his hatred and derision of whites and jews, his prejudice
and sweeping generalizations, are critical failings which disqualify
him as an appropriate role model or acceptable leader

this is why Obama and other much more reputable leaders find
his views unworthy of admiration

2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztSzoh8N6es

The late Khalid Muhammad, former spokesman of the Nation of Islam and head of the New Black Panther Party gives a speech calling for the extermination of white people in South Africa. This concept is a tenet of the theology of the Nation of Islam, which holds that the white man is Satan and will be destroyed in a race war in the End Times. Destruction of the white race will produce a millennial utopia in their belief.

Since Khalid gave this speech thousands of white farmers have been slaughtered in South Africa. This may not be due directly to Khalid, but a reflection of the beliefs of the Black Nationalist movement, which has world-wide influence, especially in Africa.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Louis Farrakhan Speaks On BET's Show, American Gangster, 50 Cent, Rappers & More! "Some Of These Satanic Jews Have Taken Over BET"
2008
http://il.youtube.com/watch?v=4K75EPrtBz4&feature=related

.....................................................................

According to the Evil, Demon, Muslim, Fairykhan says,"Hitler was a great man."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

How many years did bHo attend radical wright's church???

He quit going in 2008, the same year he decided to make space between him and his mentor Fairykhan.

Obama’s Church Loves Farrakhan
January 10, 2008, 6:28 pm
By Andrew L. Jaffee

Will our beloved media follow this story or selectively ignore it? Should voters know about such tidbits — at least have a chance to decide for themselves? It seems that Barack Obama’s church adores Louis Farrakhan, a racist, homophobe, and anti-Semite, who has called Judaism a “gutter religion.” From the AC:

… When Obama announced his candidacy for president, his background entered the fray. Though it appears that he is not held to task on his religious affiliations by the mainstream media, it does re-surface. Let’s explore some recent events that may shed light on Obama’s veiled religious affiliation.

In December 2007, the Trinity United Church of Christ (TUCC) bestowed its highest social achievement award upon Louis Farrakhan, the head of the Nation of Islam. This was facilitated through the church’s publication Trumpet Magazine and presented at their end of the year awards gala. The award dubbed the Lifetime Achievement “Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr. Trumpet” Award is named after the head pastor that married Barack and Michele Obama nee Robinson. …

Also note that:

… Wright also told The New York Times in an interview published March 6: “When his (Obama’s) enemies find out that in 1984 I went to Tripoli” with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan to visit Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, “a lot of his Jewish support will dry up quicker than a snowball in hell.” …

Here is Obama repudiating Farrakhan's views:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHEyCnj0vMw

2008 political move.
That was when he was running for pres.
In 2007, he was still a member of wrights church. They praise Fairykahn.

you are a member, you have literature which states so?

doubtful,,,,

he speaks of satanic jews, he speaks of powerful whites, he speaks of conscientious blacks,,,,


jewish , white, and black are not nouns HE created, neither are the adjective he places in front of them to SEPERATE them from the GROUP AS A WHOLE


but not all will receive what he is saying, and thats ok too...

and Mike Wallace calls Nigeria 'the most corrupt nation in the world' , so all people have their idea of what adjectives are fitting to any noun


a : notably large in size : huge b : of a kind characterized by relative largeness —used in plant and animal names c : elaborate, ample <great detail>
2a : large in number or measure : numerous <great multitudes> b : predominant <the great majority>
3: remarkable in magnitude, degree, or effectiveness <great bloodshed>


NOTE: definition 3 from MIRIAM WEBSTER

the FULL hitler quote, if anyone cares

' Farrakhan said during a March 11, 1984, speech broadcast on a Chicago radio station:

So I said to the members of the press, 'Why won't you go and look into what we are saying about the threats on Reverend Jackson's life?' Here the Jews don't like Farrakhan and so they call me 'Hitler'. Well that's a good name. Hitler was a very great man. He wasn't great for me as a Black man but he was a great German and he rose Germany up from the ashes of her defeat by the united force of all of Europe and America after the First World War. Yet Hitler took Germany from the ashes and rose her up and made her the greatest fighting machine of the twentieth century, brothers and sisters, and even though Europe and America had deciphered the code that Hitler was using to speak to his chiefs of staff, they still had trouble defeating Hitler even after knowing his plans in advance. Now I'm not proud of Hitler's evil toward Jewish people, but that's a matter of record. He rose Germany up from nothing. Well, in a sense you could say there is a similarity in that we are rising our people up from nothing, but don't compare me with your wicked killers.'


from wikipedia(but you can put some of it in any search engine and probably find other sources)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gl6rTvwV9L4
Obama Crackpot Church Still Supports Farrakhan

STILL? in march of 2008


interesting

Jerry Wright ain't news any longer.
Eugene is.

why is Farrakhan news?

the "applied application" of anything, since there IS INFINITY OTHER THINGS TO APPLY IT TO, easily shows any BIAS, or pre-disposition, or the MOTIVE, or simply WHAT THE WORDS "CAN CREATE".

every human is a slave.

a slave mentality is the human existence.

a slave to work.

a slave to love.

a slave to friends.

a slave to sex.

a slave to religion.

a slave to pc.

a slave to government.

a slave, a slave, a slave.

husbands wish to enslave as a possession a "women for themself"...

a wife a "man for herself"...

a child "parents for itself"...

friends for itself...

so, applying and looking into slavery, by just seeing slavery in the context of blacks used to be slaves, IS BUT SHALLOW KNOWING POSED AS INSIGHT CAPABLE OF CREATING SOME GOOD CHANGE.

it is as worthless.

except to encite HATRED TOWWARD WHAT IS SHOWN TO ENSLAVE.

and what flappykahn appling it to?

whites enslaving blacks.

so, THE MOTIVE.

SHOWN IN THE CHOSEN APPLICATION OF THE INSIGHT.

it is but an observation, APPLIED TO CREATE THE DESIRED EFFECT FOR THE SELF MOTIVE.

you said you DO NOT EVER USE YOURSELF AS THE BAR.

but, you say it does not ENCITE HATE IN "YOU"...

that is USING YOURSELF, and whether YOU find words appealing, AS THE BAR OF THE TOTAL CAPABILITY OF WORDS...

an EXTREMELY BIASED WAY TO EVALUATE ANYTHING...

NOT ACCURATE TO ACCESS THE POWER OF WORDS "UNTO ALL".

so what if YOU DON'T HEAR HATE IN IT.

OTHERS DO.

WHY ARE YOU CORRECT, AND YOUR PERCEPTION VALID, AND OTHERS' PERCEPTION'S NOT DEEMED TO BE AS WELL?

i need not tell you that you are wrong, as i believe you, that you do not feel "hate" from the words...

HOWEVER, YOU ARE ONE PERSON.

YOUR "FEELINGS" FROM THE WORDS, DO NOT TELL THE TOTAL SUM OF "FEELINGS POSSIBLE" IN ALL OTHER HUMANS.

that is BIAS TOWARD SELF.

using self as some sort of supreme "feeling" bar for all other humans.

favoring the self perception as the GUIDE OF ALL THAT IS TRUE.

the fact that inference is drawn TO WHITE POWERFUL PEOPLE, shows the bias...

NOW, IF IT SAID, POWERFUL PEOPLE, THAT WOULD BE DIFFERENT.

but, still biased TOWARD POWERFUL PEOPLE.

MANY POWERFUL PEOPLE PULL CRABS FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE BARREL TO THE TOP.

SO, AGAIN, TOTALLY BIASED, ONLY PROVING WHAT FLAPPYKAHN "WANTS" TO PROVE WITH THE DATA.

TO SUTIE HIS "OWN FEELINGS", AS HIS OWN AGENDA.

AS THERE ARE POWERFUL BLACK PEOPLE, WHO TRY TO FIGHT THE OTHER CRABS, BLACK OR WHITE, IN FACT, YOUR FIGHTING JUST NOW TO PROVE YOUR "CRAB" PERCEPTION AS THE FINAL TOTAL TRUTH.

by saying YOU don't feel hate in it, or HEAR racism in it.

it is important to recognize, that racism is in it's root form, JUST THE SELF PERCEPTION AS "BETTER THAN", or MORE TRUE, OR MORE ACCURATE, THAN OTHERS.

so, one would then recognize just how seeped in racism, or a greater than mentality ALL HUMANS NATURALLY ARE.

the first mistake, was to define "racism" as simply WHITES THINKING THEY ARE BETTER THAN BLACKS...

as, blacks can naturally think they are "better than" whites as well, and gearing the word racism toward just race, hinders the insight from seeing ANY TRUE GREATER THAN MENTALITY.

is is born when humans are born.

it is shed via human existence.

IF IT DULY SEEN TO EXIST WHERE IT EXIST.

EVERYWHERE AND IN EVERYTHING.

Exactly. as usual....



If people can"t change.
Why do we waste time and money
on rehabilitation programs?

That's nothing.

You should hear how I talk about Republicans.

alrighty then, I shall make two brief points

the first is that I didnt say this anywhere

'WHY ARE YOU CORRECT, AND YOUR PERCEPTION VALID, AND OTHERS' PERCEPTION'S NOT DEEMED TO BE AS WELL? '

in fact, I said some will get the message and others wont(with no reference to correctness)


secondly, some BIAS is not the same as racism, If I am speaking to my children about THEIR experience at school today, I am biased towards them because of the COMMON bond we share, nowhere in that bias though does it conclude that I hate or feel better than anyone else and their experience


in fact, on the one hand, the argument is being made that no persons should set themself as a bar for a larger group, and then on the other hand the argument is being made that Farrakhan is guilty of specifying subcategories of groups instead of a group at large, and that is somehow bad too,,,,

which is it?


he speaks most often to crowds of black people, he is a man who grew up in a segregated america as a black man, there is the commonality and the audience which creates such a BIAS topic, I understand some think it is racist and I am one of many who dont


its really not that complex...

lol, I think I have,,,,

LOL

This thread needed a little humor.

Danged Republicans.

its all good, the topic of Farrakhan does that, just like the topic of Republicans,,,

Do you know what I dislike more than a Republican?