Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Previous 1 2 … 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 … 21 22 Next

Topic: Was 9/11 an 'inside job?' - Poll
HotRodDeluxe Joined Sun 05/06/12 Posts: 2743	Sat 10/27/12 02:32 AM
This is for people to read and evaluate on their own. Destruction of the World Trade Center North Tower and Fundamental Physics By David Chandler B.S., physics, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA M.A., education, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA M.S., mathematics, California Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA Running Title: Downward Acceleration of WTC The roof line of the North Tower of the World Trade Center is shown to have been in constant downward acceleration until it disappeared. A downward acceleration of the falling upper block implies a downward net force, which requires that the upward resistive force was less than the weight of the block. Therefore the downward force exerted by the falling block must also have been less than its weight. Since the lower section of the building was designed to support several times the weight of the upper block, the reduced force exerted by the falling block was insufficient to crush the lower section of the building. Therefore the falling block could not have acted as a "pile driver." The downward acceleration of the upper block can be understood as a consequence of, not the cause of, the disintegration of the lower section of the building. http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/ChandlerDownwardAccelerationOfWTC1.pdf This has to be a hoax. No-one would put their name to such garbled nonsense. No-one with a reputation to defend anyway.

HotRodDeluxe Joined Sun 05/06/12 Posts: 2743	Sat 10/27/12 02:36 AM
I don't care what other evidence anyone thinks they have or believe. When people get fired or threatened for asking questions or wanting answers to questions, that's a really big big red flag. I would've fired them for being morons.

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sat 10/27/12 02:43 AM
This is for people to read and evaluate on their own. Destruction of the World Trade Center North Tower and Fundamental Physics By David Chandler B.S., physics, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA M.A., education, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA M.S., mathematics, California Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA Running Title: Downward Acceleration of WTC The roof line of the North Tower of the World Trade Center is shown to have been in constant downward acceleration until it disappeared. A downward acceleration of the falling upper block implies a downward net force, which requires that the upward resistive force was less than the weight of the block. Therefore the downward force exerted by the falling block must also have been less than its weight. Since the lower section of the building was designed to support several times the weight of the upper block, the reduced force exerted by the falling block was insufficient to crush the lower section of the building. Therefore the falling block could not have acted as a "pile driver." The downward acceleration of the upper block can be understood as a consequence of, not the cause of, the disintegration of the lower section of the building. http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/ChandlerDownwardAccelerationOfWTC1.pdf This has to be a hoax. No-one would put their name to such garbled nonsense. No-one with a reputation to defend anyway. especially since the Lower Portion never disintegrated until it was crushed by that section from above! What a Tool! And that's what teaching today's Youth!

HotRodDeluxe Joined Sun 05/06/12 Posts: 2743	Sat 10/27/12 02:57 AM Edited by HotRodDeluxe on Sat 10/27/12 02:57 AM
This is for people to read and evaluate on their own. Destruction of the World Trade Center North Tower and Fundamental Physics By David Chandler B.S., physics, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA M.A., education, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA M.S., mathematics, California Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA Running Title: Downward Acceleration of WTC The roof line of the North Tower of the World Trade Center is shown to have been in constant downward acceleration until it disappeared. A downward acceleration of the falling upper block implies a downward net force, which requires that the upward resistive force was less than the weight of the block. Therefore the downward force exerted by the falling block must also have been less than its weight. Since the lower section of the building was designed to support several times the weight of the upper block, the reduced force exerted by the falling block was insufficient to crush the lower section of the building. Therefore the falling block could not have acted as a "pile driver." The downward acceleration of the upper block can be understood as a consequence of, not the cause of, the disintegration of the lower section of the building. http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/ChandlerDownwardAccelerationOfWTC1.pdf This has to be a hoax. No-one would put their name to such garbled nonsense. No-one with a reputation to defend anyway. especially since the Lower Portion never disintegrated until it was crushed by that section from above! What a Tool! And that's what teaching today's Youth! And that's not all he missed! Someone has to be making this **** up.

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sat 10/27/12 04:28 AM
This is for people to read and evaluate on their own. Destruction of the World Trade Center North Tower and Fundamental Physics By David Chandler B.S., physics, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA M.A., education, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA M.S., mathematics, California Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA Running Title: Downward Acceleration of WTC The roof line of the North Tower of the World Trade Center is shown to have been in constant downward acceleration until it disappeared. A downward acceleration of the falling upper block implies a downward net force, which requires that the upward resistive force was less than the weight of the block. Therefore the downward force exerted by the falling block must also have been less than its weight. Since the lower section of the building was designed to support several times the weight of the upper block, the reduced force exerted by the falling block was insufficient to crush the lower section of the building. Therefore the falling block could not have acted as a "pile driver." The downward acceleration of the upper block can be understood as a consequence of, not the cause of, the disintegration of the lower section of the building. http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/ChandlerDownwardAccelerationOfWTC1.pdf This has to be a hoax. No-one would put their name to such garbled nonsense. No-one with a reputation to defend anyway. especially since the Lower Portion never disintegrated until it was crushed by that section from above! What a Tool! And that's what teaching today's Youth! And that's not all he missed! Someone has to be making this **** up. You can’t use reason to talk someone out of a position they didn’t use reason to arrive at. — PZ Myers

Chazster Joined Tue 08/28/07 Posts: 6206	Sat 10/27/12 07:42 AM
Latest poll results 76.9 % yes it was an inside job. 12.4% say no The rest are the other choices. Thank you all for voting. Who can defend the official version of 911 and keep a straight face at this point? Who can read one of your posts and keep a straight face at this point? It would seem to me if you posted at Freethoughtnation it would be yourself in the minority. I would recommend you go there cast your vote and debate the issue there. the numbers are the same today. 76.9% for inside job 12.4 against. round it up and it its 80% to 12%. so stop the mock and ridicule it makes your argument seem foolish and a waste of time. I am almost certain that these numbers reflect the thinking public and not the folks who enjoy TV and mindless activities. Again that poll is useless. It is a poll on a CT site asking CTs whether or not they think the Conspiracy is true. Let me go to a website about the search for aliens and let me have a poll if they believe their is other life in the universe. Do you think they will correctly project the views of the general population? I mean its not rocket science to understand that a poll on a website that is only viewed by people on that website could have almost 0 credibility.

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Sat 10/27/12 07:46 AM
Latest poll results 76.9 % yes it was an inside job. 12.4% say no The rest are the other choices. Thank you all for voting. Who can defend the official version of 911 and keep a straight face at this point? Who can read one of your posts and keep a straight face at this point? It would seem to me if you posted at Freethoughtnation it would be yourself in the minority. I would recommend you go there cast your vote and debate the issue there. the numbers are the same today. 76.9% for inside job 12.4 against. round it up and it its 80% to 12%. so stop the mock and ridicule it makes your argument seem foolish and a waste of time. I am almost certain that these numbers reflect the thinking public and not the folks who enjoy TV and mindless activities. Again that poll is useless. It is a poll on a CT site asking CTs whether or not they think the Conspiracy is true. Let me go to a website about the search for aliens and let me have a poll if they believe their is other life in the universe. Do you think they will correctly project the views of the general population? I mean its not rocket science to understand that a poll on a website that is only viewed by people on that website could have almost 0 credibility. What is really hard to explain is the 12.4% against!

Chazster Joined Tue 08/28/07 Posts: 6206	Sat 10/27/12 07:51 AM
Latest poll results 76.9 % yes it was an inside job. 12.4% say no The rest are the other choices. Thank you all for voting. Who can defend the official version of 911 and keep a straight face at this point? Who can read one of your posts and keep a straight face at this point? It would seem to me if you posted at Freethoughtnation it would be yourself in the minority. I would recommend you go there cast your vote and debate the issue there. the numbers are the same today. 76.9% for inside job 12.4 against. round it up and it its 80% to 12%. so stop the mock and ridicule it makes your argument seem foolish and a waste of time. I am almost certain that these numbers reflect the thinking public and not the folks who enjoy TV and mindless activities. Again that poll is useless. It is a poll on a CT site asking CTs whether or not they think the Conspiracy is true. Let me go to a website about the search for aliens and let me have a poll if they believe their is other life in the universe. Do you think they will correctly project the views of the general population? I mean its not rocket science to understand that a poll on a website that is only viewed by people on that website could have almost 0 credibility. What is really hard to explain is the 12.4% against! probably a few people troll that website for fun lol

Bestinshow Joined Mon 06/01/09 Posts: 5540	Sat 10/27/12 10:25 AM
A quick review of this thread shows a majority supports the inside job theory but of course I am only counting americans.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Sat 10/27/12 10:33 AM
A quick review of this thread shows a majority supports the inside job theory but of course I am only counting americans.

Bestinshow Joined Mon 06/01/09 Posts: 5540	Sat 10/27/12 10:37 AM
A quick review of this thread shows a majority supports the inside job theory but of course I am only counting americans. All this despite the massive propaganda campaign by the corporate media and corrupt government.

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Sat 10/27/12 10:38 AM
A quick review of this thread shows a majority supports the inside job theory but of course I am only counting americans. You have difficulty with math!

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Sat 10/27/12 10:40 AM
A quick review of this thread shows a majority supports the inside job theory but of course I am only counting americans. You have difficulty with math! Just because four or five people on this entire site believe the official story of 9-11 and post the same meaningless opinions and remarks over and over does not count for numbers.

Bestinshow Joined Mon 06/01/09 Posts: 5540	Sat 10/27/12 10:44 AM
A quick review of this thread shows a majority supports the inside job theory but of course I am only counting americans. You have difficulty with math! Just because four or five people on this entire site believe the official story of 9-11 and post the same meaningless opinions and remarks over and over does not count for numbers. I do not count non americans.

Bestinshow Joined Mon 06/01/09 Posts: 5540	Sat 10/27/12 10:44 AM
“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” santiz Hermann Goering

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sat 10/27/12 10:46 AM
http://mingle2.com/topic/show/306334?page=2 SOS,same Old MO!

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sat 10/27/12 10:47 AM
“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” santiz Hermann Goering

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Sat 10/27/12 10:49 AM
“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” santiz Hermann Goering Yep that is the mind set that is also running this country. The war on terrorism is a scam. The war on drugs is a scam. Business is business.

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sat 10/27/12 10:51 AM
“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” santiz Hermann Goering Yep that is the mind set that is also running this country. The war on terrorism is a scam. The war on drugs is a scam. Business is business. why don't you all move? I hear Israel is taking in Immigrants,and so is Gaza!

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Sat 10/27/12 10:52 AM
“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” santiz Hermann Goering Yep that is the mind set that is also running this country. The war on terrorism is a scam. The war on drugs is a scam. Business is business. why don't you all move? I hear Israel is taking in Immigrants,and so is Gaza! Israel is the last place you want to be right now. This is what you would call END GAME. Notice to anyone living in Israel: Get out if you can.