Two-thirds of voters are dissatisfied with the way things are going in the country today, and more than not think Barack Obama’s presidency has made the country weaker (45 percent) rather than stronger (37 percent).

The president’s job approval among registered voters is currently 41 percent, a record low. This compares to 43 percent in mid-October and 46 percent in early September. Half disapprove of Obama’s performance. Among likely voters, negative sentiment is even stronger: 40 percent approve and 55 percent disapprove.

Frustrations are high. Most voters feel dissatisfied (51 percent) or even angry (25 percent) about the way the federal government is working. Just one in five is satisfied (22 percent), while 2 percent are enthusiastic. Angry voters are backing the Republican candidate by a 65-point margin.

Nearly half of likely voters -- 46 percent -- say they will cast their vote to express opposition to Obama administration policies. That shouldn’t be surprising given almost all voters rate economic conditions negatively, only a quarter thinks the stimulus plan has helped the economy, and fewer than one in five wants the new health care law to remain intact.

About a third of likely voters say they will use their vote to express support for Obama policies, and 20 percent say the president will not be a factor in their vote.

Forty-seven percent of likely voters approve of the job their own representative is doing. Even so, most -- 76 percent -- disapprove of the job Congress is doing overall.

Nearly equal numbers of voters have a positive view of the Democratic (42 percent) and Republican (44 percent) parties. By a six-point spread, more voters have a negative view of the Democratic Party.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/10/29/fox-news-poll-dissatisfied-washington-1566102765/

who does the polls, id vote for obama again

too many sources to name, and most have differing results,,,


I would vote for him too, unless a better CANDIDATE stepped forward

Wow, one person. Yup he's got momentum now.

Anyone would be a better candidate, hell Pamela Anderson would do a better job.

let me guess your a rich republican thats never worked with his hands there whole life right? Born with a silver or maybe gold spoon in there mouth?

I disagree, even if I didnt support OBama, I would believe such a statement to be obviously illogical....

Of course it would be illogical to you, you worship the guy.

Yep Michelles ratings are falling fast since she is actually running the show and he does whatever she says....at least that's the word from behind the scenes

I think you are getting Obama confused with Clinton.

no , it is illogical because Pamela Anderson has nowhere near the formal education or political or social experience to suggest she would be his equal or superior in the political arena

Anyways.

Wow! Someone actually has this right!
I suppose that I should conclude my duties at my llc, and all my customers that I work fifty plus hours a week for. I didn't realize that being a republican I was practically aire to the throne

Seriously? You obviously don't know much about me. Maybe you should lear about someone before you make a personal attack(Which is against the rules by the way) or wild accusations.

Perhaps you should have pointed out the difference between "there" their and they're.

Not according to my sources......

obama is a one-timer....he will be losing 2012

strange considering that she didnt even want him to run for the office and isnt too fond of much of the drama and scrutinization that comes with having her family (children and herself and her husband) in that position of responsibility and expectation


maybe the sources just arent used to partnerships in their culture, where the mother and father work TOGETHER for their family,,,

Sure whatever you wish to think.....she says jump he says how high......she is running the show just like Hillary did....not doubt about.....again a first man in office of the Presidency

my 'sources' say different,,