Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Topic: Obama ~ Romney ~ or Third Party?
becca777 Joined Tue 08/05/08 Posts: 2161	Thu 10/04/12 01:02 PM
Interesting points on both sides... I will, most definitely, be more attentive in the debates coming up.

suds00 Joined Mon 01/16/12 Posts: 34	Thu 10/04/12 02:04 PM
gary johnson,the libertarian candidate.

Sojourning_Soul Joined Fri 02/13/09 Posts: 10767	Thu 10/04/12 03:52 PM Edited by Sojourning_Soul on Thu 10/04/12 03:54 PM
Ron Paul would have crushed O in the debates! http://www.policymic.com/articles/15854/ron-paul-would-have-crushed-obama-in-the-presidential-debate Like him or not, it would have been a debate worth watching! They couldn't let him be the nominee because he would have addressed the issues and not gone by their "If you don't mention this, I won't bring up that" preset agenda.

andrewzooms Joined Fri 10/26/07 Posts: 2842	Thu 10/04/12 03:58 PM
When Gary Johnson says something he does it!

Sojourning_Soul Joined Fri 02/13/09 Posts: 10767	Thu 10/04/12 04:26 PM
If a write-in isn't an option for Paul, GJ gets my vote! Voting for either of them will allow me to face myself in a mirror with an intact conscience.

alleoops Joined Sat 08/06/11 Posts: 10832	Thu 10/04/12 05:10 PM
gary johnson,the libertarian candidate. That's what I'm talking about. Why settle for a third party when we can have four or more?

Sojourning_Soul Joined Fri 02/13/09 Posts: 10767	Thu 10/04/12 05:13 PM
gary johnson,the libertarian candidate. That's what I'm talking about. Why settle for a third party when we can have four or more? Two people is not my idea of a party.... more of a love affair in my opinion...

alleoops Joined Sat 08/06/11 Posts: 10832	Thu 10/04/12 05:19 PM
gary johnson,the libertarian candidate. That's what I'm talking about. Why settle for a third party when we can have four or more? Two people is not my idea of a party.... more of a love affair in my opinion... it is apparent the each of us has their own opinion, as well as a$$-holes, so we should have a party(political) for everyone. It's only fair.

becca777 Joined Tue 08/05/08 Posts: 2161	Fri 10/05/12 07:22 AM
i would love to know how others felt. i just don't want my vote to be lost.

Sojourning_Soul Joined Fri 02/13/09 Posts: 10767	Fri 10/05/12 08:31 AM
i would love to know how others felt. i just don't want my vote to be lost. Gary Johnson is the best "counting" vote of conscience, otherwise a write-in for Ron Paul. Either way, you can feel good about your choice knowing you did the right thing!

Sojourning_Soul Joined Fri 02/13/09 Posts: 10767	Fri 10/05/12 08:44 AM Edited by Sojourning_Soul on Fri 10/05/12 08:51 AM
gary johnson,the libertarian candidate. That's what I'm talking about. Why settle for a third party when we can have four or more? Two people is not my idea of a party.... more of a love affair in my opinion... it is apparent the each of us has their own opinion, as well as a$$-holes, so we should have a party(political) for everyone. It's only fair. Money (Rep) and power (Dem) have smothered the political system with their love affair, the media is the preacher at the wedding.... Everyone else is invited guests or just outsiders, fringe, unelectable, crazy, fanatic party crashers (and any other names or terms the media can come up with). Sad state of affairs we have allowed when only two parties are represented and in control of the DC chambers!

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Fri 10/05/12 10:19 AM Edited by Conrad_73 on Fri 10/05/12 10:28 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assembly_(Switzerland) Federal Assembly (Switzerland) and it DOES work,even if there are multiple Parties involved like here! gonna fix the link later! FIXED

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Fri 10/05/12 10:20 AM
i would love to know how others felt. i just don't want my vote to be lost. go with how you feel and what your own priorities are, and I hope you do use your vote,,

becca777 Joined Tue 08/05/08 Posts: 2161	Fri 10/05/12 10:22 AM
oh i am definitely voting