Previous 1
Topic: What is classical liberalism?
heavenlyboy34's photo
Thu 03/10/11 11:41 AM
Edited by heavenlyboy34 on Thu 03/10/11 11:44 AM
Learn here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iU-8Uz_nMaQ

One of the great tragedies of modernity is the hijacking of the word "liberal" by socialists of various stripes.

metalwing's photo
Thu 03/10/11 11:55 AM
That's pretty funny. It's pretty much the opposite of how "liberals" in the US think. It is a pretty good definition of Libertarianism.

no photo
Thu 03/10/11 12:02 PM
It worked great in the 19th century.

InvictusV's photo
Thu 03/10/11 03:53 PM

Learn here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iU-8Uz_nMaQ

One of the great tragedies of modernity is the hijacking of the word "liberal" by socialists of various stripes.


and then we had the progressives take over in the early 20th century..

1.free abortion for the undesirables.

2.sterilization for the undesirables

3.racist immigration policies for undesirables

4.Social Darwinism and Eugenics

5.Cheerleading and encouraging the National Socialist German Workers Party to put its eugenics and racial policy into practice.

But don't worry.. The modern progressive just wants peace, love and for you to donate all your hard earned money to them because they all know what is best for you.. (see 1-5)



msharmony's photo
Thu 03/10/11 03:55 PM


Learn here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iU-8Uz_nMaQ

One of the great tragedies of modernity is the hijacking of the word "liberal" by socialists of various stripes.


and then we had the progressives take over in the early 20th century..

1.free abortion for the undesirables.

2.sterilization for the undesirables

3.racist immigration policies for undesirables

4.Social Darwinism and Eugenics

5.Cheerleading and encouraging the National Socialist German Workers Party to put its eugenics and racial policy into practice.

But don't worry.. The modern progressive just wants peace, love and for you to donate all your hard earned money to them because they all know what is best for you.. (see 1-5)






but , honestly, cant that be said about EVERY political label there is



make sure 'THOSE' people do their part, cause Im already doing mine,,,,,lol

InvictusV's photo
Thu 03/10/11 04:04 PM



Learn here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iU-8Uz_nMaQ

One of the great tragedies of modernity is the hijacking of the word "liberal" by socialists of various stripes.


and then we had the progressives take over in the early 20th century..

1.free abortion for the undesirables.

2.sterilization for the undesirables

3.racist immigration policies for undesirables

4.Social Darwinism and Eugenics

5.Cheerleading and encouraging the National Socialist German Workers Party to put its eugenics and racial policy into practice.

But don't worry.. The modern progressive just wants peace, love and for you to donate all your hard earned money to them because they all know what is best for you.. (see 1-5)






but , honestly, cant that be said about EVERY political label there is



make sure 'THOSE' people do their part, cause Im already doing mine,,,,,lol


No.

Show me another group that actively supported the racial policy of eradicating undesirables during the Third Reich.





heavenlyboy34's photo
Fri 03/11/11 10:01 PM
Edited by heavenlyboy34 on Fri 03/11/11 10:04 PM



Learn here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iU-8Uz_nMaQ

One of the great tragedies of modernity is the hijacking of the word "liberal" by socialists of various stripes.


and then we had the progressives take over in the early 20th century..

1.free abortion for the undesirables.

2.sterilization for the undesirables

3.racist immigration policies for undesirables

4.Social Darwinism and Eugenics

5.Cheerleading and encouraging the National Socialist German Workers Party to put its eugenics and racial policy into practice.

But don't worry.. The modern progressive just wants peace, love and for you to donate all your hard earned money to them because they all know what is best for you.. (see 1-5)






but , honestly, cant that be said about EVERY political label there is



make sure 'THOSE' people do their part, cause Im already doing mine,,,,,lol


Not to the same extent. What we now call "classical liberalism" (known as simply "liberalism" in its day) was quite rigidly defined. The word is derived from the latin "libre", meaning "liberty". There were (and are) slightly differing opinions among liberals (in the classical sense), but not nearly so much as in more modern schools of thought. (This is because the origins of liberalism are primarily in England and France) You will find similar opinions expressed by Bastiat, Locke, Jefferson, and Mises, for example. The primary differences come about with accumulated knowledge over time. For example, not many modern liberals accept Utilitarianism, but Locke did.

no photo
Fri 03/11/11 11:36 PM
Classical liberalism is but one flavor of the umbrella label, liberalism. it is the branch that simply became obsolete at the beginning of the 20th century. American society simply became too big, too complex, too sophisticated for a philosophy that was suited for coon-skin caps, muskets, robber barons and brass spitoons.

msharmony's photo
Sat 03/12/11 12:30 AM




Learn here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iU-8Uz_nMaQ

One of the great tragedies of modernity is the hijacking of the word "liberal" by socialists of various stripes.


and then we had the progressives take over in the early 20th century..

1.free abortion for the undesirables.

2.sterilization for the undesirables

3.racist immigration policies for undesirables

4.Social Darwinism and Eugenics

5.Cheerleading and encouraging the National Socialist German Workers Party to put its eugenics and racial policy into practice.

But don't worry.. The modern progressive just wants peace, love and for you to donate all your hard earned money to them because they all know what is best for you.. (see 1-5)






but , honestly, cant that be said about EVERY political label there is



make sure 'THOSE' people do their part, cause Im already doing mine,,,,,lol


No.

Show me another group that actively supported the racial policy of eradicating undesirables during the Third Reich.









I was referring to this characterization
' The modern progressive just wants peace, love and for you to donate all your hard earned money to them because they all know what is best for you.. '


replace whatever political label you want to where you now have the words MODERN PROGRESSIVE and it would pretty much still be applicable

heavenlyboy34's photo
Sat 03/12/11 09:50 PM
Edited by heavenlyboy34 on Sat 03/12/11 09:53 PM

Classical liberalism is but one flavor of the umbrella label, liberalism. it is the branch that simply became obsolete at the beginning of the 20th century. American society simply became too big, too complex, too sophisticated for a philosophy that was suited for coon-skin caps, muskets, robber barons and brass spitoons.


WTF? Classical liberalism wasn't for the cliched types you mentioned at all. Have you even bothered to read any classical liberals? Ludwig Von Mises and his students carried the classical liberal tradition well into the 20th century, adapting it to the complexities of the time, and it's still practical today. (classical liberal ideas are still taught to this day in liberal arts schools and applied to modern situations) The only major difference is that "libertarian" has become the default label for them (and I count myself among their ranks) primarily because the word "liberal" was hijacked by statists in the 20th century.

KerryO's photo
Sat 03/12/11 10:38 PM


Learn here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iU-8Uz_nMaQ

One of the great tragedies of modernity is the hijacking of the word "liberal" by socialists of various stripes.


and then we had the progressives take over in the early 20th century..

1.free abortion for the undesirables.

2.sterilization for the undesirables

3.racist immigration policies for undesirables

4.Social Darwinism and Eugenics

5.Cheerleading and encouraging the National Socialist German Workers Party to put its eugenics and racial policy into practice.

But don't worry.. The modern progressive just wants peace, love and for you to donate all your hard earned money to them because they all know what is best for you.. (see 1-5)





As opposed to modern conservatism, which thinks all the money belongs in the hands of the few who will TELL YOU what is best for you and you'll learn to like it or else?

Equating all other political philosophies with the Third Riech is hilarious, because Nazism was/ Fascism is FAR RIGHT.

But hey, as Ronald Reagan, the patriarch of Conservatism Today once said, "Facts are stupid things."

-Kerry O.

no photo
Sat 03/12/11 11:51 PM
Edited by artlo on Sat 03/12/11 11:53 PM
WTF? Classical liberalism wasn't for the cliched types you mentioned at all. Have you even bothered to read any classical liberals? Ludwig Von Mises and his students carried the classical liberal tradition well into the 20th century,
I wouldn't be likely to read these philosophies. I didn't have to read Mein Kamph to understand why radical fascism has no place in a civilized world. I am not a disciple of classical Liberalism, so no. I would not be likely to study this philosophy.

Basically, if you want to know what classical Liberalism is all about, you need only read about the opinions of Ayn Rand, Milton Friedman and the Chicago School of Economics. Another good reference would be Alan Greenspan, who had to admit after the crash of 2007 that his philosophy had been wrong.










no photo
Sun 03/13/11 09:08 AM
THIS,,is still yet,,ANOTHER force,,DIVIDING THIS COUNTRY...
Its that simple,,,,as we divide,,votes separate, politicians can pull apart people, friends, even family,,through acts to discriminate,,or out-cast others political views..

WHEN THIS NATION NEEDS NOW MORE THAN EVER,,ITS PEOPLE TO STAND TOGETHER, AS A WHOLE, UNITED FOR THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS WE ALL AGREE ARE RIGHT OR WRONG BASED ON THE QUALITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS GIVEN OR TAKEN, AS IF WE ALL WERE ONE GIANT FAMILY WORKING ON MAKING LIFE FOR "EVERY" REASON,,,A BETTER LIFE FOR "ALL"..



We have separated,divided, ripped apart each other so much,,that WE have forgotten HOW to stand UNITED AS ONE WHOLE..


WHY?


BECAUSE,,our Government LIKES US THAT WAY....
Industry LIKES US THAT WAY.
OTHER NATIONS LIKE US THAT WAY.

WE ARE,,AND HAVE BEEN,,LETTING THE MONOPOLIES WITH MONEY,
CORRUPT THE ONES WE PUT INTO OFFICE, AND THOSE COMPANIES
WITH ALL THAT POWER,,DICTATE WHAT WE DO,WHAT WE HAVE AND WHAT OUR FREEDOMS ARE. THROUGH THEIR USE OF MONIES TO TAINT AND PERSUADE GOOD PEOPLE INTO CHANGING THEIR VIEWS AND VOTES.


WHEN do we stand for all that is right, for us as humans.
And stop allowing money to rule how we live, and breathe here?

WHERE,,is OVER-SIGHT? Where is responsibility. Where is RESPECT,
for every citizen,,and their welfare of living a healthy life.


FROM the Tobacco Companies,,hand in hand with OUR GOVERNMENT TO TAX,SELL, AND THE USE OF TOBACCO HERE,,To the DRINKING WATER WE DRINK.

CAN ""ANY"" OF YOU TRULY JUSTIFY THE LEGALIZED USE OF SMOKING TOBACCO AS A PLUS FOR ANY HUMAN BEING ALIVE AND BREATHING?

IT ""HURTS"" THE USER FROM ITS FIRST ONE ON...

Yet,,,We don't care do we?

WHY?

BECAUSE OUR OWN GOVERNMENT DOESN'T CARE FOR US TO BE WORRIED.

AS THEY MAKE MUCH MONEY OFF OF THIS WASTE OF HUMAN LIVES TO GO THROUGH, AND THEN COMPLAIN ABOUT HEALTH-CARE ISSUES TO US..



PLEASE,,,ITS NOT ALL ABOUT YOU FOLKS,,ITS ALL ABOUT US!!!!!!!

willing2's photo
Sun 03/13/11 11:18 AM
Joe Kennedy was Liberal and pro-nazi.

no photo
Sun 03/13/11 11:29 AM
Joe Kennedy was Liberal and pro-nazi.
What does that have to do with anything? Charles Lindberg and Henry Ford were pro-Nazi.

heavenlyboy34's photo
Sun 03/13/11 11:33 AM

THIS,,is still yet,,ANOTHER force,,DIVIDING THIS COUNTRY...
Its that simple,,,,as we divide,,votes separate, politicians can pull apart people, friends, even family,,through acts to discriminate,,or out-cast others political views..

WHEN THIS NATION NEEDS NOW MORE THAN EVER,,ITS PEOPLE TO STAND TOGETHER, AS A WHOLE, UNITED FOR THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS WE ALL AGREE ARE RIGHT OR WRONG BASED ON THE QUALITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS GIVEN OR TAKEN, AS IF WE ALL WERE ONE GIANT FAMILY WORKING ON MAKING LIFE FOR "EVERY" REASON,,,A BETTER LIFE FOR "ALL"..



We have separated,divided, ripped apart each other so much,,that WE have forgotten HOW to stand UNITED AS ONE WHOLE..


WHY?


BECAUSE,,our Government LIKES US THAT WAY....
Industry LIKES US THAT WAY.
OTHER NATIONS LIKE US THAT WAY.

WE ARE,,AND HAVE BEEN,,LETTING THE MONOPOLIES WITH MONEY,
CORRUPT THE ONES WE PUT INTO OFFICE, AND THOSE COMPANIES
WITH ALL THAT POWER,,DICTATE WHAT WE DO,WHAT WE HAVE AND WHAT OUR FREEDOMS ARE. THROUGH THEIR USE OF MONIES TO TAINT AND PERSUADE GOOD PEOPLE INTO CHANGING THEIR VIEWS AND VOTES.


WHEN do we stand for all that is right, for us as humans.
And stop allowing money to rule how we live, and breathe here?

WHERE,,is OVER-SIGHT? Where is responsibility. Where is RESPECT,
for every citizen,,and their welfare of living a healthy life.


FROM the Tobacco Companies,,hand in hand with OUR GOVERNMENT TO TAX,SELL, AND THE USE OF TOBACCO HERE,,To the DRINKING WATER WE DRINK.

CAN ""ANY"" OF YOU TRULY JUSTIFY THE LEGALIZED USE OF SMOKING TOBACCO AS A PLUS FOR ANY HUMAN BEING ALIVE AND BREATHING?

IT ""HURTS"" THE USER FROM ITS FIRST ONE ON...

Yet,,,We don't care do we?

WHY?

BECAUSE OUR OWN GOVERNMENT DOESN'T CARE FOR US TO BE WORRIED.

AS THEY MAKE MUCH MONEY OFF OF THIS WASTE OF HUMAN LIVES TO GO THROUGH, AND THEN COMPLAIN ABOUT HEALTH-CARE ISSUES TO US..



PLEASE,,,ITS NOT ALL ABOUT YOU FOLKS,,ITS ALL ABOUT US!!!!!!!


A lot of good points there, but smoking in itself is perfectly justifiable. Some people simply like it, and don't mind that it affects their health. People own their respective bodies, and can treat them as well or as poorly as they please. Smoking isn't even as dangerous as high fructose corn syrup statistically. Last I checked, obesity related diseases like type-2 diabetes are more deadly than smoking related diseases.

willing2's photo
Sun 03/13/11 11:36 AM

Joe Kennedy was Liberal and pro-nazi.
What does that have to do with anything? Charles Lindberg and Henry Ford were pro-Nazi.

He is representative of typical progressives.

no photo
Sun 03/13/11 11:39 AM
He is representative of typical progressives.
OK, and Peter King and Joe McCarthy are representative of typical Conservatives.

msharmony's photo
Sun 03/13/11 12:35 PM


THIS,,is still yet,,ANOTHER force,,DIVIDING THIS COUNTRY...
Its that simple,,,,as we divide,,votes separate, politicians can pull apart people, friends, even family,,through acts to discriminate,,or out-cast others political views..

WHEN THIS NATION NEEDS NOW MORE THAN EVER,,ITS PEOPLE TO STAND TOGETHER, AS A WHOLE, UNITED FOR THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS WE ALL AGREE ARE RIGHT OR WRONG BASED ON THE QUALITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS GIVEN OR TAKEN, AS IF WE ALL WERE ONE GIANT FAMILY WORKING ON MAKING LIFE FOR "EVERY" REASON,,,A BETTER LIFE FOR "ALL"..



We have separated,divided, ripped apart each other so much,,that WE have forgotten HOW to stand UNITED AS ONE WHOLE..


WHY?


BECAUSE,,our Government LIKES US THAT WAY....
Industry LIKES US THAT WAY.
OTHER NATIONS LIKE US THAT WAY.

WE ARE,,AND HAVE BEEN,,LETTING THE MONOPOLIES WITH MONEY,
CORRUPT THE ONES WE PUT INTO OFFICE, AND THOSE COMPANIES
WITH ALL THAT POWER,,DICTATE WHAT WE DO,WHAT WE HAVE AND WHAT OUR FREEDOMS ARE. THROUGH THEIR USE OF MONIES TO TAINT AND PERSUADE GOOD PEOPLE INTO CHANGING THEIR VIEWS AND VOTES.


WHEN do we stand for all that is right, for us as humans.
And stop allowing money to rule how we live, and breathe here?

WHERE,,is OVER-SIGHT? Where is responsibility. Where is RESPECT,
for every citizen,,and their welfare of living a healthy life.


FROM the Tobacco Companies,,hand in hand with OUR GOVERNMENT TO TAX,SELL, AND THE USE OF TOBACCO HERE,,To the DRINKING WATER WE DRINK.

CAN ""ANY"" OF YOU TRULY JUSTIFY THE LEGALIZED USE OF SMOKING TOBACCO AS A PLUS FOR ANY HUMAN BEING ALIVE AND BREATHING?

IT ""HURTS"" THE USER FROM ITS FIRST ONE ON...

Yet,,,We don't care do we?

WHY?

BECAUSE OUR OWN GOVERNMENT DOESN'T CARE FOR US TO BE WORRIED.

AS THEY MAKE MUCH MONEY OFF OF THIS WASTE OF HUMAN LIVES TO GO THROUGH, AND THEN COMPLAIN ABOUT HEALTH-CARE ISSUES TO US..



PLEASE,,,ITS NOT ALL ABOUT YOU FOLKS,,ITS ALL ABOUT US!!!!!!!


A lot of good points there, but smoking in itself is perfectly justifiable. Some people simply like it, and don't mind that it affects their health. People own their respective bodies, and can treat them as well or as poorly as they please. Smoking isn't even as dangerous as high fructose corn syrup statistically. Last I checked, obesity related diseases like type-2 diabetes are more deadly than smoking related diseases.


but crackheads, weed smokers, coke users(when they are ever searched for or caught) and prostitutes cant treat their bodies as they wish without legal consequence,,,,

heavenlyboy34's photo
Sun 03/13/11 12:45 PM



THIS,,is still yet,,ANOTHER force,,DIVIDING THIS COUNTRY...
Its that simple,,,,as we divide,,votes separate, politicians can pull apart people, friends, even family,,through acts to discriminate,,or out-cast others political views..

WHEN THIS NATION NEEDS NOW MORE THAN EVER,,ITS PEOPLE TO STAND TOGETHER, AS A WHOLE, UNITED FOR THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS WE ALL AGREE ARE RIGHT OR WRONG BASED ON THE QUALITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS GIVEN OR TAKEN, AS IF WE ALL WERE ONE GIANT FAMILY WORKING ON MAKING LIFE FOR "EVERY" REASON,,,A BETTER LIFE FOR "ALL"..



We have separated,divided, ripped apart each other so much,,that WE have forgotten HOW to stand UNITED AS ONE WHOLE..


WHY?


BECAUSE,,our Government LIKES US THAT WAY....
Industry LIKES US THAT WAY.
OTHER NATIONS LIKE US THAT WAY.

WE ARE,,AND HAVE BEEN,,LETTING THE MONOPOLIES WITH MONEY,
CORRUPT THE ONES WE PUT INTO OFFICE, AND THOSE COMPANIES
WITH ALL THAT POWER,,DICTATE WHAT WE DO,WHAT WE HAVE AND WHAT OUR FREEDOMS ARE. THROUGH THEIR USE OF MONIES TO TAINT AND PERSUADE GOOD PEOPLE INTO CHANGING THEIR VIEWS AND VOTES.


WHEN do we stand for all that is right, for us as humans.
And stop allowing money to rule how we live, and breathe here?

WHERE,,is OVER-SIGHT? Where is responsibility. Where is RESPECT,
for every citizen,,and their welfare of living a healthy life.


FROM the Tobacco Companies,,hand in hand with OUR GOVERNMENT TO TAX,SELL, AND THE USE OF TOBACCO HERE,,To the DRINKING WATER WE DRINK.

CAN ""ANY"" OF YOU TRULY JUSTIFY THE LEGALIZED USE OF SMOKING TOBACCO AS A PLUS FOR ANY HUMAN BEING ALIVE AND BREATHING?

IT ""HURTS"" THE USER FROM ITS FIRST ONE ON...

Yet,,,We don't care do we?

WHY?

BECAUSE OUR OWN GOVERNMENT DOESN'T CARE FOR US TO BE WORRIED.

AS THEY MAKE MUCH MONEY OFF OF THIS WASTE OF HUMAN LIVES TO GO THROUGH, AND THEN COMPLAIN ABOUT HEALTH-CARE ISSUES TO US..



PLEASE,,,ITS NOT ALL ABOUT YOU FOLKS,,ITS ALL ABOUT US!!!!!!!


A lot of good points there, but smoking in itself is perfectly justifiable. Some people simply like it, and don't mind that it affects their health. People own their respective bodies, and can treat them as well or as poorly as they please. Smoking isn't even as dangerous as high fructose corn syrup statistically. Last I checked, obesity related diseases like type-2 diabetes are more deadly than smoking related diseases.


but crackheads, weed smokers, coke users(when they are ever searched for or caught) and prostitutes cant treat their bodies as they wish without legal consequence,,,,

This is true. But that doesn't mean the legal consequences are rational or just. It just means that the regime made arbitrary laws against said drugs, turning otherwise harmless people into "criminals".

Previous 1