100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Misdirected Vigilantaism,, a shame | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
previously it was written that this witness was walking his dog Nope mixing up witnesses. The "John" witness is a grown man, not a child.
nope, Im pretty clear in THESE threads, it was posted that a man 'john' had been walking his dog, saw the dispute( at that time he only saw a portion of it) and was telling the boy to stop when his dog got loose and he ran after him and then went inside to call 911 as it turns out though, there was a LITTLE boy to whom this happened and his sisters call to 911 is one of the recordings released and transcripts available but NOW, in THIS thread, the man 'john' was inside his house just watching the whole thing and giving a blow by blow a recording that hasnt been released apparently, because he wants to remain anonymous? ....lol well, we will see if it ever surfaces,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previously it was written that this witness was walking his dog Nope mixing up witnesses. The "John" witness is a grown man, not a child.
nope, Im pretty clear in THESE threads, it was posted that a man 'john' had been walking his dog, saw the dispute( at that time he only saw a portion of it) and was telling the boy to stop when his dog got loose and he ran after him and then went inside to call 911 as it turns out though, there was a LITTLE boy to whom this happened and his sisters call to 911 is one of the recordings released and transcripts available but NOW, in THIS thread, the man 'john' was inside his house just watching the whole thing and giving a blow by blow a recording that hasnt been released apparently, because he wants to remain anonymous? ....lol well, we will see if it ever surfaces,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previously it was written that this witness was walking his dog Nope mixing up witnesses. The "John" witness is a grown man, not a child.
nope, Im pretty clear in THESE threads, it was posted that a man 'john' had been walking his dog, saw the dispute( at that time he only saw a portion of it) and was telling the boy to stop when his dog got loose and he ran after him and then went inside to call 911 as it turns out though, there was a LITTLE boy to whom this happened and his sisters call to 911 is one of the recordings released and transcripts available but NOW, in THIS thread, the man 'john' was inside his house just watching the whole thing and giving a blow by blow a recording that hasnt been released apparently, because he wants to remain anonymous? ....lol well, we will see if it ever surfaces,,,, who said anything about evidence I was pointing out the inconsistency in some of the reasons people are giving to believe Zimmerman,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previously it was written that this witness was walking his dog Nope mixing up witnesses. The "John" witness is a grown man, not a child.
nope, Im pretty clear in THESE threads, it was posted that a man 'john' had been walking his dog, saw the dispute( at that time he only saw a portion of it) and was telling the boy to stop when his dog got loose and he ran after him and then went inside to call 911 as it turns out though, there was a LITTLE boy to whom this happened and his sisters call to 911 is one of the recordings released and transcripts available but NOW, in THIS thread, the man 'john' was inside his house just watching the whole thing and giving a blow by blow a recording that hasnt been released apparently, because he wants to remain anonymous? ....lol well, we will see if it ever surfaces,,,, who said anything about evidence I was pointing out the inconsistency in some of the reasons people are giving to believe Zimmerman,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previously it was written that this witness was walking his dog Nope mixing up witnesses. The "John" witness is a grown man, not a child.
nope, Im pretty clear in THESE threads, it was posted that a man 'john' had been walking his dog, saw the dispute( at that time he only saw a portion of it) and was telling the boy to stop when his dog got loose and he ran after him and then went inside to call 911 as it turns out though, there was a LITTLE boy to whom this happened and his sisters call to 911 is one of the recordings released and transcripts available but NOW, in THIS thread, the man 'john' was inside his house just watching the whole thing and giving a blow by blow a recording that hasnt been released apparently, because he wants to remain anonymous? ....lol well, we will see if it ever surfaces,,,, who said anything about evidence I was pointing out the inconsistency in some of the reasons people are giving to believe Zimmerman,,, I bet we will, inconsistency is a pet peeve of mine actually and it exists in most mingle threads but when talking about evidence 'pointing' to trayvon as aggressor, I just keep looking for what evidence there is besides that someone fighting him was injured? and I keep getting inconsistent answers,,,,from some posters,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
but when talking about evidence 'pointing' to trayvon as aggressor, I just keep looking for what evidence there is besides that someone fighting him was injured? Actually that is the best evidence that can exist.
I can defend myself without striking you. I cannot attack you without striking you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
but when talking about evidence 'pointing' to trayvon as aggressor, I just keep looking for what evidence there is besides that someone fighting him was injured? Actually that is the best evidence that can exist.
I can defend myself without striking you. I cannot attack you without striking you. really? how does one defend themself if unarmed from a person with a gun?....without striking them , I mean,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i still have yet to why this kid was shot. was he breaking into someones home/car/doghouse? it sounded to me that zimmerman thought he looked "something". so, a kid is dead because A: zimmerman was suspicious of this kid. B: said he " 'could' be on drugs" C: The boy was unarmed. D: Zimmerman says "these a$$holes always get away" E: confronts the kid after being warned not to. (by the police) if this same guy confronted any one of you a 12:30 at night, would you not be a little concerned? At 12:30 at night if someone was following me I would call 911. i never called 911 in my life... even when someone was chasing me... that is not an option for most youths of today, because of the gangster mentality. and it clearly is not a usable defence in this situation. as you know, he was talking with his girl when everything went down. And you are not a 17 year old. Sing followed by someone. How do you know he had a "gangster mentality"? If he did have that mentality then it's possible Martin was the aggressor and initiated the fight. Isn't that what gangsters do? yes, anything is possible. i could care less who started the fight, none of it would have happened if zimmerman just did his job. if you cannot see that, then there is really nothing to discuss. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yes, anything is possible. i could care less who started the fight, none of it would have happened if zimmerman just did his job. if you cannot see that, then there is really nothing to discuss. There really is nothing more to discuss.
At any time at any point in that encounter if no one strikes anyone else, it would have not happened. You decide to draw the line of what would change this situation at Zimmerman following the teen. ME I draw it at when they meet face to face and someone strikes someone. The law happens to draw the line where I do. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
replace strike with illegally touch,,,,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yes, anything is possible. i could care less who started the fight, none of it would have happened if zimmerman just did his job. if you cannot see that, then there is really nothing to discuss. There really is nothing more to discuss.
At any time at any point in that encounter if no one strikes anyone else, it would have not happened. You decide to draw the line of what would change this situation at Zimmerman following the teen. ME I draw it at when they meet face to face and someone strikes someone. The law happens to draw the line where I do. huh... i'm not saying your wrong, but murder cases in court go way deeper than that. they will delve into why was he following him, even after talking to police and doing the opposite of what they told him to do. it seems to me they already have a good case against zimmerman, and it looks like it might be premeditated... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think 'stopping' Treyvon was premeditated
I think 'stopping' him by shooting him was the panicked result of that premeditated intent leading to a physical altercation, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
like minds think alike....
"A member of the New Orleans Police Dept. has been suspended without pay after incendiary comments attributed to him about the killing of Trayvon Martin were found posted online. Jason Giroir, the officer, is under investigation after comments were posted on a story about a local rally for Martin published on the WWL-TV website. "Act like a Thug Die like one!" one comment reads. Later, Giroir—who identified himself as "Works at NOPD"—responded to another commenter who claimed the initial comment was racially insensitive: "Eddie come on down to our town with a 'Hoodie' and you can join Martin in HELL and talk about your racist stories!:-P" NOPD superintendent Ronal Serpas, who called for the investigation, said the comments "have caused me great concern concerning his fitness for duty." "To say that I'm angry is an understatement," Serpas added. "Let me be clear: the hardworking men and women of the NOPD do not condone such statements." Giroir had already been assigned to desk duty for his involvement in a traffic stop that ended in a shootout. According to WWL-TV, Giroir "pulled over brothers Justin and Earl Sipp for a traffic violation on March 1, and a shootout erupted after two officers were called to the scene to back [him] up." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IM also concerned because initially he said he was 'jumped' from behind,,,(well, the reports claimed he said so)
now , after a girlfriend says she was on the phone and heard an altercation, he claims they FIRST exchanged some words,,, there is just too much suspicious deletion and editing of information as time goes on,,,, I hope justice is served and documented FACTS eventually come out,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fact is he will be arrested. It is just a matter of time. The dispatcher told him to not confront Travon. Zimmerman was the one who confronted. He was the aggressor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fact is he will be arrested. It is just a matter of time. The dispatcher told him to not confront Travon. Zimmerman was the one who confronted. He was the aggressor. thats the troubling part, although he admits on phone to being the one PURSUING,,, he claims that his pursuit stopped and then the BOY confronted HIM.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It says something he made over 40 calls made to 911 about people in the area. It was a gated community! This guy is going to face charges sometime in the near future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fact is he will be arrested. It is just a matter of time. The dispatcher told him to not confront Travon. Zimmerman was the one who confronted. He was the aggressor. thats the troubling part, although he admits on phone to being the one PURSUING,,, he claims that his pursuit stopped and then the BOY confronted HIM.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fact is he will be arrested. It is just a matter of time. The dispatcher told him to not confront Travon. Zimmerman was the one who confronted. He was the aggressor. thats the troubling part, although he admits on phone to being the one PURSUING,,, he claims that his pursuit stopped and then the BOY confronted HIM.... and no victim account on the incident report is also strange if there is any account at all, I think it is the one that he JUST gave a day ago, and the other is what he SAID that they didnt bother to document,,,,but repeated to media over and over before THIS statement,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
