100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: If you wrote the news,... | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Would you determine what to report based strictly upon what was profitably newsworthy, or would you report with integrity?
My mom and I had this discussion about how the determination is made. Why when Brad and Angie have fallings out involving the police(as married older couple) they dont get the press that then teenager Chris Brown and Rihanna received? Or why when Charlie Sheen gets arrested for domestic abuse, he is assumed innocent but when Tiger has an accident in his car,, he is assumeed the adulterer? Who determines what life those in the public eye should live and who has the right to put them on a symbolic cross for public execution if they fall short? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First celebrity fall outs are not news, news agencies need to report on everything our government does regardless who is in the white house. There are so many atrocities that occur in Washington that never gets covered and that would be real news. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First celebrity fall outs are not news, news agencies need to report on everything our government does regardless who is in the white house. There are so many atrocities that occur in Washington that never gets covered and that would be real news. Good idea. Id love if the gossip magazines all put disclaimers on their front page that they were unfounded gossip,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell it like it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First celebrity fall outs are not news, news agencies need to report on everything our government does regardless who is in the white house. There are so many atrocities that occur in Washington that never gets covered and that would be real news. I agree with you...however our society has made celeb's GODS and it seems people actually give a flying f * cK in a rolling doughnut what they do... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Would you determine what to report based strictly upon what was profitably newsworthy, or would you report with integrity? My mom and I had this discussion about how the determination is made. Why when Brad and Angie have fallings out involving the police(as married older couple) they dont get the press that then teenager Chris Brown and Rihanna received? Or why when Charlie Sheen gets arrested for domestic abuse, he is assumed innocent but when Tiger has an accident in his car,, he is assumeed the adulterer? Who determines what life those in the public eye should live and who has the right to put them on a symbolic cross for public execution if they fall short? Why do you think I stopped believing the so called news, which are controlled by corporations, who has invested money in certain things? How can it be NOT biased, if it's their interest is at stake? Think about that. If you want to hear real news, then you must get as many sources as possible and filter out what is BS what isn't. For example. - You will never hear "bad" news about Time Warner Corp. from CNN. Why? Because Time Warner owns CNN. Why would MSNBC not say anything bad about Microsoft? Because MSNBC (Microsoft Network Broadcasting Company) is owned by Microsoft! Needs more explanation? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I love NPR and BBC... anyone find slants to their reporting?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I love NPR and BBC... anyone find slants to their reporting? They are good for entertainment purposes. Both are a step up from the typical Fox News/MSNBC/CNN propaganda but still, nothing beats multiple sources, even those that report the news from an entirely different angle. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I stick to PBS...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would report the truth but, only the stories that would get the most views and highest ratings. Have to remember to appease the stockholders and CEOs.
When it comes to a story about Sheen vs. Woods. Woods wins because he's the bigger celebrity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First celebrity fall outs are not news, news agencies need to report on everything our government does regardless who is in the white house. There are so many atrocities that occur in Washington that never gets covered and that would be real news. I heard that! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I love NPR and BBC... anyone find slants to their reporting? Sometimes, but not often. I listen to NPR alot. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's a conservative site.
They say they're non-partisan. I bookmarked it to look later though. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
cashu
on
Sun 12/27/09 05:13 PM
|
|
Would you determine what to report based strictly upon what was profitably newsworthy, or would you report with integrity? My mom and I had this discussion about how the determination is made. Why when Brad and Angie have fallings out involving the police(as married older couple) they dont get the press that then teenager Chris Brown and Rihanna received? Or why when Charlie Sheen gets arrested for domestic abuse, he is assumed innocent but when Tiger has an accident in his car,, he is assumeed the adulterer? Who determines what life those in the public eye should live and who has the right to put them on a symbolic cross for public execution if they fall short? YOUR ABSOLUTELY RIGHT ITS BECAUSE THERE WHITE . DAM THEM . STINKING RACIST . AND OF COURSE I KNOW if you don't agree with what i write i no longer have my integrity in tack , and yet your not a bigot . also the one girl was beaten like a dog and i couldnt see a mark on the other .WAS that an equal crime or thats a culteral thing i guess . so maybe a little red mard is equal the a face beat all out of shape . you should try for the supreme court we need some more politically correct people in power . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMO...they are in the public eye and they are famous. Comes with the territory. I think the media decides based on what will sell the most. If people weren't eager to read the scandal...the media wouldn't report it because then it wouldn't be news
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sun 12/27/09 05:04 PM
|
|
Would you determine what to report based strictly upon what was profitably newsworthy, or would you report with integrity? My mom and I had this discussion about how the determination is made. Why when Brad and Angie have fallings out involving the police(as married older couple) they dont get the press that then teenager Chris Brown and Rihanna received? Or why when Charlie Sheen gets arrested for domestic abuse, he is assumed innocent but when Tiger has an accident in his car,, he is assumeed the adulterer? Who determines what life those in the public eye should live and who has the right to put them on a symbolic cross for public execution if they fall short? YOUR ABSULUTELY RIGHT ITS BECAUSE THERE WHITE . DAM THEM . STINKING RACIST . AND OFCOURSE I KNOW if you don't agree with what i write i no longer have my integrity in tack , and yet your not a bigot . did you mean to quote me? I said nothing about race, nor did I attack your integrity,,,, perhaps your own conscious slipping in,,,,? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
cashu
on
Sun 12/27/09 05:18 PM
|
|
Would you determine what to report based strictly upon what was profitably newsworthy, or would you report with integrity? My mom and I had this discussion about how the determination is made. Why when Brad and Angie have fallings out involving the police(as married older couple) they dont get the press that then teenager Chris Brown and Rihanna received? Or why when Charlie Sheen gets arrested for domestic abuse, he is assumed innocent but when Tiger has an accident in his car,, he is assumeed the adulterer? Who determines what life those in the public eye should live and who has the right to put them on a symbolic cross for public execution if they fall short? YOUR ABSULUTELY RIGHT ITS BECAUSE THERE WHITE . DAM THEM . STINKING RACIST . AND OFCOURSE I KNOW if you don't agree with what i write i no longer have my integrity in tack , and yet your not a bigot . did you mean to quote me? I said nothing about race, nor did I attack your integrity,,,, perhaps your own conscious slipping in,,,,? NO just don't have any guilt and don't like your comparison which was white and the crimes were not even close to equal . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Would you determine what to report based strictly upon what was profitably newsworthy, or would you report with integrity? My mom and I had this discussion about how the determination is made. Why when Brad and Angie have fallings out involving the police(as married older couple) they dont get the press that then teenager Chris Brown and Rihanna received? Or why when Charlie Sheen gets arrested for domestic abuse, he is assumed innocent but when Tiger has an accident in his car,, he is assumeed the adulterer? Who determines what life those in the public eye should live and who has the right to put them on a symbolic cross for public execution if they fall short? Why do you think I stopped believing the so called news, which are controlled by corporations, who has invested money in certain things? How can it be NOT biased, if it's their interest is at stake? Think about that. If you want to hear real news, then you must get as many sources as possible and filter out what is BS what isn't. For example. - You will never hear "bad" news about Time Warner Corp. from CNN. Why? Because Time Warner owns CNN. Why would MSNBC not say anything bad about Microsoft? Because MSNBC (Microsoft Network Broadcasting Company) is owned by Microsoft! Needs more explanation? Actually Microsoft on owns about 18% of MSNBC, the majority owner is GE. I find MSNBC to be the best news source...Olbermann is sharp, Maddow will take on good causes. I find FOCKS to be the worst...they are more inclined to stress over absurd clebrity news as a decoy to real news....and of course they LIE 24/7...See the doc called Outfoxed...ya gotta see a propaganda machine at work..WOW. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXNvDD13hoY 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Would you determine what to report based strictly upon what was profitably newsworthy, or would you report with integrity? My mom and I had this discussion about how the determination is made. Why when Brad and Angie have fallings out involving the police(as married older couple) they dont get the press that then teenager Chris Brown and Rihanna received? Or why when Charlie Sheen gets arrested for domestic abuse, he is assumed innocent but when Tiger has an accident in his car,, he is assumeed the adulterer? Who determines what life those in the public eye should live and who has the right to put them on a symbolic cross for public execution if they fall short? Why do you think I stopped believing the so called news, which are controlled by corporations, who has invested money in certain things? How can it be NOT biased, if it's their interest is at stake? Think about that. If you want to hear real news, then you must get as many sources as possible and filter out what is BS what isn't. For example. - You will never hear "bad" news about Time Warner Corp. from CNN. Why? Because Time Warner owns CNN. Why would MSNBC not say anything bad about Microsoft? Because MSNBC (Microsoft Network Broadcasting Company) is owned by Microsoft! Needs more explanation? Actually Microsoft on owns about 18% of MSNBC, the majority owner is GE. I find MSNBC to be the best news source...Olbermann is sharp, Maddow will take on good causes. I find FOCKS to be the worst...they are more inclined to stress over absurd clebrity news as a decoy to real news....and of course they LIE 24/7...See the doc called Outfoxed...ya gotta see a propaganda machine at work..WOW. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXNvDD13hoY I use to own a cunk of ge and never told anyone what to report . |
|
|
|
|
