Topic: RF disorder - should it be studied?
no photo
Thu 01/19/12 10:03 AM

Oy, another disorder? How will this play out in a court of Law? Sorry judge, I shot that abortion doctor because my parents/minister brainwashed me and I have RF disorder. I need treatment, not punishment.


laugh laugh laugh

Yep.

When are people going to finally be held accountable for their stupidity and their actions?


no photo
Thu 01/19/12 10:04 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Thu 01/19/12 10:05 AM
If a dog has been trained to attack and kill children all of its life, what do you do? Can you retrain the dog? Very unlikely.

You have to put the dog down or keep it in a cage.


no photo
Thu 01/19/12 11:50 AM
Edited by Bushidobillyclub on Thu 01/19/12 11:56 AM

If a dog has been trained to attack and kill children all of its life, what do you do? Can you retrain the dog? Very unlikely.

You have to put the dog down or keep it in a cage.


That is true. I agree!

However I have seen dogs in just such situations come a long way. I think I would still never place such a dog in a home with vulnerable people, old, too young, or disabled.

I think Stanley Williams should not have been executed. I think when a person tries desperately to reengage with society and you see an honest effort to reform they should be given second chances. (not necessarily freedom, but not necessarily death.)

I dont know, I am conflicted, I have a side that wants to believe in redemption. Perhaps it is irrational for me, my very best friend in the world was murdered, and it hurts so much to think about how she was killed, on one hand I think about switching places with the family of the victims of Stanley Williams, and I hate, on the other I want to believe in the idea of redemption.

(The person who murdered my friend has mental disorders, but was deemed capable to stand trial and is on death row)

no photo
Thu 01/19/12 11:56 AM

If a dog has been trained to attack and kill children all of its life, what do you do? Can you retrain the dog? Very unlikely.

You have to put the dog down or keep it in a cage.


In your metaphor, are you actually comparing religious people to dogs that have been trained to kill children?

no photo
Thu 01/19/12 12:59 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Thu 01/19/12 01:01 PM


If a dog has been trained to attack and kill children all of its life, what do you do? Can you retrain the dog? Very unlikely.

You have to put the dog down or keep it in a cage.


In your metaphor, are you actually comparing religious people to dogs that have been trained to kill children?



Not just religious people who have radical and dysfunctional beliefs, but also people who are raised or indoctrinated all their lives towards hatred of blacks or Jews.

People taught to believe that they should fight and kill in the name of some God or some cause, or some country are similar to dogs that are trained to kill children.

How much programming or deprogramming can a brain go through and what would it take for a person to change a strongly held belief?

If our brains are just computers that can be programmed, (and some people believe they are) then where is the real person? Where is free will? Where is the spiritual essence of a human being?

We are not simply robots or computers that follow programming. We are conscious thinking centers.




no photo
Thu 01/19/12 01:06 PM



If a dog has been trained to attack and kill children all of its life, what do you do? Can you retrain the dog? Very unlikely.

You have to put the dog down or keep it in a cage.


In your metaphor, are you actually comparing religious people to dogs that have been trained to kill children?



Not just religious people who have radical and dysfunctional beliefs, but also people who are raised or indoctrinated all their lives towards hatred of blacks or Jews.

People taught to believe that they should fight and kill in the name of some God or some cause, or some country are similar to dogs that are trained to kill children.

How much programming or deprogramming can a brain go through and what would it take for a person to change a strongly held belief?

If our brains are just computers that can be programmed, (and some people believe they are) then where is the real person? Where is free will? Where is the spiritual essence of a human being?

We are not simply robots or computers that follow programming. We are conscious thinking centers.






Okay, given that, I respectfully ask: Are you suggesting that religious people (excluding yourself, of course) and racists should locked up or killed?

no photo
Thu 01/19/12 02:46 PM




If a dog has been trained to attack and kill children all of its life, what do you do? Can you retrain the dog? Very unlikely.

You have to put the dog down or keep it in a cage.


In your metaphor, are you actually comparing religious people to dogs that have been trained to kill children?



Not just religious people who have radical and dysfunctional beliefs, but also people who are raised or indoctrinated all their lives towards hatred of blacks or Jews.

People taught to believe that they should fight and kill in the name of some God or some cause, or some country are similar to dogs that are trained to kill children.

How much programming or deprogramming can a brain go through and what would it take for a person to change a strongly held belief?

If our brains are just computers that can be programmed, (and some people believe they are) then where is the real person? Where is free will? Where is the spiritual essence of a human being?

We are not simply robots or computers that follow programming. We are conscious thinking centers.






Okay, given that, I respectfully ask: Are you suggesting that religious people (excluding yourself, of course) and racists should locked up or killed?


Only if they are a danger to themselves or others.

If a religious fanatic believes that they should burn witches and if they think that a tarot card reader is a witch, then they should be locked up if they attempt to carry out that belief.

I know people in the town I live in who believe this and if it were not for the fact that it is actually against the law to burn witches they would probably do it.


no photo
Thu 01/19/12 02:57 PM

Only if they are a danger to themselves or others.

If a religious fanatic believes that they should burn witches and if they think that a tarot card reader is a witch, then they should be locked up if they attempt to carry out that belief.


If someone commits a crime or attempts to commit a crime, it's against the law. We already have laws and punishments in place. I don't see why religion or beliefs of any kind need to be brought in.


I know people in the town I live in who believe this and if it were not for the fact that it is actually against the law to burn witches they would probably do it.


But surely you don't want to see people punished for thought crimes?

no photo
Thu 01/19/12 03:21 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Thu 01/19/12 03:22 PM


Only if they are a danger to themselves or others.

If a religious fanatic believes that they should burn witches and if they think that a tarot card reader is a witch, then they should be locked up if they attempt to carry out that belief.


If someone commits a crime or attempts to commit a crime, it's against the law. We already have laws and punishments in place. I don't see why religion or beliefs of any kind need to be brought in.


I know people in the town I live in who believe this and if it were not for the fact that it is actually against the law to burn witches they would probably do it.


But surely you don't want to see people punished for thought crimes?


I never said I did.

Even insane people are not locked up unless they are deemed to be a danger to themselves or others.

In fact, half, maybe more, of everyone you meet on the street could have a disorder or even be totally insane.

It is not illegal to be insane or to have a disorder.

But if an insane person tried to harm me, I am just as likely to shoot him as I am to shoot a sane person.



no photo
Thu 01/19/12 03:43 PM

So you trivialize the seriousness of Autism and schizophrenia in order to insult a man with whom you disagree and label a large number of the people in the world mentally ill? Stay classy Redykeulous.


For once, I'm with Spider on this one.

Redykeulous's photo
Thu 01/19/12 07:39 PM

I would think allowing children to develop without pressures to accept things on faith would be enough. Actually this is pretty common with people who are only moderately religious (the majority in the US).

Education is required by law. This is the government by the poeple saying that it is neglect to not educate your child.

We approve what is proper to teach our children, becuase we want them to have skills which will help them be successful.

This is really no different. It often gets people on the defensive becuase we are taught that religious ideas are off limit to criticism. But when a religious belief that medical science is wrong, or of the devil or what else and you pray instead of getting your child life saving medication . . .

Is raising one's child in a particular religious tradition abusive?

For now, forget all about religion. Suppose that a couple decides to raise their child as sort of a prolonged experiment in child development. Make them a pair of unethical child psychologists if you like. They deliberately teach their child a bunch of nonsense (e.g., incorrect names for all the colors, incorrect terms for basic words, strange magical notions, etc.). They homeschool their child until high school, carefully controlling all the child's interactions and media exposure to make sure that their teachings go unchallenged. They then send their child off to high school and monitor the consequences.

Is this abusive? I suspect most of us would agree that it is. The parents are deliberately providing inaccurate information without correction, setting the child up for what will surely be a devastating trauma.

Time for another example, one which is much more realistic and unfortunately common. A racist couple who belong to the Klan and various other white supremacist groups are firmly committed to raising their child to have similar beliefs. If you've seen any of the documentaries on hate groups on the History Channel or other cable networks, you've seen this. Disturbing images of babies in Klan garb or with little swastikas. Makes you sick, doesn't it? Basically, these parents raise their child from birth to hate everyone who they hate. And yet, when you see their toddler, you recognize that this is not a racist child but a child raised by racist parents.

Is this abusive? I suspect that most of us would agree that it is, however, I'd argue that this case actually goes beyond child abuse. How? In addition to damaging the child, these parents are raising a child who is likely to be a potential threat to the rest of us. If you are going to stand by the "I have the right to raise my child however I see fit" claim, note that this is exactly what these parents typically say.

Now look at the parents who raise their child in a particular religious tradition. Like the first example, they end up teaching their child a bunch of nonsense, ranging from incorrect information about the natural world to magical (i.e., supernatural) rubbish. But like the second example, they do this because they genuinely believe it to be true. Worse, like the second couple, they teach hatred and exclusion. "But Christianity/Islam/Judaism is about love!" How is fostering an us-and-them mentality where children are taught that they are members of a "chosen" group - an island of good surrounded by evil - who must adhere to ancient superstition or risk the hell to which all the nonbelievers are condemned, about love?

Is this abusive? In other words, is raising a child to value irrationality (i.e., faith) over reason and to accept an inherently divisive belief system a form of abuse?


I found the above on another site, and I think the examples offer good reason to acknowledge this isn't a black and white topic. Complete freedom to teach your child anything isn't really anything we should take seriously. Children have rights of there own, and abuse can start with how you shape there world view.


Interesting and thanks for posting it.

Redykeulous's photo
Thu 01/19/12 07:44 PM

Wow, people are actually taking the OP seriously. Okay, me and my sarcasm seem to have come to the wrong place.


I can't believe I didn't see this the first time.

SARCASM - GOOD! Don't deny me my share and I admit, you will see sarcasm in a good many of my posts as well (sometimes even when I'm serious).

So don't go away, sarcasm has this odd ability to make make people think sometimes.

no photo
Thu 01/19/12 08:04 PM


So you trivialize the seriousness of Autism and schizophrenia in order to insult a man with whom you disagree and label a large number of the people in the world mentally ill? Stay classy Redykeulous.


For once, I'm with Spider on this one.



That will happen a lot more than you expect. Don't let it scare you, it's perfectly natural. I might be an a-hole, but I'm an a-hole who is right most of the time. winking

no photo
Thu 01/19/12 08:51 PM
Here is what I think.

1. I could be wrong but out of all the men I meet, I am guessing that one out of three are either gay or have had a homosexual encounter.

2. Probably more than half of everyone I meet are dysfunctional or mentally ill.


no photo
Fri 01/20/12 08:22 AM
Edited by Bushidobillyclub on Fri 01/20/12 08:31 AM


So you trivialize the seriousness of Autism and schizophrenia in order to insult a man with whom you disagree and label a large number of the people in the world mentally ill? Stay classy Redykeulous.


For once, I'm with Spider on this one.

Did you read the hypothetical situation with the unethical child physiologist? Raising there child as an experiment were they taught the child things clearly not true? What about the racist couple example? What about examples of teaching children its good to be suicide bombers? What about the example of parents withholding medical treatments in favor of prayer?

Does this example seem like something fair to the child? Does that child need to be protected?

I do not think this subject is so cut and dry . . .




So you trivialize the seriousness of Autism and schizophrenia in order to insult a man with whom you disagree and label a large number of the people in the world mentally ill? Stay classy Redykeulous.


For once, I'm with Spider on this one.



That will happen a lot more than you expect. Don't let it scare you, it's perfectly natural. I might be an a-hole, but I'm an a-hole who is right most of the time. winking
Simplistic views of the world are easy to agree with . . . until confronted with complexity of course . . .

Spider uses a lot of straw man arguments as well.

no photo
Fri 01/20/12 08:54 AM



So you trivialize the seriousness of Autism and schizophrenia in order to insult a man with whom you disagree and label a large number of the people in the world mentally ill? Stay classy Redykeulous.


For once, I'm with Spider on this one.



That will happen a lot more than you expect. Don't let it scare you, it's perfectly natural. I might be an a-hole, but I'm an a-hole who is right most of the time. winking
Simplistic views of the world are easy to agree with . . . until confronted with complexity of course . . .

Spider uses a lot of straw man arguments as well.



no photo
Fri 01/20/12 09:25 AM
Edited by Bushidobillyclub on Fri 01/20/12 09:36 AM
Define Indoctrinate:
1. to teach (a person or group of people) systematically to accept doctrines, esp uncritically


Problem solving starts with thinking about a problem critically. Sometimes taking it apart, and questioning each of the pieces systematically. Religions tend to hold uncritical examination of beliefs as a value. You will often hear praise of people who have strong faith. There is a wide range as the level of value placed on faith and often times it is restricted to a small subset of ideas.

At its most fundamental this is the problem with beliefs in things that do not have empirical support, that are not demonstrable.

It is objectively true that a child who is strong in critical thinking skills is better prepared for independence. Most moderately religious people agree, and it is a rare person (in my own experience) that treats the concept of god in the same way as other concepts: they tend to be critical of every other concept, and systematic in their approaches to problem solving regarding those concepts.

However, extremists take the concepts of faith to new levels. They will praise faith to a much higher degree and incorporate faith based thinking into more parts of life than just the concept of the existence of god, but also in how god works within the world.

This distinction of an active participating god, and a non-participating god is a very important distinction to consider when we analyze fundamentalism/extremism in religious circles.

This is the context of this conversation, and really you cannot necessarily apply the concepts universally. The reason should be clear: becuase there is such a diversity of belief regarding this topic. (Hence spiders straw man he called fallacious)

The greater the control an authority has on belief structures, the greater the appeal of placing faith into these authorities has a direct relationship with the level of dysfunction of critical thinking skills.

I will continue with this train of thought later and describe mind control techniques often used by cults to remove free thought and independence from their followers.

no photo
Fri 01/20/12 09:32 AM
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2010/november/27.40.html


There has been a corresponding drop in church involvement. According to Rainer Research, approximately 70 percent of American youth drop out of church between the age of 18 and 22. The Barna Group estimates that 80 percent of those reared in the church will be "disengaged" by the time they are 29. Barna Group president David Kinnaman described the reality in stark terms:


That's some amazing "brain washing", that lasts until the kid turns 18...

no photo
Fri 01/20/12 09:37 AM
Edited by Bushidobillyclub on Fri 01/20/12 09:37 AM

http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2010/november/27.40.html


There has been a corresponding drop in church involvement. According to Rainer Research, approximately 70 percent of American youth drop out of church between the age of 18 and 22. The Barna Group estimates that 80 percent of those reared in the church will be "disengaged" by the time they are 29. Barna Group president David Kinnaman described the reality in stark terms:


That's some amazing "brain washing", that lasts until the kid turns 18...
Moderate religious beliefs done right, and not really within the context of religious fundamentalism is it?

I can see your still not tracking this topic . . .

no photo
Fri 01/20/12 09:44 AM

Moderate religious beliefs done right, and not really within the context of religious fundamentalism is it?


When you said you weren't going to talk to me anymore, did you mean that you were going to still talk to me, but only in gibberish?


I can see your still not tracking this topic . . .


I've been following it's footprints for the past 2 days. I'm wearing a coyote skin to hide my scent. Soon, i will catch up with it and hang it's head upon my wall and wrap my women in it's skin.