Previous 1 3
Topic: Will Unemployment Extensions EVER run out for
willing2's photo
Sun 10/21/12 01:20 PM
the CHRONICALLY unemployed?

I read a lot of other forums and I find, the Liberal consensus seem to be they never will and they will take full advantage.

Where is the incentive to get those who have been retired on unemployment back to really looking for work?

My Mama told me once, and she was speaking to me. If I wanted a job, they are out there. Why was I sitting on my a$$ during the weekend instead of out hustling for a job?

Again? Where is the push to get them back out there?

msharmony's photo
Sun 10/21/12 01:27 PM
what type of push do you propose?

and how long are these extensions that are chronic?

surely not in ohio or nevada,,,,

msharmony's photo
Sun 10/21/12 01:27 PM
where are the incentives for businesses to HIRE some of these people,,,,


??

italianman4u's photo
Sun 10/21/12 01:32 PM
(Where is the push to get them back out there? )


hes about to get voted in.

willing2's photo
Sun 10/21/12 01:32 PM
Wal-Mart is hiring.

msharmony's photo
Sun 10/21/12 01:35 PM
Edited by msharmony on Sun 10/21/12 01:36 PM

Wal-Mart is hiring.


I know , I applied

ever notice how they have forty registers and five cashiers?

,,,any other suggestions?

preferrably someone paying enough to afford the childcare and gas.auto/insurance to attend the job since I dont live CLOSE to the places hiring,,,


and with a regular DAY shift, so I Can spend some time with my child in the evening...

willing2's photo
Sun 10/21/12 01:38 PM
Sure.
The claim is Barry created 11650 Jobs available in Las Vegas, NV

msharmony's photo
Sun 10/21/12 01:55 PM

businesses like walmart wont hire people who could potentially leave as soon as the economy picks up and people with higher education are needed. I applied there too.

I was under employed for over a year. I was able to collect unemployment all that time only by proving I was indeed continually looking for work. Its a requirement of collecting.

I consider myself extremely lucky to have a better paying job now than what I had before.

My benefits would have run out by a certain date. Its not a forever gig.





exactly...

I am expecting my 'luck' to change soon,asI continue to seek and apply for work,


and I will feel fortunate when it does

willing2's photo
Sun 10/21/12 02:00 PM

businesses like walmart wont hire people who could potentially leave as soon as the economy picks up and people with higher education are needed. I applied there too.

I was under employed for over a year. I was able to collect unemployment all that time only by proving I was indeed continually looking for work. Its a requirement of collecting.

I consider myself extremely lucky to have a better paying job now than what I had before.

My benefits would have run out by a certain date. Its not a forever gig.



Yes.
That works very well for those actually out seeking a job.



msharmony's photo
Sun 10/21/12 02:08 PM



businesses like walmart wont hire people who could potentially leave as soon as the economy picks up and people with higher education are needed. I applied there too.

I was under employed for over a year. I was able to collect unemployment all that time only by proving I was indeed continually looking for work. Its a requirement of collecting.

I consider myself extremely lucky to have a better paying job now than what I had before.

My benefits would have run out by a certain date. Its not a forever gig.





exactly...

I am expecting my 'luck' to change soon,asI continue to seek and apply for work,


and I will feel fortunate when it does


They will be fortunate to have you. Too bad its not easier to tell the good eggs from the bad. Im sure you make a valuable member of any team youre on.


thank you.

at this point ive added unconventional networking to try to find out about other options to earn income

willing2's photo
Sun 10/21/12 02:17 PM



businesses like walmart wont hire people who could potentially leave as soon as the economy picks up and people with higher education are needed. I applied there too.

I was under employed for over a year. I was able to collect unemployment all that time only by proving I was indeed continually looking for work. Its a requirement of collecting.

I consider myself extremely lucky to have a better paying job now than what I had before.

My benefits would have run out by a certain date. Its not a forever gig.



Yes.
That works very well for those actually out seeking a job.



Like I said, seeking a job is a requirement. You must provide the names/numbers of people youve contacted for work.

Understood.
Fraud happens when one is unemployed for years, no?


no photo
Sun 10/21/12 02:31 PM


businesses like walmart wont hire people who could potentially leave as soon as the economy picks up and people with higher education are needed. I applied there too.

I was under employed for over a year. I was able to collect unemployment all that time only by proving I was indeed continually looking for work. Its a requirement of collecting.

I consider myself extremely lucky to have a better paying job now than what I had before.

My benefits would have run out by a certain date. Its not a forever gig.





exactly...

I am expecting my 'luck' to change soon,asI continue to seek and apply for work,


and I will feel fortunate when it does

MS, have you explored any thing ?winking

InvictusV's photo
Sun 10/21/12 02:47 PM
Edited by InvictusV on Sun 10/21/12 02:49 PM
This is pretty pathetic..


Obama stimulus awarded Nevada $2,899,520,000..

$1,850,600,000 was received..

Wait for it.. Wait for it...


and it created or saved.... now get this...


751 jobs...


Now I see why it is so difficult to get a job in Nevada..

They cost $2,464,181 to create or save..

http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/default.aspx



msharmony's photo
Sun 10/21/12 02:50 PM



businesses like walmart wont hire people who could potentially leave as soon as the economy picks up and people with higher education are needed. I applied there too.

I was under employed for over a year. I was able to collect unemployment all that time only by proving I was indeed continually looking for work. Its a requirement of collecting.

I consider myself extremely lucky to have a better paying job now than what I had before.

My benefits would have run out by a certain date. Its not a forever gig.





exactly...

I am expecting my 'luck' to change soon,asI continue to seek and apply for work,


and I will feel fortunate when it does

MS, have you explored any thing ?winking



yes, i am applying there also

tyflowerforyou


no photo
Sun 10/21/12 03:02 PM




businesses like walmart wont hire people who could potentially leave as soon as the economy picks up and people with higher education are needed. I applied there too.

I was under employed for over a year. I was able to collect unemployment all that time only by proving I was indeed continually looking for work. Its a requirement of collecting.

I consider myself extremely lucky to have a better paying job now than what I had before.

My benefits would have run out by a certain date. Its not a forever gig.





exactly...

I am expecting my 'luck' to change soon,asI continue to seek and apply for work,


and I will feel fortunate when it does

MS, have you explored any thing ?winking



yes, i am applying there also

tyflowerforyou



:thumbsup:

willing2's photo
Sun 10/21/12 03:02 PM
I have lots of positions open.


no photo
Sun 10/21/12 05:13 PM

Wal-Mart is hiring.


Do they pay enough for someone to actually live on?

navygirl's photo
Sun 10/21/12 05:17 PM
Edited by navygirl on Sun 10/21/12 05:20 PM

the CHRONICALLY unemployed?

I read a lot of other forums and I find, the Liberal consensus seem to be they never will and they will take full advantage.

Where is the incentive to get those who have been retired on unemployment back to really looking for work?

My Mama told me once, and she was speaking to me. If I wanted a job, they are out there. Why was I sitting on my a$$ during the weekend instead of out hustling for a job?

Again? Where is the push to get them back out there?


Simple; cut of the extensions. We don't have extensions here for unemployment unless there is an extreme circumstance like the jobs offered are less than what unemployment is paying.Unemployment pays crappy here as it is no longer 70% of your pay. The did a flat rate of $1600.00 a month and no one can live off that here.

no photo
Sun 10/21/12 05:35 PM
Edited by alleoops on Sun 10/21/12 05:36 PM


the CHRONICALLY unemployed?

I read a lot of other forums and I find, the Liberal consensus seem to be they never will and they will take full advantage.

Where is the incentive to get those who have been retired on unemployment back to really looking for work?

My Mama told me once, and she was speaking to me. If I wanted a job, they are out there. Why was I sitting on my a$$ during the weekend instead of out hustling for a job?

Again? Where is the push to get them back out there?


Simple; cut of the extensions. We don't have extensions here for unemployment unless there is an extreme circumstance like the jobs offered are less than what unemployment is paying.Unemployment pays crappy here as it is no longer 70% of your pay. The did a flat rate of $1600.00 a month and no one can live off that here.

I do. One has to down size to bare necessities only and I have two dogs. Times are tough but it's better than living on the street. You do what you have to do. Oh, and I have never received unemployment or welfare.

navygirl's photo
Sun 10/21/12 06:15 PM



the CHRONICALLY unemployed?

I read a lot of other forums and I find, the Liberal consensus seem to be they never will and they will take full advantage.

Where is the incentive to get those who have been retired on unemployment back to really looking for work?

My Mama told me once, and she was speaking to me. If I wanted a job, they are out there. Why was I sitting on my a$$ during the weekend instead of out hustling for a job?

Again? Where is the push to get them back out there?


Simple; cut of the extensions. We don't have extensions here for unemployment unless there is an extreme circumstance like the jobs offered are less than what unemployment is paying.Unemployment pays crappy here as it is no longer 70% of your pay. The did a flat rate of $1600.00 a month and no one can live off that here.

I do. One has to down size to bare necessities only and I have two dogs. Times are tough but it's better than living on the street. You do what you have to do. Oh, and I have never received unemployment or welfare.


Yep; whe I lost my job; I had to cut back on things big time. Even now having a low paying job; I still cut back on things; even meals. I usually skip supper 3 to 5 times a week; keep the heat on the lowest setting, go to second hand stores for clothing, and bike to work to save on gas. Hopefully after next week; I will have a better paying job.

Previous 1 3