2+2= In the Fix?

Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Debt Mysteriously Paid Off Before Benghazi Testimony

(PP)- One day before her much anticipated testimony before both houses of Congress, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has surprisingly paid off the outstanding debt from her 2008 presidential campaign.

Unofficial campaign finance reports filed late Tuesday show Clinton’s campaign made payments of $10,800,000 on January 22nd to a loan shark working for her former adviser and middle weight contender Alessandro Petacchi. That accounted for the last part of the debt going back to her losing primary campaign against Barack Hussein Obama.

Clinton had owed vendors about $12 million at the end of June 2008, and had only paid off $1.2 million over the past four years. Insiders close to the Secretary of State believed that the very large final payment had nothing to do with the former First Lady’s testimony before Congress on Wednesday.

“We are not yet sure were all the cash came from,” said a Hillary 2008 campaign aide. “Everyone here is just glad that the debt is retired so we can finally move on and get new jobs. The past four years we’ve only made minimum wage, and trying to sell old Hillary for President bumper stickers is useless.”

As a Cabinet member, Clinton faced strict fundraising restrictions to eliminate her debt but someone, perhaps a wealthy benefactor or a secret government slush fund, could pay the debt on her behalf.

Former President Bill Clinton sent a fundraising email to old friends in his little black book late November, begging for their assistance in retiring his wife’s huge debt. The campaign raised only $108 in the last quarter of 2012…. an all time record low.

Mrs, Clinton, who was reported to be under heavy protective security before her Congressional hearings on Wednesday, may have been offered a last minute contribution by an anonymous party intensely interested in her potentially damaging testimony.

“We have been monitoring large cash transactions through the federal reserve bank,” said a Palookaville Post mail room attendant. “The only transaction near $10 million was from the Heinz Foods Corporation to the John Kerry for Secretary of State petty cash account. We know he’s richer than Romney, but seriously…. that’s a lot of petty cash.”

Neither Senator John Fitzgerald Kerry, Teresa Heinz Ward or Hines Ward were available for comment.

The Palookaville Post has learned of a secret signal Hillary is to give to Democrats who need to know if she is going to testify truthfully in Wednesday’s hearings or if she will be evasive and cover up for her friends on the radical left. If Hillary wears glasses during her testimony, that gives Democrats the all clear signal, and they can return to writing pork barrel spending bills instead of catching the first flight back to Havana, Chicago or Detroit. If she does not wear glasses, some of her friends are going to jail.

http://www.palookavillepost.com/2013/01/23/hillary-clintons-campaign-debt-mysteriously-paid-off-before-benghazi-testimony/

It matters much!

Remember that... in 2016!

Liberals love dead babies and lots and lots of blood and guts.

That may be where ideas for all those great Horror movies come from. Liberal wet-dreams.

http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/filmmakers-flee-country-after-hillary-s-senate-testimony-t10597.html



Filmmakers Flee Country After Hillary's Senate Testimony

911 was a far larger tragedy with gigantic repercussions lets keep things in perspective eh?

Most of us can chew bubble-gum and walk at the same time.
There is no comparing one to another.
Perspective is, lives were lost and like yours, BFD? Who cares?
Pathetic.

Hillary will testify except not under oath and if only Bill goes with her and it must be closed to the public.

I'm a liberal and I don't love dead babies or blood and guts. Where do you get that idea?

If anything, Liberals aren't so bugged by the Benghazi attack because it wasn't the US Government committing the attack, and the Conservatives seem selectively upset about this incident when they pretty much yawned at other intelligence failures under the Bush Administration. I don't see anything criminal on the Government's part, here.

Then you are truly blind and easily led by your lame government. Even worse, you fell for the partisan puppet show.

Seriously?

What good is a testimony if not under oath? To say that is like saying, I will testify but I'm not going to tell the truth and I don't want the public to see me lying.

How stupid.

No judge ever allowed me to run the show.

We should follow the example of our leaders. If we are ever called to testify in court we should tell them, that we will, but not UNDER OATH or under the penalty of prosecution. We should never agree to that verbal contract with anyone.

It is time to take our power back from these bastards.

Then government officials who were called to testify before the 911 commission included:

George W. Bush - President; testimony not under oath. The session was not officially transcribed because the White House considered it a "private meeting" in which highly classified information would be discussed. Asked to limit the length of testimony to one hour (However, the meeting lasted for three hours and ten minutes). Testimony took place in the Oval Office. Initially, Bush insisted that he testify only to the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the commission, but later agreed to testify before the full panel.[11]
Dick Cheney - Vice President; testimony not under oath. The session was not officially transcribed because the White House considered it a "private meeting" in which highly classified information would be discussed. Testimony took place in the Oval Office.[11]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_Commission