1 3 5 6 7 8 9 15 16
Topic: Twoofer Madness
HotRodDeluxe's photo
Sun 10/28/12 01:44 AM
Edited by HotRodDeluxe on Sun 10/28/12 01:46 AM
I lifted this snippet of so-called 'logic' from another thread.


Destruction of the World Trade Center North
Tower and Fundamental Physics
By David Chandler
B.S., physics, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA
M.A., education, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA
M.S., mathematics, California Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA
Running Title: Downward Acceleration of WTC


The roof line of the North Tower of the World Trade Center is shown to have been in constant downward acceleration until it disappeared. A downward acceleration of the falling upper block implies a downward net force, which requires that the upward resistive force was less than the weight of the block. Therefore the downward force exerted by the falling block must also have been less than its weight. Since the lower section of the building was designed to support several times the weight of the upper block, the reduced force exerted by the falling block was insufficient to crush the lower section of the building. Therefore the falling block could not have acted as a "pile driver." The downward acceleration of the upper block can be understood as a consequence of, not the cause of, the disintegration of the lower section of the building.


http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/ChandlerDownwardAccelerationOfWTC1.pdf

laugh


Conrad_73's photo
Sun 10/28/12 05:38 AM

I lifted this snippet of so-called 'logic' from another thread.


Destruction of the World Trade Center North
Tower and Fundamental Physics
By David Chandler
B.S., physics, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA
M.A., education, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA
M.S., mathematics, California Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA
Running Title: Downward Acceleration of WTC


The roof line of the North Tower of the World Trade Center is shown to have been in constant downward acceleration until it disappeared. A downward acceleration of the falling upper block implies a downward net force, which requires that the upward resistive force was less than the weight of the block. Therefore the downward force exerted by the falling block must also have been less than its weight. Since the lower section of the building was designed to support several times the weight of the upper block, the reduced force exerted by the falling block was insufficient to crush the lower section of the building. Therefore the falling block could not have acted as a "pile driver." The downward acceleration of the upper block can be understood as a consequence of, not the cause of, the disintegration of the lower section of the building.


http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/ChandlerDownwardAccelerationOfWTC1.pdf

laugh


rofl In my days it was called Gravity!
And on this Earth it act MAINLY downward!
Besides,does the Jerk think all those upper Stories became weightless or something?
Really wonder how many of the Courses he attended!slaphead
Every Video shows that the disintegration started at the point of Impact,not below!
Unless,of course,if one stands on his head,or has his Monitor-settings screwed up!rofl

HotRodDeluxe's photo
Sun 10/28/12 04:40 PM
Edited by HotRodDeluxe on Sun 10/28/12 05:14 PM
Check this one:

I think I have posted about this in another thread, only as a brief mentioning. This thread is meant to examine the question about whether building 7 was pulled in more detail.

Pulled here means, in addition to controlled demolition, that the building was actually pulled towards the ground at a speed greater than free fall.

The seismic recordings of building 7 falling show only small signals. This indicates that the building was pulled into a huge underground cavern.


From JREF

BTW, this dipshit is for real, not a troll.

metalwing's photo
Sun 10/28/12 05:08 PM


I lifted this snippet of so-called 'logic' from another thread.


Destruction of the World Trade Center North
Tower and Fundamental Physics
By David Chandler
B.S., physics, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA
M.A., education, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA
M.S., mathematics, California Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA
Running Title: Downward Acceleration of WTC


The roof line of the North Tower of the World Trade Center is shown to have been in constant downward acceleration until it disappeared. A downward acceleration of the falling upper block implies a downward net force, which requires that the upward resistive force was less than the weight of the block. Therefore the downward force exerted by the falling block must also have been less than its weight. Since the lower section of the building was designed to support several times the weight of the upper block, the reduced force exerted by the falling block was insufficient to crush the lower section of the building. Therefore the falling block could not have acted as a "pile driver." The downward acceleration of the upper block can be understood as a consequence of, not the cause of, the disintegration of the lower section of the building.


http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/ChandlerDownwardAccelerationOfWTC1.pdf

laugh


rofl In my days it was called Gravity!
And on this Earth it act MAINLY downward!
Besides,does the Jerk think all those upper Stories became weightless or something?
Really wonder how many of the Courses he attended!slaphead
Every Video shows that the disintegration started at the point of Impact,not below!
Unless,of course,if one stands on his head,or has his Monitor-settings screwed up!rofl


When you see a post like this, it makes you wonder how it was created and why. No real educated person is that stupid and even a poor student of the sciences who managed to get a degree would know about gravity. Like some of the posts here, it is impossible to be that stupid so it is the agenda that is the real question that needs answering.

HotRodDeluxe's photo
Sun 10/28/12 05:12 PM
Edited by HotRodDeluxe on Sun 10/28/12 05:54 PM



I lifted this snippet of so-called 'logic' from another thread.


Destruction of the World Trade Center North
Tower and Fundamental Physics
By David Chandler
B.S., physics, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA
M.A., education, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA
M.S., mathematics, California Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA
Running Title: Downward Acceleration of WTC


The roof line of the North Tower of the World Trade Center is shown to have been in constant downward acceleration until it disappeared. A downward acceleration of the falling upper block implies a downward net force, which requires that the upward resistive force was less than the weight of the block. Therefore the downward force exerted by the falling block must also have been less than its weight. Since the lower section of the building was designed to support several times the weight of the upper block, the reduced force exerted by the falling block was insufficient to crush the lower section of the building. Therefore the falling block could not have acted as a "pile driver." The downward acceleration of the upper block can be understood as a consequence of, not the cause of, the disintegration of the lower section of the building.


http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/ChandlerDownwardAccelerationOfWTC1.pdf

laugh


rofl In my days it was called Gravity!
And on this Earth it act MAINLY downward!
Besides,does the Jerk think all those upper Stories became weightless or something?
Really wonder how many of the Courses he attended!slaphead
Every Video shows that the disintegration started at the point of Impact,not below!
Unless,of course,if one stands on his head,or has his Monitor-settings screwed up!rofl


When you see a post like this, it makes you wonder how it was created and why. No real educated person is that stupid and even a poor student of the sciences who managed to get a degree would know about gravity. Like some of the posts here, it is impossible to be that stupid so it is the agenda that is the real question that needs answering.


Either this, or the derogatory term 'sheeple' they use actually applies to the twoofers alone. :wink:

In all seriousness, I'm inclined to agree with you. I feel the agenda is to make money off the recent wave of New-Age CT enthusiasts that spawned from the internet age. Despite ridiculous claims to the contrary, people have made a fortune out of the gullible regarding this subject, just look at one of the instigators of truther stupidity, Richard Gage. He has become rich from book sales and advertising rights on his site for guess what? Other truther books, and although not strictly a truther, David Icke is another fleecing the 'sheeple' of their money. This man has struck a goldmine, and he is not alone. But as someone once said, "No-one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people". However, I would not limit this to the USA, it is universal.
There is the other possibility that the above article is just an elaborate hoax.

metalwing's photo
Sun 10/28/12 05:16 PM




I lifted this snippet of so-called 'logic' from another thread.


Destruction of the World Trade Center North
Tower and Fundamental Physics
By David Chandler
B.S., physics, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA
M.A., education, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA
M.S., mathematics, California Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA
Running Title: Downward Acceleration of WTC


The roof line of the North Tower of the World Trade Center is shown to have been in constant downward acceleration until it disappeared. A downward acceleration of the falling upper block implies a downward net force, which requires that the upward resistive force was less than the weight of the block. Therefore the downward force exerted by the falling block must also have been less than its weight. Since the lower section of the building was designed to support several times the weight of the upper block, the reduced force exerted by the falling block was insufficient to crush the lower section of the building. Therefore the falling block could not have acted as a "pile driver." The downward acceleration of the upper block can be understood as a consequence of, not the cause of, the disintegration of the lower section of the building.


http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/ChandlerDownwardAccelerationOfWTC1.pdf

laugh


rofl In my days it was called Gravity!
And on this Earth it act MAINLY downward!
Besides,does the Jerk think all those upper Stories became weightless or something?
Really wonder how many of the Courses he attended!slaphead
Every Video shows that the disintegration started at the point of Impact,not below!
Unless,of course,if one stands on his head,or has his Monitor-settings screwed up!rofl


When you see a post like this, it makes you wonder how it was created and why. No real educated person is that stupid and even a poor student of the sciences who managed to get a degree would know about gravity. Like some of the posts here, it is impossible to be that stupid so it is the agenda that is the real question that needs answering.


Either this, or the derogatory term 'sheeple' they use actually applies to the twoofers alone. :wink:


Possibly, but who is the "herder"?laugh (Shepard doesn't apply here)

HotRodDeluxe's photo
Sun 10/28/12 05:48 PM





I lifted this snippet of so-called 'logic' from another thread.


Destruction of the World Trade Center North
Tower and Fundamental Physics
By David Chandler
B.S., physics, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA
M.A., education, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA
M.S., mathematics, California Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA
Running Title: Downward Acceleration of WTC


The roof line of the North Tower of the World Trade Center is shown to have been in constant downward acceleration until it disappeared. A downward acceleration of the falling upper block implies a downward net force, which requires that the upward resistive force was less than the weight of the block. Therefore the downward force exerted by the falling block must also have been less than its weight. Since the lower section of the building was designed to support several times the weight of the upper block, the reduced force exerted by the falling block was insufficient to crush the lower section of the building. Therefore the falling block could not have acted as a "pile driver." The downward acceleration of the upper block can be understood as a consequence of, not the cause of, the disintegration of the lower section of the building.


http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/ChandlerDownwardAccelerationOfWTC1.pdf

laugh


rofl In my days it was called Gravity!
And on this Earth it act MAINLY downward!
Besides,does the Jerk think all those upper Stories became weightless or something?
Really wonder how many of the Courses he attended!slaphead
Every Video shows that the disintegration started at the point of Impact,not below!
Unless,of course,if one stands on his head,or has his Monitor-settings screwed up!rofl


When you see a post like this, it makes you wonder how it was created and why. No real educated person is that stupid and even a poor student of the sciences who managed to get a degree would know about gravity. Like some of the posts here, it is impossible to be that stupid so it is the agenda that is the real question that needs answering.


Either this, or the derogatory term 'sheeple' they use actually applies to the twoofers alone. :wink:


Possibly, but who is the "herder"?laugh (Shepard doesn't apply here)


I prefer the term 'shearer'. It works if one uses the term 'fleece' as a verb. laugh

HotRodDeluxe's photo
Tue 10/30/12 10:28 PM
Some more gems:


* I deny that most of the so-called victims ever existed, those who did exist were in on the plot and are still alive, maybe having remarried their "widow(er)s" after plastic surgery.

* the WTC buildings were almost completely hollow, and the corporations that allegedly rented (non-existent) floor space were in on the plot as well.

* the towers were built expressly for the purpose of a faked terrorist attack decades later and fitted with fake smoke generators as well as dummies.


From LetsRoll WTF?


HotRodDeluxe's photo
Tue 10/30/12 10:31 PM
From Hardfire:


'These debunkers wanted to go to "judy wood" who's theories are obviously manufactured DISINFORMATION by the government so that people are less apt to believe more accurate information like that released by A&E for 911 Truth.'

'The FNDY members who claim there were "fires on every floor" and the "fires were out of control" are CLEAR LIARS!'


Conrad_73's photo
Wed 10/31/12 01:52 AM

Check this one:

I think I have posted about this in another thread, only as a brief mentioning. This thread is meant to examine the question about whether building 7 was pulled in more detail.

Pulled here means, in addition to controlled demolition, that the building was actually pulled towards the ground at a speed greater than free fall.

The seismic recordings of building 7 falling show only small signals. This indicates that the building was pulled into a huge underground cavern.


From JREF

BTW, this dipshit is for real, not a troll.
Gasp!!
A Black Hole under WTC7!
Hoodah Thunkit?rofl

Conrad_73's photo
Wed 10/31/12 01:54 AM

Some more gems:


* I deny that most of the so-called victims ever existed, those who did exist were in on the plot and are still alive, maybe having remarried their "widow(er)s" after plastic surgery.

* the WTC buildings were almost completely hollow, and the corporations that allegedly rented (non-existent) floor space were in on the plot as well.

* the towers were built expressly for the purpose of a faked terrorist attack decades later and fitted with fake smoke generators as well as dummies.


From LetsRoll WTF?


and then they multiply!noway

TBRich's photo
Wed 10/31/12 06:15 AM



The world was flat according to experts until Columbus proved them wrong....


Incorrect. The Greeks and the Romans were aware of the Earth being a sphere. Columbus never set out to prove the Earth was round-that is just a myth. He set out to find an alternative route to China for the Turkish invasion of Constantinople in 1453 had closed the Silk Road to the west.


This is also a myth. If you read Columbus' personal diary, you find that his sole, personal goal was to spread the gospel to "all four corners of the world" in order to fulfill scripture and bring about the return of g-d.

TBRich's photo
Wed 10/31/12 06:19 AM


This whole unprovable argument for or against one theory or another, name calling and opinion bashing....

It's like 2 monkeys arguing over a banana under a tree full of them!

POINTLESS!


This is like saying that Creationism and Evolution are on par with each other, which they are not. One has provable facts, the other doesn't

metalwing's photo
Wed 10/31/12 07:10 AM



This whole unprovable argument for or against one theory or another, name calling and opinion bashing....

It's like 2 monkeys arguing over a banana under a tree full of them!

POINTLESS!


This is like saying that Creationism and Evolution are on par with each other, which they are not. One has provable facts, the other doesn't


Boy, is that ever an understatement!

metalwing's photo
Wed 10/31/12 07:14 AM
However, we have not seriously considered the fact that aliens may be microscopic and have anti-gravity weapons. They could have conquered and enslaved the race of nano-termites to do their bidding. Millions of warrior class nano-termite soldiers with gravity weapons could have gotten under Building 7 (for example) and caused the building to fall faster than gravity alone!

Someone prove this didn't happen!!

Conrad_73's photo
Wed 10/31/12 07:51 AM

However, we have not seriously considered the fact that aliens may be microscopic and have anti-gravity weapons. They could have conquered and enslaved the race of nano-termites to do their bidding. Millions of warrior class nano-termite soldiers with gravity weapons could have gotten under Building 7 (for example) and caused the building to fall faster than gravity alone!

Someone prove this didn't happen!!
It does sound reasonable!
But don't give them any Ideas!scared

HotRodDeluxe's photo
Wed 10/31/12 01:13 PM
Edited by HotRodDeluxe on Wed 10/31/12 01:35 PM




The world was flat according to experts until Columbus proved them wrong....


Incorrect. The Greeks and the Romans were aware of the Earth being a sphere. Columbus never set out to prove the Earth was round-that is just a myth. He set out to find an alternative route to China for the Turkish invasion of Constantinople in 1453 had closed the Silk Road to the west.


This is also a myth. If you read Columbus' personal diary, you find that his sole, personal goal was to spread the gospel to "all four corners of the world" in order to fulfill scripture and bring about the return of g-d.


Not a myth at all, and your statement is a rather simplistic synopsis of his plans for the voyage. If you will examine the reason he was awarded the funds by the monarchy, you will note that is was to re-open the trade routes closed by the invasion of Constantinople and bringing Christianity to the Orient was merely a part of his plan. That is how he 'sold' his voyage to Queen Isabella. The economic and political factors are responsible for his receipt of ships and funds. In reading his personal diary you will, of course have noted his admiration for Marco Polo and his willingness to emulate his exploits via an ocean route. He also wished to embark on this voyage in order to prove theories regarding distances, based on a Portuguese expedition a few years prior. His desire to proselytize was merely concomitant to the economic plans of Ferdinand and Isabella, as was the desire to prove his mathematical theories on navigation.

Bestinshow's photo
Wed 10/31/12 02:27 PM
Latest poll results.


Was 911 an inside job?

77.3 % say yes

12.1% say no

9.2% say depends how you define inside.

1.4% say none of the above.

cast your vote at.
http://freethoughtnation.com/contributing-writers/63-acharya-s/379-was-911-an-inside-job-poll.html

Conrad_73's photo
Wed 10/31/12 02:40 PM

Latest poll results.


Was 911 an inside job?

77.3 % say yes

12.1% say no

9.2% say depends how you define inside.

1.4% say none of the above.

cast your vote at.
http://freethoughtnation.com/contributing-writers/63-acharya-s/379-was-911-an-inside-job-poll.html
only one definition on a CT-Site!
Twoofer!

HotRodDeluxe's photo
Wed 10/31/12 03:09 PM
Edited by HotRodDeluxe on Wed 10/31/12 03:19 PM

Latest poll results.


Was 911 an inside job?

77.3 % say yes

12.1% say no

9.2% say depends how you define inside.

1.4% say none of the above.

cast your vote at.
http://freethoughtnation.com/contributing-writers/63-acharya-s/379-was-911-an-inside-job-poll.html


offtopic SPAM

Please note the forum's rules:

10) Do not spam the forums with advertisements for other services, websites, etc. URL links that are being used to promote other websites will be removed immediately. No advertising or self-promotion is allowed on the Mingle2 forums. We may allow certain links in the interest of discussion, such as links to current events, music videos, and other non-promotional sites. We will handle this on a case-by-case basis, but any link which leads directly to a sales page will promptly be removed. Links which lead to questionable content may be temporarily removed from the board for review.

1 3 5 6 7 8 9 15 16