100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: How Bush Planned 9-11 | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Nazis, Communists, all the same political extremism. the russians were communists, and they beat hitler in WW2... Well I think that we had something to do with that. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I hope the supporters and believers of the official account of 9/11 are having a lot of fun in this thread. It is a perfect example of a classic and desperate attempt at ridicule directed at people who are looking for and will expose the truth about the attack on the WTC. Your ridicule is a defense mechanism and an attempt to discredit people who are uncovering the truth that you don't want to face. What truth have you personally uncovered? Copy and pasting from truther sites is not truth or evidence or fact. It is just copying and pasting. I can see clearly that the official account of 9/11 is a lie and a cover up from all angles. I look at both sides and I do a lot of reading and research that I sure most people don't do. I also know sarcasm and ridicule when I see it because I get it a lot of it from people who are defending their core beliefs and don't want to hear it. They respond with anger to the simplest fact or suggestion and they make fun of me, always trying to get others to join them. None of that bothers me. Some people genuinely want the truth because they don't want to live in a pool of lies or delusions. When something is not right, I ask questions. People will sometimes get really angry just because I ask the questions. That rings an alarm bell with me. When I copy and paste something it is just information to be considered. A person can read it or not. If a person does not want to look for answers, or consider or hear the question, that is certainly fine with me. The information in my head does not add up to the official report being true. In fact the official report is an outlandish obvious and ridiculous lie in my opinion. That is just where I stand on the issue. You are assuming that people who don't buy the conspiracy have done no research or looked at this objectively and concluded that the conspiracy theories have no merit based on official reports. I for one, have spent many an hour looking at the "evidence" on AE for 9-11 truth and I can say beyond any doubt that they are doing it for: 1. Money 2. They have a political axe to grind with Bush and Republicans 3. Money Their theories are a sham. Their evidence is a fning joke. They want peoples money, and there are enough idiots around the world that are more than willing to give it to them. That is your opinion. You are one of the 16% of the people who buy the official account. I am sure there are a lot of different "conspiracy theories" about what really happened on 9/11. I am not involved in any of them. I don't know what particular conspiracy theory you are referring to either. I don't give any money to any of them. I have purchased books on both sides of the issue. I am just glad that MOST thinking people are not just buying the official fictional account without questions. It is not about money for most. I'm sure there are a few who are trying to make money but that's not surprising. But the idea that someone would get involved in conspiracy theory "because" they have a "political ax to grind with Bush or republicans is grasping at straws. How about they just want the truth? How about people are just sick and tired of being lied to? If you want to see "evidence" that is a joke, look at the evidence that supposedly supports the official version. That's a joke. I don't care what the official account says. I can see 2 planes hitting 2 buildings. I can apply Newtons Second Law.. Force = Mass x Acceleration.. I can see the collapse sequence beginning above the damaged areas. I can see debris falling from the tops hitting the ground before the collapse is over. With just those 4 things I can easily deduce that the conspiracy theories regarding the collapse of WTC 1/2 are fning absurd.. I don't need the NIST report to tell me that.. The best analysis, in my opinion, of the entire episode was done by MIT.. NOT NIST.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Sat 05/12/12 10:37 AM
|
|
I hope the supporters and believers of the official account of 9/11 are having a lot of fun in this thread. It is a perfect example of a classic and desperate attempt at ridicule directed at people who are looking for and will expose the truth about the attack on the WTC. Your ridicule is a defense mechanism and an attempt to discredit people who are uncovering the truth that you don't want to face. What truth have you personally uncovered? Copy and pasting from truther sites is not truth or evidence or fact. It is just copying and pasting. I can see clearly that the official account of 9/11 is a lie and a cover up from all angles. I look at both sides and I do a lot of reading and research that I sure most people don't do. I also know sarcasm and ridicule when I see it because I get it a lot of it from people who are defending their core beliefs and don't want to hear it. They respond with anger to the simplest fact or suggestion and they make fun of me, always trying to get others to join them. None of that bothers me. Some people genuinely want the truth because they don't want to live in a pool of lies or delusions. When something is not right, I ask questions. People will sometimes get really angry just because I ask the questions. That rings an alarm bell with me. When I copy and paste something it is just information to be considered. A person can read it or not. If a person does not want to look for answers, or consider or hear the question, that is certainly fine with me. The information in my head does not add up to the official report being true. In fact the official report is an outlandish obvious and ridiculous lie in my opinion. That is just where I stand on the issue. You are assuming that people who don't buy the conspiracy have done no research or looked at this objectively and concluded that the conspiracy theories have no merit based on official reports. I for one, have spent many an hour looking at the "evidence" on AE for 9-11 truth and I can say beyond any doubt that they are doing it for: 1. Money 2. They have a political axe to grind with Bush and Republicans 3. Money Their theories are a sham. Their evidence is a fning joke. They want peoples money, and there are enough idiots around the world that are more than willing to give it to them. That is your opinion. You are one of the 16% of the people who buy the official account. I am sure there are a lot of different "conspiracy theories" about what really happened on 9/11. I am not involved in any of them. I don't know what particular conspiracy theory you are referring to either. I don't give any money to any of them. I have purchased books on both sides of the issue. I am just glad that MOST thinking people are not just buying the official fictional account without questions. It is not about money for most. I'm sure there are a few who are trying to make money but that's not surprising. But the idea that someone would get involved in conspiracy theory "because" they have a "political ax to grind with Bush or republicans is grasping at straws. How about they just want the truth? How about people are just sick and tired of being lied to? If you want to see "evidence" that is a joke, look at the evidence that supposedly supports the official version. That's a joke. I don't care what the official account says. Really? Why not? I can see 2 planes hitting 2 buildings. I can apply Newtons Second Law.. Force = Mass x Acceleration.. I'm sure you did....
I can see the collapse sequence beginning above the damaged areas. I didn't see that. I saw the areas below give way and the areas above free fall to the ground. I can see debris falling from the tops hitting the ground before the collapse is over.
I guess you were there then. Show me where you saw something from the top hit the ground before the collapse is over I would be interested. With just those 4 things I can easily deduce that the conspiracy theories regarding the collapse of WTC 1/2 are fning absurd.. And yet you don't care about the official government conspiracy theory. It is more absurd by far. I don't need the NIST report to tell me that.. The best analysis, in my opinion, of the entire episode was done by MIT.. NOT NIST.. MIT? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invictus said: "I can see debris falling from the tops hitting the ground before the collapse is over." Here is a video of how large pieces of steel are turning to dust in midair and do not reach the intersection below. Whatever anyone says or thinks about Judy Wood, her website has the largest amount of photographic and video evidence I have seen to date. http://www.drjudywood.com/wtc/ |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Sat 05/12/12 12:51 PM
|
|
Invictus said: "I can see debris falling from the tops hitting the ground before the collapse is over." Here is a video of how large pieces of steel are turning to dust in midair and do not reach the intersection below. Whatever anyone says or thinks about Judy Wood, her website has the largest amount of photographic and video evidence I have seen to date. http://www.drjudywood.com/wtc/
Now that the Explosives Theory has been debunked,you all bring up the Tesla Death-Ray! Even more improbable than Explosives! Almost time now to bring up the Nuclear Satchel-Charges! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Sat 05/12/12 12:54 PM
|
|
As I said before, whatever anyone says or thinks about Judy Wood, her website has the largest amount of photographic and video evidence I have seen to date.
http://www.drjudywood.com/wtc/ and laughing faces and ridicule can't explain what she has shown us at ground zero. so get over it. Saying that something has been "debunked" is meaningless if you can't explain it in detail. And you can't. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As I said before, whatever anyone says or thinks about Judy Wood, her website has the largest amount of photographic and video evidence I have seen to date. http://www.drjudywood.com/wtc/ and laughing faces and ridicule can't explain what she has shown us at ground zero. so get over it. Saying that something has been "debunked" is meaningless if you can't explain it in detail. And you can't. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a death ray from space did destroy the twin towers nobody really wants to know that. And I don't really blame the government for trying to cover it all up. They don't want the public to know that we are at the mercy of whoever owns that technology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As I said before, whatever anyone says or thinks about Judy Wood, her website has the largest amount of photographic and video evidence I have seen to date. http://www.drjudywood.com/wtc/ and laughing faces and ridicule can't explain what she has shown us at ground zero. so get over it. Saying that something has been "debunked" is meaningless if you can't explain it in detail. And you can't. Name calling ain't gonna cut it. You still can't explain her evidence or those pictures. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invictus said: "I can see debris falling from the tops hitting the ground before the collapse is over." Here is a video of how large pieces of steel are turning to dust in midair and do not reach the intersection below. Whatever anyone says or thinks about Judy Wood, her website has the largest amount of photographic and video evidence I have seen to date. http://www.drjudywood.com/wtc/
Now that the Explosives Theory has been debunked,you all bring up the Tesla Death-Ray! Even more improbable than Explosives! Almost time now to bring up the Nuclear Satchel-Charges! And you too can buy the book for only $49.95 plus $5.30 in shipping and handling ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what interest would out of space aliens have in destroying the twin towers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As I said before, whatever anyone says or thinks about Judy Wood, her website has the largest amount of photographic and video evidence I have seen to date. http://www.drjudywood.com/wtc/ and laughing faces and ridicule can't explain what she has shown us at ground zero. so get over it. Saying that something has been "debunked" is meaningless if you can't explain it in detail. And you can't. Name calling ain't gonna cut it. You still can't explain her evidence or those pictures. Those are the same photos you and Cartman post over and over and over that were debunked by PrisonPlanet (of all sources) just a page or so back. The beams aren't turning to dust. The photos from the other side just show them falling down. Can't you find anything to post but lies? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Sat 05/12/12 01:15 PM
|
|
Those are the same photos you and Cartman post over and over and over that were debunked by PrisonPlanet (of all sources) just a page or so back. The beams aren't turning to dust. The photos from the other side just show them falling down. Can't you find anything to post but lies? Metalwing, there were not near enough steel beams in the rubble to account for all that were in the buildings. How could prison planet "debunk" her photos? She has countless photos from many different sources. I am posting links to photos for people to go look for themselves. You and they can determine for themselves what they think is a lie and what is not a lie. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Sat 05/12/12 01:19 PM
|
|
what interest would out of space aliens have in destroying the twin towers? I could tell you but it would be off topic. (Its long, its complicated, and its very scary.) p.s. the aliens are not really from outer space, more like inner space. |
|
|
|
|
