Previous 1
Topic: Toddler Dropped In Boiling Water Dies
Lpdon's photo
Tue 12/14/10 12:48 PM
A Dallas toddler has died after police say he was dropped in a pot of boiling water.

Dallas police told The Dallas Morning News in a story Tuesday that 16-month-old Jabraylon Bables appeared to have been dipped in boiling water. The toddler died Saturday from injuries and infections, 36 days after police say he was deliberately burned.

Police say the burns covered the toddler's legs, feet, hands and buttocks.

"It's a horrible case. It's heartbreaking for everybody involved," Dallas police Sgt. Brenda Nichols, supervisor of the child abuse unit, told the paper.

The boyfriend of the child's mother is a convicted murderer named Carlnelus Delaney Simmons. He remains in the Dallas County Jail on a felony charge of injury to a child.

Simmons told police he accidentally dropped hot water on the boy.

"From the injuries on the baby, I think he did it intentionally," the boy's aunt, Veronica Bables, told the paper. "I feel like he tortured him."

Attorney information was not available. Jabraylon's mother, Jasmine Thompson, said she does not believe Simmons would have deliberately hurt her child.

The Dallas County medical examiner has ruled the death a homicide.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/12/14/dallas-police-dead-toddler-dropped-boiling-water/?test=latestnews

He should get the death penalty and be executed the same way.

How is a convicted murder out of jail anyways?

willing2's photo
Tue 12/14/10 12:53 PM
Where was the mother in all this?

boredinaz06's photo
Tue 12/14/10 12:58 PM



I don't understand women who defend their men in such a way. He was obviously not a good person or he wouldn't be a convicted murderer, and she defends him. I see pathetic codependent women who have kids who find them self a new boyfriend and the kids can go play in the highway as far as she is concerned. I'm all for having kids fixed so they can't breed until old enough and mature enough to accept and succeed responsibly as a parent.

msharmony's photo
Tue 12/14/10 01:04 PM
it seems all the reports on this are nearly verbatim and there is no real background on the suspect or the details of the case,,, I have to wait for more on this one

tragic to lose a child that way though,,,

Lpdon's photo
Tue 12/14/10 04:25 PM

Where was the mother in all this?


She's defending him! It's at the end of the article where she said she is supporting him. I say kill him.

willing2's photo
Tue 12/14/10 04:58 PM


Where was the mother in all this?


She's defending him! It's at the end of the article where she said she is supporting him. I say kill him.

Well, if she has any other kids, CPS should take them until it's all sorted out.

Lpdon's photo
Tue 12/14/10 05:52 PM



Where was the mother in all this?


She's defending him! It's at the end of the article where she said she is supporting him. I say kill him.

Well, if she has any other kids, CPS should take them until it's all sorted out.


She should be charged in the death as well.

DiveBomber4's photo
Tue 12/14/10 08:05 PM
He did it.

Lpdon's photo
Tue 12/14/10 08:16 PM

He did it.


So?

DiveBomber4's photo
Tue 12/14/10 09:27 PM


He did it.


So?
So, it seems there will be liberals clamoring to defend the guy, even though he said he "accidently" spilled hot water on the child.
Seems as though thats not good enough for the leftists who will spring to his defense. It must have been the childs fault, huh??

FearandLoathing's photo
Tue 12/14/10 09:35 PM



He did it.


So?
So, it seems there will be liberals clamoring to defend the guy, even though he said he "accidently" spilled hot water on the child.
Seems as though thats not good enough for the leftists who will spring to his defense. It must have been the childs fault, huh??


One; how do you know he did it intentionally? Are you aware of some part of this story that everyone else is not? If so we would like to be filled in as well.

Two; there is a difference between negligence and intent, just because someone gets off with a smaller charge because of no intent being found does not mean it is the victims fault. That is some horribly twisted logic, even by me.

Fanta46's photo
Wed 12/15/10 12:28 AM
Poor innocent toddler.tears

Lpdon's photo
Wed 12/15/10 01:43 PM



He did it.


So?
So, it seems there will be liberals clamoring to defend the guy, even though he said he "accidently" spilled hot water on the child.
Seems as though thats not good enough for the leftists who will spring to his defense. It must have been the childs fault, huh??


I don't see anyone here defending this sick bastard.

DiveBomber4's photo
Fri 12/17/10 02:17 AM




He did it.


So?
So, it seems there will be liberals clamoring to defend the guy, even though he said he "accidently" spilled hot water on the child.
Seems as though thats not good enough for the leftists who will spring to his defense. It must have been the childs fault, huh??


One; how do you know he did it intentionally? Are you aware of some part of this story that everyone else is not? If so we would like to be filled in as well.

Two; there is a difference between negligence and intent, just because someone gets off with a smaller charge because of no intent being found does not mean it is the victims fault. That is some horribly twisted logic, even by me.


There's his defense, right there^^

BDBoop's photo
Fri 12/17/10 02:29 AM

So, it seems there will be liberals clamoring to defend the guy,

noway

How can you make the tragic death of a child, by torture, be about political bias? Seriously.



DiveBomber4's photo
Fri 12/17/10 02:49 AM


So, it seems there will be liberals clamoring to defend the guy,

noway

How can you make the tragic death of a child, by torture, be about political bias? Seriously.





Its not me that does it. It happens every day. There are those will defend the monsters.

BDBoop's photo
Fri 12/17/10 02:50 AM


Its not me that does it. It happens every day. There are those will defend the monsters.


Of course there are those. You labeled them liberals.

It is you that does it.

DiveBomber4's photo
Fri 12/17/10 10:47 AM
The stats support my statement. Liberals and leftists are the first to defend criminals and scream about their "rights" while blaming the victims in most cases.

BDBoop's photo
Fri 12/17/10 11:01 AM

The stats support my statement. Liberals and leftists are the first to defend criminals and scream about their "rights" while blaming the victims in most cases.


Your attitude sickens me.

yellowrose10's photo
Fri 12/17/10 11:14 AM
This is just a reminder that everyone is entitled to their own beliefs and opinions, but keep the debate civil.

Kim

Previous 1