Topic: Thanks 'God' still alive !
CowboyGH's photo
Wed 04/06/11 09:03 PM

Can you prove ANYTHING without a shadow of doubt? Things can only be proven true if the one is willing to accept it as true. You can NOT prove anything to someone if they wish it not be true.



I'm glad you cleared that up cowboy. Now I know why you believe in the Christian God. You simply wish it to be true.

But your wishes are not enough to convince other people and just because you wish it, that doesn't make it true for anyone else.

Yet you continue to speak as if your truth is everybody's truth.


















I'm not here to convince anyone of anything. I'm here for enlightening discussion. To talk with other fellow people of our own different beliefs. Not trying to "prove" my beliefs, not trying to sway another to my beliefs. Just merely discussion.

Why is it when a Christian or person of other "religious" beliefs discusses their beliefs it is taken as they are trying to convince/convert someone else? And it's not seen the same when an atheists speak of their beliefs in God and or the lack there of? Why is it always seen as the believer trying to convince/convert the unbeliever, but not seen as the unbeliever trying to convince/convert the believer? Again, we're just here for discussion, enlightenment, friendly conversation.

Kleisto's photo
Wed 04/06/11 09:26 PM


Can you prove ANYTHING without a shadow of doubt? Things can only be proven true if the one is willing to accept it as true. You can NOT prove anything to someone if they wish it not be true.



I'm glad you cleared that up cowboy. Now I know why you believe in the Christian God. You simply wish it to be true.

But your wishes are not enough to convince other people and just because you wish it, that doesn't make it true for anyone else.

Yet you continue to speak as if your truth is everybody's truth.


















I'm not here to convince anyone of anything. I'm here for enlightening discussion. To talk with other fellow people of our own different beliefs. Not trying to "prove" my beliefs, not trying to sway another to my beliefs. Just merely discussion.

Why is it when a Christian or person of other "religious" beliefs discusses their beliefs it is taken as they are trying to convince/convert someone else? And it's not seen the same when an atheists speak of their beliefs in God and or the lack there of? Why is it always seen as the believer trying to convince/convert the unbeliever, but not seen as the unbeliever trying to convince/convert the believer?


Because you Christians all think you have it exactly right and everyone else is simply wrong. That's it in a nutshell.

Abracadabra's photo
Wed 04/06/11 10:03 PM
Edited by Abracadabra on Wed 04/06/11 10:04 PM
Cowboy wrote:

I'm not here to convince anyone of anything. I'm here for enlightening discussion. To talk with other fellow people of our own different beliefs. Not trying to "prove" my beliefs, not trying to sway another to my beliefs. Just merely discussion.


I don't see how you can say that unless you've dramatically changed your position from your previous stance. You've stated before that you are a "Servant of your Lord", out to spread "His word". You've also stated in the past that you do it out of love because you're concerned about "saving" people, and helping people to "Find the Lord".

In fact, you've stated explicitly in no uncertain terms that "Jesus is the only way to God". You refuse to hear of anything other than this. You've even stated on several occasions that you're not even interested in hearing about other religions or spiritual philosophies because you already have the "Truth".

I have no problem with your believe in this regard. But why then pretend otherwise? That's the part I don't understand.

If you genuinely feel that you're a "Servant of God" out to spread his word in no uncertain terms, then why pretend otherwise?

What's wrong with honesty?

That's the part I don't understand.


Why is it when a Christian or person of other "religious" beliefs discusses their beliefs it is taken as they are trying to convince/convert someone else? And it's not seen the same when an atheists speak of their beliefs in God and or the lack there of? Why is it always seen as the believer trying to convince/convert the unbeliever, but not seen as the unbeliever trying to convince/convert the believer? Again, we're just here for discussion, enlightenment, friendly conversation.


Well, seriously Cowboy how can you even ask such a question in the face of the religion that you support?

First off, it's usually the Protestant Christians who are out to shove their religious beliefs down the throats of others. That's just a fact of life. It's no secret that the Christian doctrine itself makes these sorts of claims (either believe in this religion or you're "rejecting God"). That's part and parcel of the actual doctrine.

Moreover, Christianity, as well as all of the Abrahamic religions are indeed based on a "jealous God" concept. They are all based on the Ten Commandments the very first of which basically states "Thou shalt have no other gods before me".

So this pits the Abrahamic religions against each other as well as against the whole rest of the world, simply because they are stuck with a "Jealous God" who won't tolerate any other "gods", and that basically means no other religions.

You don't see this kind of stuff coming from religions like Wicca, or Buddhism, etc. And you certainly don't see it coming from the atheists.

The reason that it might appear to you that people are singling your religion out, is simply because the religion you have chosen to believe in has already singled out everyone else!

Jesus is the Only Way! And "Thou shalt have no other gods before the God of Abraham!"

This is old hat Cowboy.

How can you not be aware of the religious "intolerance" of your very own religion?

~~~~~~

Moreover, religions don't need to "Prove" anything. Religions are based on "Faith".

Have you ever seen anyone trying to "Prove" to anyone that Wicca is true? Or that Buddhism is true? I seriously doubt it. Although I imagine you could find rare people who do try to prove those spiritual faiths. But not anywhere near on the scale that Christians attempt to proselytize their religion.

Of course the atheists, and anyone who recognizes the intellectual achievements of science, are going to be speaking in terms of evidence and "proofs", of what the scientific method has revealed to us.

However science is not a religion, and totally opposite to the falsities that you spread, science is not based on "faith" either. It's based on observation, physical evidence, logic, mathematics, reason, and most importantly it's based on the work of thousands of independent scientists any one of which would love nothing more than to prove previous results and conclusions of science to be wrong.

It's precisely the opposite of what religious people do. They are all out to prove a single conclusion to be right, not wrong! And they've already shown that they'll lie, and misrepresent known facts just to try to fool people into believing that their religion might have merit. It's truly amazing the lengths of dishonesty that they'll go in an attempt to support their religious faith.

So the religious "Christians" (certainly not all of them), but the ones who are out to proselytize and evangelize, have gotten themselves caught up in the "proof" thing because they view science as their opposition!

Buddhism, for example, has no problem with science. There is no conflict between the spiritual philosophy of Buddhism and science.

In fact, here's what Albert Einstein had to say on this very matter:

"The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. It should transcend personal God and avoid dogma and theology. Covering both the natural and the spiritual, it should be based on a religious sense arising from the experience of all things natural and spiritual as a meaningful unity. Buddhism answers this description. If there is any religion that could cope with modern scientific needs it would be Buddhism." - (Albert Einstein)

One of the greatest problems with Christianity is that in order for Christianity to be correct, modern science needs to be wrong. So the Christians are up against a real brick wall on that one. They need to discredit science in order to keep their religion alive because their religion doesn't coexist with evolution very well.

So the problem is with your religion Cowboy. You're religion conflicts with knowledge that has been considered to have been "proven" to many people (myself included). Thus you need to find a way to discredit science in order for your religion to stand.

Obviously your foremost method is to simply reduce science to being nothing more than "faith" itself, thus placing it on equal footing with your faith-based religion. The problem with that approach is two-fold.

1. Most people aren't prepared to accept you assertion that science has no more merit than a totally unproven religious tale. (myself included in this group)

2. Even if a person were to accept this idea that science has no more merit than religious myths, that still doesn't help your agenda, because that ideal necessarily places all religions and spiritual philosophies on equal footing.

Well, gee whiz. If everything is on equal footing then there's no reason to chose to believe any one over any other. May as well just pick the one you like the best in that. For me, I would pick either Buddhism or Wicca over Christianity if they are all on equal footing. They're simply prettier spiritual views, IMHO, and I find them both to be far more attractive than the Abrahamic religions.

So even if you reduce everything to being equally "faith-based" it doesn't help your cause.

And what's your cause?

Well, you've stated it before. You're a "Servant of you Lord" out to "Spread His Word" because you love people and want to save them from the wrath of God that this religion predicts will fall upon anyone who refuses to accept Jesus as their "Lord and Savior". You've been preaching that we must "Obey God" for months now. And you keep referencing the text of the Holy Bible as the "Word of God" that we must "Obey".

Unless you've changed your agenda since then? flowerforyou



Abracadabra's photo
Wed 04/06/11 10:06 PM



Can you prove ANYTHING without a shadow of doubt? Things can only be proven true if the one is willing to accept it as true. You can NOT prove anything to someone if they wish it not be true.



I'm glad you cleared that up cowboy. Now I know why you believe in the Christian God. You simply wish it to be true.

But your wishes are not enough to convince other people and just because you wish it, that doesn't make it true for anyone else.

Yet you continue to speak as if your truth is everybody's truth.


I'm not here to convince anyone of anything. I'm here for enlightening discussion. To talk with other fellow people of our own different beliefs. Not trying to "prove" my beliefs, not trying to sway another to my beliefs. Just merely discussion.

Why is it when a Christian or person of other "religious" beliefs discusses their beliefs it is taken as they are trying to convince/convert someone else? And it's not seen the same when an atheists speak of their beliefs in God and or the lack there of? Why is it always seen as the believer trying to convince/convert the unbeliever, but not seen as the unbeliever trying to convince/convert the believer?


Because you Christians all think you have it exactly right and everyone else is simply wrong. That's it in a nutshell.


Hey. We said the same thing! drinker

I just gave more details. bigsmile

no photo
Wed 04/06/11 10:18 PM

I'm not here to convince anyone of anything. I'm here for enlightening discussion. To talk with other fellow people of our own different beliefs. Not trying to "prove" my beliefs, not trying to sway another to my beliefs. Just merely discussion.


I'm glad you cleared that up Cowboy. I am happy to have enlightened you.


Why is it when a Christian or person of other "religious" beliefs discusses their beliefs it is taken as they are trying to convince/convert someone else? And it's not seen the same when an atheists speak of their beliefs in God and or the lack there of? Why is it always seen as the believer trying to convince/convert the unbeliever, but not seen as the unbeliever trying to convince/convert the believer? Again, we're just here for discussion, enlightenment, friendly conversation.




Oh don't worry, you haven't actually convinced anyone.




Abracadabra's photo
Wed 04/06/11 10:31 PM


I'm not here to convince anyone of anything. I'm here for enlightening discussion. To talk with other fellow people of our own different beliefs. Not trying to "prove" my beliefs, not trying to sway another to my beliefs. Just merely discussion.


I'm glad you cleared that up Cowboy. I am happy to have enlightened you.


Why is it when a Christian or person of other "religious" beliefs discusses their beliefs it is taken as they are trying to convince/convert someone else? And it's not seen the same when an atheists speak of their beliefs in God and or the lack there of? Why is it always seen as the believer trying to convince/convert the unbeliever, but not seen as the unbeliever trying to convince/convert the believer? Again, we're just here for discussion, enlightenment, friendly conversation.




Oh don't worry, you haven't actually convinced anyone.



He's convinced me that he's trying to convince people.

no photo
Wed 04/06/11 10:37 PM


I like your little laughing guy.bigsmile

Abracadabra's photo
Wed 04/06/11 10:47 PM


I like your avatar. It's very professional and look like you are being very productive even when you're actually posting on the forums.

That photo makes me want to get my butt in gear and set up an art room. I already have all the art supplies, I just need to set up a space to work in. bigsmile

wux's photo
Wed 04/06/11 11:00 PM



7 Everyone who is called by My name,
Whom I have created for My glory;
I have formed him, yes, I have made him."
NKJV


So is every chr-stian who calls upon JC saved? Was created for his glory.. He made him?


Miles, please read more carefully.

The quote says "who is called by My name", not "who calls my name".

So clearly it's only Jesuses he talks about.

What he means to say, is that all children ought to be named at baptisem, "Jesus of Nazareth".

Then he goes on to say that these children he had made.

Which says zip all about salvation or anything.

He just gives a benchmark-example of patrilinear naming of children. My father was a Sz.......y. My mother was a R........d. My last name is the same as my father's, and different from my mother's, coz my father made me. My mother simply offered 1 ovum and her fertile womb to assist in the process.

-------

One difference: Jesus may have been proud of his children, to be his glory, if he had any courage to have them (he died at 33, childless, unmarried, virgin, unless you count the very likely forthcoming BJs in his men's club) but Dad definitely did not think I was his "glory". He rather thought, instead, that I was a good-for-nothing lazy damned boy, leeching off him and not doing my homework. He loved me, all right, but his prophesy of my later amonting to nothing when I grow up acutally came true.


Miles, please read more carefully.

The quote says "who is called by My name", not "who calls my name".

So clearly it's only Jesuses he talks about.

What he means to say, is that all children ought to be named at baptisem, "Jesus of Nazareth".


Who is called by my name has a dual purpose.

You are Called.. The calling.. as in you hear his voice and another you will not follow. The calling..

and 2.. A family name. Many prophets were called by his name. JeremYah, with a "Y" IsiaYah, ZecharYah all have the family name of Yah the same as Yahshua his only begotten son.

The jews have no problem saying JC..I do but they don't because they know it means nothing to them and you are not calling on Yahweh's name.. The " I Am" That Yahshua was condemned for saying he was and so was Stephen.

Nmaes mean alot. It's respect. yes it is true why a jew will not say Yahweh and If you refer to Yahshua as the son in parts of the world you may be told to not to say that name again or suffer the consequinces as I was on Devon street in Chicago's jewish district.

I have spoke with many Rabbi's and Jewish or Levitical priests of the Cohens and they will not deny that Yahweh's name is said as it sounds. The High priests who give the Blessings at the Wailing wall are from the levitical priesthood Just like Arron who it has been passed down to.

It has not been lost as the High priests do keep tradition even though the Temple is not standing and they can not enter on The Day of Atonement each year with the name Yahweh (YHWH in the Paleo Hebrew lettering) on thier foreheads.

That is why I said that. The theme of Scripture is family and the family has a name. rev 14 speaks of this. even helel in the number of his name has copied this. and name is part of his own.

I do not see how you can say IsiaYah says anything different but i am not hear to say convert anyone. you deside whats right for you. Blessings...Miles


Lots of talk, Miles, completely off-target. I said "who is called by my name" and "who calls my name" are different in meaning, yet you used the two as if their meanings were completely interchangeable.

Your essay did not touch on that, at all. In the beginning you touch on that, but what you wrote was, in my book at least, and no disrespect meant, gibberish. I for one could not make heads or tails of this:

"Who is called by my name has a dual purpose.

You are Called.. The calling.. as in you hear his voice and another you will not follow. The calling..

and 2.. A family name. Many prophets were called by his name. JeremYah, with a "Y" IsiaYah, ZecharYah all have the family name of Yah the same as Yahshua his only begotten son."

I really resent being forced to explain why a gibberish is gibberish, to a person who can operate a keyboard.

no photo
Wed 04/06/11 11:05 PM
I can never make anything out of most of that either wux, so don't feel alone. Of course I also have a hard time following some of your posts too. :tongue:

no photo
Wed 04/06/11 11:06 PM



I like your avatar. It's very professional and look like you are being very productive even when you're actually posting on the forums.

That photo makes me want to get my butt in gear and set up an art room. I already have all the art supplies, I just need to set up a space to work in. bigsmile


Yeh, it reminds me to get to work.

CowboyGH's photo
Thu 04/07/11 08:13 AM



Can you prove ANYTHING without a shadow of doubt? Things can only be proven true if the one is willing to accept it as true. You can NOT prove anything to someone if they wish it not be true.



I'm glad you cleared that up cowboy. Now I know why you believe in the Christian God. You simply wish it to be true.

But your wishes are not enough to convince other people and just because you wish it, that doesn't make it true for anyone else.

Yet you continue to speak as if your truth is everybody's truth.


















I'm not here to convince anyone of anything. I'm here for enlightening discussion. To talk with other fellow people of our own different beliefs. Not trying to "prove" my beliefs, not trying to sway another to my beliefs. Just merely discussion.

Why is it when a Christian or person of other "religious" beliefs discusses their beliefs it is taken as they are trying to convince/convert someone else? And it's not seen the same when an atheists speak of their beliefs in God and or the lack there of? Why is it always seen as the believer trying to convince/convert the unbeliever, but not seen as the unbeliever trying to convince/convert the believer?


Because you Christians all think you have it exactly right and everyone else is simply wrong. That's it in a nutshell.


And atheists believe the same, other beliefs believe the same. Why point fingers making the Christians look bad when in fact atheists and other beliefs are doing the same thing?

CowboyGH's photo
Thu 04/07/11 08:15 AM

Cowboy wrote:

I'm not here to convince anyone of anything. I'm here for enlightening discussion. To talk with other fellow people of our own different beliefs. Not trying to "prove" my beliefs, not trying to sway another to my beliefs. Just merely discussion.


I don't see how you can say that unless you've dramatically changed your position from your previous stance. You've stated before that you are a "Servant of your Lord", out to spread "His word". You've also stated in the past that you do it out of love because you're concerned about "saving" people, and helping people to "Find the Lord".

In fact, you've stated explicitly in no uncertain terms that "Jesus is the only way to God". You refuse to hear of anything other than this. You've even stated on several occasions that you're not even interested in hearing about other religions or spiritual philosophies because you already have the "Truth".

I have no problem with your believe in this regard. But why then pretend otherwise? That's the part I don't understand.

If you genuinely feel that you're a "Servant of God" out to spread his word in no uncertain terms, then why pretend otherwise?

What's wrong with honesty?

That's the part I don't understand.


Why is it when a Christian or person of other "religious" beliefs discusses their beliefs it is taken as they are trying to convince/convert someone else? And it's not seen the same when an atheists speak of their beliefs in God and or the lack there of? Why is it always seen as the believer trying to convince/convert the unbeliever, but not seen as the unbeliever trying to convince/convert the believer? Again, we're just here for discussion, enlightenment, friendly conversation.


Well, seriously Cowboy how can you even ask such a question in the face of the religion that you support?

First off, it's usually the Protestant Christians who are out to shove their religious beliefs down the throats of others. That's just a fact of life. It's no secret that the Christian doctrine itself makes these sorts of claims (either believe in this religion or you're "rejecting God"). That's part and parcel of the actual doctrine.

Moreover, Christianity, as well as all of the Abrahamic religions are indeed based on a "jealous God" concept. They are all based on the Ten Commandments the very first of which basically states "Thou shalt have no other gods before me".

So this pits the Abrahamic religions against each other as well as against the whole rest of the world, simply because they are stuck with a "Jealous God" who won't tolerate any other "gods", and that basically means no other religions.

You don't see this kind of stuff coming from religions like Wicca, or Buddhism, etc. And you certainly don't see it coming from the atheists.

The reason that it might appear to you that people are singling your religion out, is simply because the religion you have chosen to believe in has already singled out everyone else!

Jesus is the Only Way! And "Thou shalt have no other gods before the God of Abraham!"

This is old hat Cowboy.

How can you not be aware of the religious "intolerance" of your very own religion?

~~~~~~

Moreover, religions don't need to "Prove" anything. Religions are based on "Faith".

Have you ever seen anyone trying to "Prove" to anyone that Wicca is true? Or that Buddhism is true? I seriously doubt it. Although I imagine you could find rare people who do try to prove those spiritual faiths. But not anywhere near on the scale that Christians attempt to proselytize their religion.

Of course the atheists, and anyone who recognizes the intellectual achievements of science, are going to be speaking in terms of evidence and "proofs", of what the scientific method has revealed to us.

However science is not a religion, and totally opposite to the falsities that you spread, science is not based on "faith" either. It's based on observation, physical evidence, logic, mathematics, reason, and most importantly it's based on the work of thousands of independent scientists any one of which would love nothing more than to prove previous results and conclusions of science to be wrong.

It's precisely the opposite of what religious people do. They are all out to prove a single conclusion to be right, not wrong! And they've already shown that they'll lie, and misrepresent known facts just to try to fool people into believing that their religion might have merit. It's truly amazing the lengths of dishonesty that they'll go in an attempt to support their religious faith.

So the religious "Christians" (certainly not all of them), but the ones who are out to proselytize and evangelize, have gotten themselves caught up in the "proof" thing because they view science as their opposition!

Buddhism, for example, has no problem with science. There is no conflict between the spiritual philosophy of Buddhism and science.

In fact, here's what Albert Einstein had to say on this very matter:

"The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. It should transcend personal God and avoid dogma and theology. Covering both the natural and the spiritual, it should be based on a religious sense arising from the experience of all things natural and spiritual as a meaningful unity. Buddhism answers this description. If there is any religion that could cope with modern scientific needs it would be Buddhism." - (Albert Einstein)

One of the greatest problems with Christianity is that in order for Christianity to be correct, modern science needs to be wrong. So the Christians are up against a real brick wall on that one. They need to discredit science in order to keep their religion alive because their religion doesn't coexist with evolution very well.

So the problem is with your religion Cowboy. You're religion conflicts with knowledge that has been considered to have been "proven" to many people (myself included). Thus you need to find a way to discredit science in order for your religion to stand.

Obviously your foremost method is to simply reduce science to being nothing more than "faith" itself, thus placing it on equal footing with your faith-based religion. The problem with that approach is two-fold.

1. Most people aren't prepared to accept you assertion that science has no more merit than a totally unproven religious tale. (myself included in this group)

2. Even if a person were to accept this idea that science has no more merit than religious myths, that still doesn't help your agenda, because that ideal necessarily places all religions and spiritual philosophies on equal footing.

Well, gee whiz. If everything is on equal footing then there's no reason to chose to believe any one over any other. May as well just pick the one you like the best in that. For me, I would pick either Buddhism or Wicca over Christianity if they are all on equal footing. They're simply prettier spiritual views, IMHO, and I find them both to be far more attractive than the Abrahamic religions.

So even if you reduce everything to being equally "faith-based" it doesn't help your cause.

And what's your cause?

Well, you've stated it before. You're a "Servant of you Lord" out to "Spread His Word" because you love people and want to save them from the wrath of God that this religion predicts will fall upon anyone who refuses to accept Jesus as their "Lord and Savior". You've been preaching that we must "Obey God" for months now. And you keep referencing the text of the Holy Bible as the "Word of God" that we must "Obey".

Unless you've changed your agenda since then? flowerforyou






First off, it's usually the Protestant Christians who are out to shove their religious beliefs down the throats of others. That's just a fact of life. It's no secret that the Christian doctrine itself makes these sorts of claims (either believe in this religion or you're "rejecting God"). That's part and parcel of the actual doctrine.


And you do the exact same thing my friend. First off, we're in a RELIGION DISCUSSION chat. That is where people come to discuss their religious beliefs, DISCUSS. Not to particularly convince/convert anyone. Or shove beliefs down anyone's throat. Just purely enlightening DISCUSSION.

Milesoftheusa's photo
Thu 04/07/11 09:07 AM
Edited by Milesoftheusa on Thu 04/07/11 09:23 AM




7 Everyone who is called by My name,
Whom I have created for My glory;
I have formed him, yes, I have made him."
NKJV


So is every chr-stian who calls upon JC saved? Was created for his glory.. He made him?


Miles, please read more carefully.

The quote says "who is called by My name", not "who calls my name".

So clearly it's only Jesuses he talks about.

What he means to say, is that all children ought to be named at baptisem, "Jesus of Nazareth".

Then he goes on to say that these children he had made.

Which says zip all about salvation or anything.

He just gives a benchmark-example of patrilinear naming of children. My father was a Sz.......y. My mother was a R........d. My last name is the same as my father's, and different from my mother's, coz my father made me. My mother simply offered 1 ovum and her fertile womb to assist in the process.

-------

One difference: Jesus may have been proud of his children, to be his glory, if he had any courage to have them (he died at 33, childless, unmarried, virgin, unless you count the very likely forthcoming BJs in his men's club) but Dad definitely did not think I was his "glory". He rather thought, instead, that I was a good-for-nothing lazy damned boy, leeching off him and not doing my homework. He loved me, all right, but his prophesy of my later amonting to nothing when I grow up acutally came true.


Miles, please read more carefully.

The quote says "who is called by My name", not "who calls my name".

So clearly it's only Jesuses he talks about.

What he means to say, is that all children ought to be named at baptisem, "Jesus of Nazareth".


Who is called by my name has a dual purpose.

You are Called.. The calling.. as in you hear his voice and another you will not follow. The calling..

and 2.. A family name. Many prophets were called by his name. JeremYah, with a "Y" IsiaYah, ZecharYah all have the family name of Yah the same as Yahshua his only begotten son.

The jews have no problem saying JC..I do but they don't because they know it means nothing to them and you are not calling on Yahweh's name.. The " I Am" That Yahshua was condemned for saying he was and so was Stephen.

Nmaes mean alot. It's respect. yes it is true why a jew will not say Yahweh and If you refer to Yahshua as the son in parts of the world you may be told to not to say that name again or suffer the consequinces as I was on Devon street in Chicago's jewish district.

I have spoke with many Rabbi's and Jewish or Levitical priests of the Cohens and they will not deny that Yahweh's name is said as it sounds. The High priests who give the Blessings at the Wailing wall are from the levitical priesthood Just like Arron who it has been passed down to.

It has not been lost as the High priests do keep tradition even though the Temple is not standing and they can not enter on The Day of Atonement each year with the name Yahweh (YHWH in the Paleo Hebrew lettering) on thier foreheads.

That is why I said that. The theme of Scripture is family and the family has a name. rev 14 speaks of this. even helel in the number of his name has copied this. and name is part of his own.

I do not see how you can say IsiaYah says anything different but i am not hear to say convert anyone. you deside whats right for you. Blessings...Miles


Lots of talk, Miles, completely off-target. I said "who is called by my name" and "who calls my name" are different in meaning, yet you used the two as if their meanings were completely interchangeable.

Your essay did not touch on that, at all. In the beginning you touch on that, but what you wrote was, in my book at least, and no disrespect meant, gibberish. I for one could not make heads or tails of this:

"Who is called by my name has a dual purpose.

You are Called.. The calling.. as in you hear his voice and another you will not follow. The calling..

and 2.. A family name. Many prophets were called by his name. JeremYah, with a "Y" IsiaYah, ZecharYah all have the family name of Yah the same as Yahshua his only begotten son."

I really resent being forced to explain why a gibberish is gibberish, to a person who can operate a keyboard.



I really do try to make things simple as I can.

The root of the gibberish as you put it is like this.

the dual purpose is respect. Yahweh says anyone can be adopted into the family. but that is what you must want to do.

when you are a willing partisipent in the adoption you take on the name of your new father.

How did you come to want to become adoptive?

You desire to and want to take on the name of Yah. ( the poetic name of Yahweh)

You were called by what you saw.. you want to be a part of this family.

once adopted you take on the family name.. this points to who you are, what you believe.

but it goes way deeper than this. because being Chosen is the next step and that is how you live your life.

Gen 1:1 - Matt 22:14

And Yahshua answered and spoke to them again by parables and said: 2 "The kingdom of heaven is like a certain king who arranged a marriage for his son, 3 and sent out his servants to call those who were invited to the wedding; and they were not willing to come. 4 Again, he sent out other servants, saying, 'Tell those who are invited, "See, I have prepared my dinner; my oxen and fatted cattle are killed, and all things are ready. Come to the wedding."' 5 But they made light of it and went their ways, one to his own farm, another to his business. 6 And the rest seized his servants, treated them spitefully, and killed them. 7 But when the king heard about it, he was furious. And he sent out his armies, destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city. 8 Then he said to his servants, 'The wedding is ready, but those who were invited were not worthy. 9 Therefore go into the highways, and as many as you find, invite to the wedding.' 10 So those servants went out into the highways and gathered together all whom they found, both bad and good. And the wedding hall was filled with guests.
11 "But when the king came in to see the guests, he saw a man there who did not have on a wedding garment. 12 So he said to him, 'Friend, how did you come in here without a wedding garment?' And he was speechless. 13 Then the king said to the servants, 'Bind him hand and foot, take him away, and cast him into outer darkness; there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.'
14 "For many are called , but few are chosen."
NKJV


When you have tried to study this parable then you may understand why they are of dual porpuse. you have to want to learn or forget it you never will... Blessings..Miles

no photo
Thu 04/07/11 09:43 AM

So long we are alive we are thankful to 'God'.
What is the ultimate goal of the life?smokin


in religious reality the ulitmate goal in life is pain, suffering, death and finding God, in non-religious reality the ulitmate goal is to end pain suffering and Death and become God

according to some religous beliefs as long as you are alive in the flesh you will not be able to enter Heaven which is why I've always wonder why religious people thank God that they are still alive ......especially when Heaven and God is all about death

no photo
Thu 04/07/11 09:48 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Thu 04/07/11 09:49 AM
And atheists believe the same, other beliefs believe the same. Why point fingers making the Christians look bad when in fact atheists and other beliefs are doing the same thing?



Some of them do, I'll give you that. I've met some very obnoxious atheists as well as condescending Christians.

Just make sure you are not one of them.

Atheists don't usually go around preaching their non-belief however. They merely respond to in-your-face religious zealots who have been throwing their power and authority in every-bodies faces for two centuries. They are fighting back basically.

So now Christians are whining and complaining about it. Boo hoo. sad
They can dish it out but they can't take it.

Just stop spreading the propaganda and you will not be bothered and you won't have to complain.

I think everyone in the world by now has heard about Jesus. There is no need to spread the word anymore. Let people make their own choices. If they want to know more, they can go to church and ask questions.



Abracadabra's photo
Thu 04/07/11 09:51 AM

Cowboy wrote:

And atheists believe the same, other beliefs believe the same. Why point fingers making the Christians look bad when in fact atheists and other beliefs are doing the same thing?


But they don't do the same thing at all. Not even close.

No atheists or, non-Abrahamic religions accuse anyone of turning against their creator if they refuse to accept their religious or secular beliefs.

Christians (and other Abrahamic religions) are the only people who do this dastardly thing.


Cowboy wrote:

And you do the exact same thing my friend. First off, we're in a RELIGION DISCUSSION chat. That is where people come to discuss their religious beliefs, DISCUSS. Not to particularly convince/convert anyone. Or shove beliefs down anyone's throat. Just purely enlightening DISCUSSION.


But I don't do the same thing at all. Not even close.

How many times have I told you that I personally feel confident that any creator of life that might exist would surely be pleased with your dedication to your religion in the name of the creator.

The actual religion doesn't need to be true. The mere fact that you view it as the truth of your creator and you revere it as such is all that's necessary to show your sincerity. Surely any just and righteous creator is going to recognize your sincere desire for the divine.

However, unlike you, I see where this same ideal applies to all religions, spiritual philosophies, and even secular thinking.

The religion you've chosen to worship, quite unfortunately, has condemned all non-believers to be at odds with the creator. ohwell

That's truly sad.

That's all I know to tell you.

It comes with the territory of Christianity. This is one reason why I had to distance myself from Christianity. Of course, I'm convinced that it can't be true verbatim anyway. I can't support something that I can't even truly believe myself. I found no way to salvage the religion from its totally unwarranted religious bigotry.

I just don't see where it's even possible to save it, especially in light of the orthodox Christian view, because they simple refuse to allow for enough abstraction to embrace other religions and even secular thinking into the mix.

Their own egotism is what kills them. They shoot themselves in their own foot and they have no one to blame but themselves.

You need to either find a way to allow for some truly powerful abstraction in your religion, or you'll forever be stuck with a bigoted religion that will forever make you feel "victimized" by all other spiritual and secular beliefs and views.

Because YOU FORCE THEM to be your nemesis. You give them no choice.

Either they agree with you, or you judge them to be "refusing to accept and obey their creator".

As long as you hold that black cloud over everyone's heads no one is going to like you except potentially other "Christians". You're bound to get support from some of them. But you refuse to accept the views and beliefs of all other people. You condemn them to being wrong and you won't accept anything less.

You create your own victimization in terms of religion by alienating everyone who doesn't believe like you.

You don't need to accept their beliefs as your own. But you do need to accept their believes as being valid for THEM.

Just like I accept your beliefs are valid for you,... Like I have always told you:

I personally feel confident that any creator of life that might exist would surely be pleased with your dedication to your religion in the name of the creator.

It doesn't matter whether your religion is true or not. That's a totally moot point.

Abracadabra's photo
Thu 04/07/11 10:05 AM
Jeanniebean wrote:

I think everyone in the world by now has heard about Jesus. There is no need to spread the word anymore. Let people make their own choices. If they want to know more, they can go to church and ask questions.


Truly.

Besides, there's a HUGE DIFFERENCE between telling someone about the biblical story who has never heard it before, and constantly arguing with people who are totally familiar with the story and who have concluded that it simply can't be true.

~~~~~

Unfortunately many orthodox Christians do feel that they need to 'defend' against any views and opinions that the biblical stories might potentially be false. That places them on the defense right there.

But the true irony is that their very religion has already taken the stance that all other spiritual and secular views are necessarily false. So they have already placed everyone else in a defensive position whether the other person wants to be defensive or not.

Christianity (and the Abrahamic religions in general) are divisive by their very nature, and it all stems from the "jealous God" concept upon which they all unfortunately founded.


CowboyGH's photo
Thu 04/07/11 10:23 AM

And atheists believe the same, other beliefs believe the same. Why point fingers making the Christians look bad when in fact atheists and other beliefs are doing the same thing?



Some of them do, I'll give you that. I've met some very obnoxious atheists as well as condescending Christians.

Just make sure you are not one of them.

Atheists don't usually go around preaching their non-belief however. They merely respond to in-your-face religious zealots who have been throwing their power and authority in every-bodies faces for two centuries. They are fighting back basically.

So now Christians are whining and complaining about it. Boo hoo. sad
They can dish it out but they can't take it.

Just stop spreading the propaganda and you will not be bothered and you won't have to complain.

I think everyone in the world by now has heard about Jesus. There is no need to spread the word anymore. Let people make their own choices. If they want to know more, they can go to church and ask questions.





What you said is semi irrelevant. For we are in a GENERAL RELIGION CHAT forum. This is the area we are to come to, to discuss our own personal RELIGIOUS beliefs. No one is shoving anything down anyone's throats, just again merely CHATTING about our religious beliefs.

Milesoftheusa's photo
Thu 04/07/11 10:28 AM

Jeanniebean wrote:

I think everyone in the world by now has heard about Jesus. There is no need to spread the word anymore. Let people make their own choices. If they want to know more, they can go to church and ask questions.


Truly.

Besides, there's a HUGE DIFFERENCE between telling someone about the biblical story who has never heard it before, and constantly arguing with people who are totally familiar with the story and who have concluded that it simply can't be true.

~~~~~

Unfortunately many orthodox Christians do feel that they need to 'defend' against any views and opinions that the biblical stories might potentially be false. That places them on the defense right there.

But the true irony is that their very religion has already taken the stance that all other spiritual and secular views are necessarily false. So they have already placed everyone else in a defensive position whether the other person wants to be defensive or not.

Christianity (and the Abrahamic religions in general) are divisive by their very nature, and it all stems from the "jealous God" concept upon which they all unfortunately founded.




Ex 20:2-6

2 "I am Yahweh your Elohim, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.

3 "You shall have no other g-ds before Me.

4 "You shall not make for yourself a carved image — any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; 5 you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, Yahweh your Elohim, am a JEALOUS Elohim, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me, 6 but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My commandments.
NKJV

Jealous. jealous for who?

Me being Jealous for my children and as the commandment says..

but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My commandments.

Jealous to those who do wrong and loving those who do right.

Bad parenting skills ..huh..Blessings..Miles