Community > General Religion Chat

Topic: Bible Question
Leigh2154 Joined Sun 10/02/11 Posts: 16479	Wed 02/01/12 11:17 AM
No, inbreeding is not mating, it is reproduction ...mating is having intercourse... Inbreeding the mating of closely related individuals, as cousins, sire-daughter, brother-sister, or self-fertilized plants, which tends to increase the number of individuals that are homozygous for a trait and therefore increases the appearance of recessive traits. Maybe you should correct the guys who write the dictionaries instead of me, I'm just their latest victim. Maybe God instructed Adam to ejaculate into the palm of his hand, suck the sperm up into a hollow reed, immediately insert into Eve, and gently blow.... Is artificial insemination incest?...

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Wed 02/01/12 11:17 AM
so if the children are born with no genetic defects then having sex with family member isn't imbreeding...but if there are genetic defects then it is imbreeding ....is this your logic? I never said that. Inbreeding is mating between two closely related people. how about to be on the safe side...simply not imbreed Good advice, I won't. but my point to all of this is that God deem incest to be a sin and at the same time condemn all of Mankind when it was him that first gave the command to Adam and Eve to imbreed God didn't declare inbreeding a sin until the time of Moses. The reason is that until that time, the amount of defective genes hadn't reached the point that close relations had a higher chance of producing deformed children. Up until that time, there was no greater danger of deformed children from these sorts of marriages. doesn't matter when he declared inbredding a sin...the facts are according to the bible the entire Human Race is a product of inbredding and therefore a product of sin that can not be taken away unless you kill off the entire human race God even choose to kill off mankind but amazingly left a few of the inbreeders alive on Noah's Ark to once again start imbreeding among themselves ....then God the father had a son with his daughter ...now do you see why God is all about incest

Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13137	Wed 02/01/12 11:23 AM
No, inbreeding is not mating, it is reproduction ...mating is having intercourse... Inbreeding the mating of closely related individuals, as cousins, sire-daughter, brother-sister, or self-fertilized plants, which tends to increase the number of individuals that are homozygous for a trait and therefore increases the appearance of recessive traits. Maybe you should correct the guys who write the dictionaries instead of me, I'm just their latest victim. Maybe God instructed Adam to ejaculate into the palm of his hand, suck the sperm up into a hollow reed, immediately insert into Eve, and gently blow.... Is artificial insemination incest?... No, incest is defined as "Sexual relations between people classed as being too closely related to marry each other.", so sexual intercourse is required. The problem is that you seem to be unaware that "mate" has many different definitions. While "mate" can mean just copulation, it can also mean "to breed". That's the definition that was used in both my post and the definition I supplied.

Leigh2154 Joined Sun 10/02/11 Posts: 16479	Wed 02/01/12 11:27 AM
No, inbreeding is not mating, it is reproduction ...mating is having intercourse... Inbreeding the mating of closely related individuals, as cousins, sire-daughter, brother-sister, or self-fertilized plants, which tends to increase the number of individuals that are homozygous for a trait and therefore increases the appearance of recessive traits. Maybe you should correct the guys who write the dictionaries instead of me, I'm just their latest victim. Maybe God instructed Adam to ejaculate into the palm of his hand, suck the sperm up into a hollow reed, immediately insert into Eve, and gently blow.... Is artificial insemination incest?... No, incest is defined as "Sexual relations between people classed as being too closely related to marry each other.", so sexual intercourse is required. The problem is that you seem to be unaware that "mate" has many different definitions. While "mate" can mean just copulation, it can also mean "to breed". That's the definition that was used in both my post and the definition I supplied. K.....

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Wed 02/01/12 11:34 AM
No, inbreeding is not mating, it is reproduction ...mating is having intercourse... Inbreeding the mating of closely related individuals, as cousins, sire-daughter, brother-sister, or self-fertilized plants, which tends to increase the number of individuals that are homozygous for a trait and therefore increases the appearance of recessive traits. Maybe you should correct the guys who write the dictionaries instead of me, I'm just their latest victim. Maybe God instructed Adam to ejaculate into the palm of his hand, suck the sperm up into a hollow reed, immediately insert into Eve, and gently blow.... Is artificial insemination incest?... yep...if the two parties are blood relatives...it's called turkey baster imbreeding

Leigh2154 Joined Sun 10/02/11 Posts: 16479	Wed 02/01/12 11:51 AM
No, inbreeding is not mating, it is reproduction ...mating is having intercourse... Inbreeding the mating of closely related individuals, as cousins, sire-daughter, brother-sister, or self-fertilized plants, which tends to increase the number of individuals that are homozygous for a trait and therefore increases the appearance of recessive traits. Maybe you should correct the guys who write the dictionaries instead of me, I'm just their latest victim. Maybe God instructed Adam to ejaculate into the palm of his hand, suck the sperm up into a hollow reed, immediately insert into Eve, and gently blow.... Is artificial insemination incest?... No, incest is defined as "Sexual relations between people classed as being too closely related to marry each other.", so sexual intercourse is required. The problem is that you seem to be unaware that "mate" has many different definitions. While "mate" can mean just copulation, it can also mean "to breed". That's the definition that was used in both my post and the definition I supplied. Due to the pesky little problem of evolution, I'm sticking with mating (humans only) to mean the pairing of two (or more) people and not necessarily of the same sex, for the purpose of experiencing the joy of copulation to include anal if it is same sex.... And breeding (inbreeding included) to mean same sex copulation for the sole purpose of procreating... I don't give a chit how Webster defines it....rather how life as we live it in the 21st century defines it...

s1owhand Joined Fri 05/18/07 Posts: 29437	Wed 02/01/12 02:50 PM
No one knows actually. Fortunately it is hardly important.

CowboyGH Joined Mon 10/05/09 Posts: 13651	Wed 02/01/12 05:46 PM
No, inbreeding is not mating, it is reproduction ...mating is having intercourse... Inbreeding the mating of closely related individuals, as cousins, sire-daughter, brother-sister, or self-fertilized plants, which tends to increase the number of individuals that are homozygous for a trait and therefore increases the appearance of recessive traits. Maybe you should correct the guys who write the dictionaries instead of me, I'm just their latest victim. Maybe God instructed Adam to ejaculate into the palm of his hand, suck the sperm up into a hollow reed, immediately insert into Eve, and gently blow.... Is artificial insemination incest?... yep...if the two parties are blood relatives...it's called turkey baster imbreeding For 1. Adam and Eve weren't related 2. As I've shown "Adam" doesn't mean a singular person and neither does Eve. 3. Inbreeding only occurs when the two related and again Adam was not related to Eve and both "Adam" and "Eve" are not singular people.

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Wed 02/01/12 07:32 PM
No, inbreeding is not mating, it is reproduction ...mating is having intercourse... Inbreeding the mating of closely related individuals, as cousins, sire-daughter, brother-sister, or self-fertilized plants, which tends to increase the number of individuals that are homozygous for a trait and therefore increases the appearance of recessive traits. Maybe you should correct the guys who write the dictionaries instead of me, I'm just their latest victim. Maybe God instructed Adam to ejaculate into the palm of his hand, suck the sperm up into a hollow reed, immediately insert into Eve, and gently blow.... Is artificial insemination incest?... yep...if the two parties are blood relatives...it's called turkey baster imbreeding For 1. Adam and Eve weren't related 2. As I've shown "Adam" doesn't mean a singular person and neither does Eve. 3. Inbreeding only occurs when the two related and again Adam was not related to Eve and both "Adam" and "Eve" are not singular people. I don't even have to debate you on this one...because apparently you forgot that God drown everyone in the great flood except Noah and his family ...so in order to re-populate the Earth it would require Noah and his family to have sex with their relatives you just have to accept the fact that the bible and your belief is about inbreeding in which Jesus is a product of

CowboyGH Joined Mon 10/05/09 Posts: 13651	Wed 02/01/12 07:40 PM
No, inbreeding is not mating, it is reproduction ...mating is having intercourse... Inbreeding the mating of closely related individuals, as cousins, sire-daughter, brother-sister, or self-fertilized plants, which tends to increase the number of individuals that are homozygous for a trait and therefore increases the appearance of recessive traits. Maybe you should correct the guys who write the dictionaries instead of me, I'm just their latest victim. Maybe God instructed Adam to ejaculate into the palm of his hand, suck the sperm up into a hollow reed, immediately insert into Eve, and gently blow.... Is artificial insemination incest?... yep...if the two parties are blood relatives...it's called turkey baster imbreeding For 1. Adam and Eve weren't related 2. As I've shown "Adam" doesn't mean a singular person and neither does Eve. 3. Inbreeding only occurs when the two related and again Adam was not related to Eve and both "Adam" and "Eve" are not singular people. I don't even have to debate you on this one...because apparently you forgot that God drown everyone in the great flood except Noah and his family ...so in order to re-populate the Earth it would require Noah and his family to have sex with their relatives you just have to accept the fact that the bible and your belief is about inbreeding in which Jesus is a product of There was 8 people on the Ark. Relations with second cousins does not constitute inbreeding. Either way you wish to look at how the human race came about, there would have been some where along the lines of having a relationship with at least a second cousin. As in if you wish to believe in the big bang theory, some other creation, or whatever may be your thoughts on how we came about. Somewhere a long the line they were having a relation with a least their second cousin.

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Thu 02/02/12 05:01 AM
No, inbreeding is not mating, it is reproduction ...mating is having intercourse... Inbreeding the mating of closely related individuals, as cousins, sire-daughter, brother-sister, or self-fertilized plants, which tends to increase the number of individuals that are homozygous for a trait and therefore increases the appearance of recessive traits. Maybe you should correct the guys who write the dictionaries instead of me, I'm just their latest victim. Maybe God instructed Adam to ejaculate into the palm of his hand, suck the sperm up into a hollow reed, immediately insert into Eve, and gently blow.... Is artificial insemination incest?... yep...if the two parties are blood relatives...it's called turkey baster imbreeding For 1. Adam and Eve weren't related 2. As I've shown "Adam" doesn't mean a singular person and neither does Eve. 3. Inbreeding only occurs when the two related and again Adam was not related to Eve and both "Adam" and "Eve" are not singular people. I don't even have to debate you on this one...because apparently you forgot that God drown everyone in the great flood except Noah and his family ...so in order to re-populate the Earth it would require Noah and his family to have sex with their relatives you just have to accept the fact that the bible and your belief is about inbreeding in which Jesus is a product of There was 8 people on the Ark. Relations with second cousins does not constitute inbreeding. Either way you wish to look at how the human race came about, there would have been some where along the lines of having a relationship with at least a second cousin. As in if you wish to believe in the big bang theory, some other creation, or whatever may be your thoughts on how we came about. Somewhere a long the line they were having a relation with a least their second cousin. those on the ark would have been first cousins....but either way, having sex with a second a third or a fourth or fifth cousin or any blood relation would be inbreeding when jesus was turned into flesh...he became an inbred

Sin_and_Sorrow Joined Sun 01/01/12 Posts: 5757	Thu 02/02/12 05:27 AM
No, inbreeding is not mating, it is reproduction ...mating is having intercourse... Inbreeding the mating of closely related individuals, as cousins, sire-daughter, brother-sister, or self-fertilized plants, which tends to increase the number of individuals that are homozygous for a trait and therefore increases the appearance of recessive traits. Maybe you should correct the guys who write the dictionaries instead of me, I'm just their latest victim. Maybe God instructed Adam to ejaculate into the palm of his hand, suck the sperm up into a hollow reed, immediately insert into Eve, and gently blow.... Is artificial insemination incest?... yep...if the two parties are blood relatives...it's called turkey baster imbreeding For 1. Adam and Eve weren't related 2. As I've shown "Adam" doesn't mean a singular person and neither does Eve. 3. Inbreeding only occurs when the two related and again Adam was not related to Eve and both "Adam" and "Eve" are not singular people. I don't even have to debate you on this one...because apparently you forgot that God drown everyone in the great flood except Noah and his family ...so in order to re-populate the Earth it would require Noah and his family to have sex with their relatives you just have to accept the fact that the bible and your belief is about inbreeding in which Jesus is a product of There was 8 people on the Ark. Relations with second cousins does not constitute inbreeding. Either way you wish to look at how the human race came about, there would have been some where along the lines of having a relationship with at least a second cousin. As in if you wish to believe in the big bang theory, some other creation, or whatever may be your thoughts on how we came about. Somewhere a long the line they were having a relation with a least their second cousin. those on the ark would have been first cousins....but either way, having sex with a second a third or a fourth or fifth cousin or any blood relation would be inbreeding when jesus was turned into flesh...he became an inbred ...and he says it again as if he changed anything from the way said 5 times over.

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Thu 02/02/12 05:34 AM
No, inbreeding is not mating, it is reproduction ...mating is having intercourse... Inbreeding the mating of closely related individuals, as cousins, sire-daughter, brother-sister, or self-fertilized plants, which tends to increase the number of individuals that are homozygous for a trait and therefore increases the appearance of recessive traits. Maybe you should correct the guys who write the dictionaries instead of me, I'm just their latest victim. Maybe God instructed Adam to ejaculate into the palm of his hand, suck the sperm up into a hollow reed, immediately insert into Eve, and gently blow.... Is artificial insemination incest?... yep...if the two parties are blood relatives...it's called turkey baster imbreeding For 1. Adam and Eve weren't related 2. As I've shown "Adam" doesn't mean a singular person and neither does Eve. 3. Inbreeding only occurs when the two related and again Adam was not related to Eve and both "Adam" and "Eve" are not singular people. I don't even have to debate you on this one...because apparently you forgot that God drown everyone in the great flood except Noah and his family ...so in order to re-populate the Earth it would require Noah and his family to have sex with their relatives you just have to accept the fact that the bible and your belief is about inbreeding in which Jesus is a product of There was 8 people on the Ark. Relations with second cousins does not constitute inbreeding. Either way you wish to look at how the human race came about, there would have been some where along the lines of having a relationship with at least a second cousin. As in if you wish to believe in the big bang theory, some other creation, or whatever may be your thoughts on how we came about. Somewhere a long the line they were having a relation with a least their second cousin. those on the ark would have been first cousins....but either way, having sex with a second a third or a fourth or fifth cousin or any blood relation would be inbreeding when jesus was turned into flesh...he became an inbred ...and he says it again as if he changed anything from the way said 5 times over. what you taking about willis?

Sin_and_Sorrow Joined Sun 01/01/12 Posts: 5757	Thu 02/02/12 06:45 AM
what you taking about willis? ..wow. Even that was far too complex for you to grasp.

Leigh2154 Joined Sun 10/02/11 Posts: 16479	Thu 02/02/12 06:57 AM
what you taking about willis? ..wow. Even that was far too complex for you to grasp. I think all of you should take a thirty minute break and come to my "Steamy Poetry" thread and just............well,,,,,,, just relax and enjoy......a great way to start any day...and end one too ...

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Thu 02/02/12 07:27 AM
what you taking about willis? ..wow. Even that was far too complex for you to grasp. just giving you a heads up to take your meds

CowboyGH Joined Mon 10/05/09 Posts: 13651	Thu 02/02/12 07:40 AM
No, inbreeding is not mating, it is reproduction ...mating is having intercourse... Inbreeding the mating of closely related individuals, as cousins, sire-daughter, brother-sister, or self-fertilized plants, which tends to increase the number of individuals that are homozygous for a trait and therefore increases the appearance of recessive traits. Maybe you should correct the guys who write the dictionaries instead of me, I'm just their latest victim. Maybe God instructed Adam to ejaculate into the palm of his hand, suck the sperm up into a hollow reed, immediately insert into Eve, and gently blow.... Is artificial insemination incest?... yep...if the two parties are blood relatives...it's called turkey baster imbreeding For 1. Adam and Eve weren't related 2. As I've shown "Adam" doesn't mean a singular person and neither does Eve. 3. Inbreeding only occurs when the two related and again Adam was not related to Eve and both "Adam" and "Eve" are not singular people. I don't even have to debate you on this one...because apparently you forgot that God drown everyone in the great flood except Noah and his family ...so in order to re-populate the Earth it would require Noah and his family to have sex with their relatives you just have to accept the fact that the bible and your belief is about inbreeding in which Jesus is a product of There was 8 people on the Ark. Relations with second cousins does not constitute inbreeding. Either way you wish to look at how the human race came about, there would have been some where along the lines of having a relationship with at least a second cousin. As in if you wish to believe in the big bang theory, some other creation, or whatever may be your thoughts on how we came about. Somewhere a long the line they were having a relation with a least their second cousin. those on the ark would have been first cousins....but either way, having sex with a second a third or a fourth or fifth cousin or any blood relation would be inbreeding when jesus was turned into flesh...he became an inbred Genesis 7:13 13In the selfsame day entered Noah, and Shem, and Ham, and Japheth, the sons of Noah, and Noah's wife, and the three wives of his sons with them, into the ark No they were not. The son's of Noah and their wives had no relation besides the fact they were married. If this statement is not true, please correct and show how it is not true. those on the ark would have been first cousins....but either way, having sex with a second a third or a fourth or fifth cousin or any blood relation would be inbreeding Inbreeding only constitutes in the first cousin. And if you wish to go that far with it in your own little world, please then explain how the world came about that your version of inbreeding did not happen.

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Thu 02/02/12 07:43 AM
Genesis 7:13 13In the selfsame day entered Noah, and Shem, and Ham, and Japheth, the sons of Noah, and Noah's wife, and the three wives of his sons with them, into the ark No they were not. The son's of Noah and their wives had no relation besides the fact they were married. If this statement is not true, please correct and show how it is not true. Cowboy...who would their children have sex with? ..their first cousins perhaps?

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Thu 02/02/12 07:45 AM
Inbreeding only constitutes in the first cousin. And if you wish to go that far with it in your own little world, please then explain how the world came about that your version of inbreeding did not happen. then there is no need for you to be on a dating site...just go to one of your familiy reunions and pick out a second cousin when you put it like that...it sure sounds like inbreeding

Sin_and_Sorrow Joined Sun 01/01/12 Posts: 5757	Thu 02/02/12 08:04 AM
what you taking about willis? ..wow. Even that was far too complex for you to grasp. just giving you a heads up to take your meds ..you need 'em more than I do. I'd make a comeback.. ..but if only you were actually worth it. Worth something for that matter.. ..but sadly, you are not. Spitting image of why a lot of us don't feel 'God's presence' these days.. ..look no further then Funches. shruggs Yeah well..