Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Previous 1 2 … 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 … 17 18 Next

Topic: NIST says WTC building # 7 collapse caused by fire.
Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Fri 04/20/12 03:09 PM
To do the kind of prep work needed, they would need to shut down the whole building, all three buildings, for a long time Jeannie....One floor off limits!!!???!!!...Give me a break!...That is too funny!! No, they would not. As you know this was not a normal run of the mill planned demolition where they were concerned with gutting the building or where they were worried about killing people, so no they would not need to shut down the building or evacuate anyone. All they would need is access -- which they had from an off limits floor, that had elevator access to the entire building and they had plenty of time to do it too. Maybe years.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Fri 04/20/12 03:44 PM Edited by Jeanniebean on Fri 04/20/12 04:10 PM
The plan to bring down both towers in 1993. The 1993 World Trade Center bombing occurred on February 26, 1993, when a truck bomb was detonated below the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York, NY. The 1,336 lb (606 kg) urea nitrate–hydrogen gas enhanced device was intended to knock the North Tower (Tower One) into the South Tower (Tower Two), bringing both towers down and killing thousands of people. It failed to do so, but did kill six people and injured more than a thousand. The next attack in september 11 2001, eight years later, was successful as we all know. They had eight years to come up with a better plane. Even then, the security at the WTC buildings was so lax, anyone could drive a truck bomb into the lower parking garage.

InvictusV Joined Sun 11/23/08 Posts: 5282	Fri 04/20/12 04:11 PM
The plan to bring down both towers in 1993. The 1993 World Trade Center bombing occurred on February 26, 1993, when a truck bomb was detonated below the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York, NY. The 1,336 lb (606 kg) urea nitrate–hydrogen gas enhanced device was intended to knock the North Tower (Tower One) into the South Tower (Tower Two), bringing both towers down and killing thousands of people. It failed to do so, but did kill six people and injured more than a thousand. The next attack in september 11 2001, eight years later, was successful as we all know. They had eight years to come up with a better plane. Even then, the security at the WTC buildings was so lax, anyone could drive a truck bomb into the lower parking garage. so you are saying that the bombing in 1993 is connected to 2001?

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Fri 04/20/12 04:18 PM
The plan to bring down both towers in 1993. The 1993 World Trade Center bombing occurred on February 26, 1993, when a truck bomb was detonated below the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York, NY. The 1,336 lb (606 kg) urea nitrate–hydrogen gas enhanced device was intended to knock the North Tower (Tower One) into the South Tower (Tower Two), bringing both towers down and killing thousands of people. It failed to do so, but did kill six people and injured more than a thousand. The next attack in september 11 2001, eight years later, was successful as we all know. They had eight years to come up with a better plane. Even then, the security at the WTC buildings was so lax, anyone could drive a truck bomb into the lower parking garage. so you are saying that the bombing in 1993 is connected to 2001? DUH... of course it is.

Optomistic69 Joined Mon 10/10/11 Posts: 5173	Fri 04/20/12 04:19 PM
cough inside job cough Knowing that the truth can be concealed I was starting to think you were on another 10 day vacation.. Were you missing me Invictue?

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Fri 04/20/12 04:20 PM
And George Bush Sr. was the president then.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Fri 04/20/12 04:21 PM
Where daddy Bush failed, his son succeeded. In Iraq too.

InvictusV Joined Sun 11/23/08 Posts: 5282	Fri 04/20/12 04:43 PM
And George Bush Sr. was the president then. actually clinton was president in 1993.. so who bombed khobar towers in 1996, the embassies in kenya and tanzania in 1998 and the USS Cole in 2000? No Bush in office..

InvictusV Joined Sun 11/23/08 Posts: 5282	Fri 04/20/12 04:45 PM
cough inside job cough Knowing that the truth can be concealed I was starting to think you were on another 10 day vacation.. Were you missing me Invictue? of course.. I enjoy your interesting perspective

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Fri 04/20/12 05:08 PM
And George Bush Sr. was the president then. actually clinton was president in 1993.. so who bombed khobar towers in 1996, the embassies in kenya and tanzania in 1998 and the USS Cole in 2000? No Bush in office.. George Bush (1981-1989) George Bush (1989-1993) Bill Clinton (1993-2001)

Torgo70 Joined Fri 06/27/08 Posts: 27387	Fri 04/20/12 05:20 PM
There was bush in the office when Clinton was president- Monica Lewinsky.

InvictusV Joined Sun 11/23/08 Posts: 5282	Fri 04/20/12 05:23 PM
And George Bush Sr. was the president then. actually clinton was president in 1993.. so who bombed khobar towers in 1996, the embassies in kenya and tanzania in 1998 and the USS Cole in 2000? No Bush in office.. George Bush (1981-1989) George Bush (1989-1993) Bill Clinton (1993-2001) Feb 26, 1993: World Trade Center bombed Clinton was President You didn't answer my question

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Fri 04/20/12 05:25 PM
Let me get this strait, you are asking me who bombed khobar towers in 1996, the embassies in kenya and tanzania in 1998 and the USS Cole in 2000? Even if I knew the answer to those questions, they are off topic.

yellowrose10 Joined Tue 12/11/07 Posts: 52804	Fri 04/20/12 05:29 PM
Invictus is right. Clinton was in office when the bombing of the WTC Clinton took office January 20

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Fri 04/20/12 05:57 PM
So George Bush was only in office during the actual planning of the bombing of the WTC, but not during the actual event. okay...I can understand that.....

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Sat 04/21/12 01:24 AM
And George Bush Sr. was the president then. actually clinton was president in 1993.. so who bombed khobar towers in 1996, the embassies in kenya and tanzania in 1998 and the USS Cole in 2000? No Bush in office.. George Bush (1981-1989) George Bush (1989-1993) Bill Clinton (1993-2001) wasn't Reagan in there somewhere?

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sat 04/21/12 03:03 AM
To do the kind of prep work needed, they would need to shut down the whole building, all three buildings, for a long time Jeannie....One floor off limits!!!???!!!...Give me a break!...That is too funny!! No, they would not. As you know this was not a normal run of the mill planned demolition where they were concerned with gutting the building or where they were worried about killing people, so no they would not need to shut down the building or evacuate anyone. All they would need is access -- which they had from an off limits floor, that had elevator access to the entire building and they had plenty of time to do it too. Maybe years. shows just how much you know about Demolition and Explosives! The Building has to be gutted to get at the Structure of it,and has to be weakened in order for it to drop properly! You don't "BLOW" down a Building with explosives,you weaken it to a point,so the cutting Charges can remove the last props in order for the Building to fall! Proof is,when they take down Buildings next to others,and leave them standing without a Scratch! Try do that by BLOWING up a Building!

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sat 04/21/12 03:04 AM
There was bush in the office when Clinton was president- Monica Lewinsky.

InvictusV Joined Sun 11/23/08 Posts: 5282	Sat 04/21/12 03:15 AM
Let me get this strait, you are asking me who bombed khobar towers in 1996, the embassies in kenya and tanzania in 1998 and the USS Cole in 2000? Even if I knew the answer to those questions, they are off topic. They are not off topic since you brought in the 1993 WTC bombing.. That has nothing to do with your OP. You are attempting to connect 1993 and 2001 as a progression in your theory blaming BUSH SR and JR. "1993 was the first attempt when Bush sr was in office, even though he wasn't, and then jr finished it off.." That is what you posted.. You cannot make that assertion and just ignore what happened elsewhere in between 1993 and 2001. I realize it shoots holes in your theory, but you should have thought about that before you tried tying those together. Either the Bush family is responsible for every act of terrorism against the US since 1993 or the theory there is no Islamic terrorist group blowing stuff up is BS.

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Sat 04/21/12 06:47 AM
Let me get this strait, you are asking me who bombed khobar towers in 1996, the embassies in kenya and tanzania in 1998 and the USS Cole in 2000? Even if I knew the answer to those questions, they are off topic. They are not off topic since you brought in the 1993 WTC bombing.. That has nothing to do with your OP. You are attempting to connect 1993 and 2001 as a progression in your theory blaming BUSH SR and JR. "1993 was the first attempt when Bush sr was in office, even though he wasn't, and then jr finished it off.." That is what you posted.. You cannot make that assertion and just ignore what happened elsewhere in between 1993 and 2001. I realize it shoots holes in your theory, but you should have thought about that before you tried tying those together. Either the Bush family is responsible for every act of terrorism against the US since 1993 or the theory there is no Islamic terrorist group blowing stuff up is BS. You are giving credence to some of her theories?