But people are wary now, and people don't trust their government or their media any more.

Where do you think the people who died in the airplanes went?
Same place as those killed in the collapsing towers?

Do you think they never boarded the planes regardless of the
airlines records and phone calls from the planes and recordings
of the terrorists?

no, only CT's at this point

Yep, and the same old debunked crap over and over again.

You ask me "Where do I think......???"

Why on earth would you want to know what I think about where the passengers went?

In your first question, you are already assuming that the alleged passengers on those flights died in the airplanes as you have been told. But you don't know that. You assume that. There is no evidence that they even boarded.



First thing is first.
Where is the credible evidence that they boarded the planes?
Where is the the videos?
Where is the authentic passenger list?

I am saying that THERE IS NO PROOF any of those airplanes were boarded at all.

I don't have any idea where those people went. They could all be dead, they could all be in the witness protection program for all I know.

Below is a screen-shot of the BTS database, Bureau of Traffic Statistics. Oddly it shows that Flight 11, with no wheels off time, or departure time, showing that it never took off on 9/11. This exact same oddity is duplicated regarding the Flight 77, the other American Airlines flight on 9/11 which allegedly took off from Dulles. The BTS database shows that the 2 American airlines planes, flights 11 & 77, as having no wheels off time or departure times. This is actually a key to understanding 9/11 as well as the mystery of the planes & passengers.

One mystery compounds into another creating a chain or sequence of events that become confusion. The largest blunder that 911 investigators have made is to be aware of this BTS discrepancy and then act as though it wasn't there. Nearly everyone who becomes aware of this BTS discrepancy, then go on to assume that these passengers somehow still ended up on flight 11. The passengers did disappear after all, did they not? And we were all told that they boarded and were on flight 11, right? We have Air Traffic controllers as eye witnesses saying that flight 11 was seen on radar, and followed all the way to the North Tower of the World Trade Center complex. We also then have the cell phone calls from the passengers themselves, to bolster this story, do we not? Thus the path of least resistance to the investigator of 911 is to assume that the BTS discrepancies regarding flight 11 & 77 is just a snafu or a glitch. Or perhaps, facing all of the obstacles above, the 911 investigator thinks it less difficult to shift focus into other areas of investigation, of which, thanks to the planners of 911, there is an abundance. Please see the rest of story below the chart below;

Question # 1. Do we have any evidence that shows the passengers at the airport, boarding terminals or boarding the planes?

Answer:
No - Not on any of the "4 flights" of 911 [Is this not a huge red flag already? If such footage existed, and by all means if the governments story is true, there is indeed footage of all the passengers at the airports and boarding terminals. Yet not an inch of footage of this video has ever once been produced.] **The answer why there is no video of any of the passengers at any of the terminals or airports is because it simply does not exist and never did exist.


Don't assume things that are not in evidence.

Consider the possibility that you have been lied to.

Just consider that possibility.

Then ask for evidence and proof of their claims.

Or since we are so crazy, ask the 911 victims family members who do not believe the official story.

BTS database, Bureau of Traffic Statistics-----

Oddly it shows that Flight 11, with no wheels off time, or departure time, showing that it never took off on 9/11. This exact same oddity is duplicated regarding the Flight 77

Now focus on the information above.

1. The BTS shows that Flight 11 never took off that day.
2. The BTS shows that flight 77 never took off that day.

3. There is no authentic credible passenger lists of any of the flights.
4. There are no videos of passengers boarding any of those planes.

5. There are no videos of any hijackers boarding any of those planes.
6. The names of the hijackers are not on any passenger lists, because there are no authentic passenger lists.

7. Some of the names of the alleged people supposedly on the planes changed. One alleged passenger turned out to be alive and well. .... then he and his wife died or disappeared later.

Have you ever seen a magician make an elephant disappear?

Where do you think it went?

And yet, this post does exactly that, blatantly.

No these are facts. And you cannot dispute facts. Facts are facts.

So if there is any video footage ..... prove it.

A fact is a fact.

No, you missed my point yet again. Christ, do I really want to go through this with you?

Ok, I'll do it once only.

You said: "The answer why there is no video of any of the passengers at any of the terminals or airports is because it simply does not exist and never did exist."

Then you followed it with: "Don't assume things that are not in evidence."

The first sentence quoted does exactly that. Id est it assumes things that are not in evidence. I won't remind you of the burden of proof, for I realise the futility in even mentioning that.

Until then, your claim that the footage doesn't exist is merely an assumption without any supporting evidence.

Apparently your dancing bananas have been fooled!

It is the same when people say that God does not exist.

I cannot prove something does not exist.

But if a the footage exists, then where is it? Why has it not been plastered all over the media?

There is no evidence that the footage exists or ever existed.

So yes, I am assuming and claiming that it does not exist. If it does exist, the burden of proof is on the person who claims it does exist.

Again, because a person cannot prove or provide evidence that a thing does NOT EXIST.

There is no evidence that the footage exists or ever existed.

Who will dispute my claim?

Who will prove me wrong?

I rest my case.

Take that to the enquiry and see how far you get with such sophist logic. You're so funny! This BS doesn't change the illogical nature of your tendentious position.

Illogical?

Explain why that is illogical.

Just think about it for a while. My experience has taught me that explaining anything to you is an exercise in futility. You counter everything with puerile sophistry that doesn't even give a cursory nod toward causality, probability, nor any academic discipline. Basically, try to figure it out for yourself.