Topic: Obama Will Lose in a Landslide... | |
---|---|
We are all interdependent now.
Globalization Has Arrived.. |
|
|
|
You are big on the Iran issue.. You gonna feel the same way about Obama if Iran is attacked? Iran will not be attacked if Obama has his way. If Iran is attacked then the Israeli Lobby will have had its way. Either way he will be elected. He will definitely be elected if Iran is attacked. I am Guessing that Big Dick Foreign Policy is at an end. Time to put America back together. Time to make the world a level playing field. Time for Peace and Prosperity for all. So the Israeli lobby is actually the Commander in Chief.. A strong President wouldn't be forced by any lobby group to start a war they were against.. I can only infer that you see Obama as a weak President willing to give in to a lobby group.. Interesting.. |
|
|
|
So the Israeli lobby is actually the Commander in Chief.. A strong President wouldn't be forced by any lobby group to start a war they were against.. I can only infer that you see Obama as a weak President willing to give in to a lobby group.. Interesting.. Be Honest you really do not like Obama.. |
|
|
|
Globalization has arrived, it will only thrive if American stays on board....and we are getting tired of the BS...
|
|
|
|
You are big on the Iran issue.. You gonna feel the same way about Obama if Iran is attacked? Iran will not be attacked if Obama has his way. If Iran is attacked then the Israeli Lobby will have had its way. Either way he will be elected. He will definitely be elected if Iran is attacked. I am Guessing that Big Dick Foreign Policy is at an end. Time to put America back together. Time to make the world a level playing field. Time for Peace and Prosperity for all. So the Israeli lobby is actually the Commander in Chief.. A strong President wouldn't be forced by any lobby group to start a war they were against.. I can only infer that you see Obama as a weak President willing to give in to a lobby group.. Interesting.. Well said.... |
|
|
|
Edited by
Optomistic69
on
Fri 02/03/12 05:18 AM
|
|
Big Dick Foreign Policy not Good
This is an anti-Obama Thread |
|
|
|
So the Israeli lobby is actually the Commander in Chief.. A strong President wouldn't be forced by any lobby group to start a war they were against.. I can only infer that you see Obama as a weak President willing to give in to a lobby group.. Interesting.. Be Honest you really do not like Obama.. I don't like his policy or agenda. I didn't like GW Bush's policy or agenda. I believe in limited government and sound fiscal policy. Neither of them practiced this.. Therefore, I cannot support and will never support politicians that continue this insane policy track. |
|
|
|
You are big on the Iran issue.. You gonna feel the same way about Obama if Iran is attacked? Iran will not be attacked if Obama has his way. If Iran is attacked then the Israeli Lobby will have had its way. Either way he will be elected. He will definitely be elected if Iran is attacked. I am Guessing that Big Dick Foreign Policy is at an end. Time to put America back together. Time to make the world a level playing field. Time for Peace and Prosperity for all. So the Israeli lobby is actually the Commander in Chief.. A strong President wouldn't be forced by any lobby group to start a war they were against.. I can only infer that you see Obama as a weak President willing to give in to a lobby group.. Interesting.. Well said.... Thank You.. |
|
|
|
Big Dick Foreign Policy not Good This is an anti-Obama Thread Obama will lose in a landslide is the title I chose.. Did you really think that it was going to be an Obama love fest? Come on man |
|
|
|
Big Dick Foreign Policy not Good This is an anti-Obama Thread Obama will lose in a landslide is the title I chose.. Did you really think that it was going to be an Obama love fest? Come on man This is northing more than a thread ABOUT Obama ...If there is nothing positive to say about the man's track record, whose fault is that?.....Here in American we subscribe to the belief that giving equal time and consideration to the man from both sides and the middle is fair and equitable..... |
|
|
|
Big Dick Foreign Policy not Good This is an anti-Obama Thread
|
|
|
|
Big Dick Foreign Policy not Good This is an anti-Obama Thread
|
|
|
|
Big Dick Foreign Policy not Good This is an anti-Obama Thread |
|
|
|
Edited by
Optomistic69
on
Fri 02/03/12 06:24 AM
|
|
See...I told you, you need your reading glasses..
With your glasses you could have done that in one attempt. |
|
|
|
I wonder what sound fiscal policy others would have offered up to deal with a failing BANKING, Housing, and crumbling AUTO industry in america,,,,,
I suppose people actually believe letting them FAIL would be sound and reasonable,,,,all while complaining how large the unemployment rate is,,,, interesting,,, |
|
|
|
I wonder what sound fiscal policy others would have offered up to deal with a failing BANKING, Housing, and crumbling AUTO industry in america,,,,, I suppose people actually believe letting them FAIL would be sound and reasonable,,,,all while complaining how large the unemployment rate is,,,, interesting,,, I don't think it is so much about sound policy or not...Rather about the speed of application and the "specifics" for the benefactors of the bailout...Also, even though hindsight is 20/20....Obama must take the rap for the results...Simple fact.... Morning Harmony.... |
|
|
|
I wonder what sound fiscal policy others would have offered up to deal with a failing BANKING, Housing, and crumbling AUTO industry in america,,,,, I suppose people actually believe letting them FAIL would be sound and reasonable,,,,all while complaining how large the unemployment rate is,,,, interesting,,, Since you pointed out in another thread that TARP was signed by Bush it's a moot point. Allowing companies to reorganize through bankruptcy has obviously worked since every major airline has done it and they are all still flying and employing people. The GM/ Chrysler bailout was done in order to appease Obama's union cronies. If they went through bankruptcy they would still be in business. I suppose you forget that the bailout cost many jobs since they reduced the number of dealerships.. We are going to lose 10's of billions on bailing out the car companies, but I guess that is irrelevant since it's just the rich white guys tax money being pi$$ed away. |
|
|
|
I wonder what sound fiscal policy others would have offered up to deal with a failing BANKING, Housing, and crumbling AUTO industry in america,,,,, I suppose people actually believe letting them FAIL would be sound and reasonable,,,,all while complaining how large the unemployment rate is,,,, interesting,,, Since you pointed out in another thread that TARP was signed by Bush it's a moot point. Allowing companies to reorganize through bankruptcy has obviously worked since every major airline has done it and they are all still flying and employing people. The GM/ Chrysler bailout was done in order to appease Obama's union cronies. If they went through bankruptcy they would still be in business. I suppose you forget that the bailout cost many jobs since they reduced the number of dealerships.. We are going to lose 10's of billions on bailing out the car companies, but I guess that is irrelevant since it's just the rich white guys tax money being pi$$ed away. Some very good points to what the bailout was really about and who it affected...who it affected in both positive and negative ways...I will just say this...."We the people" were NOT the benefactors.... Great post Invictus.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder what sound fiscal policy others would have offered up to deal with a failing BANKING, Housing, and crumbling AUTO industry in america,,,,, I suppose people actually believe letting them FAIL would be sound and reasonable,,,,all while complaining how large the unemployment rate is,,,, interesting,,, Letting them fail creates openings for new unimpeded businesses...... |
|
|