100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Was 9/11 an 'inside job?' - Poll | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Latest poll results. Was 911 an inside job? Yes at 78.8 No 11.4% Depends on how you define inside at 8.6% None of the above at 1.2% All this despite a 24/7 11 year propaganda campaign. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I went to the page... and I found this comment to be most interesting: http://freethoughtnation.com/contributing-writers/63-acharya-s/379-was-911-an-inside-job-poll.html Number of structural engineers who posit bombs in the towers: 0 Number of engineering classes taken by the guys who are absolutely sure there were bombs in the towers: 0 Number of scientific polls showing a significant number of Americans believe 9/11 was an inside job: 0 Number of architects who pos it bombs in the towers: 0 Number of explosions registered by seismologists when the towers fell: 0 Number of materials specialists who posit bombs in the towers: 0 Number of engineering conferences held to discuss bombs in the towers: 0 Number of engineering reports discussing bombs in the towers: 0 Number of seismologists who pos it bombs in the towers: 0 Number of demolition experts who pos it bombs in the towers: 0 Number of documents revealing the secret plan: 0 Number of NORAD people who said they stood down on 9/11: 0 Number of NORAD people who said they were confused by drills on 9/11: 0 Number of defense experts who say NORAD standing down was inexplicable: 0 Number of eye witnesses in the Pentagon who believe that a missile hit the building on 9/11: 0 Number of firemen at the scene who say there really were bombs in the buildings (i.e., not just saying it SOUNDED like bombs): 0 Number of commercial airline pilots who say the NORAD thing sounds fishy: 0 Number of journalists (mainstream or otherwise—but NOT wingnuts posing as journalists) who write seriously about 9/11 conspiracy theories: 0 Number of people who say they were actually involved in the plan: 0 Number of FBI agents, ex-agents, or whistle blowers who say 9/11 was an inside job (as opposed to mere incompetence): 0 Number of people who might know anything who have come forward (as opposed to people who wouldn't know anything—like a former German Defense Minister): 0 Number of clips of the buildings falling (used by conspiracists to bolster their theory) that have been authenticated by experts: 0 Number of items in the Northwoods document that were actually pulled off: 0 Number of intelligence specialists who think 9/11 was an inside job: 0 Number of historians who subscribe to the inside-job hypothesis: 0 Number of sane people who think Bush used his family friends to bring off 9/11: 0 Number of sane people who think international bankers financed a plan to close down Wall Street: 0 Number of sane people who think the most incompetent administration in galactic history pulled off the most complex subterfuge in history...fooling everyone except a few creepy guys who got on the web: 0 Number of follow-up domestic terror attacks after 9/11 (as confidently predicted by most inside-job theorists): 0 Now I don't claim to actually know if it was an inside job or not, but it's been years now...you know as well as I do that people wouldn't keep a secret this big if they knew anything. Number of dupes who believe any nonsense posited: 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clearly not many are impressed with the moronic "official" explanation of 911.
Each day is better and better. Latest poll results. Was 911 an inside job? Yes at 79.5% No 11.1% Depends on how you define inside at 8.2% None of the above at 1.2% All this despite a 24/7 11 year propaganda campaign. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh no, you're not biased! Kinda like that website poll attracts only unbiased views.
 Now as for the writer who posed the question, Acharya S., I like her views on religion and have subscribed to her newsletters for years, but this is way off the mark of her expertise. And the way I interpreted this "survey", it wasn't serious anyway. Directly from the page "I created this poll because I'm really curious about the numbers, especially among people who are within my purview. Please answer it, leave a comment and pass it around!" The keyword is within her "purview." Which is her train of thought. But if it helps you feel better to think of it as a valid and unbiased poll, so be it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh no, you're not biased! Kinda like that website poll attracts only unbiased views. Now as for the writer who posed the question, Acharya S., I like her views on religion and have subscribed to her newsletters for years, but this is way off the mark of her expertise. And the way I interpreted this "survey", it wasn't serious anyway. Directly from the page "I created this poll because I'm really curious about the numbers, especially among people who are within my purview. Please answer it, leave a comment and pass it around!" The keyword is within her "purview." Which is her train of thought. But if it helps you feel better to think of it as a valid and unbiased poll, so be it. Here are the latest numbers. Was 911 an Inside Job? 79.7% say yes 11% say no 8.1 % say depends how you define 'Inside Job" 1.2% say none of the above. Not even close. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to understand the improbability of the government’s explanation of 9/11, it is not necessary to know anything about what force or forces brought down the three World Trade Center buildings, what hit the Pentagon or caused the explosion, the flying skills or lack thereof of the alleged hijackers, whether the airliner crashed in Pennsylvania or was shot down, whether cell phone calls made at the altitudes could be received, or any other debated aspect of the controversy.
You only have to know two things. One is that according to the official story, a handful of Arabs, mainly Saudi Arabians, operating independently of any government and competent intelligence service, men without James Bond and V for Vendetta capabilities, outwitted not only the CIA, FBI, and National Security Agency, but all 16 US intelligence agencies, along with all security agencies of America’s NATO allies and Israel’s Mossad. Not only did the entire intelligence forces of the Western world fail, but on the morning of the attack the entire apparatus of the National Security State simultaneously failed. Airport security failed four times in one hour. NORAD failed. Air Traffic Control failed. The US Air Force failed. The National Security Council failed. Dick Cheney failed. Absolutely nothing worked. The world’s only superpower was helpless at the humiliating mercy of a few undistinguished Arabs. It is hard to image a more far-fetched story–except for the second thing you need to know: The humiliating failure of US National Security did not result in immediate demands from the President of the United States, from Congress, from the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and from the media for an investigation of how such improbable total failure could have occurred. No one was held accountable for the greatest failure of national security in world history. Instead, the White House dragged its feet for a year resisting any investigation until the persistent demands from 9/11 families for accountability forced President George W. Bush to appoint a political commission, devoid of any experts, to hold a pretend investigation. http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/09/11/the-11th-anniversary-911-paul-craig-roberts/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey! This poll shows the opposite of yours.
 http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/38598/most_americans_reject_9_11_conspiracy_theories/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh no, you're not biased! Kinda like that website poll attracts only unbiased views. Now as for the writer who posed the question, Acharya S., I like her views on religion and have subscribed to her newsletters for years, but this is way off the mark of her expertise. And the way I interpreted this "survey", it wasn't serious anyway. Directly from the page "I created this poll because I'm really curious about the numbers, especially among people who are within my purview. Please answer it, leave a comment and pass it around!" The keyword is within her "purview." Which is her train of thought. But if it helps you feel better to think of it as a valid and unbiased poll, so be it.   
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh no, you're not biased! Kinda like that website poll attracts only unbiased views. Now as for the writer who posed the question, Acharya S., I like her views on religion and have subscribed to her newsletters for years, but this is way off the mark of her expertise. And the way I interpreted this "survey", it wasn't serious anyway. Directly from the page "I created this poll because I'm really curious about the numbers, especially among people who are within my purview. Please answer it, leave a comment and pass it around!" The keyword is within her "purview." Which is her train of thought. But if it helps you feel better to think of it as a valid and unbiased poll, so be it. Here are the latest numbers. Was 911 an Inside Job? 79.7% say yes 11% say no 8.1 % say depends how you define 'Inside Job" 1.2% say none of the above. Not even close.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to understand the improbability of the government’s explanation of 9/11, it is not necessary to know anything about what force or forces brought down the three World Trade Center buildings, what hit the Pentagon or caused the explosion, the flying skills or lack thereof of the alleged hijackers, whether the airliner crashed in Pennsylvania or was shot down, whether cell phone calls made at the altitudes could be received, or any other debated aspect of the controversy. You only have to know two things. One is that according to the official story, a handful of Arabs, mainly Saudi Arabians, operating independently of any government and competent intelligence service, men without James Bond and V for Vendetta capabilities, outwitted not only the CIA, FBI, and National Security Agency, but all 16 US intelligence agencies, along with all security agencies of America’s NATO allies and Israel’s Mossad. Not only did the entire intelligence forces of the Western world fail, but on the morning of the attack the entire apparatus of the National Security State simultaneously failed. Airport security failed four times in one hour. NORAD failed. Air Traffic Control failed. The US Air Force failed. The National Security Council failed. Dick Cheney failed. Absolutely nothing worked. The world’s only superpower was helpless at the humiliating mercy of a few undistinguished Arabs. It is hard to image a more far-fetched story–except for the second thing you need to know: The humiliating failure of US National Security did not result in immediate demands from the President of the United States, from Congress, from the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and from the media for an investigation of how such improbable total failure could have occurred. No one was held accountable for the greatest failure of national security in world history. Instead, the White House dragged its feet for a year resisting any investigation until the persistent demands from 9/11 families for accountability forced President George W. Bush to appoint a political commission, devoid of any experts, to hold a pretend investigation. http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/09/11/the-11th-anniversary-911-paul-craig-roberts/ What a Bad Joke that Guy is! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to understand the improbability of the government’s explanation of 9/11, it is not necessary to know anything about what force or forces brought down the three World Trade Center buildings, what hit the Pentagon or caused the explosion, the flying skills or lack thereof of the alleged hijackers, whether the airliner crashed in Pennsylvania or was shot down, whether cell phone calls made at the altitudes could be received, or any other debated aspect of the controversy. You only have to know two things. One is that according to the official story, a handful of Arabs, mainly Saudi Arabians, operating independently of any government and competent intelligence service, men without James Bond and V for Vendetta capabilities, outwitted not only the CIA, FBI, and National Security Agency, but all 16 US intelligence agencies, along with all security agencies of America’s NATO allies and Israel’s Mossad. Not only did the entire intelligence forces of the Western world fail, but on the morning of the attack the entire apparatus of the National Security State simultaneously failed. Airport security failed four times in one hour. NORAD failed. Air Traffic Control failed. The US Air Force failed. The National Security Council failed. Dick Cheney failed. Absolutely nothing worked. The world’s only superpower was helpless at the humiliating mercy of a few undistinguished Arabs. It is hard to image a more far-fetched story–except for the second thing you need to know: The humiliating failure of US National Security did not result in immediate demands from the President of the United States, from Congress, from the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and from the media for an investigation of how such improbable total failure could have occurred. No one was held accountable for the greatest failure of national security in world history. Instead, the White House dragged its feet for a year resisting any investigation until the persistent demands from 9/11 families for accountability forced President George W. Bush to appoint a political commission, devoid of any experts, to hold a pretend investigation. http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/09/11/the-11th-anniversary-911-paul-craig-roberts/ What a Bad Joke that Guy is! Roberts has written extensively that during the 21st century the Bush and Obama administrations have destroyed the US Constitution's protections of Americans' civil liberties, such as habeas corpus and due process in the name of "the war on terror." Roberts has been a critic of both Democratic and Republican administrations. Roberts has compared supporters of George W. Bush to "brownshirts with the same low intelligence and morals as Hitler's enthusiastic supporters." He has opposed the War on Drugs and the War on Terror stating it has "made widows and orphans of millions of Muslims". Roberts is a critic of Israel's policy toward Gaza "the world's largest concentration camp" populated by people who were "driven out of Palestine so that Israel could steal their land."[citation needed]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Craig_Roberts The known facts about Mr. Roberts. It would seem to any reasonable person that he has some good credentials. |
|
|
|
|
