100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: "When 4 Americans get killed, it's not optimal" | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
lol, no it hasnt the answer has been, go find your own answer,,lol More updates on the investigation. Seems Hussein was aware all the time that they needed more security and refused them. Jake Tapper By Jake Tapper @jaketapper Find on FacebookFollow on Twitter Oct 19, 2012 3:22pm Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi Email 158 Smaller Font Text Larger Text | Print gty us embassy benghazi ll 121019 wblog Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi STR/AFP/GettyImages Republicans on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform have released new documents backing up claims by security personnel previously station in Libya that there was a shortage of security personnel in Benghazi. The documents contain previously unreleased cables from Ambassador Stevens and his staff reflecting concerns about safety in the country. The U.S. State Department did not have an immediate comment. One signed by Stevens and titled “LIBYA’S FRAGILE SECURITY DETERIORIATES AS TRIBAL RIVALRIES, POWER PLAYS AND EXTREMISM INTENSIFY,” dated June 25, 2012, assess the increase in violence. ”From April to June, Libya also witnesses an increase in attacks targeting international organizations and foreign interests,” Stevens wrote, describing attacks on a United Nations official in Benghazi, International Committee for the Red Cross buildings in Benghazi and Misrata, and IED at the mission in Benghazi, and RPG fired at the British Ambassador’s convoy, and an attack on the consulate of Tunisia. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol, no it hasnt the answer has been, go find your own answer,,lol More updates on the investigation. Seems Hussein was aware all the time that they needed more security and refused them. Jake Tapper By Jake Tapper @jaketapper Find on FacebookFollow on Twitter Oct 19, 2012 3:22pm Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi Email 158 Smaller Font Text Larger Text | Print gty us embassy benghazi ll 121019 wblog Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi STR/AFP/GettyImages Republicans on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform have released new documents backing up claims by security personnel previously station in Libya that there was a shortage of security personnel in Benghazi. The documents contain previously unreleased cables from Ambassador Stevens and his staff reflecting concerns about safety in the country. The U.S. State Department did not have an immediate comment. One signed by Stevens and titled “LIBYA’S FRAGILE SECURITY DETERIORIATES AS TRIBAL RIVALRIES, POWER PLAYS AND EXTREMISM INTENSIFY,” dated June 25, 2012, assess the increase in violence. ”From April to June, Libya also witnesses an increase in attacks targeting international organizations and foreign interests,” Stevens wrote, describing attacks on a United Nations official in Benghazi, International Committee for the Red Cross buildings in Benghazi and Misrata, and IED at the mission in Benghazi, and RPG fired at the British Ambassador’s convoy, and an attack on the consulate of Tunisia. I dont think at this point there is a dispute about requests being made who received the requests and what those requests would have changed if granted is whats still debated,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol, no it hasnt the answer has been, go find your own answer,,lol More updates on the investigation. Seems Hussein was aware all the time that they needed more security and refused them. Jake Tapper By Jake Tapper @jaketapper Find on FacebookFollow on Twitter Oct 19, 2012 3:22pm Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi Email 158 Smaller Font Text Larger Text | Print gty us embassy benghazi ll 121019 wblog Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi STR/AFP/GettyImages Republicans on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform have released new documents backing up claims by security personnel previously station in Libya that there was a shortage of security personnel in Benghazi. The documents contain previously unreleased cables from Ambassador Stevens and his staff reflecting concerns about safety in the country. The U.S. State Department did not have an immediate comment. One signed by Stevens and titled “LIBYA’S FRAGILE SECURITY DETERIORIATES AS TRIBAL RIVALRIES, POWER PLAYS AND EXTREMISM INTENSIFY,” dated June 25, 2012, assess the increase in violence. ”From April to June, Libya also witnesses an increase in attacks targeting international organizations and foreign interests,” Stevens wrote, describing attacks on a United Nations official in Benghazi, International Committee for the Red Cross buildings in Benghazi and Misrata, and IED at the mission in Benghazi, and RPG fired at the British Ambassador’s convoy, and an attack on the consulate of Tunisia. All of the attacks and threats are documented in a timeline of actual events...The "shifting" explanations from Obama, Biden, and Clinton are also documented....All three lied repeatedly....They were aware of the violence and the need for more security and did nothing...what will be interesting is finding out why they turned a blind eye to the danger in Benghazi that ultimately lead to the deaths of four Americans.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol, no it hasnt the answer has been, go find your own answer,,lol More updates on the investigation. Seems Hussein was aware all the time that they needed more security and refused them. Jake Tapper By Jake Tapper @jaketapper Find on FacebookFollow on Twitter Oct 19, 2012 3:22pm Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi Email 158 Smaller Font Text Larger Text | Print gty us embassy benghazi ll 121019 wblog Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi STR/AFP/GettyImages Republicans on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform have released new documents backing up claims by security personnel previously station in Libya that there was a shortage of security personnel in Benghazi. The documents contain previously unreleased cables from Ambassador Stevens and his staff reflecting concerns about safety in the country. The U.S. State Department did not have an immediate comment. One signed by Stevens and titled “LIBYA’S FRAGILE SECURITY DETERIORIATES AS TRIBAL RIVALRIES, POWER PLAYS AND EXTREMISM INTENSIFY,” dated June 25, 2012, assess the increase in violence. ”From April to June, Libya also witnesses an increase in attacks targeting international organizations and foreign interests,” Stevens wrote, describing attacks on a United Nations official in Benghazi, International Committee for the Red Cross buildings in Benghazi and Misrata, and IED at the mission in Benghazi, and RPG fired at the British Ambassador’s convoy, and an attack on the consulate of Tunisia. All of the attacks and threats are documented in a timeline of actual events...The "shifting" explanations from Obama, Biden, and Clinton are also documented....All three lied repeatedly....They were aware of the violence and the need for more security and did nothing...what will be interesting is finding out why they turned a blind eye to the danger in Benghazi that ultimately lead to the deaths of four Americans.... Why would they lie when they all knew the truth would come out eventually? You reckon Holder will man-up and investigate them criminally? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol, no it hasnt the answer has been, go find your own answer,,lol More updates on the investigation. Seems Hussein was aware all the time that they needed more security and refused them. Jake Tapper By Jake Tapper @jaketapper Find on FacebookFollow on Twitter Oct 19, 2012 3:22pm Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi Email 158 Smaller Font Text Larger Text | Print gty us embassy benghazi ll 121019 wblog Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi STR/AFP/GettyImages Republicans on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform have released new documents backing up claims by security personnel previously station in Libya that there was a shortage of security personnel in Benghazi. The documents contain previously unreleased cables from Ambassador Stevens and his staff reflecting concerns about safety in the country. The U.S. State Department did not have an immediate comment. One signed by Stevens and titled “LIBYA’S FRAGILE SECURITY DETERIORIATES AS TRIBAL RIVALRIES, POWER PLAYS AND EXTREMISM INTENSIFY,” dated June 25, 2012, assess the increase in violence. ”From April to June, Libya also witnesses an increase in attacks targeting international organizations and foreign interests,” Stevens wrote, describing attacks on a United Nations official in Benghazi, International Committee for the Red Cross buildings in Benghazi and Misrata, and IED at the mission in Benghazi, and RPG fired at the British Ambassador’s convoy, and an attack on the consulate of Tunisia. All of the attacks and threats are documented in a timeline of actual events...The "shifting" explanations from Obama, Biden, and Clinton are also documented....All three lied repeatedly....They were aware of the violence and the need for more security and did nothing...what will be interesting is finding out why they turned a blind eye to the danger in Benghazi that ultimately lead to the deaths of four Americans.... a timeline document,,great thats what I was asking for where can it be found...? I recall two seperate things going on, an attack in Libya on the date of the release of an anti mohammed movie and also an attack in Benghazi which left an ambassador dead I still have not seen where Obama or Biden shifted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol, no it hasnt the answer has been, go find your own answer,,lol More updates on the investigation. Seems Hussein was aware all the time that they needed more security and refused them. Jake Tapper By Jake Tapper @jaketapper Find on FacebookFollow on Twitter Oct 19, 2012 3:22pm Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi Email 158 Smaller Font Text Larger Text | Print gty us embassy benghazi ll 121019 wblog Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi STR/AFP/GettyImages Republicans on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform have released new documents backing up claims by security personnel previously station in Libya that there was a shortage of security personnel in Benghazi. The documents contain previously unreleased cables from Ambassador Stevens and his staff reflecting concerns about safety in the country. The U.S. State Department did not have an immediate comment. One signed by Stevens and titled “LIBYA’S FRAGILE SECURITY DETERIORIATES AS TRIBAL RIVALRIES, POWER PLAYS AND EXTREMISM INTENSIFY,” dated June 25, 2012, assess the increase in violence. ”From April to June, Libya also witnesses an increase in attacks targeting international organizations and foreign interests,” Stevens wrote, describing attacks on a United Nations official in Benghazi, International Committee for the Red Cross buildings in Benghazi and Misrata, and IED at the mission in Benghazi, and RPG fired at the British Ambassador’s convoy, and an attack on the consulate of Tunisia. All of the attacks and threats are documented in a timeline of actual events...The "shifting" explanations from Obama, Biden, and Clinton are also documented....All three lied repeatedly....They were aware of the violence and the need for more security and did nothing...what will be interesting is finding out why they turned a blind eye to the danger in Benghazi that ultimately lead to the deaths of four Americans.... perhaps preoccupied with their own narcissistic delusions? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol, no it hasnt the answer has been, go find your own answer,,lol More updates on the investigation. Seems Hussein was aware all the time that they needed more security and refused them. Jake Tapper By Jake Tapper @jaketapper Find on FacebookFollow on Twitter Oct 19, 2012 3:22pm Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi Email 158 Smaller Font Text Larger Text | Print gty us embassy benghazi ll 121019 wblog Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi STR/AFP/GettyImages Republicans on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform have released new documents backing up claims by security personnel previously station in Libya that there was a shortage of security personnel in Benghazi. The documents contain previously unreleased cables from Ambassador Stevens and his staff reflecting concerns about safety in the country. The U.S. State Department did not have an immediate comment. One signed by Stevens and titled “LIBYA’S FRAGILE SECURITY DETERIORIATES AS TRIBAL RIVALRIES, POWER PLAYS AND EXTREMISM INTENSIFY,” dated June 25, 2012, assess the increase in violence. ”From April to June, Libya also witnesses an increase in attacks targeting international organizations and foreign interests,” Stevens wrote, describing attacks on a United Nations official in Benghazi, International Committee for the Red Cross buildings in Benghazi and Misrata, and IED at the mission in Benghazi, and RPG fired at the British Ambassador’s convoy, and an attack on the consulate of Tunisia. All of the attacks and threats are documented in a timeline of actual events...The "shifting" explanations from Obama, Biden, and Clinton are also documented....All three lied repeatedly....They were aware of the violence and the need for more security and did nothing...what will be interesting is finding out why they turned a blind eye to the danger in Benghazi that ultimately lead to the deaths of four Americans.... Why would they lie when they all knew the truth would come out eventually? You reckon Holder will man-up and investigate them criminally? repeating 'they lied' doesnt make it true is there anyone willing to actually REFERENCE what lies they specificaly told,,, anyone? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol, no it hasnt the answer has been, go find your own answer,,lol More updates on the investigation. Seems Hussein was aware all the time that they needed more security and refused them. Jake Tapper By Jake Tapper @jaketapper Find on FacebookFollow on Twitter Oct 19, 2012 3:22pm Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi Email 158 Smaller Font Text Larger Text | Print gty us embassy benghazi ll 121019 wblog Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi STR/AFP/GettyImages Republicans on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform have released new documents backing up claims by security personnel previously station in Libya that there was a shortage of security personnel in Benghazi. The documents contain previously unreleased cables from Ambassador Stevens and his staff reflecting concerns about safety in the country. The U.S. State Department did not have an immediate comment. One signed by Stevens and titled “LIBYA’S FRAGILE SECURITY DETERIORIATES AS TRIBAL RIVALRIES, POWER PLAYS AND EXTREMISM INTENSIFY,” dated June 25, 2012, assess the increase in violence. ”From April to June, Libya also witnesses an increase in attacks targeting international organizations and foreign interests,” Stevens wrote, describing attacks on a United Nations official in Benghazi, International Committee for the Red Cross buildings in Benghazi and Misrata, and IED at the mission in Benghazi, and RPG fired at the British Ambassador’s convoy, and an attack on the consulate of Tunisia. All of the attacks and threats are documented in a timeline of actual events...The "shifting" explanations from Obama, Biden, and Clinton are also documented....All three lied repeatedly....They were aware of the violence and the need for more security and did nothing...what will be interesting is finding out why they turned a blind eye to the danger in Benghazi that ultimately lead to the deaths of four Americans.... perhaps preoccupied with their own narcissistic delusions? perhaps assessing the available INTELLIGENCE,,,,,but the narcissist angle is more sensational and entertaining,,,, two very important factors in politics,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A bigger issue is how can the MSM give Obama a free pass after being caught lying so blatantly. It makes the MSM look as dishonest as him. He is counting on their help and so far, he is getting it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol, no it hasnt the answer has been, go find your own answer,,lol More updates on the investigation. Seems Hussein was aware all the time that they needed more security and refused them. Jake Tapper By Jake Tapper @jaketapper Find on FacebookFollow on Twitter Oct 19, 2012 3:22pm Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi Email 158 Smaller Font Text Larger Text | Print gty us embassy benghazi ll 121019 wblog Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi STR/AFP/GettyImages Republicans on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform have released new documents backing up claims by security personnel previously station in Libya that there was a shortage of security personnel in Benghazi. The documents contain previously unreleased cables from Ambassador Stevens and his staff reflecting concerns about safety in the country. The U.S. State Department did not have an immediate comment. One signed by Stevens and titled “LIBYA’S FRAGILE SECURITY DETERIORIATES AS TRIBAL RIVALRIES, POWER PLAYS AND EXTREMISM INTENSIFY,” dated June 25, 2012, assess the increase in violence. ”From April to June, Libya also witnesses an increase in attacks targeting international organizations and foreign interests,” Stevens wrote, describing attacks on a United Nations official in Benghazi, International Committee for the Red Cross buildings in Benghazi and Misrata, and IED at the mission in Benghazi, and RPG fired at the British Ambassador’s convoy, and an attack on the consulate of Tunisia. All of the attacks and threats are documented in a timeline of actual events...The "shifting" explanations from Obama, Biden, and Clinton are also documented....All three lied repeatedly....They were aware of the violence and the need for more security and did nothing...what will be interesting is finding out why they turned a blind eye to the danger in Benghazi that ultimately lead to the deaths of four Americans.... perhaps preoccupied with their own narcissistic delusions? perhaps assessing the available INTELLIGENCE,,,,,but the narcissist angle is more sensational and entertaining,,,, two very important factors in politics,,, I'm sure. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issa and Chaffetz say they’ve “been told repeatedly” that the Obama administration not only “repeatedly reject(ed) requests for increased security despite escalating violence, but it also systematically decreased existing security to dangerous and ineffective levels,” and did so “to effectuate a policy of ‘normalization’ in Libya after the conclusion of its civil war.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A bigger issue is how can the MSM give Obama a free pass after being caught lying so blatantly. It makes the MSM look as dishonest as him. He is counting on their help and so far, he is getting it. he has been caught in no more or less 'blatant' lies than any president before |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
He can lie according to the Affirmative Action Scale.
He is allowed 23% more lies than any other president. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Bush got away with 100 percent more drunken crimes than any other president
since we are just creating random information....lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol, no it hasnt the answer has been, go find your own answer,,lol More updates on the investigation. Seems Hussein was aware all the time that they needed more security and refused them. Jake Tapper By Jake Tapper @jaketapper Find on FacebookFollow on Twitter Oct 19, 2012 3:22pm Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi Email 158 Smaller Font Text Larger Text | Print gty us embassy benghazi ll 121019 wblog Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi STR/AFP/GettyImages Republicans on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform have released new documents backing up claims by security personnel previously station in Libya that there was a shortage of security personnel in Benghazi. The documents contain previously unreleased cables from Ambassador Stevens and his staff reflecting concerns about safety in the country. The U.S. State Department did not have an immediate comment. One signed by Stevens and titled “LIBYA’S FRAGILE SECURITY DETERIORIATES AS TRIBAL RIVALRIES, POWER PLAYS AND EXTREMISM INTENSIFY,” dated June 25, 2012, assess the increase in violence. ”From April to June, Libya also witnesses an increase in attacks targeting international organizations and foreign interests,” Stevens wrote, describing attacks on a United Nations official in Benghazi, International Committee for the Red Cross buildings in Benghazi and Misrata, and IED at the mission in Benghazi, and RPG fired at the British Ambassador’s convoy, and an attack on the consulate of Tunisia. All of the attacks and threats are documented in a timeline of actual events...The "shifting" explanations from Obama, Biden, and Clinton are also documented....All three lied repeatedly....They were aware of the violence and the need for more security and did nothing...what will be interesting is finding out why they turned a blind eye to the danger in Benghazi that ultimately lead to the deaths of four Americans.... Why would they lie when they all knew the truth would come out eventually? You reckon Holder will man-up and investigate them criminally? The Obama administration has never been honest or wise when it comes to dealing with Islamic extremists and the threat they pose...Motive for lying is anyone's guess...Mine would be they lied because they knew the political cost would be fatal to Obama's bid for re-election....I don't think it was a matter of them thinking the truth would NOT come out eventually, it was a matter of them thinking they could control WHEN it came out, glad hand the incident until after the election...I think they underestimated Nordstrom and Issa's insistence on telling the truth immediately as well as Romney and Ryan's determination to push the issue to the front of the campaign...I also don't think anyone on the Obama team was expecting Biden to outright lie on a nationally televised event but it is a proven fact that he did lie when he answered the question asked about the lack of security in Benghazi only hours after State Department security officials testified under oath at a special hearing in Congress stating that they made repeated requests for more security only to have those requests denied...This was Biden's answer,"We weren't told they wanted more security. We did not know they wanted more security there."... As to a criminal investigation into the events...I hope so.....If nothing else, all three are guilty of negligence...IMO of course....  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol, no it hasnt the answer has been, go find your own answer,,lol More updates on the investigation. Seems Hussein was aware all the time that they needed more security and refused them. Jake Tapper By Jake Tapper @jaketapper Find on FacebookFollow on Twitter Oct 19, 2012 3:22pm Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi Email 158 Smaller Font Text Larger Text | Print gty us embassy benghazi ll 121019 wblog Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi STR/AFP/GettyImages Republicans on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform have released new documents backing up claims by security personnel previously station in Libya that there was a shortage of security personnel in Benghazi. The documents contain previously unreleased cables from Ambassador Stevens and his staff reflecting concerns about safety in the country. The U.S. State Department did not have an immediate comment. One signed by Stevens and titled “LIBYA’S FRAGILE SECURITY DETERIORIATES AS TRIBAL RIVALRIES, POWER PLAYS AND EXTREMISM INTENSIFY,” dated June 25, 2012, assess the increase in violence. ”From April to June, Libya also witnesses an increase in attacks targeting international organizations and foreign interests,” Stevens wrote, describing attacks on a United Nations official in Benghazi, International Committee for the Red Cross buildings in Benghazi and Misrata, and IED at the mission in Benghazi, and RPG fired at the British Ambassador’s convoy, and an attack on the consulate of Tunisia. All of the attacks and threats are documented in a timeline of actual events...The "shifting" explanations from Obama, Biden, and Clinton are also documented....All three lied repeatedly....They were aware of the violence and the need for more security and did nothing...what will be interesting is finding out why they turned a blind eye to the danger in Benghazi that ultimately lead to the deaths of four Americans.... Why would they lie when they all knew the truth would come out eventually? You reckon Holder will man-up and investigate them criminally? The Obama administration has never been honest or wise when it comes to dealing with Islamic extremists and the threat they pose...Motive for lying is anyone's guess...Mine would be they lied because they knew the political cost would be fatal to Obama's bid for re-election....I don't think it was a matter of them thinking the truth would NOT come out eventually, it was a matter of them thinking they could control WHEN it came out, glad hand the incident until after the election...I think they underestimated Nordstrom and Issa's insistence on telling the truth immediately as well as Romney and Ryan's determination to push the issue to the front of the campaign...I also don't think anyone on the Obama team was expecting Biden to outright lie on a nationally televised event but it is a proven fact that he did lie when he answered the question asked about the lack of security in Benghazi only hours after State Department security officials testified under oath at a special hearing in Congress stating that they made repeated requests for more security only to have those requests denied...This was Biden's answer,"We weren't told they wanted more security. We did not know they wanted more security there."... As to a criminal investigation into the events...I hope so.....If nothing else, all three are guilty of negligence...IMO of course.... Beats hell out of me why Clinton still has a job. How come she hasn't been let go? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obama's illegal war in Libya no big deal.
Using the world optimal to describe a situation that is not optimal is a huge deal. Why do we have Embassies around these unstable regions around the world? How the hell do we protect all of these hundreds of embassies? 1983 U.S. embassy bombing 63 dead. Blame Reagan 1998 United States embassy bombings. 224 dead. Blame Clinton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Leigh2154
on
Fri 10/19/12 06:59 PM
|
|
lol, no it hasnt the answer has been, go find your own answer,,lol More updates on the investigation. Seems Hussein was aware all the time that they needed more security and refused them. Jake Tapper By Jake Tapper @jaketapper Find on FacebookFollow on Twitter Oct 19, 2012 3:22pm Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi Email 158 Smaller Font Text Larger Text | Print gty us embassy benghazi ll 121019 wblog Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi STR/AFP/GettyImages Republicans on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform have released new documents backing up claims by security personnel previously station in Libya that there was a shortage of security personnel in Benghazi. The documents contain previously unreleased cables from Ambassador Stevens and his staff reflecting concerns about safety in the country. The U.S. State Department did not have an immediate comment. One signed by Stevens and titled “LIBYA’S FRAGILE SECURITY DETERIORIATES AS TRIBAL RIVALRIES, POWER PLAYS AND EXTREMISM INTENSIFY,” dated June 25, 2012, assess the increase in violence. ”From April to June, Libya also witnesses an increase in attacks targeting international organizations and foreign interests,” Stevens wrote, describing attacks on a United Nations official in Benghazi, International Committee for the Red Cross buildings in Benghazi and Misrata, and IED at the mission in Benghazi, and RPG fired at the British Ambassador’s convoy, and an attack on the consulate of Tunisia. All of the attacks and threats are documented in a timeline of actual events...The "shifting" explanations from Obama, Biden, and Clinton are also documented....All three lied repeatedly....They were aware of the violence and the need for more security and did nothing...what will be interesting is finding out why they turned a blind eye to the danger in Benghazi that ultimately lead to the deaths of four Americans.... Why would they lie when they all knew the truth would come out eventually? You reckon Holder will man-up and investigate them criminally? The Obama administration has never been honest or wise when it comes to dealing with Islamic extremists and the threat they pose...Motive for lying is anyone's guess...Mine would be they lied because they knew the political cost would be fatal to Obama's bid for re-election....I don't think it was a matter of them thinking the truth would NOT come out eventually, it was a matter of them thinking they could control WHEN it came out, glad hand the incident until after the election...I think they underestimated Nordstrom and Issa's insistence on telling the truth immediately as well as Romney and Ryan's determination to push the issue to the front of the campaign...I also don't think anyone on the Obama team was expecting Biden to outright lie on a nationally televised event but it is a proven fact that he did lie when he answered the question asked about the lack of security in Benghazi only hours after State Department security officials testified under oath at a special hearing in Congress stating that they made repeated requests for more security only to have those requests denied...This was Biden's answer,"We weren't told they wanted more security. We did not know they wanted more security there."... As to a criminal investigation into the events...I hope so.....If nothing else, all three are guilty of negligence...IMO of course.... Beats hell out of me why Clinton still has a job. How come she hasn't been let go? In all fairness to Clinton, until Benghazi, I think she did a decent job especially considering what she had to work with (that would be zero)...Also, think back to the 08 campaign and how much support she had before narrowly losing the nomination to Obama...There was a lot riding on her giving support to Barack and I think a few deals were made before she endorsed him...Remember, she didn't endorse him until after the two met privately at her home in NY...Also, do not underestimate the Clintons pull in Washington, especially Billy's...I hear he is all over this one....And why does it beat hell out of you why she still has a job?...On what grounds would they fire her?....I'm not saying they won't have grounds after the investigation is complete, but right now they have none for her or Obama...And lastly and not that this is a reason, but Clinton has made it clear if Obama is re-elected she will not serve as his Sec'y of State...Maybe she also made it clear to Obama that she is no longer willing to be his patsy... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Bush got away with 100 percent more drunken crimes than any other president since we are just creating random information....lol and those were? |
|
|
|
|
