Topic: Obama's comments | |
---|---|
Obama's recent comments to and about the Judiciary "Activist" show a failed president, once again, pointing accusing fingers at something other than himself. He is a failed president. He has wasted 4 years doing nothing but lying, blaming others and getting us in worse debt. Goodbye Obama, won't miss ya!
|
|
|
|
how many politicians actually DO point fingers at themself in election year?
did they all fail,,,,,? |
|
|
|
Edited by
boredinaz06
on
Tue 04/03/12 08:28 PM
|
|
A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?" This guy if given the chance would become a dictator. |
|
|
|
I love the guy that got off after threatening him too! I have not a clue how those that like him....got theirs heads twisted on incorrect at birth........maybe if I quit work and start on the public dole.....I might like him too/ NOT!!!
|
|
|
|
how many politicians actually DO point fingers at themself in election year? did they all fail,,,,,? Not many, I agree, but not many are as big a Liar as he. |
|
|
|
A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?" This guy if given the chance would become a dictator. I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges "I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress" |
|
|
|
"a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress" another lie. |
|
|
|
A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?" This guy if given the chance would become a dictator. I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges "I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress" the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock. |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Tue 04/03/12 08:58 PM
|
|
A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?" This guy if given the chance would become a dictator. I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges "I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress" the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock. forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them? this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,, |
|
|
|
A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?" This guy if given the chance would become a dictator. I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges "I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress" the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock. forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them? this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,, People ride bikes and buses! What they should have done was prevent insurance companies from refusing you for pre-existing conditions and limiting amount of the monthly premiums (capping them). |
|
|
|
A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?" This guy if given the chance would become a dictator. I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges "I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress" the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock. forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them? this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,, People ride bikes and buses! What they should have done was prevent insurance companies from refusing you for pre-existing conditions and limiting amount of the monthly premiums (capping them). not everyone rides a bike or uses transit,, some stick to sidewalks and walking the caps and pre existing was in the bill too... |
|
|
|
A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?" This guy if given the chance would become a dictator. I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges "I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress" the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock. forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them? this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,, People ride bikes and buses! What they should have done was prevent insurance companies from refusing you for pre-existing conditions and limiting amount of the monthly premiums (capping them). not everyone rides a bike or uses transit,, some stick to sidewalks and walking the caps and pre existing was in the bill too... Not enough people don't use the roads to matter so your point is moot. If these are in the law then we don't need it to be mandatory. Explain to me why I should pay for someone who is not a friend or relative? |
|
|
|
A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?" This guy if given the chance would become a dictator. I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges "I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress" the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock. forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them? this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,, People ride bikes and buses! What they should have done was prevent insurance companies from refusing you for pre-existing conditions and limiting amount of the monthly premiums (capping them). not everyone rides a bike or uses transit,, some stick to sidewalks and walking the caps and pre existing was in the bill too... Not enough people don't use the roads to matter so your point is moot. If these are in the law then we don't need it to be mandatory. Explain to me why I should pay for someone who is not a friend or relative? this is the same argument they try to use against taxes from single people going towards paying for schools,,, its called an investment in COMMUNITY so you have the OPTION to use it without worry |
|
|
|
A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?" This guy if given the chance would become a dictator. I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges "I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress" the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock. forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them? this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,, People ride bikes and buses! What they should have done was prevent insurance companies from refusing you for pre-existing conditions and limiting amount of the monthly premiums (capping them). not everyone rides a bike or uses transit,, some stick to sidewalks and walking the caps and pre existing was in the bill too... Not enough people don't use the roads to matter so your point is moot. If these are in the law then we don't need it to be mandatory. Explain to me why I should pay for someone who is not a friend or relative? this is the same argument they try to use against taxes from single people going towards paying for schools,,, its called an investment in COMMUNITY so you have the OPTION to use it without worry No it isn't. People will most likely have kids whether they want them or not so that comparison is silly. |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Tue 04/03/12 10:00 PM
|
|
A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?" This guy if given the chance would become a dictator. I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges "I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress" the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock. forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them? this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,, People ride bikes and buses! What they should have done was prevent insurance companies from refusing you for pre-existing conditions and limiting amount of the monthly premiums (capping them). not everyone rides a bike or uses transit,, some stick to sidewalks and walking the caps and pre existing was in the bill too... Not enough people don't use the roads to matter so your point is moot. If these are in the law then we don't need it to be mandatory. Explain to me why I should pay for someone who is not a friend or relative? this is the same argument they try to use against taxes from single people going towards paying for schools,,, its called an investment in COMMUNITY so you have the OPTION to use it without worry No it isn't. People will most likely have kids whether they want them or not so that comparison is silly. there are these things called infertility and condoms and pills,,,,and,,,,, do you realize how many kids there would be if all adults were having kids? its no more or less common than someone going through a lifetime and never needing medical care,,, |
|
|
|
Edited by
boredinaz06
on
Wed 04/04/12 12:09 AM
|
|
A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?" This guy if given the chance would become a dictator. I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges "I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress" the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock. forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them? this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,, People ride bikes and buses! What they should have done was prevent insurance companies from refusing you for pre-existing conditions and limiting amount of the monthly premiums (capping them). not everyone rides a bike or uses transit,, some stick to sidewalks and walking the caps and pre existing was in the bill too... Not enough people don't use the roads to matter so your point is moot. If these are in the law then we don't need it to be mandatory. Explain to me why I should pay for someone who is not a friend or relative? this is the same argument they try to use against taxes from single people going towards paying for schools,,, its called an investment in COMMUNITY so you have the OPTION to use it without worry No it isn't. People will most likely have kids whether they want them or not so that comparison is silly. there are these things called infertility and condoms and pills,,,,and,,,,, do you realize how many kids there would be if all adults were having kids? its no more or less common than someone going through a lifetime and never needing medical care,,, Your examples are tired and weak. |
|
|
|
According to the CDC, approximately 7.3 million women of childbearing age (between 15 and 44) in the US are likely to have impaired fecundity. Overall, that means an impaired fecundity rate of about 11.8%. Many of these women will not become aware that they have a fertility problem until they try to start a family
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/4651989 thats just the WOMEN rate of infertility and then you have women who get ABORTIONS because they dont want children and those who properly use their BIRTH CONTROL to avoid pregnancy |
|
|
|
A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?" This guy if given the chance would become a dictator. I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges "I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress" the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock. forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them? this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,, The roads get paid for when you register your car. The majority of that money goes to the local schools and the roads! |
|
|
|
A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?" This guy if given the chance would become a dictator. I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges "I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress" the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock. forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them? this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,, People ride bikes and buses! What they should have done was prevent insurance companies from refusing you for pre-existing conditions and limiting amount of the monthly premiums (capping them). not everyone rides a bike or uses transit,, some stick to sidewalks and walking the caps and pre existing was in the bill too... Not enough people don't use the roads to matter so your point is moot. If these are in the law then we don't need it to be mandatory. Explain to me why I should pay for someone who is not a friend or relative? this is the same argument they try to use against taxes from single people going towards paying for schools,,, its called an investment in COMMUNITY so you have the OPTION to use it without worry It is hard to believe that a constitutional lawyer didn't know that a federal court has the power to strike down any law they deem unconstitutional.. He must have been out community organizing when they taught that at Harvard Law. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Wed 04/04/12 05:36 AM
|
|
A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?" This guy if given the chance would become a dictator. I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges "I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress" the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock. forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them? this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,, Roads and infrastructer were NEVER the job of the Fed Gov't.... That's a farce imposed under the commerce clause to collect more taxes on citizens! It's all about taking the peoples money and giving it to the crony capitalists and the banks! Slavery thru taxation and entitlements! Take money from the people and you take power from the people. Markets fail, gov't grows thru regulation and control to "fix" the economy. A failed system (as we see VERY clearly!) imposed by gov't, that the FED uses to profit by putting more money into the system, raising the nat debt and devaluing the dollar further so even more is needed. This system of unsustanable growth has been the downfall of any who have used it and why the founding fathers would only allow "charters" on such banks before 1913. They warned of the corruption and intent of the Bank Of England (The World Bank) but allowed the charters to keep prices down with competing currency. The devices used by the bankers has caused many if not MOST of the wars, the great depression, their takeover in 1913, the establishment of the IRS, and the situation we are in today. All who have challenged them (the banksters) in the past have been black listed, assassinated or died mysteriously! "Give me control over a nations currency, and I care not who makes its laws." Baron M.A. Rothschild Welcome to the reality of that statement! |
|
|