Previous 1
Topic: Obama's comments
no photo
Tue 04/03/12 08:24 PM
Obama's recent comments to and about the Judiciary "Activist" show a failed president, once again, pointing accusing fingers at something other than himself. He is a failed president. He has wasted 4 years doing nothing but lying, blaming others and getting us in worse debt. Goodbye Obama, won't miss ya!

msharmony's photo
Tue 04/03/12 08:26 PM
how many politicians actually DO point fingers at themself in election year?


did they all fail,,,,,?

boredinaz06's photo
Tue 04/03/12 08:28 PM
Edited by boredinaz06 on Tue 04/03/12 08:28 PM

A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?"

This guy if given the chance would become a dictator.

Howtostart's photo
Tue 04/03/12 08:30 PM
I love the guy that got off after threatening him too! I have not a clue how those that like him....got theirs heads twisted on incorrect at birth........maybe if I quit work and start on the public dole.....I might like him too/ NOT!!!

no photo
Tue 04/03/12 08:35 PM

how many politicians actually DO point fingers at themself in election year?


did they all fail,,,,,?


Not many, I agree, but not many are as big a Liar as he. smile2

msharmony's photo
Tue 04/03/12 08:36 PM


A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?"

This guy if given the chance would become a dictator.



I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges

"I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress"

no photo
Tue 04/03/12 08:39 PM


"a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress"

another lie.

boredinaz06's photo
Tue 04/03/12 08:42 PM



A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?"

This guy if given the chance would become a dictator.



I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges

"I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress"


the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock.

msharmony's photo
Tue 04/03/12 08:57 PM
Edited by msharmony on Tue 04/03/12 08:58 PM




A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?"

This guy if given the chance would become a dictator.



I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges

"I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress"


the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock.



forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them?

:wink:

this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,,

boredinaz06's photo
Tue 04/03/12 09:14 PM





A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?"

This guy if given the chance would become a dictator.



I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges

"I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress"


the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock.



forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them?

:wink:

this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,,


People ride bikes and buses! What they should have done was prevent insurance companies from refusing you for pre-existing conditions and limiting amount of the monthly premiums (capping them).

msharmony's photo
Tue 04/03/12 09:29 PM






A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?"

This guy if given the chance would become a dictator.



I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges

"I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress"


the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock.



forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them?

:wink:

this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,,


People ride bikes and buses! What they should have done was prevent insurance companies from refusing you for pre-existing conditions and limiting amount of the monthly premiums (capping them).



not everyone rides a bike or uses transit,, some stick to sidewalks and walking

the caps and pre existing was in the bill too...

boredinaz06's photo
Tue 04/03/12 09:40 PM







A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?"

This guy if given the chance would become a dictator.



I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges

"I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress"


the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock.



forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them?

:wink:

this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,,


People ride bikes and buses! What they should have done was prevent insurance companies from refusing you for pre-existing conditions and limiting amount of the monthly premiums (capping them).



not everyone rides a bike or uses transit,, some stick to sidewalks and walking

the caps and pre existing was in the bill too...


Not enough people don't use the roads to matter so your point is moot. If these are in the law then we don't need it to be mandatory. Explain to me why I should pay for someone who is not a friend or relative?

msharmony's photo
Tue 04/03/12 09:43 PM








A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?"

This guy if given the chance would become a dictator.



I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges

"I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress"


the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock.



forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them?

:wink:

this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,,


People ride bikes and buses! What they should have done was prevent insurance companies from refusing you for pre-existing conditions and limiting amount of the monthly premiums (capping them).



not everyone rides a bike or uses transit,, some stick to sidewalks and walking

the caps and pre existing was in the bill too...


Not enough people don't use the roads to matter so your point is moot. If these are in the law then we don't need it to be mandatory. Explain to me why I should pay for someone who is not a friend or relative?


this is the same argument they try to use against taxes from single people going towards paying for schools,,,

its called an investment in COMMUNITY so you have the OPTION to use it without worry

boredinaz06's photo
Tue 04/03/12 09:52 PM









A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?"

This guy if given the chance would become a dictator.



I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges

"I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress"


the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock.



forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them?

:wink:

this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,,


People ride bikes and buses! What they should have done was prevent insurance companies from refusing you for pre-existing conditions and limiting amount of the monthly premiums (capping them).



not everyone rides a bike or uses transit,, some stick to sidewalks and walking

the caps and pre existing was in the bill too...


Not enough people don't use the roads to matter so your point is moot. If these are in the law then we don't need it to be mandatory. Explain to me why I should pay for someone who is not a friend or relative?


this is the same argument they try to use against taxes from single people going towards paying for schools,,,

its called an investment in COMMUNITY so you have the OPTION to use it without worry


No it isn't. People will most likely have kids whether they want them or not so that comparison is silly.

msharmony's photo
Tue 04/03/12 09:59 PM
Edited by msharmony on Tue 04/03/12 10:00 PM










A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?"

This guy if given the chance would become a dictator.



I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges

"I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress"


the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock.



forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them?

:wink:

this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,,


People ride bikes and buses! What they should have done was prevent insurance companies from refusing you for pre-existing conditions and limiting amount of the monthly premiums (capping them).



not everyone rides a bike or uses transit,, some stick to sidewalks and walking

the caps and pre existing was in the bill too...


Not enough people don't use the roads to matter so your point is moot. If these are in the law then we don't need it to be mandatory. Explain to me why I should pay for someone who is not a friend or relative?


this is the same argument they try to use against taxes from single people going towards paying for schools,,,

its called an investment in COMMUNITY so you have the OPTION to use it without worry


No it isn't. People will most likely have kids whether they want them or not so that comparison is silly.



there are these things called infertility and condoms and pills,,,,and,,,,,

do you realize how many kids there would be if all adults were having kids?

its no more or less common than someone going through a lifetime and never needing medical care,,,

boredinaz06's photo
Wed 04/04/12 12:09 AM
Edited by boredinaz06 on Wed 04/04/12 12:09 AM











A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?"

This guy if given the chance would become a dictator.



I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges

"I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress"


the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock.



forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them?

:wink:

this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,,


People ride bikes and buses! What they should have done was prevent insurance companies from refusing you for pre-existing conditions and limiting amount of the monthly premiums (capping them).



not everyone rides a bike or uses transit,, some stick to sidewalks and walking

the caps and pre existing was in the bill too...


Not enough people don't use the roads to matter so your point is moot. If these are in the law then we don't need it to be mandatory. Explain to me why I should pay for someone who is not a friend or relative?


this is the same argument they try to use against taxes from single people going towards paying for schools,,,

its called an investment in COMMUNITY so you have the OPTION to use it without worry


No it isn't. People will most likely have kids whether they want them or not so that comparison is silly.



there are these things called infertility and condoms and pills,,,,and,,,,,

do you realize how many kids there would be if all adults were having kids?

its no more or less common than someone going through a lifetime and never needing medical care,,,


Your examples are tired and weak.

msharmony's photo
Wed 04/04/12 12:24 AM
According to the CDC, approximately 7.3 million women of childbearing age (between 15 and 44) in the US are likely to have impaired fecundity. Overall, that means an impaired fecundity rate of about 11.8%. Many of these women will not become aware that they have a fertility problem until they try to start a family

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/4651989

thats just the WOMEN rate of infertility

and then you have women who get ABORTIONS because they dont want children

and those who properly use their BIRTH CONTROL to avoid pregnancy



Lpdon's photo
Wed 04/04/12 01:29 AM





A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?"

This guy if given the chance would become a dictator.



I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges

"I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress"


the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock.



forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them?

:wink:

this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,,


The roads get paid for when you register your car. The majority of that money goes to the local schools and the roads!

InvictusV's photo
Wed 04/04/12 03:14 AM









A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?"

This guy if given the chance would become a dictator.



I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges

"I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress"


the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock.



forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them?

:wink:

this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,,


People ride bikes and buses! What they should have done was prevent insurance companies from refusing you for pre-existing conditions and limiting amount of the monthly premiums (capping them).



not everyone rides a bike or uses transit,, some stick to sidewalks and walking

the caps and pre existing was in the bill too...


Not enough people don't use the roads to matter so your point is moot. If these are in the law then we don't need it to be mandatory. Explain to me why I should pay for someone who is not a friend or relative?


this is the same argument they try to use against taxes from single people going towards paying for schools,,,

its called an investment in COMMUNITY so you have the OPTION to use it without worry


It is hard to believe that a constitutional lawyer didn't know that a federal court has the power to strike down any law they deem unconstitutional..

He must have been out community organizing when they taught that at Harvard Law.






Sojourning_Soul's photo
Wed 04/04/12 05:04 AM
Edited by Sojourning_Soul on Wed 04/04/12 05:36 AM





A federal appeals court fired back today "You think we can't overturn laws?"

This guy if given the chance would become a dictator.



I think that was EXACTLY the sentiment OBAma was making regarding judges

"I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress"


the supreme court doesn't care whether or not elected officials voted for this, but whether it is constitutional! Forcing people to buy health insurance is a crock.



forcing them to pay for service entitlements is not...how do you think we pay for the raods, even though not EVERYONE drives on them?

:wink:

this was just a way to TRY to support a 'free market' option,, as opposed to adding a healthcare tax on everyone,,,


Roads and infrastructer were NEVER the job of the Fed Gov't....

That's a farce imposed under the commerce clause to collect more taxes on citizens!

It's all about taking the peoples money and giving it to the crony capitalists and the banks! Slavery thru taxation and entitlements!

Take money from the people and you take power from the people. Markets fail, gov't grows thru regulation and control to "fix" the economy. A failed system (as we see VERY clearly!) imposed by gov't, that the FED uses to profit by putting more money into the system, raising the nat debt and devaluing the dollar further so even more is needed. This system of unsustanable growth has been the downfall of any who have used it and why the founding fathers would only allow "charters" on such banks before 1913. They warned of the corruption and intent of the Bank Of England (The World Bank) but allowed the charters to keep prices down with competing currency.

The devices used by the bankers has caused many if not MOST of the wars, the great depression, their takeover in 1913, the establishment of the IRS, and the situation we are in today.

All who have challenged them (the banksters) in the past have been black listed, assassinated or died mysteriously!

"Give me control over a nations currency, and I care not who makes its laws."
Baron M.A. Rothschild

Welcome to the reality of that statement!

Previous 1