Topic: Three States "Proudly" give Illegal Aliens Drivers Licenses
Johnyjuan's photo
Mon 11/08/10 08:18 PM
This can't be ! I am speechless how can you not like deathnote.
How many episodes did you watch?
Where you open minded like I ask you to be??
OMG please dont tell me this sad sad

no photo
Mon 11/08/10 08:27 PM
just one.
you should be glad i watched the full thing.

Johnyjuan's photo
Mon 11/08/10 08:27 PM
I dint thought it was possible man

Johnyjuan's photo
Mon 11/08/10 08:28 PM

just one.
you should be glad i watched the full thing.

no no no that is unacceptable Ms Hernandez nope does not count sorry =)

no photo
Mon 11/08/10 08:32 PM
bleh.
you can keep watching your crap.
(:

Johnyjuan's photo
Mon 11/08/10 08:34 PM
Your judging the anime way to early come on get into it
it took me a while but slowly I was into it

no photo
Mon 11/08/10 08:40 PM
i don't like it.
it's like trying to make me go to church.
it's just not going to happen.

Johnyjuan's photo
Mon 11/08/10 08:44 PM
Can't you watch 3 more episodes?
It's like a song it takes a couple of time to like it
Come Bianca do it for the litle people =)

no photo
Mon 11/08/10 08:47 PM
no.
now quit.

Johnyjuan's photo
Mon 11/08/10 08:48 PM
Alright but your missing out

Chazster's photo
Mon 11/08/10 09:07 PM



i still don't understand how it is you know that they have children justtt to stay here.


Lets put it this way. If you say they don't have babies to stay here and he says he does then getting rid of the law is a win win. You think it doesn't have an effect, so if its gone no problem. He thinks they have babies to stay here so if it is gone he won't complain.

I personally don't see why we give citizenship to people who were born here and their parents were here illegally.
Because if you guy's dint then no one would be American and America would still belong to the Indinas since they were first here (usa tu cabeza un poquito huey)


Nope because the Indians didn't believe in owning land. XD
Anyway the same goes for Canada and they made this law. As an official country with laws and taxations and a government that is suppose to be governing to help it's citizens then I think anchor babies is an unfair policy.

Lpdon's photo
Mon 11/08/10 09:12 PM



Illegal is illegal.
I am all in favor of ending that Anchor Brat Law.
That will put an end to the attraction to drop their loads here.
All those Illegals in San Diego and all other areas are criminals.


Well, in 2012 when we get back the Senate and the Presidency and keep the House, I see us $hit canning the Anchor Baby Law and tightening the ropes on Illegals.

Might start happening sooner than that, Don.

Number of TRUE REFORMERS Doubled for Next U.S. House ('tigers' who will lead others to form 'reduction majority')



By Roy Beck, Friday, November 5, 2010, 12:00 PM EST - posted on NumbersUSA
The number of True Reformers in the next U.S. House of Representatives will double. We had 38 True Reformers in the current House. We count 73 Representatives in the new Congress pledged to a full menu of immigration reductions -- and we think that number is going to grow before Congress convenes in January. These are our tigers who are pledged to claw out some actual improvements in immigration policies the next two years, leading other anti-amnesty Members to follow them. These are Members of Congress who have publicly committed themselves to nearly all policy changes that would virtually end illegal immigration and that would dramatically reduce legal immigration to level that doesn't significantly threaten U.S. workers and their families. We count more than 200 Members elected Tuesday who have promised to support stronger enforcement and to oppose an amnesty. But the 73 listed below are the elite strike force of those 200. In one way or another they have pledged to work for all or nearly all of the 12 immigration policies on our Candidate Survey that we believe are necessary to make immigration once again serve the national interest. Our list of 12 includes a pledge to work to:

* stop mass legalizations and long-term work permits for illegal aliens (amnesty)
* end chain migration
* end the visa lottery
* support local law enforcement in removing illegal aliens
* end birthright citizenship
* support significant overall numerical reductions in legal immigration
* mandate electronic verification to drive most illegal aliens from their jobs to put millions of Americans back to work.


Folks, the elected officials on the list below have made some amazing promises. Here are some additional markings to tell you why these made the True Reformer list:

* ASTERISKS: The names with asterisks are already Members of Congress who have demonstrated through their actions their commitment to aggressive reform.
* (5/5): These are current Members who co-sponsored all 5 of what NumbersUSA promoted as the greatest immigration bills in this Congress (unfortunately none of the bills was allowed a vote).
* *(S): An (S) next to an asterisk means the incumbent not only took great actions in this Congress but also took our survey and pledged in the next Congress to work for all or nearly all of the 12 major immigraion policy positions NumbersUSA advocates.

Everybody else on this list is a brand new Member of Congress elected last Tuesday. And every one of them sent us a signed survey that they support all or nearly all of the 12 major immigration policy positions we believe are needed to protect U.S. economic justice and environmental sustainability, as well as individual freedoms. ALABAMA

* Mo Brooks
* Spencer Bachus*

ARKANSAS

* Tim Griffin
* Steve Womack

ARIZONA

* Paul Gosar
* Trent Franks*
* Ben Quayle
* David Schweikert

CALIFORNIA

* Elton Gallegly*
* Gary Miller *(S)
* Ken Calvert*
* Dana Rohrabacher*(S)
* Brian Bilbray*(S)(5/5)
* Duncan Hunter*

COLORADO

* Doug Lamborn*
* Mike Coffman*(S)(5/5)

FLORIDA

* Steve Southerland
* Rich Nugent
* Cliff Stearns*(S)
* John Mica*(S)(5/5)
* Daniel Webster
* Dennis Ross
* Bill Posey*
* Allen West
* Sandy Adams

GEORGIA

* Tom Price*
* Rob Woodall
* Paul Broun*(5/5)
* Phil Gingrey*(5/5)

IOWA

* Steve King*(5/5)

IDAHO

* Raul Labrador

ILLINOIS

* Donald Manzullo*(S)

INDIANA

* Dan Burton*(5/5)

KANSAS

* Tim Huelskamp

LOUISIANA

* John Fleming*(S)

MARYLAND

* Andy Harris
* Roscoe Bartlett*

MICHIGAN

* Dan Benishek
* Candice Miller*
* Tim Walberg*

MISSOURI

* Todd Akin*
* Vicki Hartzler

MISSISSIPPI

* Alan Nunnelee
* Steve Palazzo

NORTH CAROLINA

* Walter Jones*
* Virginia Foxx*(5/5)
* Sue Myrick*(S)(5/5)
* Patrick McHenry*(S)

NEW MEXICO

* Steve Pearce

NEVADA

* Dean Heller*(5/5)
* Joe Heck*

OHIO

* Bob Gibbs

OKLAHOMA

* Tom Sullivan*

PENNSYLVANIA

* Thomas Marino
* Lou Barletta
* Todd Platts*

SOUTH CAROLINA

* Jeff Duncan

TENNESSEE

* Phil Roe*
* Charles Fleischmann
* Scott DesJarlais
* Diane Black

TEXAS

* Ted Poe*
* Mike Conaway*
* Bill Flores
* John Faulk
* Randy Neugebauer*
* Lamar Smith*
* Kenny Marchant*(S)(5/5)

VIRGINIA

* Rob Wittman*
* Scott Rigell
* Bob Goodlatte*(S)(5/5)

WEST VIRGINIA

* David McKinley

This list does not include the True Reformers in the Senate. I'll write about them next week. All of you who contacted these U.S. Representative candidates through the year and encouraged them to take a strong stand on immigration, we at NumbersUSA salute you. In fact, all million activists of NumbersUSA owe you thanks for sending Representatives to Congress who have been willing to pledge such strong actions these next two years. As soon as the new Congress convenes, we will be giving you an opportunity to remind all of these of the pledges they have made and encourage them to sign on to the key bills as fast as they are introduced. ROY BECK is Founder & CEO of NumbersUSA

NumbersUSA's blogs are copyrighted and may be republished or reposted only if they are copied in their entirety, including this paragraph, and provide proper credit to NumbersUSA. NumbersUSA bears no responsibility for where our blogs may be republished or reposted.


I know both Joe Heck and Dean Heller is my neighbor. They are very strong on immigration, but I am afraid that the Obama regime with veto any efforts on any tough laws against immigration.

Lpdon's photo
Mon 11/08/10 09:16 PM



Illegal is illegal.
I am all in favor of ending that Anchor Brat Law.
That will put an end to the attraction to drop their loads here.
All those Illegals in San Diego and all other areas are criminals.


Well, in 2012 when we get back the Senate and the Presidency and keep the House, I see us $hit canning the Anchor Baby Law and tightening the ropes on Illegals.

Might start happening sooner than that, Don.

Number of TRUE REFORMERS Doubled for Next U.S. House ('tigers' who will lead others to form 'reduction majority')



By Roy Beck, Friday, November 5, 2010, 12:00 PM EST - posted on NumbersUSA
The number of True Reformers in the next U.S. House of Representatives will double. We had 38 True Reformers in the current House. We count 73 Representatives in the new Congress pledged to a full menu of immigration reductions -- and we think that number is going to grow before Congress convenes in January. These are our tigers who are pledged to claw out some actual improvements in immigration policies the next two years, leading other anti-amnesty Members to follow them. These are Members of Congress who have publicly committed themselves to nearly all policy changes that would virtually end illegal immigration and that would dramatically reduce legal immigration to level that doesn't significantly threaten U.S. workers and their families. We count more than 200 Members elected Tuesday who have promised to support stronger enforcement and to oppose an amnesty. But the 73 listed below are the elite strike force of those 200. In one way or another they have pledged to work for all or nearly all of the 12 immigration policies on our Candidate Survey that we believe are necessary to make immigration once again serve the national interest. Our list of 12 includes a pledge to work to:

* stop mass legalizations and long-term work permits for illegal aliens (amnesty)
* end chain migration
* end the visa lottery
* support local law enforcement in removing illegal aliens
* end birthright citizenship
* support significant overall numerical reductions in legal immigration
* mandate electronic verification to drive most illegal aliens from their jobs to put millions of Americans back to work.


Folks, the elected officials on the list below have made some amazing promises. Here are some additional markings to tell you why these made the True Reformer list:

* ASTERISKS: The names with asterisks are already Members of Congress who have demonstrated through their actions their commitment to aggressive reform.
* (5/5): These are current Members who co-sponsored all 5 of what NumbersUSA promoted as the greatest immigration bills in this Congress (unfortunately none of the bills was allowed a vote).
* *(S): An (S) next to an asterisk means the incumbent not only took great actions in this Congress but also took our survey and pledged in the next Congress to work for all or nearly all of the 12 major immigraion policy positions NumbersUSA advocates.

Everybody else on this list is a brand new Member of Congress elected last Tuesday. And every one of them sent us a signed survey that they support all or nearly all of the 12 major immigration policy positions we believe are needed to protect U.S. economic justice and environmental sustainability, as well as individual freedoms. ALABAMA

* Mo Brooks
* Spencer Bachus*

ARKANSAS

* Tim Griffin
* Steve Womack

ARIZONA

* Paul Gosar
* Trent Franks*
* Ben Quayle
* David Schweikert

CALIFORNIA

* Elton Gallegly*
* Gary Miller *(S)
* Ken Calvert*
* Dana Rohrabacher*(S)
* Brian Bilbray*(S)(5/5)
* Duncan Hunter*

COLORADO

* Doug Lamborn*
* Mike Coffman*(S)(5/5)

FLORIDA

* Steve Southerland
* Rich Nugent
* Cliff Stearns*(S)
* John Mica*(S)(5/5)
* Daniel Webster
* Dennis Ross
* Bill Posey*
* Allen West
* Sandy Adams

GEORGIA

* Tom Price*
* Rob Woodall
* Paul Broun*(5/5)
* Phil Gingrey*(5/5)

IOWA

* Steve King*(5/5)

IDAHO

* Raul Labrador

ILLINOIS

* Donald Manzullo*(S)

INDIANA

* Dan Burton*(5/5)

KANSAS

* Tim Huelskamp

LOUISIANA

* John Fleming*(S)

MARYLAND

* Andy Harris
* Roscoe Bartlett*

MICHIGAN

* Dan Benishek
* Candice Miller*
* Tim Walberg*

MISSOURI

* Todd Akin*
* Vicki Hartzler

MISSISSIPPI

* Alan Nunnelee
* Steve Palazzo

NORTH CAROLINA

* Walter Jones*
* Virginia Foxx*(5/5)
* Sue Myrick*(S)(5/5)
* Patrick McHenry*(S)

NEW MEXICO

* Steve Pearce

NEVADA

* Dean Heller*(5/5)
* Joe Heck*

OHIO

* Bob Gibbs

OKLAHOMA

* Tom Sullivan*

PENNSYLVANIA

* Thomas Marino
* Lou Barletta
* Todd Platts*

SOUTH CAROLINA

* Jeff Duncan

TENNESSEE

* Phil Roe*
* Charles Fleischmann
* Scott DesJarlais
* Diane Black

TEXAS

* Ted Poe*
* Mike Conaway*
* Bill Flores
* John Faulk
* Randy Neugebauer*
* Lamar Smith*
* Kenny Marchant*(S)(5/5)

VIRGINIA

* Rob Wittman*
* Scott Rigell
* Bob Goodlatte*(S)(5/5)

WEST VIRGINIA

* David McKinley

This list does not include the True Reformers in the Senate. I'll write about them next week. All of you who contacted these U.S. Representative candidates through the year and encouraged them to take a strong stand on immigration, we at NumbersUSA salute you. In fact, all million activists of NumbersUSA owe you thanks for sending Representatives to Congress who have been willing to pledge such strong actions these next two years. As soon as the new Congress convenes, we will be giving you an opportunity to remind all of these of the pledges they have made and encourage them to sign on to the key bills as fast as they are introduced. ROY BECK is Founder & CEO of NumbersUSA

NumbersUSA's blogs are copyrighted and may be republished or reposted only if they are copied in their entirety, including this paragraph, and provide proper credit to NumbersUSA. NumbersUSA bears no responsibility for where our blogs may be republished or reposted.


I also read the Republicans are really working hard to flip a couple Democratic Senators. There is one from a Republican state who the Democrats have treated like crap and shot all his leglislation down. They have promised to back some of his funding bills if he will flip sides and also that he will recieve Republican support in his next and future races.

That puts it at 48 to 50. They are also heavily courting Liebermann who is basically a Republican which would put us at 49-50. All's we need is one more and I don't think that will be hard for a couple Senators who face the Tea Party wave in 2012.

Johnyjuan's photo
Mon 11/08/10 09:21 PM




i still don't understand how it is you know that they have children justtt to stay here.


Lets put it this way. If you say they don't have babies to stay here and he says he does then getting rid of the law is a win win. You think it doesn't have an effect, so if its gone no problem. He thinks they have babies to stay here so if it is gone he won't complain.

I personally don't see why we give citizenship to people who were born here and their parents were here illegally.
Because if you guy's dint then no one would be American and America would still belong to the Indinas since they were first here (usa tu cabeza un poquito huey)


Nope because the Indians didn't believe in owning land. XD
Anyway the same goes for Canada and they made this law. As an official country with laws and taxations and a government that is suppose to be governing to help it's citizens then I think anchor babies is an unfair policy.
alright then dont be crying of why another race is taking over haha XD pay back baby !

no photo
Mon 11/08/10 09:21 PM

i haven't shared my position on the issue.


Some of us noticed, at least.

Lpdon's photo
Mon 11/08/10 09:31 PM


who said that's their attraction.

Among our jobs, it is another attraction of the lowlife Invader.
Nitpicking much?laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh

Now, I will ignore your Pro-Illegal posts.smokin


I would just ignore all that persons posts. That's what a bunch of us are doing.

Lpdon's photo
Mon 11/08/10 09:33 PM

This can't be ! I am speechless how can you not like deathnote.
How many episodes did you watch?
Where you open minded like I ask you to be??
OMG please dont tell me this sad sad


If you wanna watch a a couple great shows check out Criminal Minds, NCIS and NCIS: Los Angeles.

Chazster's photo
Tue 11/09/10 07:47 PM





i still don't understand how it is you know that they have children justtt to stay here.


Lets put it this way. If you say they don't have babies to stay here and he says he does then getting rid of the law is a win win. You think it doesn't have an effect, so if its gone no problem. He thinks they have babies to stay here so if it is gone he won't complain.

I personally don't see why we give citizenship to people who were born here and their parents were here illegally.
Because if you guy's dint then no one would be American and America would still belong to the Indinas since they were first here (usa tu cabeza un poquito huey)


Nope because the Indians didn't believe in owning land. XD
Anyway the same goes for Canada and they made this law. As an official country with laws and taxations and a government that is suppose to be governing to help it's citizens then I think anchor babies is an unfair policy.
alright then dont be crying of why another race is taking over haha XD pay back baby !


Payback for what? My ancestors didn't do anything. There were forced into this country against their will.

Johnyjuan's photo
Tue 11/09/10 08:07 PM






i still don't understand how it is you know that they have children justtt to stay here.


Lets put it this way. If you say they don't have babies to stay here and he says he does then getting rid of the law is a win win. You think it doesn't have an effect, so if its gone no problem. He thinks they have babies to stay here so if it is gone he won't complain.

I personally don't see why we give citizenship to people who were born here and their parents were here illegally.
Because if you guy's dint then no one would be American and America would still belong to the Indinas since they were first here (usa tu cabeza un poquito huey)


Nope because the Indians didn't believe in owning land. XD
Anyway the same goes for Canada and they made this law. As an official country with laws and taxations and a government that is suppose to be governing to help it's citizens then I think anchor babies is an unfair policy.
alright then dont be crying of why another race is taking over haha XD pay back baby !


Payback for what? My ancestors didn't do anything. There were forced into this country against their will.
Shh bro see the virus has spread there's to many illegals to kick out from here. Even if you do by a miracle take them out there's still so many people that have already become legal that already have documents and are helping their families fix documents. What can you do? Do you still believe in a miracle that removes all illegals out of here? Do you really think there is such method?? The virus has spread you can't do nothing about it just sit back and become part of it.....plus white chicks are hot to mexicans and white girls have this thing for brown guys hahaha shh the process has begun good bye

no photo
Wed 11/10/10 04:38 PM

Shh bro see the virus has spread there's to many illegals to kick out from here. Even if you do by a miracle take them out there's still so many people that have already become legal that already have documents and are helping their families fix documents. What can you do? Do you still believe in a miracle that removes all illegals out of here? Do you really think there is such method?? The virus has spread you can't do nothing about it just sit back and become part of it.....


Do you really want to kick all illegals out of the country? Every single one? Even, say, an 80 year old man whose been living here for 40 years, has contributed greatly to his community, and hasn't committed a crime since his illegal entry?

I believe that there is a real problem with criminality (gangs, drugs, human trafficking) crossing the border. Having many deterrents to illegal entry is a good thing, and if we go too far to embrace illegals as members of our country it will only encourage more illegal entry.

But seriously, actually trying to deport even the majority of illegal entries - whats the point of that?