but it's not the 100% that people talk about unless it is truly the 100%. Lets not kid ourselves greed and self is the beginning of the end or it's a business contract with boundaries. I don't see any problem with folks going part way. What I have a problem with is the lie that comes along with "I give you myself completely" with no strings attached, but lets not truly become one. Completely means completely and people have been twisting the better or worse thing around so badly over the years that it has little meaning any more. Oh no, Michael's about to pitch, not really. All of us have lines and sit there with our own dictionary ready to defend those lines we draw in our sand, but keep in mind this is our sand and not necessarily by the book of the 100%. I'll take companionship (sometimes) but what I want is love and to me that means a sense of ownership (both ways). I want my worth to be claimed by the one who loves me and at the same time protected by that same person with all they have. Likewise what is giving if it is only part. And if it is only part, what part is it? What part do I think she can't handle that keeps me from giving all? And if I can't feel the joy of giving my all is it something I really want to be doing? Not me! You see I like to pour 100% into what I do for richer or poorer. That goes for love or biz. Why would I want to have a puzzle with missing parts? Spending time working on it only to find it incomplete at the end doesn't say "whole". My goal in life is to be complete, and to have someone who completes me and I them as well as the things we give ourselves to. Clone yourself and put it on a plane my direction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
OkiHeadDoctor
on
Mon 02/04/13 11:10 PM
|
|
oki, "MountainWaterGirl - FYI, your new avatar is hotter than the last! " It's going to be because I got my boobs in it right? lol All the other shots... I was trying to leave them out of the equation for obvious reasons lol.
 MWG, I'm just complimenting you at this stage, and no. Since my split, I spend a good deal of time in my master bedroom. She wanted the 42" Sony instead of the 60" Sharp, so of course I said "whatever you want." I then went and got a pretty nice 46" Samsung which fits my bedroom entertainment system PERFECTLY. What's the point? From the distance I sit and sometimes lay, I noticed your hair and facial expression well before anything else, and I thought "whoa - way sexy look there"
I only looked at the girls after you introduced them! Hello ladies!!!  (the answer to that age-old question = I've got a happy-a$$ banana in my pants that's glad to see ya!)
The Pun-murderer, Darnell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
oki, "MountainWaterGirl - FYI, your new avatar is hotter than the last! " It's going to be because I got my boobs in it right? lol All the other shots... I was trying to leave them out of the equation for obvious reasons lol.
MWG, I'm just complimenting you at this stage, and no. Since my split, I spend a good deal of time in my master bedroom. She wanted the 42" Sony instead of the 60" Sharp, so of course I said "whatever you want." I then went and got a pretty nice 46" Samsung which fits my bedroom entertainment system PERFECTLY. What's the point? From the distance I sit and sometimes lay, I noticed your hair and facial expression well before anything else, and I thought "whoa - way sexy look there"
I only looked at the girls after you introduced them! Hello ladies!!! (the answer to that age-old question = I've got a happy-a$$ banana in my pants that's glad to see ya!)
The Pun-murderer, Darnell I did figure that it was the look ....I was just razzing ya. thanks for the compliment...very much.
|
|
|
|
|
