Topic: Notice anything "odd" about this? | |
---|---|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Sun 01/13/13 07:35 PM
|
|
http://nodisinfo.com/Home/2013/01/13/sandy-hook-treachery-confirmed/ Look at the date of the article.... ![]() ![]() ![]() Sandy Hook happened on the 13th? oh oh! Nothing to see here! Move it along! Give us your guns! |
|
|
|
Edited by
JustDukkyMkII
on
Sun 01/13/13 09:38 PM
|
|
This thing just blows me away!...I was willing before to give it the benefit of the doubt to spite the anomalies in the story.
I now have no doubt the whole thing was staged...I even suspect that Adam was totally set up and never killed his mother...That was probably done FOR him...before HE was murdered at the school. ("planted" there?) |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Sun 01/13/13 10:11 PM
|
|
Then there is this......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFjo8nxND8w and this..... again on the 10th of Dec....days before http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theories/2012/12/newtown-victim-rip-facebook-page-created-4-days-before-event-2446902.html |
|
|
|
http://nodisinfo.com/Home/2013/01/13/sandy-hook-treachery-confirmed/ Look at the date of the article.... ![]() ![]() ![]() Sandy Hook happened on the 13th? oh oh! Nothing to see here! Move it along! Give us your guns! its our school systems, dont expect them all to be at the top of their game very probably, an autofill that has not been noticed as one month behind look on the same page today, it reads Descember 13 Im sure tomorrow that article will read December 14 notice the date of the viewers computer is January 10 and that screen shot has december 10 in the article heading,,, |
|
|
|
Edited by
JustDukkyMkII
on
Mon 01/14/13 12:28 AM
|
|
http://nodisinfo.com/Home/2013/01/13/sandy-hook-treachery-confirmed/ Look at the date of the article.... ![]() ![]() ![]() Sandy Hook happened on the 13th? oh oh! Nothing to see here! Move it along! Give us your guns! its our school systems, dont expect them all to be at the top of their game very probably, an autofill that has not been noticed as one month behind look on the same page today, it reads Descember 13 Im sure tomorrow that article will read December 14 notice the date of the viewers computer is January 10 and that screen shot has december 10 in the article heading,,, There are simply too many anomalies to explain away. What about this? (and there are several more besides) http://nodisinfo.com/Home/2013/01/09/adam-lanzas-photoshopped-face/ |
|
|
|
http://nodisinfo.com/Home/2013/01/13/sandy-hook-treachery-confirmed/ Look at the date of the article.... ![]() ![]() ![]() Sandy Hook happened on the 13th? oh oh! Nothing to see here! Move it along! Give us your guns! its our school systems, dont expect them all to be at the top of their game very probably, an autofill that has not been noticed as one month behind look on the same page today, it reads Descember 13 Im sure tomorrow that article will read December 14 notice the date of the viewers computer is January 10 and that screen shot has december 10 in the article heading,,, Horse pucky! There have been multiple postings for the Sandy Hook incident posted to the www and dated Dec 10... 4 days before the event. I think the screw up was on the part of some misinformation service personnel. Not aware of actual events, buried in some back room, following scripts for posting that the supplier misdated for release. There was a site with dozens of these dec 10 postings exposed that I tried to post while the site was down that now gives a "404 error". There are many who made screen shots of certain ones that are still coming out, but even those posts are being "removed" or getting error messages shortly after being submitted. Like Obozos background..... they are simply becoming invisable, unavailable, or redirected. |
|
|
|
Where are all the forensic photos and other evidence that would rule out multiple shooters?
PS Feinstein says she has been working on ban paperwork for over a year before the incident. |
|
|
|
http://nodisinfo.com/Home/2013/01/13/sandy-hook-treachery-confirmed/ Look at the date of the article.... ![]() ![]() ![]() Sandy Hook happened on the 13th? oh oh! Nothing to see here! Move it along! Give us your guns! its our school systems, dont expect them all to be at the top of their game very probably, an autofill that has not been noticed as one month behind look on the same page today, it reads Descember 13 Im sure tomorrow that article will read December 14 notice the date of the viewers computer is January 10 and that screen shot has december 10 in the article heading,,, There are simply too many anomalies to explain away. What about this? (and there are several more besides) http://nodisinfo.com/Home/2013/01/09/adam-lanzas-photoshopped-face/ I still see no conspiracy there first, because the picture STILL looks like Adam second, because to be photoshopped , they started with a picture of Adam and third, photoshopping people to make them look more beautiful/ominous,,,, is more standard in media than it is conspiracy related,,,, |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Mon 01/14/13 06:16 AM
|
|
http://nodisinfo.com/Home/2013/01/13/sandy-hook-treachery-confirmed/ Look at the date of the article.... ![]() ![]() ![]() Sandy Hook happened on the 13th? oh oh! Nothing to see here! Move it along! Give us your guns! its our school systems, dont expect them all to be at the top of their game very probably, an autofill that has not been noticed as one month behind look on the same page today, it reads Descember 13 Im sure tomorrow that article will read December 14 notice the date of the viewers computer is January 10 and that screen shot has december 10 in the article heading,,, Horse pucky! There have been multiple postings for the Sandy Hook incident posted to the www and dated Dec 10... 4 days before the event. I think the screw up was on the part of some misinformation service personnel. Not aware of actual events, buried in some back room, following scripts for posting that the supplier misdated for release. There was a site with dozens of these dec 10 postings exposed that I tried to post while the site was down that now gives a "404 error". There are many who made screen shots of certain ones that are still coming out, but even those posts are being "removed" or getting error messages shortly after being submitted. Like Obozos background..... they are simply becoming invisable, unavailable, or redirected. its explained on snopes,,,but, it would be a waste for those determined to see a conspiracy,,, sorry guys, but this is just another 'feral', who got away from his parents,,, |
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Mon 01/14/13 08:07 AM
|
|
http://nodisinfo.com/Home/2013/01/13/sandy-hook-treachery-confirmed/ Look at the date of the article.... ![]() ![]() ![]() Sandy Hook happened on the 13th? oh oh! Nothing to see here! Move it along! Give us your guns! its our school systems, dont expect them all to be at the top of their game very probably, an autofill that has not been noticed as one month behind look on the same page today, it reads Descember 13 Im sure tomorrow that article will read December 14 notice the date of the viewers computer is January 10 and that screen shot has december 10 in the article heading,,, Horse pucky! There have been multiple postings for the Sandy Hook incident posted to the www and dated Dec 10... 4 days before the event. I think the screw up was on the part of some misinformation service personnel. Not aware of actual events, buried in some back room, following scripts for posting that the supplier misdated for release. There was a site with dozens of these dec 10 postings exposed that I tried to post while the site was down that now gives a "404 error". There are many who made screen shots of certain ones that are still coming out, but even those posts are being "removed" or getting error messages shortly after being submitted. Like Obozos background..... they are simply becoming invisable, unavailable, or redirected. its explained on snopes,,,but, it would be a waste for those determined to see a conspiracy,,, sorry guys, but this is just another 'feral', who got away from his parents,,, Two old farts running snopes. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
JustDukkyMkII
on
Mon 01/14/13 08:37 AM
|
|
http://nodisinfo.com/Home/2013/01/13/sandy-hook-treachery-confirmed/ Look at the date of the article.... ![]() ![]() ![]() Sandy Hook happened on the 13th? oh oh! Nothing to see here! Move it along! Give us your guns! its our school systems, dont expect them all to be at the top of their game very probably, an autofill that has not been noticed as one month behind look on the same page today, it reads Descember 13 Im sure tomorrow that article will read December 14 notice the date of the viewers computer is January 10 and that screen shot has december 10 in the article heading,,, There are simply too many anomalies to explain away. What about this? (and there are several more besides) http://nodisinfo.com/Home/2013/01/09/adam-lanzas-photoshopped-face/ I still see no conspiracy there first, because the picture STILL looks like Adam second, because to be photoshopped , they started with a picture of Adam and third, photoshopping people to make them look more beautiful/ominous,,,, is more standard in media than it is conspiracy related,,,, The question in this regard isn't why it was done so much as when and for whom. Whose interests were served by portraying Adam Lanza in such a manner IMMEDIATELY after the alleged shootings? Clearly the intent was CRIMINAL, since the media saturation, plastering that picture everywhere, would HAVE to introduce a judicial bias into any Grand Jury investigation. Who are the criminals who photoshopped that picture and when did they do it? |
|
|
|
Its no secret that the demoncraps want to control the poplation via gun confiscation, welfare etc. Knowing this it would not surprise me that the gubmnet would pull something like this to further their agenda. The timing of this was awesome, just before Christmas. Remember when Clinton and Reno were all about getting those bastardo militias? Pretty convenient that a so called militia member blew up the federal building. Conspiracy nuts, you want to talk about an inside job? Talk about the OKC bombing! Anywho Obama is an ******* and we will be rid of him in a couple more years. |
|
|
|
Obama is an ******* and we will be rid of him in a couple more years. I would predict much sooner than that. he will probably be impeached and arrested for some of the crap he's pulling. |
|
|