Cantor says they are only willing to work with the President if he agrees with them 100%.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/07/eric-cantor-compromise-tax-cuts-obama_n_780029.html

Eric Cantor Opposes Compromise On Extending Bush Tax Cuts, Says Government Shutdown Will Be Obama's Fault

WASHINGTON -- Just as Senate Minority Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has attempted to lower expectations in recent days by saying that Republicans can't really accomplish anything unless President Obama is voted out of office in 2012, so too did Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.) set the stage on Sunday by declaring that any lack of progress in Congress -- including a possible government shutdown -- will be Obama's fault.

"I would say, Chris, it's as much his responsibility," said Cantor in response to a question from Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace about who will be to blame for a government shutdown or a default on the debt. "In fact, he is the one who sets the agenda as the chief executive and as the president of this country."

Cantor also made clear that if there's going to be any compromise, it's going to have to come from Obama, who has said he is willing to work with Republicans. Cantor, however, said that Republicans will work with Obama only if he agrees with them 100 percent.

"Listen, are we willing to work with him?" said Cantor on Sunday. "First and foremost, we're not going to be willing to work with him on the expansive liberal agenda he's been about, but if he is serious about working with us on things like earmarks, for instance -- which he said he would work with me on that -- I'm absolutely hopeful we can do that. I hope he calls Harry Reid the first thing to get the Senate to go along with the House position."

Earmarks may prove tricky for the GOP caucus though, because it's not clear that there is a unified Republican position. McConnell and Boehner have both said that they're in favor of an earmark moratorium -- a temporary suspension -- but have refused to go all-out in support of a permanent ban. "You can eliminate every congressional earmark and you would save no money," admitted McConnell in a speech last week at the conservative Heritage Foundation, essentially saying that one of the top ideas touted by Republicans to cut the deficit won't have much of an effect. When asked about a ban by Wallace on Sunday, Cantor simply replied that a moratorium was "essentially a suspension for the entire Congress."

Many Tea Party activists, however, have made a ban on earmarks a top priority, and they sharply criticized House Republican leaders when an earmark ban was not included in their Pledge to America.

On the Bush tax cuts, President Obama has indicated that he may be open to extending all of them, which is something the Republicans have been pushing for. But, his compromise would be that the middle-class tax cuts would be extended permanently, while the ones for the families making more than $250,000 would be extended temporarily. As The Washington Post explained, this "decoupling" strategy would "focus the debate when tax cuts for the rich expired next year or the year after. Republicans would be forced to defend carve-outs for a tiny minority populated by millionaires, an unpopular position that would be difficult to advance without the cover of a broad-based tax cut for everyone, aides in both parties said."

On Fox News Sunday, Cantor made clear there's no room for compromise on the tax cuts, saying he is opposed to decoupling. However, when Wallace asked him if "it's either permanent extension of all the Bush tax cuts or nothing," Cantor refused to give a definitive answer:

CANTOR: No, I am not for decoupling the rates, because all that says to people looking to go back in and put capital to work and invest to create jobs is you're going to get taxed on any return you can expect. I am not for raising taxes in a recession, especially when it comes to job-creators we need so desperately to create jobs again.

WALLACE: You talked about compromise. If he says to you, alright, we'll extend all of the Bush tax cuts -- or as you say, keep the rates as they are now -- but only for a few years, could you accept that?

CANTOR: Chris, I am not for sending any signal to small businesses in this country that they're going to have their tax rates go up. I think it's indicative of -- the election result reflected the fact that people get Washington does not have a revenue problem. It has a spending problem --

WALLACE: So wait, are you saying it's either permanent extension of all the Bush tax cuts or nothing?

CANTOR: No, what I'm saying, Chris, is we've got to come to grips with the fact that the money will be spent one way or another. ...

WALLACE: But I'm trying to get a specific answer. Would you accept a temporary extension of all the tax cuts? Or you saying that all of it has to be permanent?

CANTOR: Chris, at this point, I really want to see that we can come together and agree upon the notion that Washington doesn't need more revenues right now. And to sit here and say we're just going to go about half way, or we're going to send a signal that it's going to be uncertain for job-creators and investors to put capital to work, that's exactly what we don't need right now.

Are the Demcrats willing to compromise? It goes both ways. One side can't have everything one way. That's what compromise is meeting in the middle.

This is true. However, instead of all the change the Republicans have been talking about, they're going to refuse to do anything unless they get their way.

everyone thought nothing got done in the past this is gonna be even worst..another 2 years of absolutely nothing getting done,i hope i'm wrong but i doubt it

You're probably not wrong.

yeah america couldn't wait 2 more years for the house so americas thinking is lets split congress?makes no sense a house reps term is only 2 years why not keep it democrat until 2012...can anyone say stale mate

The reason people fired the dems was to stop hussein and democrats from their runaway spending spree.

ok but then what

and a all rightwing executive and legislative branch after bush would have had to spend money with the way our economy was to help americans out,remember baby bush was in office when the economy started going to crap

So was Clinton, infact Clinton and the reps signed the very law that overturned a 75 year old law that prevented banks from doing the risky crap that got us into this mess.

and bush's illegal trillion dollar war didn't throw gas on the fire?

atleast thousands of people didn't die cause of the bill

Did the Democrats compromose for the past couple years? The voters sent Washington a mandate November 2nd and the Republicans intend to follow that mandate.

They spent months\years traveling their districtd and stated listening to the voters and the voters dont wany ANY of this crap that is in Washington right now.

Dude, the Democrats only have a 3 seat lead in the Senate as it stands right now. The Republicans have activly been trying to flip three Senators for an even 50-50 split. Either way there are a few Democrats like Liebermann and a couple blue dogs who tend to vote with the Republicans.

I don't see a huge problem unless his Royal Highness rubber stamps it.

at this point i don't care i just hope something gets done,cause this economy is hurting alot of people including me and others i know...we'll just have to wait and see

Republicans not willing to compromise as usual?

We have a lame duck congress now.

Nothing will get done but it will show in favor of the Dems in 2012 so we may see a swing back.

You will be surprised at what will happen by around February or March, trust me.

No, I won't. You will be sadly disappointed.

And it will be sad for real, because Americans will suffer but Republicans don't care about the common folks anyway. They managed to fool them into thinking so this last election but it will show in their actions as usual.

What was it oBoreme said about he won't secure borders unless he gets Amnesty passed for Illegals.

Sounds like a lack of cooperation as well as not upholding Constitutional law.

huffington post? lol...suprise suprise...

Huffington Post... that's like a bible to you libs, aint it?