100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Are You For or Against the New World Order? | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Fri 12/02/11 05:45 PM
|
|
Here is exactly what the goal is.
To completely replace real money (gold backed money) with I.O.U.'s (faith backed money or I.O.U.'s) (That would be the Federal reserve notes here.) (The first thing they did in Iraq was to replace Saddam's gold backed money with paper money, (loans) and then they stole his gold.) Eventually, the worthless paper money will be slowly replaced by "credits" or digital money. It is doubtful that there is even enough paper money to cover the digital money going through wire every day. If everyone went to your bank and wanted to withdraw their money in cash, your bank probably would not have enough cash on hand to do that. Who is behind this plan to control the money? The Elite bankers. Start with the Rothschilds as always. "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws." - Mayer Amschel Rothschild Control the money and you will control the world. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The idealism of a "New World Order," like communism, is an ideal of order and peace and sharing etc. But in the hands of the greedy rich, it would ultimately be corrupt and unfair. From the point of view of the few who secretly run the world, it is the ultimate goal of course, and it makes perfect sense. To get there, however, people's freedom, lives, and sovereignty will be the cost. I agree with this. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Peccy
on
Fri 12/02/11 07:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just curious, if they secretly run the world now, what is the advantage of making themselves public? "You can gain your objective much faster and quieter if you're not in the public know." - Staff Sergeant Brill, USMC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A system of Global Governance is a necessary step in the world as it is now.
Just a small dot in the vast universe. That it will take the shape of such a narrow view of man as the so called 'new world order' is in serious doubt. Given the large spread of the spectrum of human asperiations and the even larger spread of what an individual feels is 'just governance' such a narrow view would lead to colapse of the system in short order. The chaos would be unmangeable by 'central' power. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are a lot of books on the rise and fall of civilizations. Utopian idealism seem to be in favor of the old world chaos instead of new world order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
no such animal as a new world order. It is not an "animal." precisely what i said. |
|
|
|
|
