Topic: Free Will? | |
---|---|
This is a quote from Stephen Hawking.
“Do people have free will? If we have free will, where in the evolutionary tree did it develop? Do blue-green algae or bacteria have free will, or is their behavior automatic and within the realm of scientific law? Is it only multicelled organisms that have free will, or only mammals? We might think that a chimpanzee is exercising free will when it chooses to chomp on a banana, or a cat when it rips up your sofa, but what about the roundworm called Caenorhabditis elegans—a simple creature made of only 959 cells? It probably never thinks, “That was damn tasty bacteria I got to dine on back there,” yet it too has a definite preference in food and will either settle for an unattractive meal or go foraging for something better, depending on recent experience. Is that the exercise of free will? Though we feel that we can choose what we do, our understanding of the molecular basis of biology shows that biological processes are governed by the laws of physics and chemistry and therefore are as determined as the orbits of the planets. Recent experiments in neuroscience support the view that it is our physical brain, following the known laws of science, that determines our actions, and not some agency that exists outside those laws. For example, a study of patients undergoing awake brain surgery found that by electrically stimulating the appropriate regions of the brain, one could create in the patient the desire to move the hand, arm, or foot, or to move the lips and talk. It is hard to imagine how free will can operate if our behavior is determined by physical law, so it seems that we are no more than biological machines and that free will is just an illusion.” It's my thought if we humans do have free will it developed along with language. |
|
|
|
Who cares.
|
|
|
|
I do.
|
|
|
|
I saw a feral cat "choose" not to run from me because he thought I had food.
|
|
|
|
I saw a feral cat "choose" not to run from me because he thought I had food. Was that a choice or was he simply following his instincts? |
|
|
|
I saw a feral cat "choose" not to run from me because he thought I had food. Was that a choice or was he simply following his instincts? His instincts told him to run. He chose to not run. |
|
|
|
It's my thought if we humans do have free will it developed along with language. Oh ffs...who or what do you think compelled you to post that thought if it wasn't of your own free will?? Does your PC or laptop have a will of its own?? |
|
|
|
Before these people were tested, they chose to allow themselves to be tested. This is free will. Unless of course they were forced to be tested by psychiatric doctors or were soldiers commanded to be tested. Why do you think fw developed with language?
|
|
|
|
Did the caveman run and hide from T-Rex of his own free will?...or was there a written sign in cavemen language somewhere telling him to run like the clappers and hide somewhere safe when T-Rex was snapping at his azz??
|
|
|
|
Lol, the cavemen I know would all run and hide from butterflies. Free will is wasted on them.
|
|
|
|
I saw a feral cat "choose" not to run from me because he thought I had food. Was that a choice or was he simply following his instincts? His instincts told him to run. He chose to not run. Both these instincts deal with self preservation, ran away or find food. Maybe his instinct to find food had become so great it overcame his instinct to run from the big man. This is how algorithms work. Oh ffs...who or what do you think compelled you to post that thought if it wasn't of your own free will?? frustrated A series of algorithms so complex it actually fools me into believing what I'm doing is thinking. But, there's no evidence that I'm actually thinking, I have no proof of it. Indeed, all the evidence we have suggests the opposite is true, that we do not think, but only operate on instinct. |
|
|
|
Lol, the cavemen I know would all run and hide from butterflies. Free will is wasted on them.bigsmile
You must be talking about other cavemen and not my Kiwi boys A series of algorithms so complex it actually fools me into believing what I'm doing is thinking. But, there's no evidence that I'm actually thinking, I have no proof of it. Indeed, all the evidence we have suggests the opposite is true, that we do not think, but only operate on instinct.
Surely you jest?? The proof you seek is in the written thought alone! |
|
|
|
Edited by
TexasScoundrel
on
Mon 06/25/12 05:46 AM
|
|
I jest not.
There is no evidence that humans operate on anything other than instinct. If you know of some, please show it to me. For now have a look at this; http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_dennett_on_our_consciousness.html And this; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41orN2hT8X4 |
|
|
|
Before these people were tested, they chose to allow themselves to be tested. This is free will. Unless of course they were forced to be tested by psychiatric doctors or were soldiers commanded to be tested. Why do you think fw developed with language? Because language is required for complex thought. If you cannot talk to yourself it's hard to solve complex problems like making a better arrow. With language you can think; "this arrow doesn't fly right, it wobbles. Maybe if I put some feathers on the back it'll help." |
|
|
|
I heard Helen Keller flipped the bird after the furniture was re-arranged. That was before she could talk.
Speaking of birds; my parrot chooses to mess with me at times by striking out at my shoulder as I pass, but not exactly as why a dog licks himself. |
|
|
|
I think free will is any action which goes against our primitive instincts. When the 17 year old girl throws herself at you, it's free will to refuse her advance, it's animal instinct to take her.
|
|
|
|
I think free will is any action which goes against our primitive instincts. When the 17 year old girl throws herself at you, it's free will to refuse her advance, it's animal instinct to take her. It's the instinct of self preservation showing up in a more complex way. |
|
|
|
I think free will is any action which goes against our primitive instincts. When the 17 year old girl throws herself at you, it's free will to refuse her advance, it's animal instinct to take her. It's the instinct of self preservation showing up in a more complex way. How do you mean? |
|
|
|
If an attractive woman is throwing herself at you self preservation is the ONLY thing that might stop you. In this case, sex with her could mean prison,being labeled a sex criminal and having to register every time you move. If you're married, it could ruin that and you'd end up losing half (if not more) of everything. All this would effect your ability to maintain the life you've built, not to mention you could be killed by an irate father or crazy man i prison.
Fear is a prime motivator. |
|
|
|
If an attractive woman is throwing herself at you self preservation is the ONLY thing that might stop you. In this case, sex with her could mean prison,being labeled a sex criminal and having to register every time you move. If you're married, it could ruin that and you'd end up losing half (if not more) of everything. All this would effect your ability to maintain the life you've built, not to mention you could be killed by an irate father or crazy man i prison. Fear is a prime motivator. Is that true for you? Are you that much of a slave to your flesh that you can't refuse to have sex with a woman for any other reason than self preservation? I don't have women throwing themselves at me every day, but I have turned down women for reasons that have nothing to do with self preservation. |
|
|