Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Topic: Twoofer Madness
HotRodDeluxe Joined Sun 05/06/12 Posts: 2743	Thu 11/15/12 03:18 AM Edited by HotRodDeluxe on Thu 11/15/12 03:22 AM
This guy is for real: "The contextual stealth of the censorship is still being disregarded and ridiculed with every new post that PsyOp shills are swift enough to type. The truth is being buried behind pixel-sucking (staged) performances, debates between alpha shills and beta shills posing as fake truthers, just to keep the deception going.' From JREF So, non-truthers are posing as truthers in order to ridicule so-called 'authentic' truthers. This is based on the premise that truthers actually need outside aid in order to achieve this.

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Thu 11/15/12 03:55 AM
This guy is for real: "The contextual stealth of the censorship is still being disregarded and ridiculed with every new post that PsyOp shills are swift enough to type. The truth is being buried behind pixel-sucking (staged) performances, debates between alpha shills and beta shills posing as fake truthers, just to keep the deception going.' From JREF So, non-truthers are posing as truthers in order to ridicule so-called 'authentic' truthers. This is based on the premise that truthers actually need outside aid in order to achieve this. they achieve looking Stoopid by their own little selfs!

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Fri 11/16/12 05:34 PM
This guy is for real: "The contextual stealth of the censorship is still being disregarded and ridiculed with every new post that PsyOp shills are swift enough to type. The truth is being buried behind pixel-sucking (staged) performances, debates between alpha shills and beta shills posing as fake truthers, just to keep the deception going.' From JREF So, non-truthers are posing as truthers in order to ridicule so-called 'authentic' truthers. This is based on the premise that truthers actually need outside aid in order to achieve this. they achieve looking Stoopid by their own little selfs! Wait!! Now it is all so clear!

Rawrr_Girl Joined Sun 10/04/09 Posts: 4431	Sat 11/17/12 02:34 AM
Some people may think I'm boring by never taking sides in any arguement. I prefer not to. I don't want to be involved in petty disagreements. Most ARE petty. It's just silly. High School ended years ago. Why put myself back in that kind of nonsense? No way.

HotRodDeluxe Joined Sun 05/06/12 Posts: 2743	Sat 11/17/12 04:28 AM
Some people may think I'm boring by never taking sides in any arguement. I prefer not to. I don't want to be involved in petty disagreements. Most ARE petty. It's just silly. High School ended years ago. Why put myself back in that kind of nonsense? No way. Good for you!

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Sat 11/17/12 06:42 AM
Some people may think I'm boring by never taking sides in any arguement. I prefer not to. I don't want to be involved in petty disagreements. Most ARE petty. It's just silly. High School ended years ago. Why put myself back in that kind of nonsense? No way. You are not boring. You are fun! You have intelligent humor. I don't think that makes you a she-bot, hot-in-tot, or even a tator tot! But please post a pic so we will know that you are not an alien spy seeking determination of our knowledge of your weapons.

HotRodDeluxe Joined Sun 05/06/12 Posts: 2743	Sun 11/18/12 12:35 AM Edited by HotRodDeluxe on Sun 11/18/12 12:46 AM
A recent independent report into the evidence of thermitic material found on the WTC site. The link: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/64959841/9119ProgressReport022912_rev1_030112web.pdf This report analyses the samples of suspected thermitic residue. It confirms an earlier report conducted on another set of samples which demonstrated that the red layer that was erroneously identified as evidence of thermite, thermate or nano-thermite is, in fact, a layer of epoxy resin containing iron oxide and kaolin-in effect, a rust preventative coating (paint). Although this report will not be considered evidence by some (no doubt for a number of specious reasons), it clearly puts the whole 'thermite' hypothesis to bed.

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sun 11/18/12 01:44 AM
A recent independent report into the evidence of thermitic material found on the WTC site. The link: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/64959841/9119ProgressReport022912_rev1_030112web.pdf This report analyses the samples of suspected thermitic residue. It confirms an earlier report conducted on another set of samples which demonstrated that the red layer that was erroneously identified as evidence of thermite, thermate or nano-thermite is, in fact, a layer of epoxy resin containing iron oxide and kaolin-in effect, a rust preventative coating (paint). Although this report will not be considered evidence by some (no doubt for a number of specious reasons), it clearly puts the whole 'thermite' hypothesis to bed. Think that will satisfy the Twoofers?

HotRodDeluxe Joined Sun 05/06/12 Posts: 2743	Sun 11/18/12 01:53 AM
A recent independent report into the evidence of thermitic material found on the WTC site. The link: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/64959841/9119ProgressReport022912_rev1_030112web.pdf This report analyses the samples of suspected thermitic residue. It confirms an earlier report conducted on another set of samples which demonstrated that the red layer that was erroneously identified as evidence of thermite, thermate or nano-thermite is, in fact, a layer of epoxy resin containing iron oxide and kaolin-in effect, a rust preventative coating (paint). Although this report will not be considered evidence by some (no doubt for a number of specious reasons), it clearly puts the whole 'thermite' hypothesis to bed. Think that will satisfy the Twoofers? No. Most won't understand the chemistry involved, nor will they wish to.

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sun 11/18/12 02:07 AM
A recent independent report into the evidence of thermitic material found on the WTC site. The link: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/64959841/9119ProgressReport022912_rev1_030112web.pdf This report analyses the samples of suspected thermitic residue. It confirms an earlier report conducted on another set of samples which demonstrated that the red layer that was erroneously identified as evidence of thermite, thermate or nano-thermite is, in fact, a layer of epoxy resin containing iron oxide and kaolin-in effect, a rust preventative coating (paint). Although this report will not be considered evidence by some (no doubt for a number of specious reasons), it clearly puts the whole 'thermite' hypothesis to bed. Think that will satisfy the Twoofers? No. Most won't understand the chemistry involved, nor will they wish to. so,they will cling to the Compound that burned them?

HotRodDeluxe Joined Sun 05/06/12 Posts: 2743	Sun 11/18/12 02:08 AM
A recent independent report into the evidence of thermitic material found on the WTC site. The link: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/64959841/9119ProgressReport022912_rev1_030112web.pdf This report analyses the samples of suspected thermitic residue. It confirms an earlier report conducted on another set of samples which demonstrated that the red layer that was erroneously identified as evidence of thermite, thermate or nano-thermite is, in fact, a layer of epoxy resin containing iron oxide and kaolin-in effect, a rust preventative coating (paint). Although this report will not be considered evidence by some (no doubt for a number of specious reasons), it clearly puts the whole 'thermite' hypothesis to bed. Think that will satisfy the Twoofers? No. Most won't understand the chemistry involved, nor will they wish to. so,they will cling to the Compound that burned them? In a manner of speaking.

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Sun 11/18/12 07:13 PM
A recent independent report into the evidence of thermitic material found on the WTC site. The link: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/64959841/9119ProgressReport022912_rev1_030112web.pdf This report analyses the samples of suspected thermitic residue. It confirms an earlier report conducted on another set of samples which demonstrated that the red layer that was erroneously identified as evidence of thermite, thermate or nano-thermite is, in fact, a layer of epoxy resin containing iron oxide and kaolin-in effect, a rust preventative coating (paint). Although this report will not be considered evidence by some (no doubt for a number of specious reasons), it clearly puts the whole 'thermite' hypothesis to bed. Think that will satisfy the Twoofers? No. Most won't understand the chemistry involved, nor will they wish to. so,they will cling to the Compound that burned them? In a manner of speaking. There have been several reports of the "basic materials" being present at 9/11 which show evidence of explosives. The materials, such as sulfur and iron oxide, as so common that the relative sources of the materials are almost infinite. The "researchers who have made these determinations invariably turn out to be devoid of actual credentials, and in some cases, don't actually exist at all. But oddly, once the debunking evidence is produced, the truthers just cruise forward as if nothing happened and will even present the same data sometime later. "Truth" obviously isn't in the agenda.

Chazster Joined Tue 08/28/07 Posts: 6206	Sun 11/18/12 09:07 PM
A recent independent report into the evidence of thermitic material found on the WTC site. The link: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/64959841/9119ProgressReport022912_rev1_030112web.pdf This report analyses the samples of suspected thermitic residue. It confirms an earlier report conducted on another set of samples which demonstrated that the red layer that was erroneously identified as evidence of thermite, thermate or nano-thermite is, in fact, a layer of epoxy resin containing iron oxide and kaolin-in effect, a rust preventative coating (paint). Although this report will not be considered evidence by some (no doubt for a number of specious reasons), it clearly puts the whole 'thermite' hypothesis to bed. Think that will satisfy the Twoofers? No. Most won't understand the chemistry involved, nor will they wish to. so,they will cling to the Compound that burned them? In a manner of speaking. There have been several reports of the "basic materials" being present at 9/11 which show evidence of explosives. The materials, such as sulfur and iron oxide, as so common that the relative sources of the materials are almost infinite. The "researchers who have made these determinations invariably turn out to be devoid of actual credentials, and in some cases, don't actually exist at all. But oddly, once the debunking evidence is produced, the truthers just cruise forward as if nothing happened and will even present the same data sometime later. "Truth" obviously isn't in the agenda. They can be found in the human body. Oh no metalwing your body has the "basic materials" that will show evidence of explosives. I guess if you get hit by a car or something unless they do an investigation you might have been killed by an internal controlled demolition. XO

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Mon 11/19/12 01:09 AM
A recent independent report into the evidence of thermitic material found on the WTC site. The link: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/64959841/9119ProgressReport022912_rev1_030112web.pdf This report analyses the samples of suspected thermitic residue. It confirms an earlier report conducted on another set of samples which demonstrated that the red layer that was erroneously identified as evidence of thermite, thermate or nano-thermite is, in fact, a layer of epoxy resin containing iron oxide and kaolin-in effect, a rust preventative coating (paint). Although this report will not be considered evidence by some (no doubt for a number of specious reasons), it clearly puts the whole 'thermite' hypothesis to bed. Think that will satisfy the Twoofers? No. Most won't understand the chemistry involved, nor will they wish to. so,they will cling to the Compound that burned them? In a manner of speaking. There have been several reports of the "basic materials" being present at 9/11 which show evidence of explosives. The materials, such as sulfur and iron oxide, as so common that the relative sources of the materials are almost infinite. The "researchers who have made these determinations invariably turn out to be devoid of actual credentials, and in some cases, don't actually exist at all. But oddly, once the debunking evidence is produced, the truthers just cruise forward as if nothing happened and will even present the same data sometime later. "Truth" obviously isn't in the agenda. They can be found in the human body. Oh no metalwing your body has the "basic materials" that will show evidence of explosives. I guess if you get hit by a car or something unless they do an investigation you might have been killed by an internal controlled demolition. XO Spontaneous Combustion! You haven't heard this one from me!

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Mon 11/19/12 07:19 AM Edited by Jeanniebean on Mon 11/19/12 07:21 AM
You truther critics seem to be beating a dead horse in this thread. I wonder if you can explain how so much total destruction (and dust) could be the result of a common pancake collapse. Cars at ground level, located blocks from the buildings were melted, burned rusted,turned over, etc. There was NO FIRE THERE. Did you hear or see any reports of an out of control fire taking over grown zero? I didn't. There was only dust. People were walking around covered in fine dust.

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Mon 11/19/12 07:28 AM
You truther critics seem to be beating a dead horse in this thread. I wonder if you can explain how so much total destruction (and dust) could be the result of a common pancake collapse. Cars at ground level, located blocks from the buildings were melted, burned rusted,turned over, etc. There was NO FIRE THERE. Did you hear or see any reports of an out of control fire taking over grown zero? I didn't. There was only dust. People were walking around covered in fine dust. We have explained that several times. You didn't listen or are incapable of understanding.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Mon 11/19/12 07:31 AM
ALLEGED PANCAKE COLLAPSE

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Mon 11/19/12 07:32 AM Edited by Jeanniebean on Mon 11/19/12 07:33 AM
You truther critics seem to be beating a dead horse in this thread. I wonder if you can explain how so much total destruction (and dust) could be the result of a common pancake collapse. Cars at ground level, located blocks from the buildings were melted, burned rusted,turned over, etc. There was NO FIRE THERE. Did you hear or see any reports of an out of control fire taking over grown zero? I didn't. There was only dust. People were walking around covered in fine dust. We have explained that several times. You didn't listen or are incapable of understanding. You have NEVER explained these things. I am capable of understanding, you are not capable of explaining it. That is, unless explosives were used. A pancake collapse can cause this? ..And you call "me" gullible.

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Mon 11/19/12 07:37 AM
You truther critics seem to be beating a dead horse in this thread. I wonder if you can explain how so much total destruction (and dust) could be the result of a common pancake collapse. Cars at ground level, located blocks from the buildings were melted, burned rusted,turned over, etc. There was NO FIRE THERE. Did you hear or see any reports of an out of control fire taking over grown zero? I didn't. There was only dust. People were walking around covered in fine dust. We have explained that several times. You didn't listen or are incapable of understanding. You have NEVER explained these things. I am capable of understanding, you are not capable of explaining it. That is, unless explosives were used. A pancake collapse can cause this? ..And you call "me" gullible. Ignorant beyond belief might describe the situation better. And BTW, you are using the term "pancake collapse" out of context.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Mon 11/19/12 07:42 AM
PANCAKE COLLAPSE. No explosion here... nothing unusual here. Just your average run of the mill pancake collapse.