There should be no laws for or against abortion in the first place. What a woman does for her health and for her body is her business.

I would never vote for any president motivated by any promise of peace because I know they are lying. There will never be peace on this earth. War is business. That's the fact of it no matter what party you vote for. None have every given us peace. None.

I would be happy if they abolished all laws regarding marriages period. Just let people live as individuals and if they want to form a partnership let them draw up a contract.

I dont agree abortion is merely an issue of the womans body,, but I do understand presidents have little to do with that issue.

promises of absolute peace are as suspect as promises of absolute equality, but promises of efforts towards MORE peace and equality are pretty significant to me

As far as marriage, I would prefer that potential parents (male female bondings) be encouraged to commit to each other for a lifetime as a stronger foundation for their potential offspring,,,,

I agree with all but the first one JB. In my opinion aborting a child is murder no matter how you look at it. There are plenty of alternatives rather than killing.

Remember that guys, anytime you ask a woman to have unprotected sex.

If you think abortion is murder, stop getting women pregnant unless you want a child.

If men were the ones who got pregnant, abortion would always have been legal.

I for one am 42 and childless; I practice what I preach. But pretty sure you're right on the men getting pregnant part.

I fully support the pro-choice movement. I believe life begins at arousal so everytime you masturbate (and you do masturbate) you are committing an act of murder.

No.......I used to A LOT! But since I live with my gf, I never need to!

Oh c'mon now, we've all had girl friends so don't hand me that.

lol............I'm serious, if I ever feel the need, she's more than willing to give me a helping hand!

How about every person of the opposite sex you meet, if you don't have sex with them until you get pregnant, you are preventing the birth of that possible child, which is the same as murder.

murder requires there to be a life to take
so that doesnt quite hold,,,

No woman should be asked to risk her life by taking a pregnancy to full term and having a baby. Not to mention having to raise it or having to find adoptive parents for it.

A woman who decides she does not want children will have a hard time finding a doctor who will tie her tubes while she is still in child bearing age. Most men prefer sex without protection, especially husbands. Some religions consider birth control to be a sin.

Until these things change, abortion should remain a option.

Women should not be asked to risk their lives and they should not be expected to be nuns for life either.

Society needs to grow up and realize that a woman's body is her business and is not the business of anyone else, pregnant or not.

There is just as much life in an egg and a sperm as there is when they are joined.

If they were not alive, their would not be a pregnancy.

Sperm is alive, eggs are alive, cells are alive.

But who is to say where life begins? I believe it when the sperm enters the egg, what ensues afterwards is simply the splitting of cells...........for a reason. uh oh.............sorry ms.............I misread

its her body until it creates another body,, in my opinion anyhow

people who create life should be responsible for it in some way other than ending it

there is adoption, there is also just the option to say no without protection ,,,

yes, but sperm is not a HUMAN life witout an EGG

its like saying an egg is food and milk and flour are foods
so they are all equally a cake,,,

Yes, the argument is who is to say where and when "life" begins?

The LAW in Colorado says that a child must take its first breath and even must live a certain amount of time to have ever been considered to have lived and died.

I understand laws differ in different states.

A fertilized egg is considered an embryo, not a human life.

If an embryo was considered a human life, then abortion would legally be murder. It is not.

but why just when they take a breath,, why not when they become self sufficient,,,,

I think it should start when it begins in the womb

perhaps someday, children will just be property incubated outside of wombs,, and then parents can argue who, when , and if either should have the right to just incenerate them....