1 2 4 Next
Topic: Who Supports These Precious Values
RhonLynn's photo
Sun 11/20/11 11:55 AM


Beautiful stuff.

I am one of those people who cannot draw a stick insect but my mind is a minefieldlaugh


No problem.....don't draw stick insects.....Take my word for it.....

pick up a pencil, draw or write whatever the hell you want....

It is time well spent...

Damn the torpedoes and damned other opinions.....

Art reveals it's self.

Just do your thing Brother....





Pierced nose & Hazel eyes & you have drawn me.....Nice work flowerforyou

krupa's photo
Sun 11/20/11 12:02 PM
Suprizngly...I have drawn alot of women Rhon......I try to draw just whatever, but, the more I draw, the more I draw actual women.

krupa's photo
Sun 11/20/11 12:08 PM


Warhol and Picasso are no talent hacks? Interesting.


Sorry if I didn't clarify enough....

worthless pieces of no talent schitt.

I hope that that let's you know where I stand Sing.

I figured that one out at 3rd grade.

no photo
Sun 11/20/11 12:29 PM
Edited by singmesweet on Sun 11/20/11 12:29 PM



Warhol and Picasso are no talent hacks? Interesting.


Sorry if I didn't clarify enough....

worthless pieces of no talent schitt.

I hope that that let's you know where I stand Sing.

I figured that one out at 3rd grade.


Well, that's the great thing about art. To some, an artist may be great. To others, they may hate their work. I'll just have to disagree with you on these two.

AndyBgood's photo
Sun 11/20/11 03:11 PM

You lost me at "Worhol was far more of an artist".........



Dude........


That is somewhere between tragic and pathetic. Worhol couldnt entertain goats with his work. Only Humans would sink to that level.


Now come on, even I can sense some artistic arrogance and potentially jealousy. I too am an artist. A sample of my work can be found on the Regulators Bar and Grill album since I did that cover for them myself so I am a published artist. I agree it is tough to stomach someone else with less talent actually making money at it. Andy Warhol is no Geiger who is one of the Best of the Best! But he did get rich, he did get to live a bohemian dream soaked in drugs. The problem is art is subjective. Adolph Hitler was an artist of some talent as well. Why succumb to hateration? Dood, therein lies the path to failure as an artist. You got some hard core artistic chops. But getting all crusade on us about how bad other name artists are to this degree is a little snobbish. I think much more of you than this! So how can you even degenerate me in such a cold fashion? You could at least offer some rational like you have done in the past rather than cut me down in such a cold manner...

I grudgingly admire the fact Warhol got famous in the first place. I wish something I have done could get me even a fraction of his notoriety! Are you jealous of their success over their lack of real talent? There is a lot more to being an artist than just one form of art itself. But I expect you know this already!

no photo
Sun 11/20/11 03:14 PM



Warhol and Picasso are no talent hacks? Interesting.


Sorry if I didn't clarify enough....

worthless pieces of no talent schitt.

I hope that that let's you know where I stand Sing.

I figured that one out at 3rd grade.


agree

I think some of picasso is interesting tho

I wouldn;t hang it in my home

no photo
Sun 11/20/11 03:58 PM
One artist that I do not like at all is Jackson Pollock.

1 2 4 Next