Whaddaya Mean Obama Hasn't Done Anything?

A blow-by-blow breakdown of the young president's first year reveals that today's frustration stems not from a lack of policy so much as a lack of common ground. The myth of the American center looms in this, the second part of a week-long series on our country since the 2008 election.

BONUS QUIZ: How Well Do You Know the News of 2009?

By John H. Richardson



Obama with his senior staff in early February, when no one disagreed about how much the administration had accomplished.


I have figured out The Problem With America Today. My inspiration was the recent one-year-later cover of Newsweek, which encapsulates the current conventional wisdom about President Obama in a single headline: YES HE CAN (BUT HE SURE HASN'T YET). Or, as Saturday Night Live put it, President Obama's two biggest accomplishments thus far are "Jack and Squat." You can find other versions of this perspective from Matt Lauer and David Gregory on NBC, from thousands of obnoxious bloggers, even from the hapless governor of New York.

These days, the argument that Obama hasn't accomplished anything may be the only example of real bipartisanship in America.

Here's the conventional wisdom in a single paragraph: Three hundred and sixty-four days after he was elected president, Obama is still stuck in Iraq, hasn't closed Guantánamo, is getting deeper into Afghanistan, hasn't accomplished health-care reform or slowed the rise in unemployment. His promises of bipartisanship are a punch line (see above). And there's still no peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians. What a failure! What a splash of cold water in the face of all our bold hopes!

But the conventional wisdom is insane. Consider the record:

A week before he was sworn in, Obama jammed part two of the bank bailout down the throat of his own party — a $350 billion accomplishment.

Two days after he was sworn in, Obama banned the use of "harsh interrogation" and ordered the closing of Guantánamo.

A day later, Obama reversed George W. Bush's funding cutoff to overseas family planning organizations — saving millions of lives with the stroke of a pen.

Three days after that, Obama gave a green light to the California car-emissions standards that Bush had been blocking for six years — an important step on the road to cleaner air and a cooler planet.

Two weeks after that, Obama signed the stimulus bill — a $787 billion accomplishment.

Ten days after that, Obama formally announced America's withdrawal from Iraq.

A week later — we're in early March now — Obama erased Bush's decision to restrict federal funding for stem-cell research.

In April and June, Obama forced Chrysler and GM into bankruptcy.

In June, Obama reset the tone of our relations with the entire Arab world with a single speech — an accomplishment that the Bush administration failed to achieve despite a series of desperate PR moves (anyone remember Charlotte Beers?) and a "public diplomacy" budget of $1 billion a year.

Also in June, Obama unveiled the "Cash for Clunkers" program, a "socialist" giveaway that reanimated the corpse of our car industry — leading, for example, to the billion-dollar profit that Ford announced on Monday.

I haven't even mentioned Sonia Sotomayor, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, the order to release the torture memos, Obama's push for charter schools, his $288 billion tax cut, or the end of Bush's war on medical marijuana. Or the minor fact that he seems to have — with Bush's help, it must be said — stopped the financial collapse, revived the credit markets, and nudged the economy toward 3.5 percent growth in the last quarter.

Oh, and one more thing: President Obama is now a month or two from accomplishing the awesome and seemingly impossible task that eluded mighty presidents like FDR, LBJ, and WJC — health-care reform.

(How well do you 2009? Take the ultimate news quiz now >>)

Obama's early returns also include a host of remarkably cautious and prudent national-security decisions that seem, these days, to have been completely forgotten:

Appointing a conservative Bush holdover like Robert Gates as Secretary of Defense.

Appointing an establishment centrist like Leon Panetta at CIA.

Appointing a hard-*** like Stanley McChrystal to head up our military forces in Afghanistan, despite McChrystal's dubious involvement in torture and the cover-up of Pat Tillman's death.

Increasing the number of drone attacks on Al Qaeda — more in the last year than all the Bush years combined.

Reinstating, with tweaks, Bush's military tribunal system for Guantánamo prisoners.

Fighting, in another unexpected defense of a controversial Bush policy, lawsuits against the "warrantless wiretapping" program — as recently as this weekend with a decision that a leading civil liberties group called "extremely disappointing."

Sending, way back in February, seventeen thousand more soldiers to Afghanistan. As Fareed Zakaira recently pointed out, this was just three thousand fewer soldiers than Bush sent to Iraq for his famous "surge."

Noticing a pattern yet? The first half of Obama's accomplishments above is mostly liberal stuff. The bottom half is all pretty dang conservative. Which brings us to The Problem With America Today: Blame it on the Internet, on partisan politics, on the economic crash, on the legacy of war or Fox News or Michael Moore, but our vital center is getting stiff — and it is starting to stink.

Liberals are upset because Obama didn't shut down Guantánamo or stop the wiretapping program or end all wars or support gay marriage and kill Don't Ask Don't Tell. Conservatives are pissed off because they hate health-care reform, family planning, ending any war at all, organic gardening at the White House, and government in general.

What's worse, both sides are so angry and righteous that they can't even begin to give credit where it is due. When was the last time you heard a conservative cheer about that $288 billion tax cut? Or credit Obama for the centrism it took to appoint McChrystal, Panetta, and Gates? And how many liberals choose to be understanding about the practical difficulties of shutting down Guantánamo, achieving equal rights for gays, or tapping Al Qaeda's phones?

And where, on either side, can you find a scrap of humility about the staggeringly complex challenge of Afghanistan and Pakistan? Or a scrap of gratitude at having escaped global financial doom?

So the question, a year since we elected him, isn't how much Obama has accomplished. The question is why we've turned so small and mean that we only see half of it — the half we happen to agree with.

Thoughts on Obama's first year? Ideas for bipartisan love? Click here to e-mail John H. Richardson about his weekly political column at Esquire.com.



http://www.esquire.com/the-side/richardson-report/obama-timeline-110309



Pretty interesting read.

And definitely refreshing compared to the permanent naysayers.

Wrong. Again.

Excellent read huh? And shows a bit more truth than most of the naysayers.

Nice propaganda piece. It's in the same vein as articles in 1930's era Pravda.

Specifically, all the "accomplishments" are unconstitutional and make no economic sense (they've been tried and failed numerous times here and abroad)

I think its a very balanced editorial of 'accomplishments' half of which I think are awesome and half of which Im not so thrilled about,,,,,,


which I think was the point, which side of the fence one falls on and how limited that causes their perception to be

Jon Stewart nailed it on this issue

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-june-15-2010/respect-my-authoritah

Balanced? Maybe if you consider propaganda "balanced".

It would appear that the 'Comedy Central Mullahs' have pulled things critical of 'The UN' ... this and others having to do with things not smarmily psychophantic all appear with a black screen and the never-ending little 'Ourobouros' version of the snake chasing its tail ... doesn't appear active now.

that is just my point

propoganda
2 : the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person


this piece included ideas that included both GOOD and BAD decisions ,,, as opposed to just lambasting all the old complaints about bad decisions or boosting up the normal complements about good ones

which to me makes it one of the more balanced pieces I have read in these threads concerning the President

but it did so INACCURATELY and without good sourcing, hence the propaganda utility of it.

All politics ... is propaganda .... that's life.

you don't ever and never will get anything else.

bytch all you want from either side of the fence

that is propaganda too and not always helping the side you want it to.

good luck.


Obama is still a million miles better than Bush.

You want sources provided for Presidential actions?
Funny how it's possible to come up with so many 'articles' about what he hasn't done and articles about his personal life or his personal views, or even his past Church affiliations, but you need a reference provided for what he has done as President.

Sourses are not needed for the kind of opinion that can only label words as inaccurate without supporting evidence of what is inaccurate. That kind of opinion does not stem from facts and a critical analysis of situtations, it comes from an inabiltiy to admit personal bais and prejudice.

You have a creative talent - almost journalistic, you could write articles for AFA. You have the bias, an incredible lack of critical analysis, and a way with words (unknown to mankind) that might make for more comic readings of their day to day dribble.

If you didn't possess a similar (but not as well-developed) talent, I'd say thank you ... but I know better ... and yes, I KNOW I'm good ... You, like most Progressives, have a coarse talent for the 'ad hominem' attack .... I'm used to it, tho' ... it's your 'style' ...

Not even close! He's taken all of Bush's stupid decisions and MAGNIFIED them! Have you even looked at economic metrics? The growing insanity of the imperialist policy abroad?

How silly of me to expect you to provide proof! The Federal propaganda machine that is regurgitated my the MSM is ALWAYS all the proof needed! /sarcasm

Wow, that's incredible, I feel as though we just shook hands and in celebration I'd like actually agree with you on something. It's true, I will never achieve the level of your talent. So I think I'll stick to my own realm which tends to be more logical and fact oriented.

Ummm ... no ... we haven't shaken anything. Feel free to 'celebrate', tho' ... or whatever it is you do. Enjoy the things you consider 'facts' ... I'll stick with truth. Just love me for what I am and envy me ...

Bad news for Obama-bots. The Dow average is down AGAIN today, the dollar is still weak against the top 6 leading currencies, gold and silver are up against the dollar again. Hope you're enjoying your failure-fest!

I voted on a long list of issues of which dow jones averages werent one,,,,,so Im still watching those things I was concerned with like

healthcare, international relations, education, economy, environment, gun control, minimum wage, taxes,,,etc,,,


everyone has their own priorities and standards upon which to judge, if I were judging on the dow jones alone,, than I obviously wouldnt be 'hopeful'