Community > General Religion Chat

Previous 1 2 … 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next

Topic: Spiritual awakening.
funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Mon 03/19/12 12:07 PM
That is not what a zombie is. A zombie again is SOULLESS, has no soul, no soul is inside that vessle called a zombie, it lacks a soul. Don't know many different ways to spell it out to you lol. Jesus was resurrected from the grave of Hell but first commanded that his followers eat of his Flesh and drink of his blood .... I generally don't like Zombies movies....but The Rapture would make a good one ...Christians rising from their graves walking around eating non-Christians Jesus commanded no one to eat of his flesh or drink his blood. What he said was symbolic of him giving his flesh and blood on the cross at Calvery. commanded, suggested, recommended or gave a coupon ...either way Jesus talked to others about eating of flesh and drinking of blood....

CowboyGH Joined Mon 10/05/09 Posts: 13651	Mon 03/19/12 12:08 PM
That is not what a zombie is. A zombie again is SOULLESS, has no soul, no soul is inside that vessle called a zombie, it lacks a soul. Don't know many different ways to spell it out to you lol. Jesus was resurrected from the grave of Hell but first commanded that his followers eat of his Flesh and drink of his blood .... I generally don't like Zombies movies....but The Rapture would make a good one ...Christians rising from their graves walking around eating non-Christians Jesus commanded no one to eat of his flesh or drink his blood. What he said was symbolic of him giving his flesh and blood on the cross at Calvery. commanded, suggested, recommended or gave a coupon ...either way Jesus talked to others about eating of flesh and drinking of blood.... Again, no he didn't.

CowboyGH Joined Mon 10/05/09 Posts: 13651	Mon 03/19/12 12:10 PM
That is not what a zombie is. A zombie again is SOULLESS, has no soul, no soul is inside that vessle called a zombie, it lacks a soul. Don't know many different ways to spell it out to you lol. Jesus was resurrected from the grave of Hell but first commanded that his followers eat of his Flesh and drink of his blood .... I generally don't like Zombies movies....but The Rapture would make a good one ...Christians rising from their graves walking around eating non-Christians Jesus commanded no one to eat of his flesh or drink his blood. What he said was symbolic of him giving his flesh and blood on the cross at Calvery. commanded, suggested, recommended or gave a coupon ...either way Jesus talked to others about eating of flesh and drinking of blood.... Again, no he didn't. John 6:35 35And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst. Next you'll claim Jesus was made of wheat... or is it rye?

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Mon 03/19/12 12:28 PM
That is not what a zombie is. A zombie again is SOULLESS, has no soul, no soul is inside that vessle called a zombie, it lacks a soul. Don't know many different ways to spell it out to you lol. Jesus was resurrected from the grave of Hell but first commanded that his followers eat of his Flesh and drink of his blood .... I generally don't like Zombies movies....but The Rapture would make a good one ...Christians rising from their graves walking around eating non-Christians Jesus commanded no one to eat of his flesh or drink his blood. What he said was symbolic of him giving his flesh and blood on the cross at Calvery. commanded, suggested, recommended or gave a coupon ...either way Jesus talked to others about eating of flesh and drinking of blood.... Again, no he didn't. so all those Christians that go to Mass every Sunday to eat of his flesh and drink of his blood are delusional because according to you Jesus never talked about it... It makes you wonder if all Christians resort to lying like you do

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Mon 03/19/12 03:35 PM
John 6:53-56 Jesus said to them, "I tell you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in him.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Mon 03/19/12 03:37 PM
Other cannibalism in the Bible: http://www.rationalchristianity.net/cannibal.html

CowboyGH Joined Mon 10/05/09 Posts: 13651	Mon 03/19/12 03:39 PM
That is not what a zombie is. A zombie again is SOULLESS, has no soul, no soul is inside that vessle called a zombie, it lacks a soul. Don't know many different ways to spell it out to you lol. Jesus was resurrected from the grave of Hell but first commanded that his followers eat of his Flesh and drink of his blood .... I generally don't like Zombies movies....but The Rapture would make a good one ...Christians rising from their graves walking around eating non-Christians Jesus commanded no one to eat of his flesh or drink his blood. What he said was symbolic of him giving his flesh and blood on the cross at Calvery. commanded, suggested, recommended or gave a coupon ...either way Jesus talked to others about eating of flesh and drinking of blood.... Again, no he didn't. so all those Christians that go to Mass every Sunday to eat of his flesh and drink of his blood are delusional because according to you Jesus never talked about it... It makes you wonder if all Christians resort to lying like you do They go and celebrate what Jesus did for us, not practicing canibolism. Because if they were practicing canibolism, the wine would be blood, not wine. Luke 22:20 20Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Mon 03/19/12 03:41 PM
So people who do not want to believe what the Bible says that Jesus said, just sluff it off and call it "symbolism." Jesus did not say that this was symbolism. He said "For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in him." He did not say symbolism. He said "real food, and real drink."

CowboyGH Joined Mon 10/05/09 Posts: 13651	Mon 03/19/12 03:44 PM
Other cannibalism in the Bible: http://www.rationalchristianity.net/cannibal.html Interesting link. But none of those verses were canabolism supporting, for exampe the following verse was used in that site. Lamentations 4:10 10The hands of the pitiful women have sodden their own children: they were their meat in the destruction of the daughter of my people. This isn't God or the scriptures supporting cannibolism or telling the people to do it. This is just what happened.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Mon 03/19/12 03:46 PM
Other cannibalism in the Bible: http://www.rationalchristianity.net/cannibal.html Interesting link. But none of those verses were canabolism supporting, for exampe the following verse was used in that site. Lamentations 4:10 10The hands of the pitiful women have sodden their own children: they were their meat in the destruction of the daughter of my people. This isn't God or the scriptures supporting cannibolism or telling the people to do it. This is just what happened. I didn't say it was "supporting" cannibalism.

CowboyGH Joined Mon 10/05/09 Posts: 13651	Mon 03/19/12 03:49 PM
So people who do not want to believe what the Bible says that Jesus said, just sluff it off and call it "symbolism." Jesus did not say that this was symbolism. He said "For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in him." He did not say symbolism. He said "real food, and real drink." Why would he have to repeat himself and say it over and over that he speaks in parables and why? Matthew 13:34 34All these things spake Jesus unto the multitude in parables; and without a parable spake he not unto them Matthew 13:10-13 10And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? 11He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given. 12For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath. 13Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.

CowboyGH Joined Mon 10/05/09 Posts: 13651	Mon 03/19/12 03:51 PM
Other cannibalism in the Bible: http://www.rationalchristianity.net/cannibal.html Interesting link. But none of those verses were canabolism supporting, for exampe the following verse was used in that site. Lamentations 4:10 10The hands of the pitiful women have sodden their own children: they were their meat in the destruction of the daughter of my people. This isn't God or the scriptures supporting cannibolism or telling the people to do it. This is just what happened. I didn't say it was "supporting" cannibalism. In your post it says "Other cannibalism in the Bible" That is stating that the bible supports cannibalism.

Peter_Pan69 Joined Sun 08/23/09 Posts: 2781	Mon 03/19/12 04:04 PM
Other cannibalism in the Bible: http://www.rationalchristianity.net/cannibal.html Interesting link. But none of those verses were canabolism supporting, for exampe the following verse was used in that site. Lamentations 4:10 10The hands of the pitiful women have sodden their own children: they were their meat in the destruction of the daughter of my people. This isn't God or the scriptures supporting cannibolism or telling the people to do it. This is just what happened. I didn't say it was "supporting" cannibalism. In your post it says "Other cannibalism in the Bible" That is stating that the bible supports cannibalism. From the website she linked: "The John 6 passage is simply an instance of Jesus using a metaphor to illustrate a concept. This particular metaphor is repeated during the Last Supper (e.g. Lk 20:19-20), when it's clearer that it's a metaphor and not literal cannibalism. Had Jesus meant it literally (or had the disciples interpreted it literally), the Gospels would have recorded the disciples' cannibalization of Jesus after his death rather than his burial. Jesus often used metaphors that his listeners misunderstood and interpreted literally (see Jn 2:19-21, 11:11-15)."

CowboyGH Joined Mon 10/05/09 Posts: 13651	Mon 03/19/12 04:06 PM
Other cannibalism in the Bible: http://www.rationalchristianity.net/cannibal.html Interesting link. But none of those verses were canabolism supporting, for exampe the following verse was used in that site. Lamentations 4:10 10The hands of the pitiful women have sodden their own children: they were their meat in the destruction of the daughter of my people. This isn't God or the scriptures supporting cannibolism or telling the people to do it. This is just what happened. I didn't say it was "supporting" cannibalism. In your post it says "Other cannibalism in the Bible" That is stating that the bible supports cannibalism. From the website she linked: "The John 6 passage is simply an instance of Jesus using a metaphor to illustrate a concept. This particular metaphor is repeated during the Last Supper (e.g. Lk 20:19-20), when it's clearer that it's a metaphor and not literal cannibalism. Had Jesus meant it literally (or had the disciples interpreted it literally), the Gospels would have recorded the disciples' cannibalization of Jesus after his death rather than his burial. Jesus often used metaphors that his listeners misunderstood and interpreted literally (see Jn 2:19-21, 11:11-15)." Yep, people tend to forget Jesus spoke in parables.

Peter_Pan69 Joined Sun 08/23/09 Posts: 2781	Mon 03/19/12 04:09 PM
Other cannibalism in the Bible: http://www.rationalchristianity.net/cannibal.html Interesting link. But none of those verses were canabolism supporting, for exampe the following verse was used in that site. Lamentations 4:10 10The hands of the pitiful women have sodden their own children: they were their meat in the destruction of the daughter of my people. This isn't God or the scriptures supporting cannibolism or telling the people to do it. This is just what happened. I didn't say it was "supporting" cannibalism. In your post it says "Other cannibalism in the Bible" That is stating that the bible supports cannibalism. From the website she linked: "The John 6 passage is simply an instance of Jesus using a metaphor to illustrate a concept. This particular metaphor is repeated during the Last Supper (e.g. Lk 20:19-20), when it's clearer that it's a metaphor and not literal cannibalism. Had Jesus meant it literally (or had the disciples interpreted it literally), the Gospels would have recorded the disciples' cannibalization of Jesus after his death rather than his burial. Jesus often used metaphors that his listeners misunderstood and interpreted literally (see Jn 2:19-21, 11:11-15)." Yep, people tend to forget Jesus spoke in parables. And people seem to forget to actually read the stuff they post... Wasn't that supposed to be a show of support of cannibalism in the Bible?

CowboyGH Joined Mon 10/05/09 Posts: 13651	Mon 03/19/12 04:11 PM
Other cannibalism in the Bible: http://www.rationalchristianity.net/cannibal.html Interesting link. But none of those verses were canabolism supporting, for exampe the following verse was used in that site. Lamentations 4:10 10The hands of the pitiful women have sodden their own children: they were their meat in the destruction of the daughter of my people. This isn't God or the scriptures supporting cannibolism or telling the people to do it. This is just what happened. I didn't say it was "supporting" cannibalism. In your post it says "Other cannibalism in the Bible" That is stating that the bible supports cannibalism. From the website she linked: "The John 6 passage is simply an instance of Jesus using a metaphor to illustrate a concept. This particular metaphor is repeated during the Last Supper (e.g. Lk 20:19-20), when it's clearer that it's a metaphor and not literal cannibalism. Had Jesus meant it literally (or had the disciples interpreted it literally), the Gospels would have recorded the disciples' cannibalization of Jesus after his death rather than his burial. Jesus often used metaphors that his listeners misunderstood and interpreted literally (see Jn 2:19-21, 11:11-15)." Yep, people tend to forget Jesus spoke in parables. And people seem to forget to actually read the stuff they post... Wasn't that supposed to be a show of support of cannibalism in the Bible? Yeah lol I went to check that site out. And it's nothing but taking a verse here or there alone out of context to help them twist the words around and make it appear as the scriptures support cannibolism.

CowboyGH Joined Mon 10/05/09 Posts: 13651	Mon 03/19/12 04:15 PM
Other cannibalism in the Bible: http://www.rationalchristianity.net/cannibal.html Interesting link. But none of those verses were canabolism supporting, for exampe the following verse was used in that site. Lamentations 4:10 10The hands of the pitiful women have sodden their own children: they were their meat in the destruction of the daughter of my people. This isn't God or the scriptures supporting cannibolism or telling the people to do it. This is just what happened. I didn't say it was "supporting" cannibalism. In your post it says "Other cannibalism in the Bible" That is stating that the bible supports cannibalism. Luke 22:20 20Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you. See? It's all parables, symbolistic.

Sin_and_Sorrow Joined Sun 01/01/12 Posts: 5757	Mon 03/19/12 04:19 PM
So people who do not want to believe what the Bible says that Jesus said, just sluff it off and call it "symbolism." Jesus did not say that this was symbolism. He said "For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in him." He did not say symbolism. He said "real food, and real drink." Perhaps, but he didn't slit his wrist, nor carve a chunk out of his shoulder.. He broke them a piece of bread and poured them some red wine.. Jesus didn't HAVE to say it was symbolism.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Mon 03/19/12 05:56 PM
So people who do not want to believe what the Bible says that Jesus said, just sluff it off and call it "symbolism." Jesus did not say that this was symbolism. He said "For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in him." He did not say symbolism. He said "real food, and real drink." Perhaps, but he didn't slit his wrist, nor carve a chunk out of his shoulder.. He broke them a piece of bread and poured them some red wine.. Jesus didn't HAVE to say it was symbolism. Maybe the bread and wine turned into flesh and blood much like he turned the water into wine. He is supposed to be God after all.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Mon 03/19/12 05:59 PM
Other cannibalism in the Bible: http://www.rationalchristianity.net/cannibal.html Interesting link. But none of those verses were canabolism supporting, for exampe the following verse was used in that site. Lamentations 4:10 10The hands of the pitiful women have sodden their own children: they were their meat in the destruction of the daughter of my people. This isn't God or the scriptures supporting cannibolism or telling the people to do it. This is just what happened. I didn't say it was "supporting" cannibalism. In your post it says "Other cannibalism in the Bible" That is stating that the bible supports cannibalism. How do you get that impression? If the Bible "supports" everything that any story talks about that happened, then it supports a lot of evil things. I did not state that the Bible supports cannibalism. I simply sent you to a link that quotes what the Bible states about people eating their own children. You can interpret that however you like.